Cargando…

The Relationship Between Payer and Risk of Surgical Site Infection Following Cesarean Delivery

BACKGROUND: Both Medicaid and private health insurance support important access to care for many pregnant women in the United States. The role of health insurance on many outcomes, such as surgical site infection (SSI) following Cesarean delivery (CD), has not been adequately investigated. METHODS:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yi, Sarah H, Perkins, Kiran Mayi, Kazakova, Sophia, Hatfield, Kelly, Kleinbaum, David, Baggs, James, Slayton, Rachel B, Jernigan, John A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5631013/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1731
_version_ 1783269348018749440
author Yi, Sarah H
Perkins, Kiran Mayi
Kazakova, Sophia
Hatfield, Kelly
Kleinbaum, David
Baggs, James
Slayton, Rachel B
Jernigan, John A
author_facet Yi, Sarah H
Perkins, Kiran Mayi
Kazakova, Sophia
Hatfield, Kelly
Kleinbaum, David
Baggs, James
Slayton, Rachel B
Jernigan, John A
author_sort Yi, Sarah H
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Both Medicaid and private health insurance support important access to care for many pregnant women in the United States. The role of health insurance on many outcomes, such as surgical site infection (SSI) following Cesarean delivery (CD), has not been adequately investigated. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study investigated SSI risk following CDs performed in California hospitals in 2011 among women covered by Medicaid or private health insurance. All CDs were obtained from identifiable state inpatient discharge (SID) data and linked with National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) data to ascertain post-delivery SSI. Characteristics including age, race/ethnicity, BMI, prior CD planned admission, emergency CD, active labor and labor duration, ASA physical status, general anesthesia, wound class, hospital ownership, hospital annual CD count, intern/resident-to-bed ratio, case mix index, disproportionate share adjustment, urban location, and area wage index were obtained from CMS facility, NHSN, and SID data. Potential effect modification of the payer-SSI relationship was assessed using a multivariable logistic regression model. RESULTS: 90% of eligible NHSN records linked with a SID record. The analytic dataset consisted of 387 SSIs following 57,143 CDs performed in 196 hospitals. Payer distribution across CDs was 49% Medicaid, 51% private insurer. SSIs were reported following 0.74% of CDs among Medicaid recipients and 0.62% among those privately insured (unadjusted risk ratio: 1.2, 95% confidence interval: 1.0–1.5, P = 0.09). In for-profit hospitals women with Medicaid had a 2.6-fold (95% CI: 1.2–5.4, P = 0.01) increase in adjusted SSI risk compared with women with private insurance. There were no differences in adjusted SSI risk by payer in government (RR: 1.1, 95% CI 0.7–1.8, P = 0.92) or not-for-profit hospitals (RR: 0.9, 95% CI 0.7–1.2, P = 0.52). CONCLUSION: Despite accounting for various patient and facility-level factors, Medicaid-insured women experienced higher SSI risk than privately-insured women in for-profit hospitals, but not in government owned or not-for-profit hospitals. Additional studies to understand underlying causes may help target efforts to prevent SSIs following CDs among vulnerable patients. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5631013
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56310132017-11-07 The Relationship Between Payer and Risk of Surgical Site Infection Following Cesarean Delivery Yi, Sarah H Perkins, Kiran Mayi Kazakova, Sophia Hatfield, Kelly Kleinbaum, David Baggs, James Slayton, Rachel B Jernigan, John A Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Both Medicaid and private health insurance support important access to care for many pregnant women in the United States. The role of health insurance on many outcomes, such as surgical site infection (SSI) following Cesarean delivery (CD), has not been adequately investigated. