Cargando…

Safety & Benefits of Directly Observed Therapy with Rifapentine and Isoniazid for Latent Tuberculosis Infection – Less is More?

BACKGROUND: Latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) treatment is essential in preventing the reactivation of tuberculosis. We compared the clinical and demographic characteristics of patients that have completed traditional therapy with 9 months of isoniazid (9H) with those that have completed 3 months...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ha, Lawrence, Lam, Megan, Niknam, Negin, Schwartz, Rebecca, Rasul, Rehana, Mol, Loyce, Chin, Suzan, Epstein, Marcia, Hirschwerk, David, Revere, Elizabeth, Hayes, Lisa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5631068/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1643
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) treatment is essential in preventing the reactivation of tuberculosis. We compared the clinical and demographic characteristics of patients that have completed traditional therapy with 9 months of isoniazid (9H) with those that have completed 3 months of rifapentine plus isoniazid using directly observed therapy (3HP), focusing on adverse effects, a barrier to completion that may contribute to discontinuation of therapy. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review (July 2013-March 2017) to compare the 9H group and 3HP group. Demographic and clinical variables were described by therapy type and groups were compared using Fisher’s exact test or t-test, as appropriate. RESULTS: Patients in the study sample (n = 124) had a mean age of 49.8 (SD=14.8) years old. Approximately half received 3HP (n = 64, 51.6%). Demographics in the 3HP and 9H groups were similar. Significantly more patients in the 3HP group completed treatment (81.3% vs. 61.7%, P < 0.0001). No patients were lost to follow-up in the 3HP group, 14 (23.33%) were lost in the 9H group. Gastrointestinal (GI) upset (n = 16), elevated liver function tests (LFTs) (n = 11), and headaches (n = 9) were the most frequent side effects. Except for neuropathy and pancreatitis, all other adverse side effects had higher incidence in the 3HP group. Specifically, the incidence of GI symptoms (23.4% vs. 1.7%, P = 0.0003), weakness (9.4% vs. 0%, P = 0.028), and headache (14.1% vs. 0%, P = 0.003) were significantly higher in the 3HP group. Of the observed patients with adverse reactions that received 3HP, 88.24% (n = 30) had them resolved within the first two weeks. CONCLUSION: The 3HP group had a higher completion rate and no loss to follow-up compared with 23% loss to follow-up in the 9H group, however, adverse reactions were significantly higher in the 3HP group. Closer weekly monitoring of the 3HP group could lend itself to capturing more adverse reactions, however, 88% of those adverse reactions resolved within the first two weeks of therapy. Liver function tests were not significantly different (P = 0.2079) between the two groups, and were mildly elevated. We conclude that three months of rifapentine plus isoniazid for the treatment of LTBI may be a favorable option over the traditional 9 months of isoniazid in certain populations. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.