Cargando…

Comparison of the Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 Definitions of Sepsis and Their Ability to Predict Mortality in a Prospective Intensive Care Unit Cohort

BACKGROUND: We compared Sepsis-2 (S2) and Sepsis-3 (S3) in classifying patients with sepsis and mortality risk. METHODS: The cohort was assembled for a prospective study of a sepsis biomarker. Entry criteria included ≥ 2 of 4 Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) clinical criteria, age ≥ 21...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Poutsiaka, Debra D, Porto, Maura, Perry, Whitney, Hudcova, Jana, Tybor, David, Hadley, Susan, Doron, Shira, Reich, John Adam, Snydman, David, Nasraway, Stanley
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5631052/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1579
_version_ 1783269357096271872
author Poutsiaka, Debra D
Porto, Maura
Perry, Whitney
Hudcova, Jana
Tybor, David
Hadley, Susan
Doron, Shira
Reich, John Adam
Snydman, David
Nasraway, Stanley
author_facet Poutsiaka, Debra D
Porto, Maura
Perry, Whitney
Hudcova, Jana
Tybor, David
Hadley, Susan
Doron, Shira
Reich, John Adam
Snydman, David
Nasraway, Stanley
author_sort Poutsiaka, Debra D
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We compared Sepsis-2 (S2) and Sepsis-3 (S3) in classifying patients with sepsis and mortality risk. METHODS: The cohort was assembled for a prospective study of a sepsis biomarker. Entry criteria included ≥ 2 of 4 Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) clinical criteria, age ≥ 21 y, and informed consent for sample collection. Classification of sepsis or prediction of death by 30 d by S2 (≥ 2 SIRS criteria + infection [I]), S3 (prescreening by quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment [qSOFA] of ≥ 2 of 3 clinical criteria followed by the complete SOFA [requiring clinical and laboratory assessments] score change ≥2 + I) and an amended S3 definition, iqSOFA (qSOFA ≥2 + I) were compared. All statistics were performed with SAS 9.4 (Cary NC). RESULTS: Of 176 patients with SIRS, 95% were cared for in the ICU. 80 of 105 patients classified by S2 as having sepsis also had sepsis per S3 or iqSOFA but 25 did not (Kappa=0.72, 95% CI 0.62, 0.82). Sepsis classifications by S3 and iqSOFA were identical. Mortality data were available for 169 patients. 25 (14.8%) of the total cohort died, (20 of 100 with sepsis per S2 [20%], and 20 of 77 [26.0%] with sepsis per S3 or iqSOFA). AUC (95% CI) of ROC curves for identifying those who died were 0.54 (0.41, 0.68) for S2, 0.84 (0.74, 0.93) for S3 and 0.69 (0.60, 0.79) for iqSOFA. AUC for S3 was significantly greater than for the other two definitions (P < 0.01, Mann–Whitney Test). S3 was more specific than S2 in distinguishing those who died (Table). iqSOFA performed identically to S3 in test performance. Unadjusted hazard ratios for death associated with sepsis are shown in the Figure and were not changed after adjusting for age or gender. CONCLUSION: S3 and iqSOFA were more stringent definitions of sepsis and better at predicting death than S2. The S3 ROC AUC was higher than for iqSOFA which otherwise performed identically to S3. The SOFA score used in the S3 definition required more data collection compared with the iqSOFA score. Thus, the complex S3 definition adds little advantage to the simpler iqSOFA in classifying patients with sepsis or forecasting mortality. DISCLOSURES: D. D. Poutsiaka, Mochida Pharmaceuticals: Investigator, Research support; J. Hudcova, Mochida Pharmaceuticals: Investigator, Research support; 
 S. Nasraway, Mochida Pharmaceuticals: Investigator, Research support
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5631052
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56310522017-11-07 Comparison of the Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 Definitions of Sepsis and Their Ability to Predict Mortality in a Prospective Intensive Care Unit Cohort Poutsiaka, Debra D Porto, Maura Perry, Whitney Hudcova, Jana Tybor, David Hadley, Susan Doron, Shira Reich, John Adam Snydman, David Nasraway, Stanley Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: We compared Sepsis-2 (S2) and Sepsis-3 (S3) in classifying patients with sepsis and mortality risk. METHODS: The cohort was assembled for a prospective study of a sepsis biomarker. Entry criteria included ≥ 2 of 4 Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) clinical criteria, age ≥ 21 y, and informed consent for sample collection. Classification of sepsis or prediction of death by 30 d by S2 (≥ 2 SIRS criteria + infection [I]), S3 (prescreening by quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment [qSOFA] of ≥ 2 of 3 clinical criteria followed by the complete SOFA [requiring clinical and laboratory assessments] score change ≥2 + I) and an amended S3 definition, iqSOFA (qSOFA ≥2 + I) were compared. All statistics were performed with SAS 9.4 (Cary NC). RESULTS: Of 176 patients with SIRS, 95% were cared for in the ICU. 80 of 105 patients classified by S2 as having sepsis also had sepsis per S3 or iqSOFA but 25 did not (Kappa=0.72, 95% CI 0.62, 0.82). Sepsis classifications by S3 and iqSOFA were identical. Mortality data were available for 169 patients. 