Cargando…

In vivo Pharmacodynamic Evaluation of Omadacycline (PTK 0796) against Staphylococcus aureus (SA) in the Murine Thigh Infection Model

BACKGROUND: Omadacycline is a novel aminomethylcycline antibiotic in development for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infection (ABSSSI) and community acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP). The goal of the study was to determine the PK/PD targets in the murine thigh infection model against a di...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lepak, Alexander J, Zhao, Miao, Marchillo, Karen, VanHecker, Jamie, Andes, David R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5630942/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1227
_version_ 1783269330588270592
author Lepak, Alexander J
Zhao, Miao
Marchillo, Karen
VanHecker, Jamie
Andes, David R
author_facet Lepak, Alexander J
Zhao, Miao
Marchillo, Karen
VanHecker, Jamie
Andes, David R
author_sort Lepak, Alexander J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Omadacycline is a novel aminomethylcycline antibiotic in development for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infection (ABSSSI) and community acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP). The goal of the study was to determine the PK/PD targets in the murine thigh infection model against a diverse group of SA pathogens including MRSA. METHODS: 10 SA strains (4 MSSA, 6 MRSA) were utilized. MICs were determined using CLSI methods. Single dose murine plasma PK was previously determined in our lab and used for PK/PD analyses. The neutropenic murine thigh infection model was utilized for all treatment studies and drug dosing was by subcutaneous route. Four-fold increasing doses of omadacycline (0.25–64 mg/kg) were administered q12h to groups of mice infected with each strain. Treatment outcome was measured by determining organism burden in the thighs (CFU) at the end of each experiment (24 hours). The Emax Hill equation was used to model the dose–response data to the PK/PD index AUC/MIC. The magnitude of the PK/PD index AUC/MIC associated with net stasis and 1-log kill were determined in the thigh model for all strains. RESULTS: MICs ranged from 0.25–0.5 mg/L. At the start of therapy, mice had 7.1 ± 0.3 log(10) CFU/thigh. In control mice, the organism burden increased 2.3 ± 0.3 log(10) CFU/thigh over 24 hours. There was a relatively steep dose–response relationship observed with escalating doses of omadacycline. Maximal organism reductions were 4–5 log(10) CFU/thigh compared with untreated controls. Stasis and 1 log-kill (from start of therapy) was observed against each strain. The AUC/MIC magnitude associated with stasis and 1-log kill endpoints are shown in the table. CONCLUSION: Omadacycline demonstrated in vivo potency against a diverse group of SA pathogens including MRSA strains. Stasis 24 hours AUC/MIC targets were approximately 24. This is very similar to previous studies of omadacycline against S. pneumoniae (stasis AUC/MIC 18) and other PK/PD evaluations of tetracycline-class antibiotics. 1-log kill targets were only 2–3 fold more than stasis targets for each strain. This data should provide useful in the dose-regimen optimization of omadacycline. DISCLOSURES: D. R. Andes, Paratek: Grant Investigator, Research support
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5630942
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56309422017-11-07 In vivo Pharmacodynamic Evaluation of Omadacycline (PTK 0796) against Staphylococcus aureus (SA) in the Murine Thigh Infection Model Lepak, Alexander J Zhao, Miao Marchillo, Karen VanHecker, Jamie Andes, David R Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Omadacycline is a novel aminomethylcycline antibiotic in development for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infection (ABSSSI) and community acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP). The goal of the study was to determine the PK/PD targets in the murine thigh infection model against a diverse group of SA pathogens including MRSA. METHODS: 10 SA strains (4 MSSA, 6 MRSA) were utilized. MICs were determined using CLSI methods. Single dose murine plasma PK was previously determined in our lab and used for PK/PD analyses. The neutropenic murine thigh infection model was utilized for all treatment studies and drug dosing was by subcutaneous route. Four-fold increasing doses of omadacycline (0.25–64 mg/kg) were administered q12h to groups of mice infected with each strain. Treatment outcome was measured by determining organism burden in the thighs (CFU) at the end of each experiment (24 hours). The Emax Hill equation was used to model the dose–response data to the PK/PD index AUC/MIC. The magnitude of the PK/PD index AUC/MIC associated with net stasis and 1-log kill were determined in the thigh model for all strains. RESULTS: MICs ranged from 0.25–0.5 mg/L. At the start of therapy, mice had 7.1 ± 0.3 log(10) CFU/thigh. In control mice, the organism burden increased 2.3 ± 0.3 log(10) CFU/thigh over 24 hours. There was a relatively steep dose–response relationship observed with escalating doses of omadacycline. Maximal organism reductions were 4–5 log(10) CFU/thigh compared with untreated controls. Stasis and 1 log-kill (from start of therapy) was observed against each strain. The AUC/MIC magnitude associated with stasis and 1-log kill endpoints are shown in the table. CONCLUSION: Omadacycline demonstrated in vivo potency against a diverse group of SA pathogens including MRSA strains. Stasis 24 hours AUC/MIC targets were approximately 24. This is very similar to previous studies of omadacycline against S. pneumoniae (stasis AUC/MIC 18) and other PK/PD evaluations of tetracycline-class antibiotics. 1-log kill targets were only 2–3 fold more than stasis targets for each strain. This data should provide useful in the dose-regimen optimization of omadacycline. DISCLOSURES: D. R. Andes, Paratek: Grant Investigator, Research support Oxford University Press 2017-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5630942/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1227 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Lepak, Alexander J
Zhao, Miao
Marchillo, Karen
VanHecker, Jamie
Andes, David R
In vivo Pharmacodynamic Evaluation of Omadacycline (PTK 0796) against Staphylococcus aureus (SA) in the Murine Thigh Infection Model
title In vivo Pharmacodynamic Evaluation of Omadacycline (PTK 0796) against Staphylococcus aureus (SA) in the Murine Thigh Infection Model
title_full In vivo Pharmacodynamic Evaluation of Omadacycline (PTK 0796) against Staphylococcus aureus (SA) in the Murine Thigh Infection Model
title_fullStr In vivo Pharmacodynamic Evaluation of Omadacycline (PTK 0796) against Staphylococcus aureus (SA) in the Murine Thigh Infection Model
title_full_unstemmed In vivo Pharmacodynamic Evaluation of Omadacycline (PTK 0796) against Staphylococcus aureus (SA) in the Murine Thigh Infection Model
title_short In vivo Pharmacodynamic Evaluation of Omadacycline (PTK 0796) against Staphylococcus aureus (SA) in the Murine Thigh Infection Model
title_sort in vivo pharmacodynamic evaluation of omadacycline (ptk 0796) against staphylococcus aureus (sa) in the murine thigh infection model
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5630942/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1227
work_keys_str_mv AT lepakalexanderj invivopharmacodynamicevaluationofomadacyclineptk0796againststaphylococcusaureussainthemurinethighinfectionmodel
AT zhaomiao invivopharmacodynamicevaluationofomadacyclineptk0796againststaphylococcusaureussainthemurinethighinfectionmodel
AT marchillokaren invivopharmacodynamicevaluationofomadacyclineptk0796againststaphylococcusaureussainthemurinethighinfectionmodel
AT vanheckerjamie invivopharmacodynamicevaluationofomadacyclineptk0796againststaphylococcusaureussainthemurinethighinfectionmodel
AT andesdavidr invivopharmacodynamicevaluationofomadacyclineptk0796againststaphylococcusaureussainthemurinethighinfectionmodel