Cargando…

Evaluation of the Accelerate Pheno™ System for the Identification and Antimicrobial Susceptibilty Testing of Gram-negative Bacteria, Compared with Conventional Laboratory Testing

BACKGROUND: The current standard technique for diagnosis of bloodstream infection (BSI) is through the detection of micro-organisms using automated blood culture systems and subsequent phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibilty testing (AST) techniques that require 24–48 hours to generate results. The a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Roulston, Kerry, Gorton, Rebecca, Kazantzaki, Ekaterini, Rebec, Monica, Hopkins, Susan, Satta, Giovanni, Mack, Damien
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5630771/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1559
_version_ 1783269288958754816
author Roulston, Kerry
Gorton, Rebecca
Kazantzaki, Ekaterini
Rebec, Monica
Hopkins, Susan
Satta, Giovanni
Mack, Damien
author_facet Roulston, Kerry
Gorton, Rebecca
Kazantzaki, Ekaterini
Rebec, Monica
Hopkins, Susan
Satta, Giovanni
Mack, Damien
author_sort Roulston, Kerry
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The current standard technique for diagnosis of bloodstream infection (BSI) is through the detection of micro-organisms using automated blood culture systems and subsequent phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibilty testing (AST) techniques that require 24–48 hours to generate results. The aim of this study was to evaluate the Accelerate Pheno™ system (AXDX), which utilises fluorescent in situ hybridization and morphokinetic cellular analysis to identify bacteria from positive blood cultures and perform AST in less than 7 hours. METHODS: The Accelerate PhenoTest™ BC kit was used to test 15 gram-negative isolates with a range of AST profiles, from simulated blood cultures. Isolates included 10 target organisms; Escherichia coli (n = 2), Enterobacter sp. (n = 2), Klebsiella sp., Proteus sp., Citrobacter sp., Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii, Serratia marcescens and 5 non-target organisms. AXDX results were compared with MALDI-ToF MS identification and BD Phoenix™ automated AST results. To evaluate the reproducibility of AXDX analysis, all isolates were tested at two different sites, six in duplicate. RESULTS: A total of 37 tests were performed. AXDX correctly identified 90% (9/10) of the target organisms, and correctly identified 100% (5/5) of non-target organisms as such. One isolate of Citrobacter sp. was initially misidentified as Enterobacter sp. but was correctly identified twice on repeat testing. The AST results demonstrated 93% (244/262) essential agreement (MIC within <1 dilution) and 90% (237/262) categorical agreement (same S/I/R interpretation) compared with conventional laboratory methods. For AST results, between-site reproducibility (MIC within <1 dilution) was 97%. CONCLUSION: The Accelerate PhenoTest™ BC kit can provide rapid identification alongside phenotypic AST results direct from positive blood cultures. In this study, the assay demonstrated high reproducibility and good correlation with conventional laboratory methods. By reducing the time to AST results the Accelerate Pheno™ system has the potential to produce actionable results for the management of BSI and enable earlier escalation or de-escalation of antibiotic therapy. This also has the potential to improve patient outcomes by reducing morbidity and mortality. DISCLOSURES: K. Roulston, Accelerate Diagnostics: Investigator, Research support; R. Gorton, Accelerate Diagnostics: Investigator, Research support; E. Kazantzaki, Accelerate Diagnostics: Investigator, Research support; M. Rebec, Accelerate Diagnostics: Investigator, Research support; S. Hopkins, Accelerate Diagnostics: Investigator, Research support; G. Satta, Accelerate Diagnostics: Investigator, Research support; D. Mack, Accelerate Diagnostics: Investigator, Research support
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5630771
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56307712017-11-07 Evaluation of the Accelerate Pheno™ System for the Identification and Antimicrobial Susceptibilty Testing of Gram-negative Bacteria, Compared with Conventional Laboratory Testing Roulston, Kerry Gorton, Rebecca Kazantzaki, Ekaterini Rebec, Monica Hopkins, Susan Satta, Giovanni Mack, Damien Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: The current standard technique for diagnosis of bloodstream infection (BSI) is through the detection of micro-organisms using automated blood culture systems and subsequent phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibilty testing (AST) techniques that require 24–48 hours to generate results. The aim of this study was to evaluate the Accelerate Pheno™ system (AXDX), which utilises fluorescent in situ hybridization and morphokinetic cellular analysis to identify bacteria from positive blood cultures and perform AST in less than 7 hours. METHODS: The Accelerate PhenoTest™ BC kit was used to test 15 gram-negative isolates with a range of AST profiles, from simulated