Cargando…
Microbial Colonization of Intravenous Luer Lock Connector During Active Infusions Among Hospitalized Patients
BACKGROUND: Central line associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) result in patient morbidity and increased length of stay. While most CLABSI’s are due to extraluminal carriage of skin flora into the bloodstream, catheter hub colonization and intraluminal carriage remains a possible cause. We have...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5630928/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1684 |
_version_ | 1783269327069249536 |
---|---|
author | Hankins, Richard Majorant, Denisa Cavalieri, R Jennifer Lyden, Elizabeth Fey, Paul D Rupp, Mark E Cawcutt, Kelly |
author_facet | Hankins, Richard Majorant, Denisa Cavalieri, R Jennifer Lyden, Elizabeth Fey, Paul D Rupp, Mark E Cawcutt, Kelly |
author_sort | Hankins, Richard |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Central line associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) result in patient morbidity and increased length of stay. While most CLABSI’s are due to extraluminal carriage of skin flora into the bloodstream, catheter hub colonization and intraluminal carriage remains a possible cause. We have previously evaluated a lever lock catheter in hospitalized patients, which had a 41.9% bacterial colonization rate. After replacing the lever lock system with a leur lock catheter system and passive port protector, we evaluated the colonization rate of this luer lock catheter system. METHODS: A prospective 3 day study was performed evaluating the microbial colonization of the luer lock system in hospitalized patients with active infusions. Infusions were assessed, and if not deemed critical or an antimicrobial, paused while the catheter connector hub was used to inoculate a blood agar plate. After 48–72 hours the plates were evaluated for microbial growth. RESULTS: 243 catheter connector hubs were cultured: 68 catheters were peripherally inserted central catheters, 60 were internal jugular venous lines, 93 were peripheral venous catheters, and 25 were others (femoral, subclavian, etc). 56 hubs (23.0%) yielded microbial growth. 176 of the hubs (71.5%) tested were in an ICU setting, and 70 (28.5%) were from an acute care ward. In comparing the luer lock system to the previously evaluated lever lock system, there was a reduced rate (P < .0001) of colonization. This reduction in the rate of colonization of the luer lock system was significant in the ICU (P < .0002). There was no difference seen in the colonization rate of the two systems in the acute care wards (P < .11). CONCLUSION: The luer lock system provided a significant reduction in colonization rates of catheters hubs, particularly in the ICU. However the observed 23% colonization rate remains unacceptably high. Causation of colonization is unable to be determined by this study. Given the potential for catheter hub colonization to increase the risk of CLABSI, the opportunity exists for further research. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5630928 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56309282017-11-07 Microbial Colonization of Intravenous Luer Lock Connector During Active Infusions Among Hospitalized Patients Hankins, Richard Majorant, Denisa Cavalieri, R Jennifer Lyden, Elizabeth Fey, Paul D Rupp, Mark E Cawcutt, Kelly Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Central line associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) result in patient morbidity and increased length of stay. While most CLABSI’s are due to extraluminal carriage of skin flora into the bloodstream, catheter hub colonization and intraluminal carriage remains a possible cause. We have previously evaluated a lever lock catheter in hospitalized patients, which had a 41.9% bacterial colonization rate. After replacing the lever lock system with a leur lock catheter system and passive port protector, we evaluated the colonization rate of this luer lock catheter system. METHODS: A prospective 3 day study was performed evaluating the microbial colonization of the luer lock system in hospitalized patients with active infusions. Infusions were assessed, and if not deemed critical or an antimicrobial, paused while the catheter connector hub was used to inoculate a blood agar plate. After 48–72 hours the plates were evaluated for microbial growth. RESULTS: 243 catheter connector hubs were cultured: 68 catheters were peripherally inserted central catheters, 60 were internal jugular venous lines, 93 were peripheral venous catheters, and 25 were others (femoral, subclavian, etc). 56 hubs (23.0%) yielded microbial growth. 176 of the hubs (71.5%) tested were in an ICU setting, and 70 (28.5%) were from an acute care ward. In comparing the luer lock system to the previously evaluated lever lock system, there was a reduced rate (P < .0001) of colonization. This reduction in the rate of colonization of the luer lock system was significant in the ICU (P < .0002). There was no difference seen in the colonization rate of the two systems in the acute care wards (P < .11). CONCLUSION: The luer lock system provided a significant reduction in colonization rates of catheters hubs, particularly in the ICU. However the observed 23% colonization rate remains unacceptably high. Causation of colonization is unable to be determined by this study. Given the potential for catheter hub colonization to increase the risk of CLABSI, the opportunity exists for further research. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2017-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5630928/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1684 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Abstracts Hankins, Richard Majorant, Denisa Cavalieri, R Jennifer Lyden, Elizabeth Fey, Paul D Rupp, Mark E Cawcutt, Kelly Microbial Colonization of Intravenous Luer Lock Connector During Active Infusions Among Hospitalized Patients |
title | Microbial Colonization of Intravenous Luer Lock Connector During Active Infusions Among Hospitalized Patients |
title_full | Microbial Colonization of Intravenous Luer Lock Connector During Active Infusions Among Hospitalized Patients |
title_fullStr | Microbial Colonization of Intravenous Luer Lock Connector During Active Infusions Among Hospitalized Patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Microbial Colonization of Intravenous Luer Lock Connector During Active Infusions Among Hospitalized Patients |
title_short | Microbial Colonization of Intravenous Luer Lock Connector During Active Infusions Among Hospitalized Patients |
title_sort | microbial colonization of intravenous luer lock connector during active infusions among hospitalized patients |
topic | Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5630928/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1684 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hankinsrichard microbialcolonizationofintravenousluerlockconnectorduringactiveinfusionsamonghospitalizedpatients AT majorantdenisa microbialcolonizationofintravenousluerlockconnectorduringactiveinfusionsamonghospitalizedpatients AT cavalierirjennifer microbialcolonizationofintravenousluerlockconnectorduringactiveinfusionsamonghospitalizedpatients AT lydenelizabeth microbialcolonizationofintravenousluerlockconnectorduringactiveinfusionsamonghospitalizedpatients AT feypauld microbialcolonizationofintravenousluerlockconnectorduringactiveinfusionsamonghospitalizedpatients AT ruppmarke microbialcolonizationofintravenousluerlockconnectorduringactiveinfusionsamonghospitalizedpatients AT cawcuttkelly microbialcolonizationofintravenousluerlockconnectorduringactiveinfusionsamonghospitalizedpatients |