Cargando…

Comparison of One vs. Two BACTEC Myco/F Lytic Bottles for Recovery of Fungi and Mycobacteria

BACKGROUND: The BACTEC Myco/F Lytic bottle (Becton Dickinson), along with the Wampole Isolator lysis centrifugation tube (Alere) are used to enhance recovery of fungal and mycobacterial organisms from blood. At our institution, one Isolator tube and two Myco/F Lytic bottles are inoculated for each s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ramanan, Poornima, Schleck, Cathy, Harmsen, William, Vetter, Emily, Wengenack, Nancy L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5630896/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1602
_version_ 1783269319297204224
author Ramanan, Poornima
Schleck, Cathy
Harmsen, William
Vetter, Emily
Wengenack, Nancy L
author_facet Ramanan, Poornima
Schleck, Cathy
Harmsen, William
Vetter, Emily
Wengenack, Nancy L
author_sort Ramanan, Poornima
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The BACTEC Myco/F Lytic bottle (Becton Dickinson), along with the Wampole Isolator lysis centrifugation tube (Alere) are used to enhance recovery of fungal and mycobacterial organisms from blood. At our institution, one Isolator tube and two Myco/F Lytic bottles are inoculated for each suspected case of fungemia or mycobacteremia. A retrospective analysis of 7518 cultures over 6 years was performed to determine whether one or twoMyco/F Lytic bottles were required for optimal recovery of these organisms. METHODS: Blood was collected by a phlebotomy team and distributed into three blood culture receptacles: 2 Myco/F Lytic bottles each with 4 mL of blood and one Isolator tube with 8 mL of blood. The sediment from the processed Isolator tube was inoculated onto Inhibitory Mold Agar, Emmons Sabouraud Dextrose Agar, and Middlebrook 7H11/7H11 Selective Agar. The Myco/F Lytic bottles were incubated for 42 days on the BACTEC FX instrument and the plated media was incubated for 30 days. We compared the recovery of fungal and mycobacterial organisms from one vs. two Myco/F Lytic bottles at our institution from April, 2004 through October, 2010. Myco/F Lytic bottles were randomly assigned as the first or second bottles and additional culture positivity results for the second bottle was compared with that of the first bottle and the Isolator tube together. RESULTS: 171 (2.3%) cultures were positive with fungal or mycobacterial isolates from a total of 7518 cultures. Among 171 positive cultures, 28 (16.4%) grew only in the second Myco/F Lytic bottle. Among these, 20 were fungi (Histoplasma capsulatum, n = 7, Candida sp., n = 7, filamentous fungi, n = 4, Cryptococcus neoformans, n = 1, other yeast, n = 1), 7 were mycobacterial species (Mycobacterium avium complex, n = 7) and 1 was an aerobic actinomycete (Streptomyces sp). 7/45 (15.6%) of H. capsulatum isolates, 7/18 (38.9%) of M.avium complex isolates and 1/17 (5.9%) of C.neoformans isolates grew in the second Myco/F Lytic bottle only. CONCLUSION: The use of two Myco/F Lytic bottles increases the recovery of certain fungal and mycobacterial organisms from blood as compared with one Myco/F Lytic bottle. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5630896
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56308962017-11-07 Comparison of One vs. Two BACTEC Myco/F Lytic Bottles for Recovery of Fungi and Mycobacteria Ramanan, Poornima Schleck, Cathy Harmsen, William Vetter, Emily Wengenack, Nancy L Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: The BACTEC Myco/F Lytic bottle (Becton Dickinson), along with the Wampole Isolator lysis centrifugation tube (Alere) are used to enhance recovery of fungal and mycobacterial organisms from blood. At our institution, one Isolator tube and two Myco/F Lytic bottles are inoculated for each suspected case of fungemia or mycobacteremia. A retrospective analysis of 7518 cultures over 6 years was performed to determine whether one or twoMyco/F Lytic bottles were required for optimal recovery of these organisms. METHODS: Blood was collected by a phlebotomy team and distributed into three blood culture receptacles: 2 Myco/F Lytic bottles each with 4 mL of blood and one Isolator tube with 8 mL of blood. The sediment from the processed Isolator tube was inoculated onto Inhibitory Mold Agar, Emmons Sabouraud Dextrose Agar, and Middlebrook 7H11/7H11 Selective Agar. The Myco/F Lytic bottles were incubated for 42 days on the BACTEC FX instrument and the plated media was incubated for 30 days. We compared the recovery of fungal and mycobacterial organisms from one vs. two Myco/F Lytic bottles at our institution from April, 2004 through October, 2010. Myco/F Lytic bottles were randomly assigned as the first or second bottles and additional culture positivity results for the second bottle was compared with that of the first bottle and the Isolator tube together. RESULTS: 171 (2.3%) cultures were positive with fungal or mycobacterial isolates from a total of 7518 cultures. Among 171 positive cultures, 28 (16.4%) grew only in the second Myco/F Lytic bottle. Among these, 20 were fungi (Histoplasma capsulatum, n = 7, Candida sp., n = 7, filamentous fungi, n = 4, Cryptococcus neoformans, n = 1, other yeast, n = 1), 7 were mycobacterial species (Mycobacterium avium complex, n = 7) and 1 was an aerobic actinomycete (Streptomyces sp). 7/45 (15.6%) of H. capsulatum isolates, 7/18 (38.9%) of M.avium complex isolates and 1/17 (5.9%) of C.neoformans isolates grew in the second Myco/F Lytic bottle only. CONCLUSION: The use of two Myco/F Lytic bottles increases the recovery of certain fungal and mycobacterial organisms from blood as compared with one Myco/F Lytic bottle. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2017-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5630896/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1602 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Ramanan, Poornima
Schleck, Cathy
Harmsen, William
Vetter, Emily
Wengenack, Nancy L
Comparison of One vs. Two BACTEC Myco/F Lytic Bottles for Recovery of Fungi and Mycobacteria
title Comparison of One vs. Two BACTEC Myco/F Lytic Bottles for Recovery of Fungi and Mycobacteria
title_full Comparison of One vs. Two BACTEC Myco/F Lytic Bottles for Recovery of Fungi and Mycobacteria
title_fullStr Comparison of One vs. Two BACTEC Myco/F Lytic Bottles for Recovery of Fungi and Mycobacteria
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of One vs. Two BACTEC Myco/F Lytic Bottles for Recovery of Fungi and Mycobacteria
title_short Comparison of One vs. Two BACTEC Myco/F Lytic Bottles for Recovery of Fungi and Mycobacteria
title_sort comparison of one vs. two bactec myco/f lytic bottles for recovery of fungi and mycobacteria
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5630896/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1602
work_keys_str_mv AT ramananpoornima comparisonofonevstwobactecmycoflyticbottlesforrecoveryoffungiandmycobacteria
AT schleckcathy comparisonofonevstwobactecmycoflyticbottlesforrecoveryoffungiandmycobacteria
AT harmsenwilliam comparisonofonevstwobactecmycoflyticbottlesforrecoveryoffungiandmycobacteria
AT vetteremily comparisonofonevstwobactecmycoflyticbottlesforrecoveryoffungiandmycobacteria
AT wengenacknancyl comparisonofonevstwobactecmycoflyticbottlesforrecoveryoffungiandmycobacteria