Cargando…

Assesing Appropriateness of Antimicrobial Treatment in Hospitalized Patients; A Point Prevalence Study

BACKGROUND: Between 20 and 50% of antibiotic therapy in hospitalized patients is considered inappropriate. Inappropriate antibiotic therapy is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. The aim of our study was to evaluate the ratio of appropriate antibiotic therapy among adult patients admi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reisfeld, Sharon, Assali, Mahdi, Tannous, Elias, Amarny, Kamal, Stein, Michal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5630757/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1320
_version_ 1783269285523619840
author Reisfeld, Sharon
Assali, Mahdi
Tannous, Elias
Amarny, Kamal
Stein, Michal
author_facet Reisfeld, Sharon
Assali, Mahdi
Tannous, Elias
Amarny, Kamal
Stein, Michal
author_sort Reisfeld, Sharon
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Between 20 and 50% of antibiotic therapy in hospitalized patients is considered inappropriate. Inappropriate antibiotic therapy is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. The aim of our study was to evaluate the ratio of appropriate antibiotic therapy among adult patients admitted to a secondary hospital and treated with at least one systemic antibiotic therapy, and to compare different methods for evaluation of appropriateness. METHODS: This was a point-prevalence study, in which all adult patients admitted to a secondary hospital and treated with systemic antibiotic therapy (orally or intravenous) were included. Appropriateness was evaluated by experts (infectious diseases specialist and a clinical pharmacist specializing in antibiotic therapy), and by ranking 11 quality indicators based on literature recommendations. Agreement between all methods was analyzed. RESULTS: 106 patients were included in the study; most of them were treated empirically (78%). Almost half of the patients were treated for urogenital and abdominal infections (44%). Appropriateness ranged from 20-75%, depending on method of evaluation. We found a very low agreement between the more strict definition and experts’ opinion (kappa=0.068), and a medium agreement between the less strict definition and experts’ opinion (kappa=0.45). Respiratory tract infections were treated inappropriately most of the time, according to all evaluation methods. Appropriate blood cultures were taken before starting antibiotic therapy only in 22% of the cases. CONCLUSION: We found a high rate of inappropriate antibiotic therapy in different indications for therapy, both by objective definitions, and by experts’ opinions (although to a lesser amount in the latter). We need to use strict and uniform parameters in order to optimize antibiotic therapy in the hospital. Immediate interventions must be made regarding appropriate blood cultures’ collection, and to improve empiric treatment for respiratory tract infections. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5630757
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56307572017-11-07 Assesing Appropriateness of Antimicrobial Treatment in Hospitalized Patients; A Point Prevalence Study Reisfeld, Sharon Assali, Mahdi Tannous, Elias Amarny, Kamal Stein, Michal Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Between 20 and 50% of antibiotic therapy in hospitalized patients is considered inappropriate. Inappropriate antibiotic therapy is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. The aim of our study was to evaluate the ratio of appropriate antibiotic therapy among adult patients admitted to a secondary hospital and treated with at least one systemic antibiotic therapy, and to compare different methods for evaluation of appropriateness. METHODS: This was a point-prevalence study, in which all adult patients admitted to a secondary hospital and treated with systemic antibiotic therapy (orally or intravenous) were included. Appropriateness was evaluated by experts (infectious diseases specialist and a clinical pharmacist specializing in antibiotic therapy), and by ranking 11 quality indicators based on literature recommendations. Agreement between all methods was analyzed. RESULTS: 106 patients were included in the study; most of them were treated empirically (78%). Almost half of the patients were treated for urogenital and abdominal infections (44%). Appropriateness ranged from 20-75%, depending on method of evaluation. We found a very low agreement between the more strict definition and experts’ opinion (kappa=0.068), and a medium agreement between the less strict definition and experts’ opinion (kappa=0.45). Respiratory tract infections were treated inappropriately most of the time, according to all evaluation methods. Appropriate blood cultures were taken before starting antibiotic therapy only in 22% of the cases. CONCLUSION: We found a high rate of inappropriate antibiotic therapy in different indications for therapy, both by objective definitions, and by experts’ opinions (although to a lesser amount in the latter). We need to use strict and uniform parameters in order to optimize antibiotic therapy in the hospital. Immediate interventions must be made regarding appropriate blood cultures’ collection, and to improve empiric treatment for respiratory tract infections. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2017-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5630757/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1320 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Reisfeld, Sharon
Assali, Mahdi
Tannous, Elias
Amarny, Kamal
Stein, Michal
Assesing Appropriateness of Antimicrobial Treatment in Hospitalized Patients; A Point Prevalence Study
title Assesing Appropriateness of Antimicrobial Treatment in Hospitalized Patients; A Point Prevalence Study
title_full Assesing Appropriateness of Antimicrobial Treatment in Hospitalized Patients; A Point Prevalence Study
title_fullStr Assesing Appropriateness of Antimicrobial Treatment in Hospitalized Patients; A Point Prevalence Study
title_full_unstemmed Assesing Appropriateness of Antimicrobial Treatment in Hospitalized Patients; A Point Prevalence Study
title_short Assesing Appropriateness of Antimicrobial Treatment in Hospitalized Patients; A Point Prevalence Study
title_sort assesing appropriateness of antimicrobial treatment in hospitalized patients; a point prevalence study
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5630757/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1320
work_keys_str_mv AT reisfeldsharon assesingappropriatenessofantimicrobialtreatmentinhospitalizedpatientsapointprevalencestudy
AT assalimahdi assesingappropriatenessofantimicrobialtreatmentinhospitalizedpatientsapointprevalencestudy
AT tannouselias assesingappropriatenessofantimicrobialtreatmentinhospitalizedpatientsapointprevalencestudy
AT amarnykamal assesingappropriatenessofantimicrobialtreatmentinhospitalizedpatientsapointprevalencestudy
AT steinmichal assesingappropriatenessofantimicrobialtreatmentinhospitalizedpatientsapointprevalencestudy