Cargando…

Predictive Characteristics of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Nasal Swab for MRSA-positive Culture in Hospitalized Veterans

BACKGROUND: Providers often must decide whether to empirically treat hospitalized patients for MRSA. The results of routine MRSA nares swabs often are available prior to clinical culture results, so could conceivably help guide antibiotic selection. However, the reported predictive value of nares sw...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fox, Teresa, Thuras, Paul, Holter, John J, Johnson, James R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5630833/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1698
_version_ 1783269304001626112
author Fox, Teresa
Thuras, Paul
Holter, John J
Johnson, James R
author_facet Fox, Teresa
Thuras, Paul
Holter, John J
Johnson, James R
author_sort Fox, Teresa
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Providers often must decide whether to empirically treat hospitalized patients for MRSA. The results of routine MRSA nares swabs often are available prior to clinical culture results, so could conceivably help guide antibiotic selection. However, the reported predictive value of nares swabs is mixed. Therefore, we sought to define the predictive characteristics of MRSA nares swabs for the MRSA status of clinical Staphylococcus aureus(SA) isolates at the Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Medical Center (MVAMC). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed electronic health records (EHRs) of 599 MVAMC inpatients with a clinical SA isolate between 2013 and 2016. The SA isolates were from skin/soft tissue (n = 281), blood (n = 99), respiratory (n = 90), urine (n = 62), and bone/joint (n = 27). We recorded each isolate’s MRSA vs. MSSA status and the result of the temporally closest MRSA nares swab, then compared swab and culture results in relation to culture site and swab-to-culture interval. RESULTS: Overall, for identifying MRSA among patients with a clinical SA isolate, the MRSA nares swab’s sensitivity was 65.1%, specificity 96.2%, positive predictive value (PPV) 91.4%, and negative predictive value (NPV) 81.9%. The odds ratio (OR) of a positive MRSA nares swab for a MRSA-positive culture was 47.9 (95% confidence interval [CI] 25.7–89.2). Exclusion of the 70 nares swabs that were collected > 14 days before the clinical isolate increased the NPV to 84.0%, with a corresponding sensitivity 68.0%, specificity 83.9%, and PPV 90.3%. Test performance varied significantly by culture site (Table). CONCLUSION: A positive MRSA nares swab greatly increased the odds that a SA isolate was MRSA. However, sensitivity and NPV were lower than some prior studies. Our findings suggest that, for veterans with a severe infection that might be due to SA, a negative MRSA nares screen provides insufficient NPV to allow confident omission of empiric MRSA-active antibiotics. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5630833
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56308332017-11-07 Predictive Characteristics of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Nasal Swab for MRSA-positive Culture in Hospitalized Veterans Fox, Teresa Thuras, Paul Holter, John J Johnson, James R Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Providers often must decide whether to empirically treat hospitalized patients for MRSA. The results of routine MRSA nares swabs often are available prior to clinical culture results, so could conceivably help guide antibiotic selection. However, the reported predictive value of nares swabs is mixed. Therefore, we sought to define the predictive characteristics of MRSA nares swabs for the MRSA status of clinical Staphylococcus aureus(SA) isolates at the Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Medical Center (MVAMC). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed electronic health records (EHRs) of 599 MVAMC inpatients with a clinical SA isolate between 2013 and 2016. The SA isolates were from skin/soft tissue (n = 281), blood (n = 99), respiratory (n = 90), urine (n = 62), and bone/joint (n = 27). We recorded each isolate’s MRSA vs. MSSA status and the result of the temporally closest MRSA nares swab, then compared swab and culture results in relation to culture site and swab-to-culture interval. RESULTS: Overall, for identifying MRSA among patients with a clinical SA isolate, the MRSA nares swab’s sensitivity was 65.1%, specificity 96.2%, positive predictive value (PPV) 91.4%, and negative predictive value (NPV) 81.9%. The odds ratio (OR) of a positive MRSA nares swab for a MRSA-positive culture was 47.9 (95% confidence interval [CI] 25.7–89.2). Exclusion of the 70 nares swabs that were collected > 14 days before the clinical isolate increased the NPV to 84.0%, with a corresponding sensitivity 68.0%, specificity 83.9%, and PPV 90.3%. Test performance varied significantly by culture site (Table). CONCLUSION: A positive MRSA nares swab greatly increased the odds that a SA isolate was MRSA. However, sensitivity and NPV were lower than some prior studies. Our findings suggest that, for veterans with a severe infection that might be due to SA, a negative MRSA nares screen provides insufficient NPV to allow confident omission of empiric MRSA-active antibiotics. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2017-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5630833/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1698 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Fox, Teresa
Thuras, Paul
Holter, John J
Johnson, James R
Predictive Characteristics of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Nasal Swab for MRSA-positive Culture in Hospitalized Veterans
title Predictive Characteristics of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Nasal Swab for MRSA-positive Culture in Hospitalized Veterans
title_full Predictive Characteristics of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Nasal Swab for MRSA-positive Culture in Hospitalized Veterans
title_fullStr Predictive Characteristics of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Nasal Swab for MRSA-positive Culture in Hospitalized Veterans
title_full_unstemmed Predictive Characteristics of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Nasal Swab for MRSA-positive Culture in Hospitalized Veterans
title_short Predictive Characteristics of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Nasal Swab for MRSA-positive Culture in Hospitalized Veterans
title_sort predictive characteristics of methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus (mrsa) nasal swab for mrsa-positive culture in hospitalized veterans
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5630833/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1698
work_keys_str_mv AT foxteresa predictivecharacteristicsofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusmrsanasalswabformrsapositivecultureinhospitalizedveterans
AT thuraspaul predictivecharacteristicsofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusmrsanasalswabformrsapositivecultureinhospitalizedveterans
AT holterjohnj predictivecharacteristicsofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusmrsanasalswabformrsapositivecultureinhospitalizedveterans
AT johnsonjamesr predictivecharacteristicsofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusmrsanasalswabformrsapositivecultureinhospitalizedveterans