blood cultures. Isolates included 10 target organisms; Escherichia coli (n = 2), Enterobacter sp. (n = 2), Klebsiella sp., Proteus sp., Citrobacter sp., Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii, Serratia marcescens and 5 non-target organisms. AXDX results were compared with MALDI-ToF MS identification and BD Phoenix™ automated AST results. To evaluate the reproducibility of AXDX analysis, all isolates were tested at two different sites, six in duplicate. RESULTS: A total of 37 tests were performed. AXDX correctly identified 90% (9/10) of the target organisms, and correctly identified 100% (5/5) of non-target organisms as such. One isolate of Citrobacter sp. was initially misidentified as Enterobacter sp. but was correctly identified twice on repeat testing. The AST results demonstrated 93% (244/262) essential agreement (MIC within <1 dilution) and 90% (237/262) categorical agreement (same S/I/R interpretation) compared with conventional laboratory methods. For AST results, between-site reproducibility (MIC within <1 dilution) was 97%. CONCLUSION: The Accelerate PhenoTest™ BC kit can provide rapid identification alongside phenotypic AST results direct from positive blood cultures. In this study, the assay demonstrated high reproducibility and good correlation with conventional laboratory methods. By reducing the time to AST results the Accelerate Pheno™ system has the potential to produce actionable results for the management of BSI and enable earlier escalation or de-escalation of antibiotic therapy. This also has the potential to improve patient outcomes by reducing morbidity and mortality. DISCLOSURES: K. Roulston, Accelerate Diagnostics: Investigator, Research support; R. Gorton, Accelerate Diagnostics: Investigator, Research support; E. Kazantzaki, Accelerate Diagnostics: Investigator, Research support; M. Rebec, Accelerate Diagnostics: Investigator, Research support; S. Hopkins, Accelerate Diagnostics: Investigator, Research support; G. Satta, Accelerate Diagnostics: Investigator, Research support; D. Mack, Accelerate Diagnostics: Investigator, Research support Oxford University Press 2017-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5630771/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1559 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Roulston, Kerry
Gorton, Rebecca
Kazantzaki, Ekaterini
Rebec, Monica
Hopkins, Susan
Satta, Giovanni
Mack, Damien
Evaluation of the Accelerate Pheno™ System for the Identification and Antimicrobial Susceptibilty Testing of Gram-negative Bacteria, Compared with Conventional Laboratory Testing
title Evaluation of the Accelerate Pheno™ System for the Identification and Antimicrobial Susceptibilty Testing of Gram-negative Bacteria, Compared with Conventional Laboratory Testing
title_full Evaluation of the Accelerate Pheno™ System for the Identification and Antimicrobial Susceptibilty Testing of Gram-negative Bacteria, Compared with Conventional Laboratory Testing
title_fullStr Evaluation of the Accelerate Pheno™ System for the Identification and Antimicrobial Susceptibilty Testing of Gram-negative Bacteria, Compared with Conventional Laboratory Testing
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the Accelerate Pheno™ System for the Identification and Antimicrobial Susceptibilty Testing of Gram-negative Bacteria, Compared with Conventional Laboratory Testing
title_short Evaluation of the Accelerate Pheno™ System for the Identification and Antimicrobial Susceptibilty Testing of Gram-negative Bacteria, Compared with Conventional Laboratory Testing
title_sort evaluation of the accelerate pheno™ system for the identification and antimicrobial susceptibilty testing of gram-negative bacteria, compared with conventional laboratory testing
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5630771/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1559
work_keys_str_mv AT roulstonkerry evaluationoftheacceleratephenosystemfortheidentificationandantimicrobialsusceptibiltytestingofgramnegativebacteriacomparedwithconventionallaboratorytesting
AT gortonrebecca evaluationoftheacceleratephenosystemfortheidentificationandantimicrobialsusceptibiltytestingofgramnegativebacteriacomparedwithconventionallaboratorytesting
AT kazantzakiekaterini evaluationoftheacceleratephenosystemfortheidentificationandantimicrobialsusceptibiltytestingofgramnegativebacteriacomparedwithconventionallaboratorytesting
AT rebecmonica evaluationoftheacceleratephenosystemfortheidentificationandantimicrobialsusceptibiltytestingofgramnegativebacteriacomparedwithconventionallaboratorytesting
AT hopkinssusan evaluationoftheacceleratephenosystemfortheidentificationandantimicrobialsusceptibiltytestingofgramnegativebacteriacomparedwithconventionallaboratorytesting
AT sattagiovanni evaluationoftheacceleratephenosystemfortheidentificationandantimicrobialsusceptibiltytestingofgramnegativebacteriacomparedwithconventionallaboratorytesting
AT mackdamien evaluationoftheacceleratephenosystemfortheidentificationandantimicrobialsusceptibiltytestingofgramnegativebacteriacomparedwithconventionallaboratorytesting