Cargando…

Inducible Clindamycin Resistance Is More Common in Lancefield groups C and G Streptococci Compared with group A in Clinical Specimens: A Single-center Experience, 2013 to 2016

BACKGROUND: Current susceptibility testing recommendations for β-hemolytic streptococci outline testing for clindamycin resistance, including inducible resistance by a positive D-zone phenotype. However, few studies describe the prevalence of clindamycin resistance among invasive GCS and GGS organis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sabin, Arick, Hansen, Glen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5630812/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1629
_version_ 1783269299187613696
author Sabin, Arick
Hansen, Glen
author_facet Sabin, Arick
Hansen, Glen
author_sort Sabin, Arick
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Current susceptibility testing recommendations for β-hemolytic streptococci outline testing for clindamycin resistance, including inducible resistance by a positive D-zone phenotype. However, few studies describe the prevalence of clindamycin resistance among invasive GCS and GGS organisms. This study aims to describe the prevalence of clindamycin resistance among GCS/GGS compared with invasive group A streptococci (GAS) during the same period in a large United States health system. METHODS: Streptococcus isolates from blood, tissue, and body fluids (n = 298) recorded from January 1, 2013 to May 1, 2017 were audited using SafetySurveillor® software. Members of the anginosus-group streptococci were excluded. Specimens submitted to the clinical microbiology laboratory were grown in 5% CO(2) on colistin-nalidixic-acid agar, Mueller–Hinton 5% sheep blood agar, and chocolate agar. Cultures positive for β-hemolytic streptococci were identified to the species level via MALDI-TOF MS. Disk diffusion D-zone testing was performed with 0.5 McFarland standards using erythromycin (15 μg) and clindamycin (2 μg) disks 12 mm apart on Mueller–Hinton 5% sheep blood agar plates incubated at 35°C in 5% CO(2) for 20–24 hours. Susceptibilities to penicillin, erythromycin, clindamycin, and vancomycin were recorded per current CLSI breakpoints. RESULTS: A total of n = 212 GCS/GGS isolates were tested, of which n = 61 (28.8%) demonstrated clindamycin resistance; 85.2% were clindamycin resistant via a positive D-zone phenotype compared with 14.8% that were constitutively clindamycin resistant. A total of n = 86 GAS isolates were tested, of which n = 9 (10%) demonstrated clindamycin resistance; 44% reported clindamycin resistance via a positive D-zone phenotype compared with 56% which were constitutively clindamycin resistant. CONCLUSION: Clindamycin resistance among GCS and GGS was present in 24.5% of the isolates tested compared with 10% for GAS. As a proportion of the total number of isolates tested, inducible resistance was 14.5% more frequent among GCS and GGS than was observed for GAS. This study demonstrates a higher proportional level of clindamycin resistance in GCS/GGC compared with GAS infections detected over the same study period. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5630812
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56308122017-11-07 Inducible Clindamycin Resistance Is More Common in Lancefield groups C and G Streptococci Compared with group A in Clinical Specimens: A Single-center Experience, 2013 to 2016 Sabin, Arick Hansen, Glen Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Current susceptibility testing recommendations for β-hemolytic streptococci outline testing for clindamycin resistance, including inducible resistance by a positive D-zone phenotype. However, few studies describe the prevalence of clindamycin resistance among invasive GCS and GGS organisms. This study aims to describe the prevalence of clindamycin resistance among GCS/GGS compared with invasive group A streptococci (GAS) during the same period in a large United States health system. METHODS: Streptococcus isolates from blood, tissue, and body fluids (n = 298) recorded from January 1, 2013 to May 1, 2017 were audited using SafetySurveillor® software. Members of the anginosus-group streptococci were excluded. Specimens submitted to the clinical microbiology laboratory were grown in 5% CO(2) on colistin-nalidixic-acid agar, Mueller–Hinton 5% sheep blood agar, and chocolate agar. Cultures positive for β-hemolytic streptococci were identified to the species level via MALDI-TOF MS. Disk diffusion D-zone testing was performed with 0.5 McFarland standards using erythromycin (15 μg) and clindamycin (2 μg) disks 12 mm apart on Mueller–Hinton 5% sheep blood agar plates incubated at 35°C in 5% CO(2) for 20–24 hours. Susceptibilities to penicillin, erythromycin, clindamycin, and vancomycin were recorded per current CLSI breakpoints. RESULTS: A total of n = 212 GCS/GGS isolates were tested, of which n = 61 (28.8%) demonstrated clindamycin resistance; 85.2% were clindamycin resistant via a positive D-zone phenotype compared with 14.8% that were constitutively clindamycin resistant. A total of n = 86 GAS isolates were tested, of which n = 9 (10%) demonstrated clindamycin resistance; 44% reported clindamycin resistance via a positive D-zone phenotype compared with 56% which were constitutively clindamycin resistant. CONCLUSION: Clindamycin resistance among GCS and GGS was present in 24.5% of the isolates tested compared with 10% for GAS. As a proportion of the total number of isolates tested, inducible resistance was 14.5% more frequent among GCS and GGS than was observed for GAS. This study demonstrates a higher proportional level of clindamycin resistance in GCS/GGC compared with GAS infections detected over the same study period. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2017-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5630812/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1629 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Sabin, Arick
Hansen, Glen
Inducible Clindamycin Resistance Is More Common in Lancefield groups C and G Streptococci Compared with group A in Clinical Specimens: A Single-center Experience, 2013 to 2016
title Inducible Clindamycin Resistance Is More Common in Lancefield groups C and G Streptococci Compared with group A in Clinical Specimens: A Single-center Experience, 2013 to 2016
title_full Inducible Clindamycin Resistance Is More Common in Lancefield groups C and G Streptococci Compared with group A in Clinical Specimens: A Single-center Experience, 2013 to 2016
title_fullStr Inducible Clindamycin Resistance Is More Common in Lancefield groups C and G Streptococci Compared with group A in Clinical Specimens: A Single-center Experience, 2013 to 2016
title_full_unstemmed Inducible Clindamycin Resistance Is More Common in Lancefield groups C and G Streptococci Compared with group A in Clinical Specimens: A Single-center Experience, 2013 to 2016
title_short Inducible Clindamycin Resistance Is More Common in Lancefield groups C and G Streptococci Compared with group A in Clinical Specimens: A Single-center Experience, 2013 to 2016
title_sort inducible clindamycin resistance is more common in lancefield groups c and g streptococci compared with group a in clinical specimens: a single-center experience, 2013 to 2016
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5630812/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1629
work_keys_str_mv AT sabinarick inducibleclindamycinresistanceismorecommoninlancefieldgroupscandgstreptococcicomparedwithgroupainclinicalspecimensasinglecenterexperience2013to2016
AT hansenglen inducibleclindamycinresistanceismorecommoninlancefieldgroupscandgstreptococcicomparedwithgroupainclinicalspecimensasinglecenterexperience2013to2016