Cargando…

The Impact of Diagnostic Stewardship on Clostridium difficile Infections

BACKGROUND: Clostridium difficile infections (CDI) pose a growing threat to hospitalized patients. This study assesses the impact of changing from a nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) to a stepwise testing algorithm (STA) by using an enzyme immunoassay (GDH and toxin A/B) and confirmatory NAAT c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bischoff, Werner, Bubnov, Andrey, Palavecino, Elizabeth, Beardsley, James, Williamson, John, Johnson, James, Luther, Vera, Ohl, Christopher, El Helou, Guy, Huang, Glen, Stehle, John, Sanders, John
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5631042/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.992
_version_ 1783269354763190272
author Bischoff, Werner
Bubnov, Andrey
Palavecino, Elizabeth
Beardsley, James
Williamson, John
Johnson, James
Luther, Vera
Ohl, Christopher
El Helou, Guy
Huang, Glen
Stehle, John
Sanders, John
author_facet Bischoff, Werner
Bubnov, Andrey
Palavecino, Elizabeth
Beardsley, James
Williamson, John
Johnson, James
Luther, Vera
Ohl, Christopher
El Helou, Guy
Huang, Glen
Stehle, John
Sanders, John
author_sort Bischoff, Werner
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Clostridium difficile infections (CDI) pose a growing threat to hospitalized patients. This study assesses the impact of changing from a nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) to a stepwise testing algorithm (STA) by using an enzyme immunoassay (GDH and toxin A/B) and confirmatory NAAT confirmation in specific cases. METHODS: In an 885 bed academic medical center a 24 month pre-/post design was used to assess the effect of the STA for the following parameters: rates of enterocolitis due to C.diff (CDE), NHSN C.diff LabID events, CDI complications, mortality, antimicrobial prescription patterns, cluster occurrences; and testing, treatment, and isolation costs. Inpatient data were extracted from ICD-9/10 diagnosis codes, infection prevention, and laboratory databases. RESULTS: The STA significantly decreased the number of CDE ICD9/10 codes, HO, CO, and CO-HCFA C.diff LabID event rates by 65%, 78%, 75%, and 75%, respectively. Similar reductions were noted for associated complications such as NHSN defined colon surgeries (-61%), megacolon (-64%), and acute kidney failure (-55%). CDE unrelated complication rates for colon surgeries and acute kidney failure remained constant while the diagnosis of megacolon decreased but not significantly (-71%; P > 0.05). Inpatient mortality did not change with or without CDE. Significant reductions were observed in the use of oral metronidazole (total: -32%; CDE specific: -70%) and vancomycin (total: -58%; CDE specific: -61%). There were no clusters detected pre-/post STA introduction. The need for isolation decreased from 748 to 181 patients post-intervention (-76%; P < 0.05). Annual cost savings were over $175,000 due to decreases in laboratory testing followed by isolation, and antibiotic use. CONCLUSION: The switch to an STA from NAAT did not affect the diagnosis, treatment, or control of clinically relevant CDI in our institution. Benefits included avoidance of unnecessary antibiotic treatment, reduction in isolation, achieving publicly reported objectives, and costs savings. Selection of clinically relevant tests can help to improve hospitalization and treatment of patients and should be considered as part of diagnostic stewardship. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5631042
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56310422017-11-07 The Impact of Diagnostic Stewardship on Clostridium difficile Infections Bischoff, Werner Bubnov, Andrey Palavecino, Elizabeth Beardsley, James Williamson, John Johnson, James Luther, Vera Ohl, Christopher El Helou, Guy Huang, Glen Stehle, John Sanders, John Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Clostridium difficile infections (CDI) pose a growing threat to hospitalized patients. This study assesses the impact of changing from a nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) to a stepwise testing algorithm (STA) by using an enzyme immunoassay (GDH and toxin A/B) and confirmatory NAAT confirmation in specific cases. METHODS: In an 885 bed academic medical center a 24 month pre-/post design was used to assess the effect of the STA for the following parameters: rates of enterocolitis due to C.diff (CDE), NHSN C.diff LabID events, CDI complications, mortality, antimicrobial prescription patterns, cluster occurrences; and testing, treatment, and