Cargando…
Evaluating the Impact of Long-Term Outpatient Ertapenem (ETP) vs. Ceftriaxone (CTX) on Clinical Success and Development of Resistance for Documented Enterobacteriaceae Infections
BACKGROUND: Ceftriaxone and ertapenem are two commonly prescribed outpatient once-daily parenteral antimicrobials with activity against Enterobacteriaceae. However, there is minimal data evaluating the impact of long-term CTX and ETP therapy on development of resistance. Therefore, the goals of this...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5631122/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1317 |
_version_ | 1783269374127243264 |
---|---|
author | Carver, Peggy Michael, Craig Facchini, Victoria Koseck, Anna Edge, Corey Nagel, Jerod |
author_facet | Carver, Peggy Michael, Craig Facchini, Victoria Koseck, Anna Edge, Corey Nagel, Jerod |
author_sort | Carver, Peggy |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Ceftriaxone and ertapenem are two commonly prescribed outpatient once-daily parenteral antimicrobials with activity against Enterobacteriaceae. However, there is minimal data evaluating the impact of long-term CTX and ETP therapy on development of resistance. Therefore, the goals of this study were to compare the development of resistance, incidence of Clostridium difficile colitis and clinical outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a single center, retrospective, case cohort study of all adult patients who completed at least 2 weeks of outpatient therapy. A list of adult patients receiving home ETP or CTX between 2011 and 2014 were screened for inclusion. The primary outcome was development of resistance during therapy or within 6 months of completing therapy, and secondary outcomes were mortality, readmission, clinical failure, C. difficileinfection and antibiotic cost. RESULTS: 1,989 patients were screened and 188 were included: 115 patients in the ETP group and 73 in the CTX group. The most common reason for exclusion was lack of documented Enterobacteriaceae infection. Resistance developed in 13 (6.9%) of all patients, but there was no difference in the development of resistance between groups (ETP 7/115 (6.1%) vs. 6/73 (8.2%), P = 0.57). Similar rates of C. difficile colitis occurred between groups: 7 (6.1%) patients receiving ETP and 4 patients receiving CTX. There was no difference in mortality, clinical failure or readmission. The total cost per treatment course per patient was significantly more expensive in the ETP group ($3,604 vs $221, P = <0.001). CONCLUSION: ETP and CTX demonstrated similar rates of mortality, clinical failure, readmission, and the development of resistance or C. difficile colitis. However, ETP therapy was significantly more expensive, and could be a target for stewardship intervention in select patients receiving home antibiotic therapy. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5631122 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56311222017-11-07 Evaluating the Impact of Long-Term Outpatient Ertapenem (ETP) vs. Ceftriaxone (CTX) on Clinical Success and Development of Resistance for Documented Enterobacteriaceae Infections Carver, Peggy Michael, Craig Facchini, Victoria Koseck, Anna Edge, Corey Nagel, Jerod Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Ceftriaxone and ertapenem are two commonly prescribed outpatient once-daily parenteral antimicrobials with activity against Enterobacteriaceae. However, there is minimal data evaluating the impact of long-term CTX and ETP therapy on development of resistance. Therefore, the goals of this study were to compare the development of resistance, incidence of Clostridium difficile colitis and clinical outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a single center, retrospective, case cohort study of all adult patients who completed at least 2 weeks of outpatient therapy. A list of adult patients receiving home ETP or CTX between 2011 and 2014 were screened for inclusion. The primary outcome was development of resistance during therapy or within 6 months of completing therapy, and secondary outcomes were mortality, readmission, clinical failure, C. difficileinfection and antibiotic cost. RESULTS: 1,989 patients were screened and 188 were included: 115 patients in the ETP group and 73 in the CTX group. The most common reason for exclusion was lack of documented Enterobacteriaceae infection. Resistance developed in 13 (6.9%) of all patients, but there was no difference in the development of resistance between groups (ETP 7/115 (6.1%) vs. 6/73 (8.2%), P = 0.57). Similar rates of C. difficile colitis occurred between groups: 7 (6.1%) patients receiving ETP and 4 patients receiving CTX. There was no difference in mortality, clinical failure or readmission. The total cost per treatment course per patient was significantly more expensive in the ETP group ($3,604 vs $221, P = <0.001). CONCLUSION: ETP and CTX demonstrated similar rates of mortality, clinical failure, readmission, and the development of resistance or C. difficile colitis. However, ETP therapy was significantly more expensive, and could be a target for stewardship intervention in select patients receiving home antibiotic therapy. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2017-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5631122/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1317 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Abstracts Carver, Peggy Michael, Craig Facchini, Victoria Koseck, Anna Edge, Corey Nagel, Jerod Evaluating the Impact of Long-Term Outpatient Ertapenem (ETP) vs. Ceftriaxone (CTX) on Clinical Success and Development of Resistance for Documented Enterobacteriaceae Infections |
title | Evaluating the Impact of Long-Term Outpatient Ertapenem (ETP) vs. Ceftriaxone (CTX) on Clinical Success and Development of Resistance for Documented Enterobacteriaceae Infections |
title_full | Evaluating the Impact of Long-Term Outpatient Ertapenem (ETP) vs. Ceftriaxone (CTX) on Clinical Success and Development of Resistance for Documented Enterobacteriaceae Infections |
title_fullStr | Evaluating the Impact of Long-Term Outpatient Ertapenem (ETP) vs. Ceftriaxone (CTX) on Clinical Success and Development of Resistance for Documented Enterobacteriaceae Infections |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating the Impact of Long-Term Outpatient Ertapenem (ETP) vs. Ceftriaxone (CTX) on Clinical Success and Development of Resistance for Documented Enterobacteriaceae Infections |
title_short | Evaluating the Impact of Long-Term Outpatient Ertapenem (ETP) vs. Ceftriaxone (CTX) on Clinical Success and Development of Resistance for Documented Enterobacteriaceae Infections |
title_sort | evaluating the impact of long-term outpatient ertapenem (etp) vs. ceftriaxone (ctx) on clinical success and development of resistance for documented enterobacteriaceae infections |
topic | Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5631122/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1317 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT carverpeggy evaluatingtheimpactoflongtermoutpatientertapenemetpvsceftriaxonectxonclinicalsuccessanddevelopmentofresistancefordocumentedenterobacteriaceaeinfections AT michaelcraig evaluatingtheimpactoflongtermoutpatientertapenemetpvsceftriaxonectxonclinicalsuccessanddevelopmentofresistancefordocumentedenterobacteriaceaeinfections AT facchinivictoria evaluatingtheimpactoflongtermoutpatientertapenemetpvsceftriaxonectxonclinicalsuccessanddevelopmentofresistancefordocumentedenterobacteriaceaeinfections AT koseckanna evaluatingtheimpactoflongtermoutpatientertapenemetpvsceftriaxonectxonclinicalsuccessanddevelopmentofresistancefordocumentedenterobacteriaceaeinfections AT edgecorey evaluatingtheimpactoflongtermoutpatientertapenemetpvsceftriaxonectxonclinicalsuccessanddevelopmentofresistancefordocumentedenterobacteriaceaeinfections AT nageljerod evaluatingtheimpactoflongtermoutpatientertapenemetpvsceftriaxonectxonclinicalsuccessanddevelopmentofresistancefordocumentedenterobacteriaceaeinfections |