Cargando…

Quality of Non-Bronchoscopic Bronchoalveolar Lavage Specimens and the Diagnosis of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia

BACKGROUND: Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is a significant cause of hospital-acquired infection. Many institutions use National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) definitions for VAP surveillance. One criterion of the NHSN definition for possible VAP (PVAP) is a positive culture obtained via n...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tien, Vivian, DeFelice, Nathaniel, Romanelli, Anna, Brown, Jennifer
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5630763/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1680
_version_ 1783269287002112000
author Tien, Vivian
DeFelice, Nathaniel
Romanelli, Anna
Brown, Jennifer
author_facet Tien, Vivian
DeFelice, Nathaniel
Romanelli, Anna
Brown, Jennifer
author_sort Tien, Vivian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is a significant cause of hospital-acquired infection. Many institutions use National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) definitions for VAP surveillance. One criterion of the NHSN definition for possible VAP (PVAP) is a positive culture obtained via non-bronchoscopic bronchoalveolar lavage (NB-BAL). NB-BAL specimens are not routinely assessed for oropharyngeal contamination prior to quantitative culture. Thus, we hypothesized that NB-BALs can yield poor quality specimens that may contribute to the misdiagnosis of PVAP. METHODS: From May 2016 to January 2017, we performed background quality assessments for NB-BAL specimens collected from patients on mechanical ventilation for >3 days. Thereafter, we retrospectively reviewed NB-BAL quality, culture results, and contribution to NHSN-defined PVAPs. Quality assessments included number of white blood cells (WBC) or squamous epithelial cells (SEC) per low-power field (lpf). Specimens were deemed acceptable if they had ≤10 SEC/lpf by “standard” criteria and zero SEC/lpf by “strict” criteria. All specimens were cultured regardless of quality assessment results, which were not revealed to ordering clinicians. RESULTS: Of 117 NB-BAL specimens, 8 (7%) did not pass standard quality assessment and an additional 47 (40%) did not pass strict quality assessment. Most samples (82%) were purulent (>25 WBC/lpf). Overall, 56 (48%) of samples resulted in significant growth of at least one species of bacteria (>10(4) CFU/mL). Of the 8 samples that did not pass standard assessment, 7 (87%) resulted in significant bacterial growth. Four PVAPs were diagnosed on the basis of NB-BAL specimens. Of these, all were acceptable by standard criteria, but one failed by strict criteria. CONCLUSION: Approximately 50% of our NB-BAL specimens had evidence of oropharyngeal contamination on quality assessment, including one specimen that contributed to a NHSN-reported PVAP. While limited by small sample size and short study duration, our data suggest that the quality of NB-BAL specimens may affect the diagnosis and surveillance of VAP. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5630763
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56307632017-11-07 Quality of Non-Bronchoscopic Bronchoalveolar Lavage Specimens and the Diagnosis of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia Tien, Vivian DeFelice, Nathaniel Romanelli, Anna Brown, Jennifer Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is a significant cause of hospital-acquired infection. Many institutions use National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) definitions for VAP surveillance. One criterion of the NHSN definition for possible VAP (PVAP) is a positive culture obtained via non-bronchoscopic bronchoalveolar lavage (NB-BAL). NB-BAL specimens are not routinely assessed for oropharyngeal contamination prior to quantitative culture. Thus, we hypothesized that NB-BALs can yield poor quality specimens that may contribute to the misdiagnosis of PVAP. METHODS: From May 2016 to January 2017, we performed background quality assessments for NB-BAL specimens collected from patients on mechanical ventilation for >3 days. Thereafter, we retrospectively reviewed NB-BAL quality, culture results, and contribution to NHSN-defined PVAPs. Quality assessments included number of white blood cells (WBC) or squamous epithelial cells (SEC) per low-power field (lpf). Specimens were deemed acceptable if they had ≤10 SEC/lpf by “standard” criteria and zero SEC/lpf by “strict” criteria. All specimens were cultured regardless of quality assessment results, which were not revealed to ordering clinicians. RESULTS: Of 117 NB-BAL specimens, 8 (7%) did not pass standard quality assessment and an additional 47 (40%) did not pass strict quality assessment. Most samples (82%) were purulent (>25 WBC/lpf). Overall, 56 (48%) of samples resulted in significant growth of at least one species of bacteria (>10(4) CFU/mL). Of the 8 samples that did not pass standard assessment, 7 (87%) resulted in significant bacterial growth. Four PVAPs were diagnosed on the basis of NB-BAL specimens. Of these, all were acceptable by standard criteria, but one failed by strict criteria. CONCLUSION: Approximately 50% of our NB-BAL specimens had evidence of oropharyngeal contamination on quality assessment, including one specimen that contributed to a NHSN-reported PVAP. While limited by small sample size and short study duration, our data suggest that the quality of NB-BAL specimens may affect the diagnosis and surveillance of VAP. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2017-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5630763/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1680 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Tien, Vivian
DeFelice, Nathaniel
Romanelli, Anna
Brown, Jennifer
Quality of Non-Bronchoscopic Bronchoalveolar Lavage Specimens and the Diagnosis of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia
title Quality of Non-Bronchoscopic Bronchoalveolar Lavage Specimens and the Diagnosis of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia
title_full Quality of Non-Bronchoscopic Bronchoalveolar Lavage Specimens and the Diagnosis of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia
title_fullStr Quality of Non-Bronchoscopic Bronchoalveolar Lavage Specimens and the Diagnosis of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia
title_full_unstemmed Quality of Non-Bronchoscopic Bronchoalveolar Lavage Specimens and the Diagnosis of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia
title_short Quality of Non-Bronchoscopic Bronchoalveolar Lavage Specimens and the Diagnosis of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia
title_sort quality of non-bronchoscopic bronchoalveolar lavage specimens and the diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5630763/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1680
work_keys_str_mv AT tienvivian qualityofnonbronchoscopicbronchoalveolarlavagespecimensandthediagnosisofventilatorassociatedpneumonia
AT defelicenathaniel qualityofnonbronchoscopicbronchoalveolarlavagespecimensandthediagnosisofventilatorassociatedpneumonia
AT romanellianna qualityofnonbronchoscopicbronchoalveolarlavagespecimensandthediagnosisofventilatorassociatedpneumonia
AT brownjennifer qualityofnonbronchoscopicbronchoalveolarlavagespecimensandthediagnosisofventilatorassociatedpneumonia