isolation costs. Inpatient data were extracted from ICD-9/10 diagnosis codes, infection prevention, and laboratory databases. RESULTS: The STA significantly decreased the number of CDE ICD9/10 codes, HO, CO, and CO-HCFA C.diff LabID event rates by 65%, 78%, 75%, and 75%, respectively. Similar reductions were noted for associated complications such as NHSN defined colon surgeries (-61%), megacolon (-64%), and acute kidney failure (-55%). CDE unrelated complication rates for colon surgeries and acute kidney failure remained constant while the diagnosis of megacolon decreased but not significantly (-71%; P > 0.05). Inpatient mortality did not change with or without CDE. Significant reductions were observed in the use of oral metronidazole (total: -32%; CDE specific: -70%) and vancomycin (total: -58%; CDE specific: -61%). There were no clusters detected pre-/post STA introduction. The need for isolation decreased from 748 to 181 patients post-intervention (-76%; P < 0.05). Annual cost savings were over $175,000 due to decreases in laboratory testing followed by isolation, and antibiotic use. CONCLUSION: The switch to an STA from NAAT did not affect the diagnosis, treatment, or control of clinically relevant CDI in our institution. Benefits included avoidance of unnecessary antibiotic treatment, reduction in isolation, achieving publicly reported objectives, and costs savings. Selection of clinically relevant tests can help to improve hospitalization and treatment of patients and should be considered as part of diagnostic stewardship. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2017-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5631042/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.992 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Bischoff, Werner
Bubnov, Andrey
Palavecino, Elizabeth
Beardsley, James
Williamson, John
Johnson, James
Luther, Vera
Ohl, Christopher
El Helou, Guy
Huang, Glen
Stehle, John
Sanders, John
The Impact of Diagnostic Stewardship on Clostridium difficile Infections
title The Impact of Diagnostic Stewardship on Clostridium difficile Infections
title_full The Impact of Diagnostic Stewardship on Clostridium difficile Infections
title_fullStr The Impact of Diagnostic Stewardship on Clostridium difficile Infections
title_full_unstemmed The Impact of Diagnostic Stewardship on Clostridium difficile Infections
title_short The Impact of Diagnostic Stewardship on Clostridium difficile Infections
title_sort impact of diagnostic stewardship on clostridium difficile infections
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5631042/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.992
work_keys_str_mv AT bischoffwerner theimpactofdiagnosticstewardshiponclostridiumdifficileinfections
AT bubnovandrey theimpactofdiagnosticstewardshiponclostridiumdifficileinfections
AT palavecinoelizabeth theimpactofdiagnosticstewardshiponclostridiumdifficileinfections
AT beardsleyjames theimpactofdiagnosticstewardshiponclostridiumdifficileinfections
AT williamsonjohn theimpactofdiagnosticstewardshiponclostridiumdifficileinfections
AT johnsonjames theimpactofdiagnosticstewardshiponclostridiumdifficileinfections
AT luthervera theimpactofdiagnosticstewardshiponclostridiumdifficileinfections
AT ohlchristopher theimpactofdiagnosticstewardshiponclostridiumdifficileinfections
AT elhelouguy theimpactofdiagnosticstewardshiponclostridiumdifficileinfections
AT huangglen theimpactofdiagnosticstewardshiponclostridiumdifficileinfections
AT stehlejohn theimpactofdiagnosticstewardshiponclostridiumdifficileinfections
AT sandersjohn theimpactofdiagnosticstewardshiponclostridiumdifficileinfections
AT bischoffwerner impactofdiagnosticstewardshiponclostridiumdifficileinfections
AT bubnovandrey impactofdiagnosticstewardshiponclostridiumdifficileinfections
AT palavecinoelizabeth impactofdiagnosticstewardshiponclostridiumdifficileinfections
AT beardsleyjames impactofdiagnosticstewardshiponclostridiumdifficileinfections
AT williamsonjohn impactofdiagnosticstewardshiponclostridiumdifficileinfections
AT johnsonjames impactofdiagnosticstewardshiponclostridiumdifficileinfections
AT luthervera impactofdiagnosticstewardshiponclostridiumdifficileinfections
AT ohlchristopher impactofdiagnosticstewardshiponclostridiumdifficileinfections
AT elhelouguy impactofdiagnosticstewardshiponclostridiumdifficileinfections
AT huangglen impactofdiagnosticstewardshiponclostridiumdifficileinfections
AT stehlejohn impactofdiagnosticstewardshiponclostridiumdifficileinfections
AT sandersjohn impactofdiagnosticstewardshiponclostridiumdifficileinfections