Cargando…

Microbial Colonization of Intravenous Luer Lock Connector During Active Infusions Among Hospitalized Patients

BACKGROUND: Central line associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) result in patient morbidity and increased length of stay. While most CLABSI’s are due to extraluminal carriage of skin flora into the bloodstream, catheter hub colonization and intraluminal carriage remains a possible cause. We have...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hankins, Richard, Majorant, Denisa, Cavalieri, R Jennifer, Lyden, Elizabeth, Fey, Paul D, Rupp, Mark E, Cawcutt, Kelly
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5630928/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1684
_version_ 1783269327069249536
author Hankins, Richard
Majorant, Denisa
Cavalieri, R Jennifer
Lyden, Elizabeth
Fey, Paul D
Rupp, Mark E
Cawcutt, Kelly
author_facet Hankins, Richard
Majorant, Denisa
Cavalieri, R Jennifer
Lyden, Elizabeth
Fey, Paul D
Rupp, Mark E
Cawcutt, Kelly
author_sort Hankins, Richard
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Central line associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) result in patient morbidity and increased length of stay. While most CLABSI’s are due to extraluminal carriage of skin flora into the bloodstream, catheter hub colonization and intraluminal carriage remains a possible cause. We have previously evaluated a lever lock catheter in hospitalized patients, which had a 41.9% bacterial colonization rate. After replacing the lever lock system with a leur lock catheter system and passive port protector, we evaluated the colonization rate of this luer lock catheter system. METHODS: A prospective 3 day study was performed evaluating the microbial colonization of the luer lock system in hospitalized patients with active infusions. Infusions were assessed, and if not deemed critical or an antimicrobial, paused while the catheter connector hub was used to inoculate a blood agar plate. After 48–72 hours the plates were evaluated for microbial growth. RESULTS: 243 catheter connector hubs were cultured: 68 catheters were peripherally inserted central catheters, 60 were internal jugular venous lines, 93 were peripheral venous catheters, and 25 were others (femoral, subclavian, etc). 56 hubs (23.0%) yielded microbial growth. 176 of the hubs (71.5%) tested were in an ICU setting, and 70 (28.5%) were from an acute care ward. In comparing the luer lock system to the previously evaluated lever lock system, there was a reduced rate (P < .0001) of colonization. This reduction in the rate of colonization of the luer lock system was significant in the ICU (P < .0002). There was no difference seen in the colonization rate of the two systems in the acute care wards (P < .11). CONCLUSION: The luer lock system provided a significant reduction in colonization rates of catheters hubs, particularly in the ICU. However the observed 23% colonization rate remains unacceptably high. Causation of colonization is unable to be determined by this study. Given the potential for catheter hub colonization to increase the risk of CLABSI, the opportunity exists for further research. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5630928
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56309282017-11-07 Microbial Colonization of Intravenous Luer Lock Connector During Active Infusions Among Hospitalized Patients Hankins, Richard Majorant, Denisa Cavalieri, R Jennifer Lyden, Elizabeth Fey, Paul D Rupp, Mark E Cawcutt, Kelly Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Central line associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) result in patient morbidity and increased length of stay. While most CLABSI’s are due to extraluminal carriage of skin flora into the bloodstream, catheter hub colonization and intraluminal carriage remains a possible cause. We have previously evaluated a lever lock catheter in hospitalized patients, which had a 41.9% bacterial colonization rate. After replacing the lever lock system with a leur lock catheter system and passive port protector, we evaluated the colonization rate of this luer lock catheter system. METHODS: A prospective 3 day study was performed evaluating the microbial colonization of the luer lock system in hospitalized patients with active infusions. Infusions were assessed, and if not deemed critical or an antimicrobial, paused while the catheter connector hub was used to inoculate a blood agar plate. After 48–72 hours the plates were evaluated for microbial growth. RESULTS: 243 catheter connector hubs were cultured: 68 catheters were peripherally inserted central catheters, 60 were internal jugular venous lines, 93 were peripheral venous catheters, and 25 were others (femoral, subclavian, etc). 56 hubs (23.0%) yielded microbial growth. 176 of the hubs (71.5%) tested were in an ICU setting, and 70 (28.5%) were from an acute care ward. In comparing the luer lock system to the previously evaluated lever lock system, there was a reduced rate (P < .0001) of colonization. This reduction in the rate of colonization of the luer lock system was significant in the ICU (P < .0002). There was no difference seen in the colonization rate of the two systems in the acute care wards (P < .11). CONCLUSION: The luer lock system provided a significant reduction in colonization rates of catheters hubs, particularly in the ICU. However the observed 23% colonization rate remains unacceptably high. Causation of colonization is unable to be determined by this study. Given the potential for catheter hub colonization to increase the risk of CLABSI, the opportunity exists for further research. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2017-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5630928/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1684 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Hankins, Richard
Majorant, Denisa
Cavalieri, R Jennifer
Lyden, Elizabeth
Fey, Paul D
Rupp, Mark E
Cawcutt, Kelly
Microbial Colonization of Intravenous Luer Lock Connector During Active Infusions Among Hospitalized Patients
title Microbial Colonization of Intravenous Luer Lock Connector During Active Infusions Among Hospitalized Patients
title_full Microbial Colonization of Intravenous Luer Lock Connector During Active Infusions Among Hospitalized Patients
title_fullStr Microbial Colonization of Intravenous Luer Lock Connector During Active Infusions Among Hospitalized Patients
title_full_unstemmed Microbial Colonization of Intravenous Luer Lock Connector During Active Infusions Among Hospitalized Patients
title_short Microbial Colonization of Intravenous Luer Lock Connector During Active Infusions Among Hospitalized Patients
title_sort microbial colonization of intravenous luer lock connector during active infusions among hospitalized patients
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5630928/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1684
work_keys_str_mv AT hankinsrichard microbialcolonizationofintravenousluerlockconnectorduringactiveinfusionsamonghospitalizedpatients
AT majorantdenisa microbialcolonizationofintravenousluerlockconnectorduringactiveinfusionsamonghospitalizedpatients
AT cavalierirjennifer microbialcolonizationofintravenousluerlockconnectorduringactiveinfusionsamonghospitalizedpatients
AT lydenelizabeth microbialcolonizationofintravenousluerlockconnectorduringactiveinfusionsamonghospitalizedpatients
AT feypauld microbialcolonizationofintravenousluerlockconnectorduringactiveinfusionsamonghospitalizedpatients
AT ruppmarke microbialcolonizationofintravenousluerlockconnectorduringactiveinfusionsamonghospitalizedpatients
AT cawcuttkelly microbialcolonizationofintravenousluerlockconnectorduringactiveinfusionsamonghospitalizedpatients