Cargando…
Comparison of the Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 Definitions of Sepsis and Their Ability to Predict Mortality in a Prospective Intensive Care Unit Cohort
BACKGROUND: We compared Sepsis-2 (S2) and Sepsis-3 (S3) in classifying patients with sepsis and mortality risk. METHODS: The cohort was assembled for a prospective study of a sepsis biomarker. Entry criteria included ≥ 2 of 4 Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) clinical criteria, age ≥ 21...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5631052/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1579 |
_version_ | 1783269357096271872 |
---|---|
author | Poutsiaka, Debra D Porto, Maura Perry, Whitney Hudcova, Jana Tybor, David Hadley, Susan Doron, Shira Reich, John Adam Snydman, David Nasraway, Stanley |
author_facet | Poutsiaka, Debra D Porto, Maura Perry, Whitney Hudcova, Jana Tybor, David Hadley, Susan Doron, Shira Reich, John Adam Snydman, David Nasraway, Stanley |
author_sort | Poutsiaka, Debra D |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: We compared Sepsis-2 (S2) and Sepsis-3 (S3) in classifying patients with sepsis and mortality risk. METHODS: The cohort was assembled for a prospective study of a sepsis biomarker. Entry criteria included ≥ 2 of 4 Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) clinical criteria, age ≥ 21 y, and informed consent for sample collection. Classification of sepsis or prediction of death by 30 d by S2 (≥ 2 SIRS criteria + infection [I]), S3 (prescreening by quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment [qSOFA] of ≥ 2 of 3 clinical criteria followed by the complete SOFA [requiring clinical and laboratory assessments] score change ≥2 + I) and an amended S3 definition, iqSOFA (qSOFA ≥2 + I) were compared. All statistics were performed with SAS 9.4 (Cary NC). RESULTS: Of 176 patients with SIRS, 95% were cared for in the ICU. 80 of 105 patients classified by S2 as having sepsis also had sepsis per S3 or iqSOFA but 25 did not (Kappa=0.72, 95% CI 0.62, 0.82). Sepsis classifications by S3 and iqSOFA were identical. Mortality data were available for 169 patients. 25 (14.8%) of the total cohort died, (20 of 100 with sepsis per S2 [20%], and 20 of 77 [26.0%] with sepsis per S3 or iqSOFA). AUC (95% CI) of ROC curves for identifying those who died were 0.54 (0.41, 0.68) for S2, 0.84 (0.74, 0.93) for S3 and 0.69 (0.60, 0.79) for iqSOFA. AUC for S3 was significantly greater than for the other two definitions (P < 0.01, Mann–Whitney Test). S3 was more specific than S2 in distinguishing those who died (Table). iqSOFA performed identically to S3 in test performance. Unadjusted hazard ratios for death associated with sepsis are shown in the Figure and were not changed after adjusting for age or gender. CONCLUSION: S3 and iqSOFA were more stringent definitions of sepsis and better at predicting death than S2. The S3 ROC AUC was higher than for iqSOFA which otherwise performed identically to S3. The SOFA score used in the S3 definition required more data collection compared with the iqSOFA score. Thus, the complex S3 definition adds little advantage to the simpler iqSOFA in classifying patients with sepsis or forecasting mortality. DISCLOSURES: D. D. Poutsiaka, Mochida Pharmaceuticals: Investigator, Research support; J. Hudcova, Mochida Pharmaceuticals: Investigator, Research support;
S. Nasraway, Mochida Pharmaceuticals: Investigator, Research support |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5631052 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56310522017-11-07 Comparison of the Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 Definitions of Sepsis and Their Ability to Predict Mortality in a Prospective Intensive Care Unit Cohort Poutsiaka, Debra D Porto, Maura Perry, Whitney Hudcova, Jana Tybor, David Hadley, Susan Doron, Shira Reich, John Adam Snydman, David Nasraway, Stanley Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: We compared Sepsis-2 (S2) and Sepsis-3 (S3) in classifying patients with sepsis and mortality risk. METHODS: The cohort was assembled for a prospective study of a sepsis biomarker. Entry criteria included ≥ 2 of 4 Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) clinical criteria, age ≥ 21 y, and informed consent for sample collection. Classification of sepsis or prediction of death by 30 d by S2 (≥ 2 SIRS criteria + infection [I]), S3 (prescreening by quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment [qSOFA] of ≥ 2 of 3 clinical criteria followed by the complete SOFA [requiring clinical and laboratory assessments] score change ≥2 + I) and an amended S3 definition, iqSOFA (qSOFA ≥2 + I) were compared. All statistics were performed with SAS 9.4 (Cary NC). RESULTS: Of 176 patients with SIRS, 95% were cared for in the ICU. 80 of 105 patients classified by S2 as having sepsis also had sepsis per S3 or iqSOFA but 25 did not (Kappa=0.72, 95% CI 0.62, 0.82). Sepsis classifications by S3 and iqSOFA were identical. Mortality data were available for 169 patients. 