25 (14.8%) of the total cohort died, (20 of 100 with sepsis per S2 [20%], and 20 of 77 [26.0%] with sepsis per S3 or iqSOFA). AUC (95% CI) of ROC curves for identifying those who died were 0.54 (0.41, 0.68) for S2, 0.84 (0.74, 0.93) for S3 and 0.69 (0.60, 0.79) for iqSOFA. AUC for S3 was significantly greater than for the other two definitions (P < 0.01, Mann–Whitney Test). S3 was more specific than S2 in distinguishing those who died (Table). iqSOFA performed identically to S3 in test performance. Unadjusted hazard ratios for death associated with sepsis are shown in the Figure and were not changed after adjusting for age or gender. CONCLUSION: S3 and iqSOFA were more stringent definitions of sepsis and better at predicting death than S2. The S3 ROC AUC was higher than for iqSOFA which otherwise performed identically to S3. The SOFA score used in the S3 definition required more data collection compared with the iqSOFA score. Thus, the complex S3 definition adds little advantage to the simpler iqSOFA in classifying patients with sepsis or forecasting mortality. DISCLOSURES: D. D. Poutsiaka, Mochida Pharmaceuticals: Investigator, Research support; J. Hudcova, Mochida Pharmaceuticals: Investigator, Research support; 
 S. Nasraway, Mochida Pharmaceuticals: Investigator, Research support Oxford University Press 2017-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5631052/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1579 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Poutsiaka, Debra D
Porto, Maura
Perry, Whitney
Hudcova, Jana
Tybor, David
Hadley, Susan
Doron, Shira
Reich, John Adam
Snydman, David
Nasraway, Stanley
Comparison of the Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 Definitions of Sepsis and Their Ability to Predict Mortality in a Prospective Intensive Care Unit Cohort
title Comparison of the Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 Definitions of Sepsis and Their Ability to Predict Mortality in a Prospective Intensive Care Unit Cohort
title_full Comparison of the Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 Definitions of Sepsis and Their Ability to Predict Mortality in a Prospective Intensive Care Unit Cohort
title_fullStr Comparison of the Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 Definitions of Sepsis and Their Ability to Predict Mortality in a Prospective Intensive Care Unit Cohort
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 Definitions of Sepsis and Their Ability to Predict Mortality in a Prospective Intensive Care Unit Cohort
title_short Comparison of the Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 Definitions of Sepsis and Their Ability to Predict Mortality in a Prospective Intensive Care Unit Cohort
title_sort comparison of the sepsis-2 and sepsis-3 definitions of sepsis and their ability to predict mortality in a prospective intensive care unit cohort
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5631052/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1579
work_keys_str_mv AT poutsiakadebrad comparisonofthesepsis2andsepsis3definitionsofsepsisandtheirabilitytopredictmortalityinaprospectiveintensivecareunitcohort
AT portomaura comparisonofthesepsis2andsepsis3definitionsofsepsisandtheirabilitytopredictmortalityinaprospectiveintensivecareunitcohort
AT perrywhitney comparisonofthesepsis2andsepsis3definitionsofsepsisandtheirabilitytopredictmortalityinaprospectiveintensivecareunitcohort
AT hudcovajana comparisonofthesepsis2andsepsis3definitionsofsepsisandtheirabilitytopredictmortalityinaprospectiveintensivecareunitcohort
AT tybordavid comparisonofthesepsis2andsepsis3definitionsofsepsisandtheirabilitytopredictmortalityinaprospectiveintensivecareunitcohort
AT hadleysusan comparisonofthesepsis2andsepsis3definitionsofsepsisandtheirabilitytopredictmortalityinaprospectiveintensivecareunitcohort
AT doronshira comparisonofthesepsis2andsepsis3definitionsofsepsisandtheirabilitytopredictmortalityinaprospectiveintensivecareunitcohort
AT reichjohnadam comparisonofthesepsis2andsepsis3definitionsofsepsisandtheirabilitytopredictmortalityinaprospectiveintensivecareunitcohort
AT snydmandavid comparisonofthesepsis2andsepsis3definitionsofsepsisandtheirabilitytopredictmortalityinaprospectiveintensivecareunitcohort
AT nasrawaystanley comparisonofthesepsis2andsepsis3definitionsofsepsisandtheirabilitytopredictmortalityinaprospectiveintensivecareunitcohort