Cargando…

Gram-Negative Polymicrobial Bloodstream Infections and Clinical Decision Making with a Microarray Testing System

BACKGROUND: Molecular rapid diagnostic tests, such as the microarray-based Verigene Gram-Negative Blood Culture Test (BC-GN), when performed in conjunction with antimicrobial stewardship, are associated with improved clinical outcomes in bloodstream infections (BSIs). Optimal use of Verigene BC-GN t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Claeys, Kimberly, Pogue, Jason, Lephart, Paul, Heil, Emily, Johnson, J Kristie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5630848/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1647
_version_ 1783269307737702400
author Claeys, Kimberly
Pogue, Jason
Lephart, Paul
Heil, Emily
Johnson, J Kristie
author_facet Claeys, Kimberly
Pogue, Jason
Lephart, Paul
Heil, Emily
Johnson, J Kristie
author_sort Claeys, Kimberly
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Molecular rapid diagnostic tests, such as the microarray-based Verigene Gram-Negative Blood Culture Test (BC-GN), when performed in conjunction with antimicrobial stewardship, are associated with improved clinical outcomes in bloodstream infections (BSIs). Optimal use of Verigene BC-GN to aid in clinical decision-making, however, can be hindered by a lack of confidence in results if patients have polymicrobial GN BSIs. METHODS: Blood culture data from patients tested by Verigene BC-GN from June 2015 – July 2016 from the Detroit Medical Center and University of Maryland Medical Center were retrospectively reviewed and evaluated for incidence of missed GNs in GN BSIs. Missed GNs entailed those not detected in the tested sample and those that grew in a separate complementary positive blood culture bottle collected but not tested using Verigene BC-GN. For blood culture sets with missed GNs, potential clinical significance was evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 1,003 sets of GN blood cultures were reviewed. Fifty-seven (5.6%) were determined to be polymicrobial GN BSIs by traditional microbiological culture methods. Verigene BC-GN did not identify one or more GNs in 37 cases (65% of polymicrobial GN BSIs; 3.7% of total GN BSIs.); 25 were missed by the probe in the tested culture and 12 where missed due to isolation in the complementary blood culture bottle that was not tested by Verigene BC-GN. While potentially inappropriate de-escalation of antibiotic therapy could have occurred in 18 (31.5%) of polymicrobial GN BSIs, this represented only 1.8% of total GN BSIs. CONCLUSION: Current practices utilizing Verigene BC-GN can result in the omission of undetected GNs in over half of polymicrobial GN BSIs. These misses were a combination of technology and workflow limitations. The potential for inappropriate de-escalation of antibiotic therapy in the entire cohort, however, was infrequent (<2% of total cases). DISCLOSURES: P. Lephart, Nanosphere: Grant Investigator, Grant recipient; 
J. K. Johnson, Nanosphere: Grant Investigator, Grant recipient
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5630848
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56308482017-11-07 Gram-Negative Polymicrobial Bloodstream Infections and Clinical Decision Making with a Microarray Testing System Claeys, Kimberly Pogue, Jason Lephart, Paul Heil, Emily Johnson, J Kristie Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Molecular rapid diagnostic tests, such as the microarray-based Verigene Gram-Negative Blood Culture Test (BC-GN), when performed in conjunction with antimicrobial stewardship, are associated with improved clinical outcomes in bloodstream infections (BSIs). Optimal use of Verigene BC-GN to aid in clinical decision-making, however, can be hindered by a lack of confidence in results if patients have polymicrobial GN BSIs. METHODS: Blood culture data from patients tested by Verigene BC-GN from June 2015 – July 2016 from the Detroit Medical Center and University of Maryland Medical Center were retrospectively reviewed and evaluated for incidence of missed GNs in GN BSIs. Missed GNs entailed those not detected in the tested sample and those that grew in a separate complementary positive blood culture bottle collected but not tested using Verigene BC-GN. For blood culture sets with missed GNs, potential clinical significance was evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 1,003 sets of GN blood cultures were reviewed. Fifty-seven (5.6%) were determined to be polymicrobial GN BSIs by traditional microbiological culture methods. Verigene BC-GN did not identify one or more GNs in 37 cases (65% of polymicrobial GN BSIs; 3.7% of total GN BSIs.); 25 were missed by the probe in the tested culture and 12 where missed due to isolation in the complementary blood culture bottle that was not tested by Verigene BC-GN. While potentially inappropriate de-escalation of antibiotic therapy could have occurred in 18 (31.5%) of polymicrobial GN BSIs, this represented only 1.8% of total GN BSIs. CONCLUSION: Current practices utilizing Verigene BC-GN can result in the omission of undetected GNs in over half of polymicrobial GN BSIs. These misses were a combination of technology and workflow limitations. The potential for inappropriate de-escalation of antibiotic therapy in the entire cohort, however, was infrequent (<2% of total cases). DISCLOSURES: P. Lephart, Nanosphere: Grant Investigator, Grant recipient; 
J. K. Johnson, Nanosphere: Grant Investigator, Grant recipient Oxford University Press 2017-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5630848/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1647 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Claeys, Kimberly
Pogue, Jason
Lephart, Paul
Heil, Emily
Johnson, J Kristie
Gram-Negative Polymicrobial Bloodstream Infections and Clinical Decision Making with a Microarray Testing System
title Gram-Negative Polymicrobial Bloodstream Infections and Clinical Decision Making with a Microarray Testing System
title_full Gram-Negative Polymicrobial Bloodstream Infections and Clinical Decision Making with a Microarray Testing System
title_fullStr Gram-Negative Polymicrobial Bloodstream Infections and Clinical Decision Making with a Microarray Testing System
title_full_unstemmed Gram-Negative Polymicrobial Bloodstream Infections and Clinical Decision Making with a Microarray Testing System
title_short Gram-Negative Polymicrobial Bloodstream Infections and Clinical Decision Making with a Microarray Testing System
title_sort gram-negative polymicrobial bloodstream infections and clinical decision making with a microarray testing system
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5630848/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1647
work_keys_str_mv AT claeyskimberly gramnegativepolymicrobialbloodstreaminfectionsandclinicaldecisionmakingwithamicroarraytestingsystem
AT poguejason gramnegativepolymicrobialbloodstreaminfectionsandclinicaldecisionmakingwithamicroarraytestingsystem
AT lephartpaul gramnegativepolymicrobialbloodstreaminfectionsandclinicaldecisionmakingwithamicroarraytestingsystem
AT heilemily gramnegativepolymicrobialbloodstreaminfectionsandclinicaldecisionmakingwithamicroarraytestingsystem
AT johnsonjkristie gramnegativepolymicrobialbloodstreaminfectionsandclinicaldecisionmakingwithamicroarraytestingsystem