Cargando…

Safety & Benefits of Directly Observed Therapy with Rifapentine and Isoniazid for Latent Tuberculosis Infection – Less is More?

BACKGROUND: Latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) treatment is essential in preventing the reactivation of tuberculosis. We compared the clinical and demographic characteristics of patients that have completed traditional therapy with 9 months of isoniazid (9H) with those that have completed 3 months...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ha, Lawrence, Lam, Megan, Niknam, Negin, Schwartz, Rebecca, Rasul, Rehana, Mol, Loyce, Chin, Suzan, Epstein, Marcia, Hirschwerk, David, Revere, Elizabeth, Hayes, Lisa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5631068/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1643
_version_ 1783269360987537408
author Ha, Lawrence
Lam, Megan
Niknam, Negin
Schwartz, Rebecca
Rasul, Rehana
Mol, Loyce
Chin, Suzan
Epstein, Marcia
Hirschwerk, David
Revere, Elizabeth
Hayes, Lisa
author_facet Ha, Lawrence
Lam, Megan
Niknam, Negin
Schwartz, Rebecca
Rasul, Rehana
Mol, Loyce
Chin, Suzan
Epstein, Marcia
Hirschwerk, David
Revere, Elizabeth
Hayes, Lisa
author_sort Ha, Lawrence
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) treatment is essential in preventing the reactivation of tuberculosis. We compared the clinical and demographic characteristics of patients that have completed traditional therapy with 9 months of isoniazid (9H) with those that have completed 3 months of rifapentine plus isoniazid using directly observed therapy (3HP), focusing on adverse effects, a barrier to completion that may contribute to discontinuation of therapy. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review (July 2013-March 2017) to compare the 9H group and 3HP group. Demographic and clinical variables were described by therapy type and groups were compared using Fisher’s exact test or t-test, as appropriate. RESULTS: Patients in the study sample (n = 124) had a mean age of 49.8 (SD=14.8) years old. Approximately half received 3HP (n = 64, 51.6%). Demographics in the 3HP and 9H groups were similar. Significantly more patients in the 3HP group completed treatment (81.3% vs. 61.7%, P < 0.0001). No patients were lost to follow-up in the 3HP group, 14 (23.33%) were lost in the 9H group. Gastrointestinal (GI) upset (n = 16), elevated liver function tests (LFTs) (n = 11), and headaches (n = 9) were the most frequent side effects. Except for neuropathy and pancreatitis, all other adverse side effects had higher incidence in the 3HP group. Specifically, the incidence of GI symptoms (23.4% vs. 1.7%, P = 0.0003), weakness (9.4% vs. 0%, P = 0.028), and headache (14.1% vs. 0%, P = 0.003) were significantly higher in the 3HP group. Of the observed patients with adverse reactions that received 3HP, 88.24% (n = 30) had them resolved within the first two weeks. CONCLUSION: The 3HP group had a higher completion rate and no loss to follow-up compared with 23% loss to follow-up in the 9H group, however, adverse reactions were significantly higher in the 3HP group. Closer weekly monitoring of the 3HP group could lend itself to capturing more adverse reactions, however, 88% of those adverse reactions resolved within the first two weeks of therapy. Liver function tests were not significantly different (P = 0.2079) between the two groups, and were mildly elevated. We conclude that three months of rifapentine plus isoniazid for the treatment of LTBI may be a favorable option over the traditional 9 months of isoniazid in certain populations. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5631068
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56310682017-11-07 Safety & Benefits of Directly Observed Therapy with Rifapentine and Isoniazid for Latent Tuberculosis Infection – Less is More? Ha, Lawrence Lam, Megan Niknam, Negin Schwartz, Rebecca Rasul, Rehana Mol, Loyce Chin, Suzan Epstein, Marcia Hirschwerk, David Revere, Elizabeth Hayes, Lisa Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) treatment is essential in preventing the reactivation of tuberculosis. We compared the clinical and demographic characteristics of patients that have completed traditional therapy with 9 months of isoniazid (9H) with those that have completed 3 months of rifapentine plus isoniazid using directly observed therapy (3HP), focusing on adverse effects, a barrier to completion that may contribute to discontinuation of therapy. