Cargando…
Vibrio cholerae Detection by the FilmArray® Gastrointestinal (GI) Panel
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to investigate reported false positive FilmArray GI Panel detections of V. cholerae in clinical patient samples. The gold standard for recovery of V. cholerae is routine stool culture. The FilmArray GI Panel contains two sensitive PCR assays for the detectio...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5630929/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1588 |
_version_ | 1783269327335587840 |
---|---|
author | Clarke, Kimon Ton, Han Bridon, Isabelle Rogatcheva, Margarita Demogines, Ann Henderson, Dave Saif, Dana Kanack, Kristen |
author_facet | Clarke, Kimon Ton, Han Bridon, Isabelle Rogatcheva, Margarita Demogines, Ann Henderson, Dave Saif, Dana Kanack, Kristen |
author_sort | Clarke, Kimon |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to investigate reported false positive FilmArray GI Panel detections of V. cholerae in clinical patient samples. The gold standard for recovery of V. cholerae is routine stool culture. The FilmArray GI Panel contains two sensitive PCR assays for the detection of V. cholerae; one targets the gyrB gene for genus-level Vibrio identification (focused on detection of V. parahaemolyticus, V. vulnificus, and V. cholerae) and the second targets the toxR gene for specific identification of V. cholerae. METHODS: Clinical samples with discordant V. cholerae detections were requested from source laboratories and then tested on the FilmArray GI Panel. Amplicons from positive samples were extracted, sequenced, and assessed using BLAST search. RESULTS: A total of 14 samples were tested during this study. Three re-tested samples were reported positive for V. cholerae. One sample was confirmed as V. cholerae by the presence of V. cholerae specific gyrB and toxR gene sequences. A second sample was confirmed to be either Vibrio alginolyticus or Vibrio diabolicus by gyrB gene sequence and possessed a 100% homolog to the V. cholerae specific toxR gene. The third sample was confirmed to contain two species of Vibrio: V. cholerae and V. parahaemolyticus. This sample was also confirmed to have the V. cholerae specific toxR gene sequence. The remaining 11 samples resulted in a negative V. cholerae result upon retesting. CONCLUSION: The investigation confirmed that the FilmArray GI Panel can detect low level V. cholerae organism not recovered by culture. Studies have shown that isolating V. cholerae through specialized media can prove difficult. V. cholerae causing vibriosis can be food-borne or acquired through exposure to affected bodies of water, marine wildlife, or seafood. We found two rare cases, one with the non-cholerae Vibrio species possessing a V. cholerae specific homolog to the toxR regulon and the one novel detection of a co-infection involving two Vibrio species. These data suggest that there will be an increase in Vibrio detections as molecular methods are more sensitive than culture and become much more common for gastrointestinal pathogen testing. DISCLOSURES: K. Clarke, BioFire Diagnostics, LLC: Employee, Salary;
M. Rogatcheva, BioFire Diagnostics, LLC: Employee, Salary; A. Demogines, BioFire Diagnostics, LLC: Employee, Salary; D. Henderson, BioFire Diagnostics, LLC: Employee, Salary; D. Saif, BioFire Diagnostics, LLC: Employee, Salary; K. Kanack, BioFire Diagnostics, LLC: Employee, Salary |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5630929 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56309292017-11-07 Vibrio cholerae Detection by the FilmArray® Gastrointestinal (GI) Panel Clarke, Kimon Ton, Han Bridon, Isabelle Rogatcheva, Margarita Demogines, Ann Henderson, Dave Saif, Dana Kanack, Kristen Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to investigate reported false positive FilmArray GI Panel detections of V. cholerae in clinical patient samples. The gold standard for recovery of V. cholerae is routine stool culture. The FilmArray GI Panel contains two sensitive PCR assays for the detection of V. cholerae; one targets the gyrB gene for genus-level Vibrio identification (focused on detection of V. parahaemolyticus, V. vulnificus, and V. cholerae) and the second targets the toxR gene for specific identification of V. cholerae. METHODS: Clinical samples with discordant V. cholerae detections were requested from source laboratories and then tested on the FilmArray GI Panel. Amplicons from positive samples were extracted, sequenced, and assessed using BLAST search. RESULTS: A total of 14 samples were tested during this study. Three re-tested samples were reported positive for V. cholerae. One sample was confirmed as V. cholerae by the presence of V. cholerae specific gyrB and toxR gene sequences. A second sample was confirmed to be either Vibrio alginolyticus or Vibrio diabolicus by gyrB gene sequence and possessed a 100% homolog to the V. cholerae specific toxR gene. The third sample was confirmed to contain two species of Vibrio: V. cholerae and V. parahaemolyticus. This sample was also confirmed to have the V. cholerae specific toxR gene sequence. The remaining 11 samples resulted in a negative V. cholerae result upon retesting. CONCLUSION: The investigation confirmed that the FilmArray GI Panel can detect low level V. cholerae organism not recovered by culture. Studies have shown that isolating V. cholerae through specialized media can prove difficult. V. cholerae causing vibriosis can be food-borne or acquired through exposure to affected bodies of water, marine wildlife, or seafood. We found two rare cases, one with the non-cholerae Vibrio species possessing a V. cholerae specific homolog to the toxR regulon and the one novel detection of a co-infection involving two Vibrio species. These data suggest that there will be an increase in Vibrio detections as molecular methods are more sensitive than culture and become much more common for gastrointestinal pathogen testing. DISCLOSURES: K. Clarke, BioFire Diagnostics, LLC: Employee, Salary;
M. Rogatcheva, BioFire Diagnostics, LLC: Employee, Salary; A. Demogines, BioFire Diagnostics, LLC: Employee, Salary; D. Henderson, BioFire Diagnostics, LLC: Employee, Salary; D. Saif, BioFire Diagnostics, LLC: Employee, Salary; K. Kanack, BioFire Diagnostics, LLC: Employee, Salary Oxford University Press 2017-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5630929/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1588 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Abstracts Clarke, Kimon Ton, Han Bridon, Isabelle Rogatcheva, Margarita Demogines, Ann Henderson, Dave Saif, Dana Kanack, Kristen Vibrio cholerae Detection by the FilmArray® Gastrointestinal (GI) Panel |
title |
Vibrio cholerae Detection by the FilmArray® Gastrointestinal (GI) Panel |
title_full |
Vibrio cholerae Detection by the FilmArray® Gastrointestinal (GI) Panel |
title_fullStr |
Vibrio cholerae Detection by the FilmArray® Gastrointestinal (GI) Panel |
title_full_unstemmed |
Vibrio cholerae Detection by the FilmArray® Gastrointestinal (GI) Panel |
title_short |
Vibrio cholerae Detection by the FilmArray® Gastrointestinal (GI) Panel |
title_sort | vibrio cholerae detection by the filmarray® gastrointestinal (gi) panel |
topic | Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5630929/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1588 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT clarkekimon vibriocholeraedetectionbythefilmarraygastrointestinalgipanel AT tonhan vibriocholeraedetectionbythefilmarraygastrointestinalgipanel AT bridonisabelle vibriocholeraedetectionbythefilmarraygastrointestinalgipanel AT rogatchevamargarita vibriocholeraedetectionbythefilmarraygastrointestinalgipanel AT demoginesann vibriocholeraedetectionbythefilmarraygastrointestinalgipanel AT hendersondave vibriocholeraedetectionbythefilmarraygastrointestinalgipanel AT saifdana vibriocholeraedetectionbythefilmarraygastrointestinalgipanel AT kanackkristen vibriocholeraedetectionbythefilmarraygastrointestinalgipanel |