Cargando…

Effect of inspiratory synchronization during pressure-controlled ventilation on lung distension and inspiratory effort

BACKGROUND: In pressure-controlled (PC) ventilation, tidal volume (V (T)) and transpulmonary pressure (P (L)) result from the addition of ventilator pressure and the patient’s inspiratory effort. PC modes can be classified into fully, partially, and non-synchronized modes, and the degree of synchron...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rittayamai, Nuttapol, Beloncle, François, Goligher, Ewan C., Chen, Lu, Mancebo, Jordi, Richard, Jean-Christophe M., Brochard, Laurent
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5630544/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28986852
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-017-0324-z
_version_ 1783269237471576064
author Rittayamai, Nuttapol
Beloncle, François
Goligher, Ewan C.
Chen, Lu
Mancebo, Jordi
Richard, Jean-Christophe M.
Brochard, Laurent
author_facet Rittayamai, Nuttapol
Beloncle, François
Goligher, Ewan C.
Chen, Lu
Mancebo, Jordi
Richard, Jean-Christophe M.
Brochard, Laurent
author_sort Rittayamai, Nuttapol
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In pressure-controlled (PC) ventilation, tidal volume (V (T)) and transpulmonary pressure (P (L)) result from the addition of ventilator pressure and the patient’s inspiratory effort. PC modes can be classified into fully, partially, and non-synchronized modes, and the degree of synchronization may result in different V (T) and P (L) despite identical ventilator settings. This study assessed the effects of three PC modes on V (T), P (L), inspiratory effort (esophageal pressure–time product, PTP(es)), and airway occlusion pressure, P (0.1). We also assessed whether P (0.1) can be used for evaluating patient effort. METHODS: Prospective, randomized, crossover physiologic study performed in 14 spontaneously breathing mechanically ventilated patients recovering from acute respiratory failure (1 subsequently withdrew). PC modes were fully (PC-CMV), partially (PC-SIMV), and non-synchronized (PC-IMV using airway pressure release ventilation) and were applied randomly; driving pressure, inspiratory time, and set respiratory rate being similar for all modes. Airway, esophageal pressure, P (0.1), airflow, gas exchange, and hemodynamics were recorded. RESULTS: V (T) was significantly lower during PC-IMV as compared with PC-SIMV and PC-CMV (387 ± 105 vs 458 ± 134 vs 482 ± 108 mL, respectively; p < 0.05). Maximal P (L) was also significantly lower (13.3 ± 4.9 vs 15.3 ± 5.7 vs 15.5 ± 5.2 cmH(2)O, respectively; p < 0.05), but PTP(es) was significantly higher in PC-IMV (215.6 ± 154.3 vs 150.0 ± 102.4 vs 130.9 ± 101.8 cmH(2)O × s × min(−1), respectively; p < 0.05), with no differences in gas exchange and hemodynamic variables. PTP(es) increased by more than 15% in 10 patients and by more than 50% in 5 patients. An increased P (0.1) could identify high levels of PTP(es). CONCLUSIONS: Non-synchronized PC mode lowers V (T) and P (L) in comparison with more synchronized modes in spontaneously breathing patients but can increase patient effort and may need specific adjustments. Clinical Trial Registration Clinicaltrial.gov # NCT02071277 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13613-017-0324-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5630544
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56305442017-10-23 Effect of inspiratory synchronization during pressure-controlled ventilation on lung distension and inspiratory effort Rittayamai, Nuttapol Beloncle, François Goligher, Ewan C. Chen, Lu Mancebo, Jordi Richard, Jean-Christophe M. Brochard, Laurent Ann Intensive Care Research BACKGROUND: In pressure-controlled (PC) ventilation, tidal volume (V (T)) and transpulmonary pressure (P (L)) result from the addition of ventilator pressure and the patient’s inspiratory effort. PC modes can be classified into fully, partially, and non-synchronized modes, and the degree of synchronization may result in different V (T) and P (L) despite identical ventilator settings. This