Cargando…
Evaluation of the Accelerate Pheno™ System for the Identification and Antimicrobial Susceptibilty Testing of Gram-negative Bacteria, Compared with Conventional Laboratory Testing
BACKGROUND: The current standard technique for diagnosis of bloodstream infection (BSI) is through the detection of micro-organisms using automated blood culture systems and subsequent phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibilty testing (AST) techniques that require 24–48 hours to generate results. The a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5630771/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1559 |
_version_ | 1783269288958754816 |
---|---|
author | Roulston, Kerry Gorton, Rebecca Kazantzaki, Ekaterini Rebec, Monica Hopkins, Susan Satta, Giovanni Mack, Damien |
author_facet | Roulston, Kerry Gorton, Rebecca Kazantzaki, Ekaterini Rebec, Monica Hopkins, Susan Satta, Giovanni Mack, Damien |
author_sort | Roulston, Kerry |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The current standard technique for diagnosis of bloodstream infection (BSI) is through the detection of micro-organisms using automated blood culture systems and subsequent phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibilty testing (AST) techniques that require 24–48 hours to generate results. The aim of this study was to evaluate the Accelerate Pheno™ system (AXDX), which utilises fluorescent in situ hybridization and morphokinetic cellular analysis to identify bacteria from positive blood cultures and perform AST in less than 7 hours. METHODS: The Accelerate PhenoTest™ BC kit was used to test 15 gram-negative isolates with a range of AST profiles, from simulated blood cultures. Isolates included 10 target organisms; Escherichia coli (n = 2), Enterobacter sp. (n = 2), Klebsiella sp., Proteus sp., Citrobacter sp., Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii, Serratia marcescens and 5 non-target organisms. AXDX results were compared with MALDI-ToF MS identification and BD Phoenix™ automated AST results. To evaluate the reproducibility of AXDX analysis, all isolates were tested at two different sites, six in duplicate. RESULTS: A total of 37 tests were performed. AXDX correctly identified 90% (9/10) of the target organisms, and correctly identified 100% (5/5) of non-target organisms as such. One isolate of Citrobacter sp. was initially misidentified as Enterobacter sp. but was correctly identified twice on repeat testing. The AST results demonstrated 93% (244/262) essential agreement (MIC within <1 dilution) and 90% (237/262) categorical agreement (same S/I/R interpretation) compared with conventional laboratory methods. For AST results, between-site reproducibility (MIC within <1 dilution) was 97%. CONCLUSION: The Accelerate PhenoTest™ BC kit can provide rapid identification alongside phenotypic AST results direct from positive blood cultures. In this study, the assay demonstrated high reproducibility and good correlation with conventional laboratory methods. By reducing the time to AST results the Accelerate Pheno™ system has the potential to produce actionable results for the management of BSI and enable earlier escalation or de-escalation of antibiotic therapy. This also has the potential to improve patient outcomes by reducing morbidity and mortality. DISCLOSURES: K. Roulston, Accelerate Diagnostics: Investigator, Research support; R. Gorton, Accelerate Diagnostics: Investigator, Research support; E. Kazantzaki, Accelerate Diagnostics: Investigator, Research support; M. Rebec, Accelerate Diagnostics: Investigator, Research support; S. Hopkins, Accelerate Diagnostics: Investigator, Research support; G. Satta, Accelerate Diagnostics: Investigator, Research support; D. Mack, Accelerate Diagnostics: Investigator, Research support |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5630771 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56307712017-11-07 Evaluation of the Accelerate Pheno™ System for the Identification and Antimicrobial Susceptibilty Testing of Gram-negative Bacteria, Compared with Conventional Laboratory Testing Roulston, Kerry Gorton, Rebecca Kazantzaki, Ekaterini Rebec, Monica Hopkins, Susan Satta, Giovanni Mack, Damien Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: The current standard technique for diagnosis of bloodstream infection (BSI) is through the detection of micro-organisms using automated blood culture systems and subsequent phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibilty testing (AST) techniques that require 24–48 hours to generate results. The aim of this study was to evaluate the Accelerate Pheno™ system (AXDX), which utilises fluorescent in situ hybridization and morphokinetic cellular analysis to identify bacteria from positive blood cultures and perform AST in less than 7 hours. METHODS: The Accelerate PhenoTest™ BC kit was used to test 15 gram-negative isolates with a range of AST profiles, from simulated blood cultures. Isolates included 10 target organisms; Escherichia coli (n = 2), Enterobacter sp. (n = 2), Klebsiella sp., Proteus