Cargando…

Efficacy of Oral Vancomycin, Oral Metronidazole, or IV Metronidazole Prophylaxis at Reducing the Risk of Clostridium difficile Recurrence

BACKGROUND: Secondary prophylaxis (SP) for Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) with oral vancomycin or oral/IV metronidazole when initiating antibiotics is common, though few studies are available to support this practice. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of prophylaxis within...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: O’Connell, Matthew, Slish, Judianne, Shelly, Mark
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5631053/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.952
_version_ 1783269357359464448
author O’Connell, Matthew
Slish, Judianne
Shelly, Mark
author_facet O’Connell, Matthew
Slish, Judianne
Shelly, Mark
author_sort O’Connell, Matthew
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Secondary prophylaxis (SP) for Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) with oral vancomycin or oral/IV metronidazole when initiating antibiotics is common, though few studies are available to support this practice. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of prophylaxis within a year of index CDI. METHODS: This retrospective chart review looks at subsequent courses of antibiotics and CDI in patients with initial positive CDI testing in 2013–16. A positive CDI test within 90 days of antibiotics was a recurrence. The use of antibiotics for SP was noted, along with other factors associated with CDI relapse. Non-parametric and exact tests were used for univariate analysis. These variables were included in a multivariate proportional hazards model. RESULTS: We found 597 antibiotic episodes in 230 patients. 130 episodes (21.8%) received SP. The difference of recurrence rates with and without antibiotics, 9.2 % vs 10.7%, was not statistically significant. No difference was seen when metronidazole was used, but vancomycin SP reduced the rate to 7.5% (6/80, P = 0.45). Probiotics were associated with a higher rate of recurrence (16.7 vs. 8.9%, P = 0.025). Proton pump inhibitors were also associated with a slightly higher rate of CDI recurrence (13.0% vs. 8.4%). The rate of relapse fell significantly with increasing time since the index case of CDI by logistic regression (P = 0.011). In multivariate regression, relapse was associated with shorter time from index CDI, shorter durations of antibiotics, and the use of probiotics. CONCLUSION: This retrospective study does not support the routine use of metronidazole in subsequent antibiotic courses following CDI. The use of probiotics paradoxically increased the rate of CDI relapse in this study. The limitations of this retrospective study do not eliminate the possibility of utility of vancomycin as prophylaxis, but this requires further evaluation. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5631053
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56310532017-11-07 Efficacy of Oral Vancomycin, Oral Metronidazole, or IV Metronidazole Prophylaxis at Reducing the Risk of Clostridium difficile Recurrence O’Connell, Matthew Slish, Judianne Shelly, Mark Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Secondary prophylaxis (SP) for Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) with oral vancomycin or oral/IV metronidazole when initiating antibiotics is common, though few studies are available to support this practice. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of prophylaxis within a year of index CDI. METHODS: This retrospective chart review looks at subsequent courses of antibiotics and CDI in patients with initial positive CDI testing in 2013–16. A positive CDI test within 90 days of antibiotics was a recurrence. The use of antibiotics for SP was noted, along with other factors associated with CDI relapse. Non-parametric and exact tests were used for univariate analysis. These variables were included in a multivariate proportional hazards model. RESULTS: We found 597 antibiotic episodes in 230 patients. 130 episodes (21.8%) received SP. The difference of recurrence rates with and without antibiotics, 9.2 % vs 10.7%, was not statistically significant. No difference was seen when metronidazole was used, but vancomycin SP reduced the rate to 7.5% (6/80, P = 0.45). Probiotics were associated with a higher rate of recurrence (16.7 vs. 8.9%, P = 0.025). Proton pump inhibitors were also associated with a slightly higher rate of CDI recurrence (13.0% vs. 8.4%). The rate of relapse fell significantly with increasing time since the index case of CDI by logistic regression (P = 0.011). In multivariate regression, relapse was associated with shorter time from index CDI, shorter durations of antibiotics, and the use of probiotics. CONCLUSION: This retrospective study does not support the routine use of metronidazole in subsequent antibiotic courses following CDI. The use of probiotics paradoxically increased the rate of CDI relapse in this study. The limitations of this retrospective study do not eliminate the possibility of utility of vancomycin as prophylaxis, but this requires further evaluation. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2017-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5631053/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.952 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
O’Connell, Matthew
Slish, Judianne
Shelly, Mark
Efficacy of Oral Vancomycin, Oral Metronidazole, or IV Metronidazole Prophylaxis at Reducing the Risk of Clostridium difficile Recurrence
title Efficacy of Oral Vancomycin, Oral Metronidazole, or IV Metronidazole Prophylaxis at Reducing the Risk of Clostridium difficile Recurrence
title_full Efficacy of Oral Vancomycin, Oral Metronidazole, or IV Metronidazole Prophylaxis at Reducing the Risk of Clostridium difficile Recurrence
title_fullStr Efficacy of Oral Vancomycin, Oral Metronidazole, or IV Metronidazole Prophylaxis at Reducing the Risk of Clostridium difficile Recurrence
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of Oral Vancomycin, Oral Metronidazole, or IV Metronidazole Prophylaxis at Reducing the Risk of Clostridium difficile Recurrence
title_short Efficacy of Oral Vancomycin, Oral Metronidazole, or IV Metronidazole Prophylaxis at Reducing the Risk of Clostridium difficile Recurrence
title_sort efficacy of oral vancomycin, oral metronidazole, or iv metronidazole prophylaxis at reducing the risk of clostridium difficile recurrence
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5631053/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.952
work_keys_str_mv AT oconnellmatthew efficacyoforalvancomycinoralmetronidazoleorivmetronidazoleprophylaxisatreducingtheriskofclostridiumdifficilerecurrence
AT slishjudianne efficacyoforalvancomycinoralmetronidazoleorivmetronidazoleprophylaxisatreducingtheriskofclostridiumdifficilerecurrence
AT shellymark efficacyoforalvancomycinoralmetronidazoleorivmetronidazoleprophylaxisatreducingtheriskofclostridiumdifficilerecurrence