Cargando…

An Antimicrobial Stewardship Initiative within a for-profit hospital: Impact of Criteria for Appropriate Use on Utilization

BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs (ASP) have shown improved patient outcomes, reduced adverse events, improved antibiotic susceptibilities, and optimized resource utilization. With the re-introduction of a formal ASP at our for-profit, non-teaching, community hospital in early 2016 in r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jerahian, Aram, Ty, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5630860/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1270
_version_ 1783269310594023424
author Jerahian, Aram
Ty, Peter
author_facet Jerahian, Aram
Ty, Peter
author_sort Jerahian, Aram
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs (ASP) have shown improved patient outcomes, reduced adverse events, improved antibiotic susceptibilities, and optimized resource utilization. With the re-introduction of a formal ASP at our for-profit, non-teaching, community hospital in early 2016 in response to both legislative and corporate requirements, we sought to evaluate the impact of one of our ASP initiatives, Criteria for Appropriate Use, on utilization of three specific antimicrobial agents: Daptomycin (DAP), Tigecycline (TIG) and Ertapenem (ERT). The results of this investigation will help characterize various shifts in prescribing practices facilitated by an ASP initiative as well as quantify resultant trends in utilization. METHODS: This single-center, retrospective cohort study included patients who received DAP, TIG, or ERT in matched time periods: July – Sept 2015 (pre-ASP) and July – Sept 2016 (post-ASP). Patients were analyzed based on demographics, antibiotic use, days of therapy (DOT), indication (criteria for use), prescriber, infection type, and antibiotic course. Cost data and adjusted patient-days (APD) were extracted from hospital records. RESULTS: 644 cases were included. There were 555 pre-ASP cases per 31,884 APD: 128 (DAP), 368 (ERT), and 59 (TIG). In the post-ASP group, there were 89 cases per 30,960 APD: 40 (DAP), 39 (ERT), and 10 (TIG). Significant decreases were realized in the post-ASP period in: restricted antibiotic utilization (17.4 vs.. 2.9 cases/1000 APD, P < 0.0001), duration (58.2 vs. 14.3 DOT/1000 APD, P < 0.0001), off-criteria use (3.6 vs. 0.65 cases/1000 APD, P < 0.0001), and cost ($12.92 vs. $2.88/APD, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The results of this study show that introduction of ASP, specifically Criteria for Appropriate Use implementation, was associated with not only significant decreases in utilization rates and antimicrobial cost, but significant shifts in prescriber behavior. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5630860
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56308602017-11-07 An Antimicrobial Stewardship Initiative within a for-profit hospital: Impact of Criteria for Appropriate Use on Utilization Jerahian, Aram Ty, Peter Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs (ASP) have shown improved patient outcomes, reduced adverse events, improved antibiotic susceptibilities, and optimized resource utilization. With the re-introduction of a formal ASP at our for-profit, non-teaching, community hospital in early 2016 in response to both legislative and corporate requirements, we sought to evaluate the impact of one of our ASP initiatives, Criteria for Appropriate Use, on utilization of three specific antimicrobial agents: Daptomycin (DAP), Tigecycline (TIG) and Ertapenem (ERT). The results of this investigation will help characterize various shifts in prescribing practices facilitated by an ASP initiative as well as quantify resultant trends in utilization. METHODS: This single-center, retrospective cohort study included patients who received DAP, TIG, or ERT in matched time periods: July – Sept 2015 (pre-ASP) and July – Sept 2016 (post-ASP). Patients were analyzed based on demographics, antibiotic use, days of therapy (DOT), indication (criteria for use), prescriber, infection type, and antibiotic course. Cost data and adjusted patient-days (APD) were extracted from hospital records. RESULTS: 644 cases were included. There were 555 pre-ASP cases per 31,884 APD: 128 (DAP), 368 (ERT), and 59 (TIG). In the post-ASP group, there were 89 cases per 30,960 APD: 40 (DAP), 39 (ERT), and 10 (TIG). Significant decreases were realized in the post-ASP period in: restricted antibiotic utilization (17.4 vs.. 2.9 cases/1000 APD, P < 0.0001), duration (58.2 vs. 14.3 DOT/1000 APD, P < 0.0001), off-criteria use (3.6 vs. 0.65 cases/1000 APD, P < 0.0001), and cost ($12.92 vs. $2.88/APD, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The results of this study show that introduction of ASP, specifically Criteria for Appropriate Use implementation, was associated with not only significant decreases in utilization rates and antimicrobial cost, but significant shifts in prescriber behavior. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2017-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5630860/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1270 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Jerahian, Aram
Ty, Peter
An Antimicrobial Stewardship Initiative within a for-profit hospital: Impact of Criteria for Appropriate Use on Utilization
title An Antimicrobial Stewardship Initiative within a for-profit hospital: Impact of Criteria for Appropriate Use on Utilization
title_full An Antimicrobial Stewardship Initiative within a for-profit hospital: Impact of Criteria for Appropriate Use on Utilization
title_fullStr An Antimicrobial Stewardship Initiative within a for-profit hospital: Impact of Criteria for Appropriate Use on Utilization
title_full_unstemmed An Antimicrobial Stewardship Initiative within a for-profit hospital: Impact of Criteria for Appropriate Use on Utilization
title_short An Antimicrobial Stewardship Initiative within a for-profit hospital: Impact of Criteria for Appropriate Use on Utilization
title_sort antimicrobial stewardship initiative within a for-profit hospital: impact of criteria for appropriate use on utilization
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5630860/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1270
work_keys_str_mv AT jerahianaram anantimicrobialstewardshipinitiativewithinaforprofithospitalimpactofcriteriaforappropriateuseonutilization
AT typeter anantimicrobialstewardshipinitiativewithinaforprofithospitalimpactofcriteriaforappropriateuseonutilization
AT jerahianaram antimicrobialstewardshipinitiativewithinaforprofithospitalimpactofcriteriaforappropriateuseonutilization
AT typeter antimicrobialstewardshipinitiativewithinaforprofithospitalimpactofcriteriaforappropriateuseonutilization