Cargando…

Comparison of Two Antiretroviral Therapy Regimens in Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV−) Infected Pregnant Women

BACKGROUND: Combined antiretroviral therapy (cART) in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected pregnant women reduces the maternal-to-child transmission (MTCT) rate from a baseline of 25% to less than 2% when the HIV viral load (VL) is <1,000 copies/mL. The traditional cART is composed of 2 nu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tate, Danielle, Samson, Fernand, Christiansen, Mary, Meyers, Lindsay, Cashion, Kitty, Wang, Jenny, Cruz, Marina Santa, Gomez, Luis
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5630893/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1767
_version_ 1783269318549569536
author Tate, Danielle
Samson, Fernand
Christiansen, Mary
Meyers, Lindsay
Cashion, Kitty
Wang, Jenny
Cruz, Marina Santa
Gomez, Luis
author_facet Tate, Danielle
Samson, Fernand
Christiansen, Mary
Meyers, Lindsay
Cashion, Kitty
Wang, Jenny
Cruz, Marina Santa
Gomez, Luis
author_sort Tate, Danielle
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Combined antiretroviral therapy (cART) in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected pregnant women reduces the maternal-to-child transmission (MTCT) rate from a baseline of 25% to less than 2% when the HIV viral load (VL) is <1,000 copies/mL. The traditional cART is composed of 2 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI-) and 1 protease inhibitor (PI)-class drugs. There is limited information on the effects of VL reduction in pregnancy with alternative cART modalities containing either an integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI) or a non-NRTI (nNRTI). OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare the HIV VL near delivery in HIV-infected pregnant women receiving 2 NRTI plus 1 PI (traditional cART) to those receiving 2 NRTI plus 1 INSTI or 1 nNRTI (alternative cART). METHODS: Prospective cohort study of pregnant HIV-infected women from 2010 through 2016 receiving care in our high-risk obstetric infectious disease clinic. Women were included if they had at least 2 VL (before and after intervention) obtained during pregnancy. Our primary outcome was the rate of VL <1,000 copies/mL near delivery. RESULTS: We collected data in 274 subjects (traditional cART=156, alternative cART=118). After adjusting for confounders, the rate of VL <1,000 copies/mL near delivery was comparable among women receiving the traditional treatment (121/156, 77.6%) to the alternative cART (101/118, 85.6%); P = 0.2765, RR 1.474 (0.733–2.967). More women in the alternative cART group (66.9%) had undetectable VL near delivery compared with the traditional cART group (46.1%); P = 0.0103, RR 2.002, 95% CI 1.178–3.403. There were 5 cases (1.8%) of MTCT: 1 in the traditional cART group and 4 in 1 in the alternative cART group. CONCLUSION: After adjusting for confounders, our cohort of women receiving either traditional or alternative cART regimens achieved similar rate of HIV VL <1,000 copies/mL near delivery. Further studies are needed to replicate our findings. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5630893
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56308932017-11-07 Comparison of Two Antiretroviral Therapy Regimens in Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV−) Infected Pregnant Women Tate, Danielle Samson, Fernand Christiansen, Mary Meyers, Lindsay Cashion, Kitty Wang, Jenny Cruz, Marina Santa Gomez, Luis Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Combined antiretroviral therapy (cART) in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected pregnant women reduces the maternal-to-child transmission (MTCT) rate from a baseline of 25% to less than 2% when the HIV viral load (VL) is <1,000 copies/mL. The traditional cART is composed of 2 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI-) and 1 protease inhibitor (PI)-class drugs. There is limited information on the effects of VL reduction in pregnancy with alternative cART modalities containing either an integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI) or a non-NRTI (nNRTI). OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare the HIV VL near delivery in HIV-infected pregnant women receiving 2 NRTI plus 1 PI (traditional cART) to those receiving 2 NRTI plus 1 INSTI or 1 nNRTI (alternative cART). METHODS: Prospective cohort study of pregnant HIV-infected women from 2010 through 2016 receiving care in our high-risk obstetric infectious disease clinic. Women were included if they had at least 2 VL (before and after intervention) obtained during pregnancy. Our primary outcome was the rate of VL <1,000 copies/mL near delivery. RESULTS: We collected data in 274 subjects (traditional cART=156, alternative cART=118). After adjusting for confounders, the rate of VL <1,000 copies/mL near delivery was comparable among women receiving the traditional treatment (121/156, 77.6%) to the alternative cART (101/118, 85.6%); P = 0.2765, RR 1.474 (0.733–2.967). More women in the alternative cART group (66.9%) had undetectable VL near delivery compared with the traditional cART group (46.1%); P = 0.0103, RR 2.002, 95% CI 1.178–3.403. There were 5 cases (1.8%) of MTCT: 1 in the traditional cART group and 4 in 1 in the alternative cART group. CONCLUSION: After adjusting for confounders, our cohort of women receiving either traditional or alternative cART regimens achieved similar rate of HIV VL <1,000 copies/mL near delivery. Further studies are needed to replicate our findings. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2017-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5630893/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1767 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Tate, Danielle
Samson, Fernand
Christiansen, Mary
Meyers, Lindsay
Cashion, Kitty
Wang, Jenny
Cruz, Marina Santa
Gomez, Luis
Comparison of Two Antiretroviral Therapy Regimens in Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV−) Infected Pregnant Women
title Comparison of Two Antiretroviral Therapy Regimens in Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV−) Infected Pregnant Women
title_full Comparison of Two Antiretroviral Therapy Regimens in Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV−) Infected Pregnant Women
title_fullStr Comparison of Two Antiretroviral Therapy Regimens in Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV−) Infected Pregnant Women
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Two Antiretroviral Therapy Regimens in Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV−) Infected Pregnant Women
title_short Comparison of Two Antiretroviral Therapy Regimens in Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV−) Infected Pregnant Women
title_sort comparison of two antiretroviral therapy regimens in human immunodeficiency virus (hiv−) infected pregnant women
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5630893/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1767
work_keys_str_mv AT tatedanielle comparisonoftwoantiretroviraltherapyregimensinhumanimmunodeficiencyvirushivinfectedpregnantwomen
AT samsonfernand comparisonoftwoantiretroviraltherapyregimensinhumanimmunodeficiencyvirushivinfectedpregnantwomen
AT christiansenmary comparisonoftwoantiretroviraltherapyregimensinhumanimmunodeficiencyvirushivinfectedpregnantwomen
AT meyerslindsay comparisonoftwoantiretroviraltherapyregimensinhumanimmunodeficiencyvirushivinfectedpregnantwomen
AT cashionkitty comparisonoftwoantiretroviraltherapyregimensinhumanimmunodeficiencyvirushivinfectedpregnantwomen
AT wangjenny comparisonoftwoantiretroviraltherapyregimensinhumanimmunodeficiencyvirushivinfectedpregnantwomen
AT cruzmarinasanta comparisonoftwoantiretroviraltherapyregimensinhumanimmunodeficiencyvirushivinfectedpregnantwomen
AT gomezluis comparisonoftwoantiretroviraltherapyregimensinhumanimmunodeficiencyvirushivinfectedpregnantwomen