sp., Citrobacter sp., Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii, Serratia marcescens and 5 non-target organisms. AXDX results were compared with MALDI-ToF MS identification and BD Phoenix™ automated AST results. To evaluate the reproducibility of AXDX analysis, all isolates were tested at two different sites, six in duplicate. RESULTS: A total of 37 tests were performed. AXDX correctly identified 90% (9/10) of the target organisms, and correctly identified 100% (5/5) of non-target organisms as such. One isolate of Citrobacter sp. was initially misidentified as Enterobacter sp. but was correctly identified twice on repeat testing. The AST results demonstrated 93% (244/262) essential agreement (MIC within <1 dilution) and 90% (237/262) categorical agreement (same S/I/R interpretation) compared with conventional laboratory methods. For AST results, between-site reproducibility (MIC within <1 dilution) was 97%. CONCLUSION: The Accelerate PhenoTest™ BC kit can provide rapid identification alongside phenotypic AST results direct from positive blood cultures. In this study, the assay demonstrated high reproducibility and good correlation with conventional laboratory methods. By reducing the time to AST results the Accelerate Pheno™ system has the potential to produce actionable results for the management of BSI and enable earlier escalation or de-escalation of antibiotic therapy. This also has the potential to improve patient outcomes by reducing morbidity and mortality. DISCLOSURES: K. Roulston, Accelerate Diagnostics: Investigator, Research support; R. Gorton, Accelerate Diagnostics: Investigator, Research support; E. Kazantzaki, Accelerate Diagnostics: Investigator, Research support; M. Rebec, Accelerate Diagnostics: Investigator, Research support; S. Hopkins, Accelerate Diagnostics: Investigator, Research support; G. Satta, Accelerate Diagnostics: Investigator, Research support; D. Mack, Accelerate Diagnostics: Investigator, Research support Oxford University Press 2017-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5630771/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1559 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Abstracts Roulston, Kerry Gorton, Rebecca Kazantzaki, Ekaterini Rebec, Monica Hopkins, Susan Satta, Giovanni Mack, Damien Evaluation of the Accelerate Pheno™ System for the Identification and Antimicrobial Susceptibilty Testing of Gram-negative Bacteria, Compared with Conventional Laboratory Testing |
title | Evaluation of the Accelerate Pheno™ System for the Identification and Antimicrobial Susceptibilty Testing of Gram-negative Bacteria, Compared with Conventional Laboratory Testing |
title_full | Evaluation of the Accelerate Pheno™ System for the Identification and Antimicrobial Susceptibilty Testing of Gram-negative Bacteria, Compared with Conventional Laboratory Testing |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of the Accelerate Pheno™ System for the Identification and Antimicrobial Susceptibilty Testing of Gram-negative Bacteria, Compared with Conventional Laboratory Testing |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of the Accelerate Pheno™ System for the Identification and Antimicrobial Susceptibilty Testing of Gram-negative Bacteria, Compared with Conventional Laboratory Testing |
title_short | Evaluation of the Accelerate Pheno™ System for the Identification and Antimicrobial Susceptibilty Testing of Gram-negative Bacteria, Compared with Conventional Laboratory Testing |
title_sort | evaluation of the accelerate pheno™ system for the identification and antimicrobial susceptibilty testing of gram-negative bacteria, compared with conventional laboratory testing |
topic | Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5630771/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1559 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT roulstonkerry evaluationoftheacceleratephenosystemfortheidentificationandantimicrobialsusceptibiltytestingofgramnegativebacteriacomparedwithconventionallaboratorytesting AT gortonrebecca evaluationoftheacceleratephenosystemfortheidentificationandantimicrobialsusceptibiltytestingofgramnegativebacteriacomparedwithconventionallaboratorytesting AT kazantzakiekaterini evaluationoftheacceleratephenosystemfortheidentificationandantimicrobialsusceptibiltytestingofgramnegativebacteriacomparedwithconventionallaboratorytesting AT rebecmonica evaluationoftheacceleratephenosystemfortheidentificationandantimicrobialsusceptibiltytestingofgramnegativebacteriacomparedwithconventionallaboratorytesting AT hopkinssusan evaluationoftheacceleratephenosystemfortheidentificationandantimicrobialsusceptibiltytestingofgramnegativebacteriacomparedwithconventionallaboratorytesting AT sattagiovanni evaluationoftheacceleratephenosystemfortheidentificationandantimicrobialsusceptibiltytestingofgramnegativebacteriacomparedwithconventionallaboratorytesting AT mackdamien evaluationoftheacceleratephenosystemfortheidentificationandantimicrobialsusceptibiltytestingofgramnegativebacteriacomparedwithconventionallaboratorytesting |