study assessed the effects of three PC modes on V (T), P (L), inspiratory effort (esophageal pressure–time product, PTP(es)), and airway occlusion pressure, P (0.1). We also assessed whether P (0.1) can be used for evaluating patient effort. METHODS: Prospective, randomized, crossover physiologic study performed in 14 spontaneously breathing mechanically ventilated patients recovering from acute respiratory failure (1 subsequently withdrew). PC modes were fully (PC-CMV), partially (PC-SIMV), and non-synchronized (PC-IMV using airway pressure release ventilation) and were applied randomly; driving pressure, inspiratory time, and set respiratory rate being similar for all modes. Airway, esophageal pressure, P (0.1), airflow, gas exchange, and hemodynamics were recorded. RESULTS: V (T) was significantly lower during PC-IMV as compared with PC-SIMV and PC-CMV (387 ± 105 vs 458 ± 134 vs 482 ± 108 mL, respectively; p < 0.05). Maximal P (L) was also significantly lower (13.3 ± 4.9 vs 15.3 ± 5.7 vs 15.5 ± 5.2 cmH(2)O, respectively; p < 0.05), but PTP(es) was significantly higher in PC-IMV (215.6 ± 154.3 vs 150.0 ± 102.4 vs 130.9 ± 101.8 cmH(2)O × s × min(−1), respectively; p < 0.05), with no differences in gas exchange and hemodynamic variables. PTP(es) increased by more than 15% in 10 patients and by more than 50% in 5 patients. An increased P (0.1) could identify high levels of PTP(es). CONCLUSIONS: Non-synchronized PC mode lowers V (T) and P (L) in comparison with more synchronized modes in spontaneously breathing patients but can increase patient effort and may need specific adjustments. Clinical Trial Registration Clinicaltrial.gov # NCT02071277 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13613-017-0324-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2017-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5630544/ /pubmed/28986852 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-017-0324-z Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research
Rittayamai, Nuttapol
Beloncle, François
Goligher, Ewan C.
Chen, Lu
Mancebo, Jordi
Richard, Jean-Christophe M.
Brochard, Laurent
Effect of inspiratory synchronization during pressure-controlled ventilation on lung distension and inspiratory effort
title Effect of inspiratory synchronization during pressure-controlled ventilation on lung distension and inspiratory effort
title_full Effect of inspiratory synchronization during pressure-controlled ventilation on lung distension and inspiratory effort
title_fullStr Effect of inspiratory synchronization during pressure-controlled ventilation on lung distension and inspiratory effort
title_full_unstemmed Effect of inspiratory synchronization during pressure-controlled ventilation on lung distension and inspiratory effort
title_short Effect of inspiratory synchronization during pressure-controlled ventilation on lung distension and inspiratory effort
title_sort effect of inspiratory synchronization during pressure-controlled ventilation on lung distension and inspiratory effort
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5630544/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28986852
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-017-0324-z
work_keys_str_mv AT rittayamainuttapol effectofinspiratorysynchronizationduringpressurecontrolledventilationonlungdistensionandinspiratoryeffort
AT belonclefrancois effectofinspiratorysynchronizationduringpressurecontrolledventilationonlungdistensionandinspiratoryeffort
AT goligherewanc effectofinspiratorysynchronizationduringpressurecontrolledventilationonlungdistensionandinspiratoryeffort
AT chenlu effectofinspiratorysynchronizationduringpressurecontrolledventilationonlungdistensionandinspiratoryeffort
AT mancebojordi effectofinspiratorysynchronizationduringpressurecontrolledventilationonlungdistensionandinspiratoryeffort
AT richardjeanchristophem effectofinspiratorysynchronizationduringpressurecontrolledventilationonlungdistensionandinspiratoryeffort
AT brochardlaurent effectofinspiratorysynchronizationduringpressurecontrolledventilationonlungdistensionandinspiratoryeffort