Cargando…

Is More Always Better? Effect of a Combination Pseudomonas Antibiogram on Levofloxacin Use and Patient Outcomes for Pneumonia in a Large Community Hospital

BACKGROUND: Evidence suggests that combination therapy for Pseudomonas pneumonia only provides mortality benefit in critically ill patients. In November 2015, the Antimicrobial Stewardship Subcommittee at Baptist Memorial Hospital-Memphis (BMH-Memphis) developed a combination Pseudomonasantibiogram...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: V. Hobbs, Athena L, Afoakwa, Benjamin, Casey, Benjamin, Zhorne, Maria
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5631010/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1282
_version_ 1783269347197714432
author V. Hobbs, Athena L
Afoakwa, Benjamin
Casey, Benjamin
Zhorne, Maria
author_facet V. Hobbs, Athena L
Afoakwa, Benjamin
Casey, Benjamin
Zhorne, Maria
author_sort V. Hobbs, Athena L
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Evidence suggests that combination therapy for Pseudomonas pneumonia only provides mortality benefit in critically ill patients. In November 2015, the Antimicrobial Stewardship Subcommittee at Baptist Memorial Hospital-Memphis (BMH-Memphis) developed a combination Pseudomonasantibiogram and guideline, based on local susceptibilities, for critically ill patients with Hospital Acquired Pneumonia (HAP), Health Care Associated Pneumonia (HCAP), or Ventilator Associated Pneumonia (VAP). METHODS: This is a single center, retrospective study evaluating patients admitted to the BMH-Memphis medical intensive care unit (MICU) and surgical intensive care unit (SICU) with a diagnosis-related group (DRG) code for HAP, HCAP, or VAP.The primary objective of this study was to compare levofloxacin days of therapy per 1000 patient-days (DOT/1000 patient-days) before and after implementation of the combination Pseudomonas antibiogram guideline at BMH-Memphis. Secondary objectives included a comparison of individual levofloxacin orders, 30-day mortality, hospital length of stay (LOS), ICU LOS, 90-day incidence of extended spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs), and 30-day readmission rates and incidence of Clostridium difficile. Adverse events including acute kidney injury and QTc prolongation were also evaluated pre- and post-implementation of the guideline. RESULTS: A total 150 patients were included in this study to meet power for the primary objective. Levofloxacin DOT/1000 patient-days was reduced by 3.4 days in the post-implementation period (P < 0.001) with a 63% reduction in individual levofloxacin orders (P < 0.001). Furthermore, there were significantly lower 30-day mortality rates in the post-implementation period, which persisted in a multivariate logistic regression analysis (P = 0.01). There was no difference in hospital or ICU LOS, 30 day readmission rates or incidence of Clostridium difficile,or 90-day incidence of ESBLs. There was also no difference in adverse events between the two study periods. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that the implementation of a combination anti-pseudomonal guideline can decrease levofloxacin use while reducing 30-day mortality rates without increasing hospital or ICU LOS. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5631010
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56310102017-11-07 Is More Always Better? Effect of a Combination Pseudomonas Antibiogram on Levofloxacin Use and Patient Outcomes for Pneumonia in a Large Community Hospital V. Hobbs, Athena L Afoakwa, Benjamin Casey, Benjamin Zhorne, Maria Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Evidence suggests that combination therapy for Pseudomonas pneumonia only provides mortality benefit in critically ill patients. In November 2015, the Antimicrobial Stewardship Subcommittee at Baptist Memorial Hospital-Memphis (BMH-Memphis) developed a combination Pseudomonasantibiogram and guideline, based on local susceptibilities, for critically ill patients with Hospital Acquired Pneumonia (HAP), Health Care Associated Pneumonia (HCAP), or Ventilator Associated Pneumonia (VAP). METHODS: This is a single center, retrospective study evaluating patients admitted to the BMH-Memphis medical intensive care unit (MICU) and surgical intensive care unit (SICU) with a diagnosis-related group (DRG) code for HAP, HCAP, or VAP.The primary objective of this study was to compare levofloxacin days of therapy per 1000 patient-days (DOT/1000 patient-days) before and after implementation of the combination Pseudomonas antibiogram guideline at BMH-Memphis. Secondary objectives included a comparison of individual levofloxacin orders, 30-day mortality, hospital length of stay (LOS), ICU LOS, 90-day incidence of extended spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs), and 30-day readmission rates and incidence of Clostridium difficile. Adverse events including acute kidney injury and QTc prolongation were also evaluated pre- and post-implementation of the guideline. RESULTS: A total 150 patients were included in this study to meet power for the primary objective. Levofloxacin DOT/1000 patient-days was reduced by 3.4 days in the post-implementation period (P < 0.001) with a 63% reduction in individual levofloxacin orders (P < 0.001). Furthermore, there were significantly lower 30-day mortality rates in the post-implementation period, which persisted in a multivariate logistic regression analysis (P = 0.01). There was no difference in hospital or ICU LOS, 30 day readmission rates or incidence of Clostridium difficile,or 90-day incidence of ESBLs. There was also no difference in adverse events between the two study periods. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that the implementation of a combination anti-pseudomonal guideline can decrease levofloxacin use while reducing 30-day mortality rates without increasing hospital or ICU LOS. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2017-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5631010/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1282 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
V. Hobbs, Athena L
Afoakwa, Benjamin
Casey, Benjamin
Zhorne, Maria
Is More Always Better? Effect of a Combination Pseudomonas Antibiogram on Levofloxacin Use and Patient Outcomes for Pneumonia in a Large Community Hospital
title Is More Always Better? Effect of a Combination Pseudomonas Antibiogram on Levofloxacin Use and Patient Outcomes for Pneumonia in a Large Community Hospital
title_full Is More Always Better? Effect of a Combination Pseudomonas Antibiogram on Levofloxacin Use and Patient Outcomes for Pneumonia in a Large Community Hospital
title_fullStr Is More Always Better? Effect of a Combination Pseudomonas Antibiogram on Levofloxacin Use and Patient Outcomes for Pneumonia in a Large Community Hospital
title_full_unstemmed Is More Always Better? Effect of a Combination Pseudomonas Antibiogram on Levofloxacin Use and Patient Outcomes for Pneumonia in a Large Community Hospital
title_short Is More Always Better? Effect of a Combination Pseudomonas Antibiogram on Levofloxacin Use and Patient Outcomes for Pneumonia in a Large Community Hospital
title_sort is more always better? effect of a combination pseudomonas antibiogram on levofloxacin use and patient outcomes for pneumonia in a large community hospital
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5631010/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1282
work_keys_str_mv AT vhobbsathenal ismorealwaysbettereffectofacombinationpseudomonasantibiogramonlevofloxacinuseandpatientoutcomesforpneumoniainalargecommunityhospital
AT afoakwabenjamin ismorealwaysbettereffectofacombinationpseudomonasantibiogramonlevofloxacinuseandpatientoutcomesforpneumoniainalargecommunityhospital
AT caseybenjamin ismorealwaysbettereffectofacombinationpseudomonasantibiogramonlevofloxacinuseandpatientoutcomesforpneumoniainalargecommunityhospital
AT zhornemaria ismorealwaysbettereffectofacombinationpseudomonasantibiogramonlevofloxacinuseandpatientoutcomesforpneumoniainalargecommunityhospital