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study investigated SSI risk following CDs performed in California hospitals in 2011 among women covered by Medicaid or private health insurance. All CDs were obtained from identifiable state inpatient discharge (SID) data and linked with National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) data to ascertain post-delivery SSI. Characteristics including age, race/ethnicity, BMI, prior CD planned admission, emergency CD, active labor and labor duration, ASA physical status, general anesthesia, wound class, hospital ownership, hospital annual CD count, intern/resident-to-bed ratio, case mix index, disproportionate share adjustment, urban location, and area wage index were obtained from CMS facility, NHSN, and SID data. Potential effect modification of the payer-SSI relationship was assessed using a multivariable logistic regression model. RESULTS: 90% of eligible NHSN records linked with a SID record. The analytic dataset consisted of 387 SSIs following 57,143 CDs performed in 196 hospitals. Payer distribution across CDs was 49% Medicaid, 51% private insurer. SSIs were reported following 0.74% of CDs among Medicaid recipients and 0.62% among those privately insured (unadjusted risk ratio: 1.2, 95% confidence interval: 1.0–1.5, P = 0.09). In for-profit hospitals women with Medicaid had a 2.6-fold (95% CI: 1.2–5.4, P = 0.01) increase in adjusted SSI risk compared with women with private insurance. There were no differences in adjusted SSI risk by payer in government (RR: 1.1, 95% CI 0.7–1.8, P = 0.92) or not-for-profit hospitals (RR: 0.9, 95% CI 0.7–1.2, P = 0.52). CONCLUSION: Despite accounting for various patient and facility-level factors, Medicaid-insured women experienced higher SSI risk than privately-insured women in for-profit hospitals, but not in government owned or not-for-profit hospitals. Additional studies to understand underlying causes may help target efforts to prevent SSIs following CDs among vulnerable patients. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2017-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5631013/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1731 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Yi, Sarah H
Perkins, Kiran Mayi
Kazakova, Sophia
Hatfield, Kelly
Kleinbaum, David
Baggs, James
Slayton, Rachel B
Jernigan, John A
The Relationship Between Payer and Risk of Surgical Site Infection Following Cesarean Delivery
title The Relationship Between Payer and Risk of Surgical Site Infection Following Cesarean Delivery
title_full The Relationship Between Payer and Risk of Surgical Site Infection Following Cesarean Delivery
title_fullStr The Relationship Between Payer and Risk of Surgical Site Infection Following Cesarean Delivery
title_full_unstemmed The Relationship Between Payer and Risk of Surgical Site Infection Following Cesarean Delivery
title_short The Relationship Between Payer and Risk of Surgical Site Infection Following Cesarean Delivery
title_sort relationship between payer and risk of surgical site infection following cesarean delivery
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5631013/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1731
work_keys_str_mv AT yisarahh therelationshipbetweenpayerandriskofsurgicalsiteinfectionfollowingcesareandelivery
AT perkinskiranmayi therelationshipbetweenpayerandriskofsurgicalsiteinfectionfollowingcesareandelivery
AT kazakovasophia therelationshipbetweenpayerandriskofsurgicalsiteinfectionfollowingcesareandelivery
AT hatfieldkelly therelationshipbetweenpayerandriskofsurgicalsiteinfectionfollowingcesareandelivery
AT kleinbaumdavid therelationshipbetweenpayerandriskofsurgicalsiteinfectionfollowingcesareandelivery
AT baggsjames therelationshipbetweenpayerandriskofsurgicalsiteinfectionfollowingcesareandelivery
AT slaytonrachelb therelationshipbetweenpayerandriskofsurgicalsiteinfectionfollowingcesareandelivery
AT jerniganjohna therelationshipbetweenpayerandriskofsurgicalsiteinfectionfollowingcesareandelivery
AT yisarahh relationshipbetweenpayerandriskofsurgicalsiteinfectionfollowingcesareandelivery
AT perkinskiranmayi relationshipbetweenpayerandriskofsurgicalsiteinfectionfollowingcesareandelivery
AT kazakovasophia relationshipbetweenpayerandriskofsurgicalsiteinfectionfollowingcesareandelivery
AT hatfieldkelly relationshipbetweenpayerandriskofsurgicalsiteinfectionfollowingcesareandelivery
AT kleinbaumdavid relationshipbetweenpayerandriskofsurgicalsiteinfectionfollowingcesareandelivery
AT baggsjames relationshipbetweenpayerandriskofsurgicalsiteinfectionfollowingcesareandelivery
AT slaytonrachelb relationshipbetweenpayerandriskofsurgicalsiteinfectionfollowingcesareandelivery
AT jerniganjohna relationshipbetweenpayerandriskofsurgicalsiteinfectionfollowingcesareandelivery