Cargando…

Electronic Hand Hygiene Monitoring: A Tool to Drive Improvement and Measure Impact

BACKGROUND: Hand hygiene (HH) is a basic principle of infection control, yet national HH adherence rates are only 40%. Challenges to improving HH rates include finding effective ways to promote and sustain change and collecting unbiased observations to measure the success of interventions. Our insti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Knepper, Bryan, Miller, Amber, Reese, Sara, Kurtz, Jennifer, Stella, Sarah, Young, Heather
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5631023/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1021
_version_ 1783269350215516160
author Knepper, Bryan
Miller, Amber
Reese, Sara
Kurtz, Jennifer
Stella, Sarah
Young, Heather
author_facet Knepper, Bryan
Miller, Amber
Reese, Sara
Kurtz, Jennifer
Stella, Sarah
Young, Heather
author_sort Knepper, Bryan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Hand hygiene (HH) is a basic principle of infection control, yet national HH adherence rates are only 40%. Challenges to improving HH rates include finding effective ways to promote and sustain change and collecting unbiased observations to measure the success of interventions. Our institution implemented an electronic HH (eHH) monitoring system on select hospital units with the goal of using this technology to both improve and measure HH rates. METHODS: In Apr 2016, Denver Health installed the HillRom Hand Hygiene Compliance Solution in 4 inpatient units (2 adult wards, 1 intensive care unit, and 1 progressive care unit). Sensors were installed on all HH dispensers and at the thresholds of patient rooms on the units. Registered nurses and certified nursing assistants wear badges that track HH upon entry and exit from the room. Appropriate eHH was defined as the use of waterless hand sanitizer or soap within 60 seconds before or after entering or exiting a room. Baseline data was collected for 2 months; a series of interventions, including public recognition of top performers, private individualized feedback, and posters emphasizing social pressures, were undertaken beginning in June 2016 (Figure 1). Descriptive statistics, chi-squared tests, and interrupted time series analyses were used to analyze the data. RESULTS: The median number of total daily observations was 4083 (IQR 3801–4437). The mean eHH adherence rate in the baseline period (Apr/May 2016) was 46% (IQR 44%-49%) and increased to 76% (IQR 75%-78%) in Mar 2017. Over the study period, there was a significant decreasing trend in the proportion of nurses with eHH rates <50% (P < 0.0001, Figure 2) and a significant increasing trend in the proportion of nurses with eHH rates ≥80% on all units (P < 0.0001, Figure 3). CONCLUSION: eHH provides thousands of objective observations per day. eHH rates improved over the study period both due to an increase in nurses with eHH ≥80% and a decrease in the proportion of nurses with eHH <50%. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5631023
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56310232017-11-07 Electronic Hand Hygiene Monitoring: A Tool to Drive Improvement and Measure Impact Knepper, Bryan Miller, Amber Reese, Sara Kurtz, Jennifer Stella, Sarah Young, Heather Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Hand hygiene (HH) is a basic principle of infection control, yet national HH adherence rates are only 40%. Challenges to improving HH rates include finding effective ways to promote and sustain change and collecting unbiased observations to measure the success of interventions. Our institution implemented an electronic HH (eHH) monitoring system on select hospital units with the goal of using this technology to both improve and measure HH rates. METHODS: In Apr 2016, Denver Health installed the HillRom Hand Hygiene Compliance Solution in 4 inpatient units (2 adult wards, 1 intensive care unit, and 1 progressive care unit). Sensors were installed on all HH dispensers and at the thresholds of patient rooms on the units. Registered nurses and certified nursing assistants wear badges that track HH upon entry and exit from the room. Appropriate eHH was defined as the use of waterless hand sanitizer or soap within 60 seconds before or after entering or exiting a room. Baseline data was collected for 2 months; a series of interventions, including public recognition of top performers, private individualized feedback, and posters emphasizing social pressures, were undertaken beginning in June 2016 (Figure 1). Descriptive statistics, chi-squared tests, and interrupted time series analyses were used to analyze the data. RESULTS: The median number of total daily observations was 4083 (IQR 3801–4437). The mean eHH adherence rate in the baseline period (Apr/May 2016) was 46% (IQR 44%-49%) and increased to 76% (IQR 75%-78%) in Mar 2017. Over the study period, there was a significant decreasing trend in the proportion of nurses with eHH rates <50% (P < 0.0001, Figure 2) and a significant increasing trend in the proportion of nurses with eHH rates ≥80% on all units (P < 0.0001, Figure 3). CONCLUSION: eHH provides thousands of objective observations per day. eHH rates improved over the study period both due to an increase in nurses with eHH ≥80% and a decrease in the proportion of nurses with eHH <50%. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2017-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5631023/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1021 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Knepper, Bryan
Miller, Amber
Reese, Sara
Kurtz, Jennifer
Stella, Sarah
Young, Heather
Electronic Hand Hygiene Monitoring: A Tool to Drive Improvement and Measure Impact
title Electronic Hand Hygiene Monitoring: A Tool to Drive Improvement and Measure Impact
title_full Electronic Hand Hygiene Monitoring: A Tool to Drive Improvement and Measure Impact
title_fullStr Electronic Hand Hygiene Monitoring: A Tool to Drive Improvement and Measure Impact
title_full_unstemmed Electronic Hand Hygiene Monitoring: A Tool to Drive Improvement and Measure Impact
title_short Electronic Hand Hygiene Monitoring: A Tool to Drive Improvement and Measure Impact
title_sort electronic hand hygiene monitoring: a tool to drive improvement and measure impact
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5631023/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1021
work_keys_str_mv AT knepperbryan electronichandhygienemonitoringatooltodriveimprovementandmeasureimpact
AT milleramber electronichandhygienemonitoringatooltodriveimprovementandmeasureimpact
AT reesesara electronichandhygienemonitoringatooltodriveimprovementandmeasureimpact
AT kurtzjennifer electronichandhygienemonitoringatooltodriveimprovementandmeasureimpact
AT stellasarah electronichandhygienemonitoringatooltodriveimprovementandmeasureimpact
AT youngheather electronichandhygienemonitoringatooltodriveimprovementandmeasureimpact