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review (July 2013-March 2017) to compare the 9H group and 3HP group. Demographic and clinical variables were described by therapy type and groups were compared using Fisher’s exact test or t-test, as appropriate. RESULTS: Patients in the study sample (n = 124) had a mean age of 49.8 (SD=14.8) years old. Approximately half received 3HP (n = 64, 51.6%). Demographics in the 3HP and 9H groups were similar. Significantly more patients in the 3HP group completed treatment (81.3% vs. 61.7%, P < 0.0001). No patients were lost to follow-up in the 3HP group, 14 (23.33%) were lost in the 9H group. Gastrointestinal (GI) upset (n = 16), elevated liver function tests (LFTs) (n = 11), and headaches (n = 9) were the most frequent side effects. Except for neuropathy and pancreatitis, all other adverse side effects had higher incidence in the 3HP group. Specifically, the incidence of GI symptoms (23.4% vs. 1.7%, P = 0.0003), weakness (9.4% vs. 0%, P = 0.028), and headache (14.1% vs. 0%, P = 0.003) were significantly higher in the 3HP group. Of the observed patients with adverse reactions that received 3HP, 88.24% (n = 30) had them resolved within the first two weeks. CONCLUSION: The 3HP group had a higher completion rate and no loss to follow-up compared with 23% loss to follow-up in the 9H group, however, adverse reactions were significantly higher in the 3HP group. Closer weekly monitoring of the 3HP group could lend itself to capturing more adverse reactions, however, 88% of those adverse reactions resolved within the first two weeks of therapy. Liver function tests were not significantly different (P = 0.2079) between the two groups, and were mildly elevated. We conclude that three months of rifapentine plus isoniazid for the treatment of LTBI may be a favorable option over the traditional 9 months of isoniazid in certain populations. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2017-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5631068/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1643 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Ha, Lawrence
Lam, Megan
Niknam, Negin
Schwartz, Rebecca
Rasul, Rehana
Mol, Loyce
Chin, Suzan
Epstein, Marcia
Hirschwerk, David
Revere, Elizabeth
Hayes, Lisa
Safety & Benefits of Directly Observed Therapy with Rifapentine and Isoniazid for Latent Tuberculosis Infection – Less is More?
title Safety & Benefits of Directly Observed Therapy with Rifapentine and Isoniazid for Latent Tuberculosis Infection – Less is More?
title_full Safety & Benefits of Directly Observed Therapy with Rifapentine and Isoniazid for Latent Tuberculosis Infection – Less is More?
title_fullStr Safety & Benefits of Directly Observed Therapy with Rifapentine and Isoniazid for Latent Tuberculosis Infection – Less is More?
title_full_unstemmed Safety & Benefits of Directly Observed Therapy with Rifapentine and Isoniazid for Latent Tuberculosis Infection – Less is More?
title_short Safety & Benefits of Directly Observed Therapy with Rifapentine and Isoniazid for Latent Tuberculosis Infection – Less is More?
title_sort safety & benefits of directly observed therapy with rifapentine and isoniazid for latent tuberculosis infection – less is more?
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5631068/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1643
work_keys_str_mv AT halawrence safetybenefitsofdirectlyobservedtherapywithrifapentineandisoniazidforlatenttuberculosisinfectionlessismore
AT lammegan safetybenefitsofdirectlyobservedtherapywithrifapentineandisoniazidforlatenttuberculosisinfectionlessismore
AT niknamnegin safetybenefitsofdirectlyobservedtherapywithrifapentineandisoniazidforlatenttuberculosisinfectionlessismore
AT schwartzrebecca safetybenefitsofdirectlyobservedtherapywithrifapentineandisoniazidforlatenttuberculosisinfectionlessismore
AT rasulrehana safetybenefitsofdirectlyobservedtherapywithrifapentineandisoniazidforlatenttuberculosisinfectionlessismore
AT molloyce safetybenefitsofdirectlyobservedtherapywithrifapentineandisoniazidforlatenttuberculosisinfectionlessismore
AT chinsuzan safetybenefitsofdirectlyobservedtherapywithrifapentineandisoniazidforlatenttuberculosisinfectionlessismore
AT epsteinmarcia safetybenefitsofdirectlyobservedtherapywithrifapentineandisoniazidforlatenttuberculosisinfectionlessismore
AT hirschwerkdavid safetybenefitsofdirectlyobservedtherapywithrifapentineandisoniazidforlatenttuberculosisinfectionlessismore
AT revereelizabeth safetybenefitsofdirectlyobservedtherapywithrifapentineandisoniazidforlatenttuberculosisinfectionlessismore
AT hayeslisa safetybenefitsofdirectlyobservedtherapywithrifapentineandisoniazidforlatenttuberculosisinfectionlessismore