25 (14.8%) of the total cohort died, (20 of 100 with sepsis per S2 [20%], and 20 of 77 [26.0%] with sepsis per S3 or iqSOFA). AUC (95% CI) of ROC curves for identifying those who died were 0.54 (0.41, 0.68) for S2, 0.84 (0.74, 0.93) for S3 and 0.69 (0.60, 0.79) for iqSOFA. AUC for S3 was significantly greater than for the other two definitions (P < 0.01, Mann–Whitney Test). S3 was more specific than S2 in distinguishing those who died (Table). iqSOFA performed identically to S3 in test performance. Unadjusted hazard ratios for death associated with sepsis are shown in the Figure and were not changed after adjusting for age or gender. CONCLUSION: S3 and iqSOFA were more stringent definitions of sepsis and better at predicting death than S2. The S3 ROC AUC was higher than for iqSOFA which otherwise performed identically to S3. The SOFA score used in the S3 definition required more data collection compared with the iqSOFA score. Thus, the complex S3 definition adds little advantage to the simpler iqSOFA in classifying patients with sepsis or forecasting mortality. DISCLOSURES: D. D. Poutsiaka, Mochida Pharmaceuticals: Investigator, Research support; J. Hudcova, Mochida Pharmaceuticals: Investigator, Research support;
S. Nasraway, Mochida Pharmaceuticals: Investigator, Research support Oxford University Press 2017-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5631052/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1579 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Abstracts Poutsiaka, Debra D Porto, Maura Perry, Whitney Hudcova, Jana Tybor, David Hadley, Susan Doron, Shira Reich, John Adam Snydman, David Nasraway, Stanley Comparison of the Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 Definitions of Sepsis and Their Ability to Predict Mortality in a Prospective Intensive Care Unit Cohort |
title | Comparison of the Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 Definitions of Sepsis and Their Ability to Predict Mortality in a Prospective Intensive Care Unit Cohort |
title_full | Comparison of the Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 Definitions of Sepsis and Their Ability to Predict Mortality in a Prospective Intensive Care Unit Cohort |
title_fullStr | Comparison of the Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 Definitions of Sepsis and Their Ability to Predict Mortality in a Prospective Intensive Care Unit Cohort |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of the Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 Definitions of Sepsis and Their Ability to Predict Mortality in a Prospective Intensive Care Unit Cohort |
title_short | Comparison of the Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 Definitions of Sepsis and Their Ability to Predict Mortality in a Prospective Intensive Care Unit Cohort |
title_sort | comparison of the sepsis-2 and sepsis-3 definitions of sepsis and their ability to predict mortality in a prospective intensive care unit cohort |
topic | Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5631052/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1579 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT poutsiakadebrad comparisonofthesepsis2andsepsis3definitionsofsepsisandtheirabilitytopredictmortalityinaprospectiveintensivecareunitcohort AT portomaura comparisonofthesepsis2andsepsis3definitionsofsepsisandtheirabilitytopredictmortalityinaprospectiveintensivecareunitcohort AT perrywhitney comparisonofthesepsis2andsepsis3definitionsofsepsisandtheirabilitytopredictmortalityinaprospectiveintensivecareunitcohort AT hudcovajana comparisonofthesepsis2andsepsis3definitionsofsepsisandtheirabilitytopredictmortalityinaprospectiveintensivecareunitcohort AT tybordavid comparisonofthesepsis2andsepsis3definitionsofsepsisandtheirabilitytopredictmortalityinaprospectiveintensivecareunitcohort AT hadleysusan comparisonofthesepsis2andsepsis3definitionsofsepsisandtheirabilitytopredictmortalityinaprospectiveintensivecareunitcohort AT doronshira comparisonofthesepsis2andsepsis3definitionsofsepsisandtheirabilitytopredictmortalityinaprospectiveintensivecareunitcohort AT reichjohnadam comparisonofthesepsis2andsepsis3definitionsofsepsisandtheirabilitytopredictmortalityinaprospectiveintensivecareunitcohort AT snydmandavid comparisonofthesepsis2andsepsis3definitionsofsepsisandtheirabilitytopredictmortalityinaprospectiveintensivecareunitcohort AT nasrawaystanley comparisonofthesepsis2andsepsis3definitionsofsepsisandtheirabilitytopredictmortalityinaprospectiveintensivecareunitcohort |