Cargando…
The Impact of Diagnostic Stewardship on Clostridium difficile Infections
BACKGROUND: Clostridium difficile infections (CDI) pose a growing threat to hospitalized patients. This study assesses the impact of changing from a nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) to a stepwise testing algorithm (STA) by using an enzyme immunoassay (GDH and toxin A/B) and confirmatory NAAT c...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5631042/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.992 |
_version_ | 1783269354763190272 |
---|---|
author | Bischoff, Werner Bubnov, Andrey Palavecino, Elizabeth Beardsley, James Williamson, John Johnson, James Luther, Vera Ohl, Christopher El Helou, Guy Huang, Glen Stehle, John Sanders, John |
author_facet | Bischoff, Werner Bubnov, Andrey Palavecino, Elizabeth Beardsley, James Williamson, John Johnson, James Luther, Vera Ohl, Christopher El Helou, Guy Huang, Glen Stehle, John Sanders, John |
author_sort | Bischoff, Werner |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Clostridium difficile infections (CDI) pose a growing threat to hospitalized patients. This study assesses the impact of changing from a nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) to a stepwise testing algorithm (STA) by using an enzyme immunoassay (GDH and toxin A/B) and confirmatory NAAT confirmation in specific cases. METHODS: In an 885 bed academic medical center a 24 month pre-/post design was used to assess the effect of the STA for the following parameters: rates of enterocolitis due to C.diff (CDE), NHSN C.diff LabID events, CDI complications, mortality, antimicrobial prescription patterns, cluster occurrences; and testing, treatment, and isolation costs. Inpatient data were extracted from ICD-9/10 diagnosis codes, infection prevention, and laboratory databases. RESULTS: The STA significantly decreased the number of CDE ICD9/10 codes, HO, CO, and CO-HCFA C.diff LabID event rates by 65%, 78%, 75%, and 75%, respectively. Similar reductions were noted for associated complications such as NHSN defined colon surgeries (-61%), megacolon (-64%), and acute kidney failure (-55%). CDE unrelated complication rates for colon surgeries and acute kidney failure remained constant while the diagnosis of megacolon decreased but not significantly (-71%; P > 0.05). Inpatient mortality did not change with or without CDE. Significant reductions were observed in the use of oral metronidazole (total: -32%; CDE specific: -70%) and vancomycin (total: -58%; CDE specific: -61%). There were no clusters detected pre-/post STA introduction. The need for isolation decreased from 748 to 181 patients post-intervention (-76%; P < 0.05). Annual cost savings were over $175,000 due to decreases in laboratory testing followed by isolation, and antibiotic use. CONCLUSION: The switch to an STA from NAAT did not affect the diagnosis, treatment, or control of clinically relevant CDI in our institution. Benefits included avoidance of unnecessary antibiotic treatment, reduction in isolation, achieving publicly reported objectives, and costs savings. Selection of clinically relevant tests can help to improve hospitalization and treatment of patients and should be considered as part of diagnostic stewardship. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5631042 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56310422017-11-07 The Impact of Diagnostic Stewardship on Clostridium difficile Infections Bischoff, Werner Bubnov, Andrey Palavecino, Elizabeth Beardsley, James Williamson, John Johnson, James Luther, Vera Ohl, Christopher El Helou, Guy Huang, Glen Stehle, John Sanders, John Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Clostridium difficile infections (CDI) pose a growing threat to hospitalized patients. This study assesses the impact of changing from a nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) to a stepwise testing algorithm (STA) by using an enzyme immunoassay (GDH and toxin A/B) and confirmatory NAAT confirmation in specific cases. METHODS: In an 885 bed academic medical center a 24 month pre-/post design was used to assess the effect of the STA for the following parameters: rates of enterocolitis due to C.diff (CDE), NHSN C.diff LabID events, CDI complications, mortality, antimicrobial prescription patterns, cluster occurrences; and testing, treatment, and isolation costs. Inpatient data were extracted from ICD-9/10 diagnosis codes, infection prevention, and laboratory databases. RESULTS: The STA