Cargando…
Etiology of Infectious Diarrhea in Patients Tested for Clostridium difficile: If It Isn’t Clostridium difficile, What Is It?
BACKGROUND: The objective of the study was to assay for alternative infectious causes of diarrhea in patients with negative EIA tests for Clostridium difficile. METHODS: A hard-stop alert was implemented at a tertiary care hospital to limit repeat testing for C. difficile within 96 hours of an initi...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5630709/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx162.004 |
_version_ | 1783269273888620544 |
---|---|
author | Kwon, Jennie H Hink, Tiffany Reske, Kimberly Dubberke, Erik R Burnham, Carey-Ann D |
author_facet | Kwon, Jennie H Hink, Tiffany Reske, Kimberly Dubberke, Erik R Burnham, Carey-Ann D |
author_sort | Kwon, Jennie H |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The objective of the study was to assay for alternative infectious causes of diarrhea in patients with negative EIA tests for Clostridium difficile. METHODS: A hard-stop alert was implemented at a tertiary care hospital to limit repeat testing for C. difficile within 96 hours of an initial negative EIA. Stool samples from patients with a negative (–) repeat EIA test for C. difficile within 96 hours in the 3 months pre- and postintervention underwent further evaluation: C. difficile toxigenic culture, GeneXpert C. difficile PCR, Biofire Gastrointestinal (GI) Panel, and culture on a blood agar plate. RESULTS: Of the 84 C. difficile EIA stool specimens evaluated, 8% were toxigenic culture positive (+), 8% tested + for C. difficile via the Biofire GI panel, and 5 (7%) + with the GenXpert C. difficile PCR (Table 1). Three of these patients were diagnosed with CDI within 30 days of a + test. Five patients were + for Norovirus via Biofire GI panel; none were tested for or diagnosed with Norovirus. Two patients were + for Enteropathogenic E. coli and one for Enteroaggregative E. coli via Biofire GI panel; none were tested for or diagnosed with E. coli infection. One patient was positive for Salmonella and Salmonella was isolated by stool culture. CONCLUSION: Patients tested for C. difficile may have alternate causes of diarrhea. When evaluating hospitalized patients with diarrhea, C. difficile, along with alternate causes of diarrhea can be considered. DISCLOSURES: E. R. Dubberke, Merck: Consultant, Consulting fee; Biofire: one time talk, Speaker honorarium;; Alere: one-time talk, Speaker honorarium; Sanofi pasteur: Grant Investigator, Grant recipient; Pfizer: Consultant, Consulting fee; Rebiotix: Investigator, Research support; Rebiotix: Consultant, Consulting fee; valneva: Consultant, Consulting fee; C. A. D. Burnham, bioMerieux: Grant Investigator, Research grant; ThermoFisher: Consultant, Salary; Cepheid: Grant Investigator, Research grant |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5630709 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56307092017-11-07 Etiology of Infectious Diarrhea in Patients Tested for Clostridium difficile: If It Isn’t Clostridium difficile, What Is It? Kwon, Jennie H Hink, Tiffany Reske, Kimberly Dubberke, Erik R Burnham, Carey-Ann D Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: The objective of the study was to assay for alternative infectious causes of diarrhea in patients with negative EIA tests for Clostridium difficile. METHODS: A hard-stop alert was implemented at a tertiary care hospital to limit repeat testing for C. difficile within 96 hours of an initial negative EIA. Stool samples from patients with a negative (–) repeat EIA test for C. difficile within 96 hours in the 3 months pre- and postintervention underwent further evaluation: C. difficile toxigenic culture, GeneXpert C. difficile PCR, Biofire Gastrointestinal (GI) Panel, and culture on a blood agar plate. RESULTS: Of the 84 C. difficile EIA stool specimens evaluated, 8% were toxigenic culture positive (+), 8% tested + for C. difficile via the Biofire GI panel, and 5 (7%) + with the GenXpert C. difficile PCR (Table 1). Three of these patients were diagnosed with CDI within 30 days of a + test. Five patients were + for Norovirus via Biofire GI panel; none were tested for or diagnosed with Norovirus. Two patients were + for Enteropathogenic E. coli and one for Enteroaggregative E. coli via Biofire GI panel; none were tested for or diagnosed with E. coli infection. One patient was positive for Salmonella and Salmonella was isolated by stool culture. CONCLUSION: Patients tested for C. difficile may have alternate causes of diarrhea. When evaluating hospitalized patients with diarrhea, C. difficile, along with alternate causes of diarrhea can be considered. DISCLOSURES: E. R. Dubberke, Merck: Consultant, Consulting fee; Biofire: one time talk, Speaker honorarium;; Alere: one-time talk, Speaker honorarium; Sanofi pasteur: Grant Investigator, Grant recipient; Pfizer: Consultant, Consulting fee; Rebiotix: Investigator, Research support; Rebiotix: Consultant, Consulting fee; valneva: Consultant, Consulting fee; C. A. D. Burnham, bioMerieux: Grant Investigator, Research grant; ThermoFisher: Consultant, Salary; Cepheid: Grant Investigator, Research grant Oxford University Press 2017-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5630709/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx162.004 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Abstracts Kwon, Jennie H Hink, Tiffany Reske, Kimberly Dubberke, Erik R Burnham, Carey-Ann D Etiology of Infectious Diarrhea in Patients Tested for Clostridium difficile: If It Isn’t Clostridium difficile, What Is It? |
title | Etiology of Infectious Diarrhea in Patients Tested for Clostridium difficile: If It Isn’t Clostridium difficile, What Is It? |
title_full | Etiology of Infectious Diarrhea in Patients Tested for Clostridium difficile: If It Isn’t Clostridium difficile, What Is It? |
title_fullStr | Etiology of Infectious Diarrhea in Patients Tested for Clostridium difficile: If It Isn’t Clostridium difficile, What Is It? |
title_full_unstemmed | Etiology of Infectious Diarrhea in Patients Tested for Clostridium difficile: If It Isn’t Clostridium difficile, What Is It? |
title_short | Etiology of Infectious Diarrhea in Patients Tested for Clostridium difficile: If It Isn’t Clostridium difficile, What Is It? |
title_sort | etiology of infectious diarrhea in patients tested for clostridium difficile: if it isn’t clostridium difficile, what is it? |
topic | Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5630709/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx162.004 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kwonjennieh etiologyofinfectiousdiarrheainpatientstestedforclostridiumdifficileifitisntclostridiumdifficilewhatisit AT hinktiffany etiologyofinfectiousdiarrheainpatientstestedforclostridiumdifficileifitisntclostridiumdifficilewhatisit AT reskekimberly etiologyofinfectiousdiarrheainpatientstestedforclostridiumdifficileifitisntclostridiumdifficilewhatisit AT dubberkeerikr etiologyofinfectiousdiarrheainpatientstestedforclostridiumdifficileifitisntclostridiumdifficilewhatisit AT burnhamcareyannd etiologyofinfectiousdiarrheainpatientstestedforclostridiumdifficileifitisntclostridiumdifficilewhatisit |