Cargando…

Evaluating the Impact of Long-Term Outpatient Ertapenem (ETP) vs. Ceftriaxone (CTX) on Clinical Success and Development of Resistance for Documented Enterobacteriaceae Infections

BACKGROUND: Ceftriaxone and ertapenem are two commonly prescribed outpatient once-daily parenteral antimicrobials with activity against Enterobacteriaceae. However, there is minimal data evaluating the impact of long-term CTX and ETP therapy on development of resistance. Therefore, the goals of this...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Carver, Peggy, Michael, Craig, Facchini, Victoria, Koseck, Anna, Edge, Corey, Nagel, Jerod
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5631122/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1317
_version_ 1783269374127243264
author Carver, Peggy
Michael, Craig
Facchini, Victoria
Koseck, Anna
Edge, Corey
Nagel, Jerod
author_facet Carver, Peggy
Michael, Craig
Facchini, Victoria
Koseck, Anna
Edge, Corey
Nagel, Jerod
author_sort Carver, Peggy
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Ceftriaxone and ertapenem are two commonly prescribed outpatient once-daily parenteral antimicrobials with activity against Enterobacteriaceae. However, there is minimal data evaluating the impact of long-term CTX and ETP therapy on development of resistance. Therefore, the goals of this study were to compare the development of resistance, incidence of Clostridium difficile colitis and clinical outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a single center, retrospective, case cohort study of all adult patients who completed at least 2 weeks of outpatient therapy. A list of adult patients receiving home ETP or CTX between 2011 and 2014 were screened for inclusion. The primary outcome was development of resistance during therapy or within 6 months of completing therapy, and secondary outcomes were mortality, readmission, clinical failure, C. difficileinfection and antibiotic cost. RESULTS: 1,989 patients were screened and 188 were included: 115 patients in the ETP group and 73 in the CTX group. The most common reason for exclusion was lack of documented Enterobacteriaceae infection. Resistance developed in 13 (6.9%) of all patients, but there was no difference in the development of resistance between groups (ETP 7/115 (6.1%) vs. 6/73 (8.2%), P = 0.57). Similar rates of C. difficile colitis occurred between groups: 7 (6.1%) patients receiving ETP and 4 patients receiving CTX. There was no difference in mortality, clinical failure or readmission. The total cost per treatment course per patient was significantly more expensive in the ETP group ($3,604 vs $221, P = <0.001). CONCLUSION: ETP and CTX demonstrated similar rates of mortality, clinical failure, readmission, and the development of resistance or C. difficile colitis. However, ETP therapy was significantly more expensive, and could be a target for stewardship intervention in select patients receiving home antibiotic therapy. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5631122
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56311222017-11-07 Evaluating the Impact of Long-Term Outpatient Ertapenem (ETP) vs. Ceftriaxone (CTX) on Clinical Success and Development of Resistance for Documented Enterobacteriaceae Infections Carver, Peggy Michael, Craig Facchini, Victoria Koseck, Anna Edge, Corey Nagel, Jerod Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Ceftriaxone and ertapenem are two commonly prescribed outpatient once-daily parenteral antimicrobials with activity against Enterobacteriaceae. However, there is minimal data evaluating the impact of long-term CTX and ETP therapy on development of resistance. Therefore, the goals of this study were to compare the development of resistance, incidence of Clostridium difficile colitis and clinical outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a single center, retrospective, case cohort study of all adult patients who completed at least 2 weeks of outpatient therapy. A list of adult patients receiving home ETP or CTX between 2011 and 2014 were screened for inclusion. The primary outcome was development of resistance during therapy or within 6 months of completing therapy, and secondary outcomes were mortality, readmission, clinical failure, C. difficileinfection and antibiotic cost. RESULTS: 1,989 patients were screened and 188 were included: 115 patients in the ETP group and 73 in the CTX group. The most common reason for exclusion was lack of documented Enterobacteriaceae infection. Resistance developed in 13 (6.9%) of all patients, but there was no difference in the development of resistance between groups (ETP 7/115 (6.1%) vs. 6/73 (8.2%), P = 0.57). Similar rates of C. difficile colitis occurred between groups: 7 (6.1%) patients receiving ETP and 4 patients receiving CTX. There was no difference in mortality, clinical failure or readmission. The total cost per treatment course per patient was significantly more expensive in the ETP group ($3,604 vs $221, P = <0.001). CONCLUSION: ETP and CTX demonstrated similar rates of mortality, clinical failure, readmission, and the development of resistance or C. difficile colitis. However, ETP therapy was significantly more expensive, and could be a target for stewardship intervention in select patients receiving home antibiotic therapy. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2017-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5631122/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1317 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Carver, Peggy
Michael, Craig
Facchini, Victoria
Koseck, Anna
Edge, Corey
Nagel, Jerod
Evaluating the Impact of Long-Term Outpatient Ertapenem (ETP) vs. Ceftriaxone (CTX) on Clinical Success and Development of Resistance for Documented Enterobacteriaceae Infections
title Evaluating the Impact of Long-Term Outpatient Ertapenem (ETP) vs. Ceftriaxone (CTX) on Clinical Success and Development of Resistance for Documented Enterobacteriaceae Infections
title_full Evaluating the Impact of Long-Term Outpatient Ertapenem (ETP) vs. Ceftriaxone (CTX) on Clinical Success and Development of Resistance for Documented Enterobacteriaceae Infections
title_fullStr Evaluating the Impact of Long-Term Outpatient Ertapenem (ETP) vs. Ceftriaxone (CTX) on Clinical Success and Development of Resistance for Documented Enterobacteriaceae Infections
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the Impact of Long-Term Outpatient Ertapenem (ETP) vs. Ceftriaxone (CTX) on Clinical Success and Development of Resistance for Documented Enterobacteriaceae Infections
title_short Evaluating the Impact of Long-Term Outpatient Ertapenem (ETP) vs. Ceftriaxone (CTX) on Clinical Success and Development of Resistance for Documented Enterobacteriaceae Infections
title_sort evaluating the impact of long-term outpatient ertapenem (etp) vs. ceftriaxone (ctx) on clinical success and development of resistance for documented enterobacteriaceae infections
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5631122/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1317
work_keys_str_mv AT carverpeggy evaluatingtheimpactoflongtermoutpatientertapenemetpvsceftriaxonectxonclinicalsuccessanddevelopmentofresistancefordocumentedenterobacteriaceaeinfections
AT michaelcraig evaluatingtheimpactoflongtermoutpatientertapenemetpvsceftriaxonectxonclinicalsuccessanddevelopmentofresistancefordocumentedenterobacteriaceaeinfections
AT facchinivictoria evaluatingtheimpactoflongtermoutpatientertapenemetpvsceftriaxonectxonclinicalsuccessanddevelopmentofresistancefordocumentedenterobacteriaceaeinfections
AT koseckanna evaluatingtheimpactoflongtermoutpatientertapenemetpvsceftriaxonectxonclinicalsuccessanddevelopmentofresistancefordocumentedenterobacteriaceaeinfections
AT edgecorey evaluatingtheimpactoflongtermoutpatientertapenemetpvsceftriaxonectxonclinicalsuccessanddevelopmentofresistancefordocumentedenterobacteriaceaeinfections
AT nageljerod evaluatingtheimpactoflongtermoutpatientertapenemetpvsceftriaxonectxonclinicalsuccessanddevelopmentofresistancefordocumentedenterobacteriaceaeinfections