Cargando…

Association of Staphylococcus aureus Colonization with the Evolving Neonatal Nasal Microbiome and the Impact of Intranasal Mupirocin

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the bacterial communities in the nares of critically ill neonates. Our objectives were to explore the evolving nasal microbiome in neonates who acquire Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) colonization and the impact of intranasal mupirocin on the nasal microbiome. MET...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khamash, Dina, Voskertchian, Annie, Baltimore, White, James, Hittle, Lauren, Mongodin, Emmanuel, Milstone, Aaron M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5630878/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1824
_version_ 1783269314916253696
author Khamash, Dina
Voskertchian, Annie
Baltimore,
White, James
Hittle, Lauren
Mongodin, Emmanuel
Milstone, Aaron M
author_facet Khamash, Dina
Voskertchian, Annie
Baltimore,
White, James
Hittle, Lauren
Mongodin, Emmanuel
Milstone, Aaron M
author_sort Khamash, Dina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Little is known about the bacterial communities in the nares of critically ill neonates. Our objectives were to explore the evolving nasal microbiome in neonates who acquire Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) colonization and the impact of intranasal mupirocin on the nasal microbiome. METHODS: In the setting of a tertiary care neonatal intensive care unit S. aureus control program where neonates are screened weekly using chromogenic agar cultures and treated with intranasal mupirocin if found to acquire S. aureus colonization, we identified 15 neonates, 8 who acquired S. aureus colonization (cases) and 7 who did not acquire S. aureus colonization (controls). Cases and controls were matched on chronologic age and systemic antibiotic exposure. DNA was extracted for amplification of the 16S rRNA gene (V3V4 region), followed by next-generation sequencing using Illumina MiSeq. Sequences were merged into consensus fragments by FLASH and submitted for high-resolution taxonomic assignment using Resphera Insight. Differentially abundant taxa and alpha diversity measures were detected utilizing a nonparametric difference test with p-value correction using the False Discovery Rate. RESULTS: Compared with conventional bacterial culture results, sequencing identified S. aureus membership in residual culture samples of all neonates who acquired S. aureus colonization. Figure 1 illustrates statistically significant differences in abundant taxa comparing cases prior to S. aureus colonization and controls. Several species were more abundant in controls, including Corynebacterium propinquum and accolens and Rothia mucilaginosa. C. propinquum and accolens and Rothia mucilaginosa were also more abundant in neonates after treatment with intranasal mupirocin than before treatment. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that there are differences in bacterial taxa abundance in the nasal microbiome in neonates who do and do not acquire S. aureus colonization and in neonates before and after treatment with intranasal mupirocin. A single species may not provide sufficient resistance to S. aureus colonization, but a community of organisms may protect against colonization. DISCLOSURES: J. White, Resphera Biosciences: Shareholder, Equity
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5630878
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56308782017-11-07 Association of Staphylococcus aureus Colonization with the Evolving Neonatal Nasal Microbiome and the Impact of Intranasal Mupirocin Khamash, Dina Voskertchian, Annie Baltimore, White, James Hittle, Lauren Mongodin, Emmanuel Milstone, Aaron M Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Little is known about the bacterial communities in the nares of critically ill neonates. Our objectives were to explore the evolving nasal microbiome in neonates who acquire Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) colonization and the impact of intranasal mupirocin on the nasal microbiome. METHODS: In the setting of a tertiary care neonatal intensive care unit S. aureus control program where neonates are screened weekly using chromogenic agar cultures and treated with intranasal mupirocin if found to acquire S. aureus colonization, we identified 15 neonates, 8 who acquired S. aureus colonization (cases) and 7 who did not acquire S. aureus colonization (controls). Cases and controls were matched on chronologic age and systemic antibiotic exposure. DNA was extracted for amplification of the 16S rRNA gene (V3V4 region), followed by next-generation sequencing using Illumina MiSeq. Sequences were merged into consensus fragments by FLASH and submitted for high-resolution taxonomic assignment using Resphera Insight. Differentially abundant taxa and alpha diversity measures were detected utilizing a nonparametric difference test with p-value correction using the False Discovery Rate. RESULTS: Compared with conventional bacterial culture results, sequencing identified S. aureus membership in residual culture samples of all neonates who acquired S. aureus colonization. Figure 1 illustrates statistically significant differences in abundant taxa comparing cases prior to S. aureus colonization and controls. Several species were more abundant in controls, including Corynebacterium propinquum and accolens and Rothia mucilaginosa. C. propinquum and accolens and Rothia mucilaginosa were also more abundant in neonates after treatment with intranasal mupirocin than before treatment. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that there are differences in bacterial taxa abundance in the nasal microbiome in neonates who do and do not acquire S. aureus colonization and in neonates before and after treatment with intranasal mupirocin. A single species may not provide sufficient resistance to S. aureus colonization, but a community of organisms may protect against colonization. DISCLOSURES: J. White, Resphera Biosciences: Shareholder, Equity Oxford University Press 2017-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5630878/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1824 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Khamash, Dina
Voskertchian, Annie
Baltimore,
White, James
Hittle, Lauren
Mongodin, Emmanuel
Milstone, Aaron M
Association of Staphylococcus aureus Colonization with the Evolving Neonatal Nasal Microbiome and the Impact of Intranasal Mupirocin
title Association of Staphylococcus aureus Colonization with the Evolving Neonatal Nasal Microbiome and the Impact of Intranasal Mupirocin
title_full Association of Staphylococcus aureus Colonization with the Evolving Neonatal Nasal Microbiome and the Impact of Intranasal Mupirocin
title_fullStr Association of Staphylococcus aureus Colonization with the Evolving Neonatal Nasal Microbiome and the Impact of Intranasal Mupirocin
title_full_unstemmed Association of Staphylococcus aureus Colonization with the Evolving Neonatal Nasal Microbiome and the Impact of Intranasal Mupirocin
title_short Association of Staphylococcus aureus Colonization with the Evolving Neonatal Nasal Microbiome and the Impact of Intranasal Mupirocin
title_sort association of staphylococcus aureus colonization with the evolving neonatal nasal microbiome and the impact of intranasal mupirocin
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5630878/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1824
work_keys_str_mv AT khamashdina associationofstaphylococcusaureuscolonizationwiththeevolvingneonatalnasalmicrobiomeandtheimpactofintranasalmupirocin
AT voskertchianannie associationofstaphylococcusaureuscolonizationwiththeevolvingneonatalnasalmicrobiomeandtheimpactofintranasalmupirocin
AT baltimore associationofstaphylococcusaureuscolonizationwiththeevolvingneonatalnasalmicrobiomeandtheimpactofintranasalmupirocin
AT whitejames associationofstaphylococcusaureuscolonizationwiththeevolvingneonatalnasalmicrobiomeandtheimpactofintranasalmupirocin
AT hittlelauren associationofstaphylococcusaureuscolonizationwiththeevolvingneonatalnasalmicrobiomeandtheimpactofintranasalmupirocin
AT mongodinemmanuel associationofstaphylococcusaureuscolonizationwiththeevolvingneonatalnasalmicrobiomeandtheimpactofintranasalmupirocin
AT milstoneaaronm associationofstaphylococcusaureuscolonizationwiththeevolvingneonatalnasalmicrobiomeandtheimpactofintranasalmupirocin