significantly decreased the number of CDE ICD9/10 codes, HO, CO, and CO-HCFA C.diff LabID event rates by 65%, 78%, 75%, and 75%, respectively. Similar reductions were noted for associated complications such as NHSN defined colon surgeries (-61%), megacolon (-64%), and acute kidney failure (-55%). CDE unrelated complication rates for colon surgeries and acute kidney failure remained constant while the diagnosis of megacolon decreased but not significantly (-71%; P > 0.05). Inpatient mortality did not change with or without CDE. Significant reductions were observed in the use of oral metronidazole (total: -32%; CDE specific: -70%) and vancomycin (total: -58%; CDE specific: -61%). There were no clusters detected pre-/post STA introduction. The need for isolation decreased from 748 to 181 patients post-intervention (-76%; P < 0.05). Annual cost savings were over $175,000 due to decreases in laboratory testing followed by isolation, and antibiotic use. CONCLUSION: The switch to an STA from NAAT did not affect the diagnosis, treatment, or control of clinically relevant CDI in our institution. Benefits included avoidance of unnecessary antibiotic treatment, reduction in isolation, achieving publicly reported objectives, and costs savings. Selection of clinically relevant tests can help to improve hospitalization and treatment of patients and should be considered as part of diagnostic stewardship. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2017-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5631042/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.992 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Abstracts Bischoff, Werner Bubnov, Andrey Palavecino, Elizabeth Beardsley, James Williamson, John Johnson, James Luther, Vera Ohl, Christopher El Helou, Guy Huang, Glen Stehle, John Sanders, John The Impact of Diagnostic Stewardship on Clostridium difficile Infections |
title | The Impact of Diagnostic Stewardship on Clostridium difficile Infections |
title_full | The Impact of Diagnostic Stewardship on Clostridium difficile Infections |
title_fullStr | The Impact of Diagnostic Stewardship on Clostridium difficile Infections |
title_full_unstemmed | The Impact of Diagnostic Stewardship on Clostridium difficile Infections |
title_short | The Impact of Diagnostic Stewardship on Clostridium difficile Infections |
title_sort | impact of diagnostic stewardship on clostridium difficile infections |
topic | Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5631042/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.992 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bischoffwerner theimpactofdiagnosticstewardshiponclostridiumdifficileinfections AT bubnovandrey theimpactofdiagnosticstewardshiponclostridiumdifficileinfections AT palavecinoelizabeth theimpactofdiagnosticstewardshiponclostridiumdifficileinfections AT beardsleyjames theimpactofdiagnosticstewardshiponclostridiumdifficileinfections AT williamsonjohn theimpactofdiagnosticstewardshiponclostridiumdifficileinfections AT johnsonjames theimpactofdiagnosticstewardshiponclostridiumdifficileinfections AT luthervera theimpactofdiagnosticstewardshiponclostridiumdifficileinfections AT ohlchristopher theimpactofdiagnosticstewardshiponclostridiumdifficileinfections AT elhelouguy theimpactofdiagnosticstewardshiponclostridiumdifficileinfections AT huangglen theimpactofdiagnosticstewardshiponclostridiumdifficileinfections AT stehlejohn theimpactofdiagnosticstewardshiponclostridiumdifficileinfections AT sandersjohn theimpactofdiagnosticstewardshiponclostridiumdifficileinfections AT bischoffwerner impactofdiagnosticstewardshiponclostridiumdifficileinfections AT bubnovandrey impactofdiagnosticstewardshiponclostridiumdifficileinfections AT palavecinoelizabeth impactofdiagnosticstewardshiponclostridiumdifficileinfections AT beardsleyjames impactofdiagnosticstewardshiponclostridiumdifficileinfections AT williamsonjohn impactofdiagnosticstewardshiponclostridiumdifficileinfections AT johnsonjames impactofdiagnosticstewardshiponclostridiumdifficileinfections AT luthervera impactofdiagnosticstewardshiponclostridiumdifficileinfections AT ohlchristopher impactofdiagnosticstewardshiponclostridiumdifficileinfections AT elhelouguy impactofdiagnosticstewardshiponclostridiumdifficileinfections AT huangglen impactofdiagnosticstewardshiponclostridiumdifficileinfections AT stehlejohn impactofdiagnosticstewardshiponclostridiumdifficileinfections AT sandersjohn impactofdiagnosticstewardshiponclostridiumdifficileinfections |