Cargando…
Factors Affecting Effectiveness of Fecal Microbiota Transplant
BACKGROUND: Fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) is an effective treatment for relapsing Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). With more widespread use of this intervention, variable cure rates (70–95%) have been observed. We conducted this study to identify specific patient- and procedure-level facto...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5631128/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.959 |
_version_ | 1783269375572180992 |
---|---|
author | Mosby, Danielle Mcgraw, Patty Duffalo, Chad Drees, Marci Depalma, Fedele Herdman, Christine Myerson, Scott Bacon, Alfred E |
author_facet | Mosby, Danielle Mcgraw, Patty Duffalo, Chad Drees, Marci Depalma, Fedele Herdman, Christine Myerson, Scott Bacon, Alfred E |
author_sort | Mosby, Danielle |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) is an effective treatment for relapsing Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). With more widespread use of this intervention, variable cure rates (70–95%) have been observed. We conducted this study to identify specific patient- and procedure-level factors affecting FMT effectiveness, hypothesizing that those patients with higher comorbidity, inadequate bowel preparation, and shorter retention of transplant would fail more frequently. METHODS: At our 2-hospital, >1100-bed community-based academic center, we prospectively followed patients pre/post-FMT between June 2014-April 2017. To undergo FMT, patients must have ≥2 CDI relapses and failed vancomycin taper. We entered all FMT patients into a registry and followed them regularly for up to 1 year, collecting age, Charlson Comorbidity Index, number of CDI relapses, Boston bowel prep score, and stool retention time. FMT donor stool was obtained from OpenBiome (Boston, MA). We defined failure as recurrent CDI requiring treatment ≤8 weeks after FMT. We used 1-sided t-tests to test our hypotheses. RESULTS: During the study period, 41 patients (mean age 65 years, SD 17.6) underwent FMT. Most (37, 90%) were performed via colonoscopy, 1 via upper endoscopy, and 3 via oral preparation (capsules). FMT failure occurred in 10 patients (24.4%). Nearly half (n = 20) reported adverse events, including constipation, gas, abdominal pain, blood in stool, and fatigue. Three patients expired from comorbid disease, and 3 were lost to follow-up. Patients with higher Charlson scores failed more frequently (P = 0.04), and history of tumor (P = 0.03) and pulmonary disease (P = 0.04) were both associated with failure. No other factors, including age, retention time, and Boston bowel prep score, were associated with failure. CONCLUSION: This study found that patients with multiple comorbid conditions, as defined by the Charlson index, are at risk for FMT failure. However, quality of bowel prep and retention time did not predict FMT failure. Future studies should include larger samples of FMT patients to determine whether specific comorbidities such as history of tumor and pulmonary disease are clinically significant predictors of FMT failure. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5631128 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56311282017-11-07 Factors Affecting Effectiveness of Fecal Microbiota Transplant Mosby, Danielle Mcgraw, Patty Duffalo, Chad Drees, Marci Depalma, Fedele Herdman, Christine Myerson, Scott Bacon, Alfred E Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) is an effective treatment for relapsing Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). With more widespread use of this intervention, variable cure rates (70–95%) have been observed. We conducted this study to identify specific patient- and procedure-level factors affecting FMT effectiveness, hypothesizing that those patients with higher comorbidity, inadequate bowel preparation, and shorter retention of transplant would fail more frequently. METHODS: At our 2-hospital, >1100-bed community-based academic center, we prospectively followed patients pre/post-FMT between June 2014-April 2017. To undergo FMT, patients must have ≥2 CDI relapses and failed vancomycin taper. We entered all FMT patients into a registry and followed them regularly for up to 1 year, collecting age, Charlson Comorbidity Index, number of CDI relapses, Boston bowel prep score, and stool retention time. FMT donor stool was obtained from OpenBiome (Boston, MA). We defined failure as recurrent CDI requiring treatment ≤8 weeks after FMT. We used 1-sided t-tests to test our hypotheses. RESULTS: During the study period, 41 patients (mean age 65 years, SD 17.6) underwent FMT. Most (37, 90%) were performed via colonoscopy, 1 via upper endoscopy, and 3 via oral preparation (capsules). FMT failure occurred in 10 patients (24.4%). Nearly half (n = 20) reported adverse events, including constipation, gas, abdominal pain, blood in stool, and fatigue. Three patients expired from comorbid disease, and 3 were lost to follow-up. Patients with higher Charlson scores failed more frequently (P = 0.04), and history of tumor (P = 0.03) and pulmonary disease (P = 0.04) were both associated with failure. No other factors, including age, retention time, and Boston bowel prep score, were associated with failure. CONCLUSION: This study found that patients with multiple comorbid conditions, as defined by the Charlson index, are at risk for FMT failure. However, quality of bowel prep and retention time did not predict FMT failure. Future studies should include larger samples of FMT patients to determine whether specific comorbidities such as history of tumor and pulmonary disease are clinically significant predictors of FMT failure. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2017-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5631128/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.959 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Abstracts Mosby, Danielle Mcgraw, Patty Duffalo, Chad Drees, Marci Depalma, Fedele Herdman, Christine Myerson, Scott Bacon, Alfred E Factors Affecting Effectiveness of Fecal Microbiota Transplant |
title | Factors Affecting Effectiveness of Fecal Microbiota Transplant |
title_full | Factors Affecting Effectiveness of Fecal Microbiota Transplant |
title_fullStr | Factors Affecting Effectiveness of Fecal Microbiota Transplant |
title_full_unstemmed | Factors Affecting Effectiveness of Fecal Microbiota Transplant |
title_short | Factors Affecting Effectiveness of Fecal Microbiota Transplant |
title_sort | factors affecting effectiveness of fecal microbiota transplant |
topic | Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5631128/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.959 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mosbydanielle factorsaffectingeffectivenessoffecalmicrobiotatransplant AT mcgrawpatty factorsaffectingeffectivenessoffecalmicrobiotatransplant AT duffalochad factorsaffectingeffectivenessoffecalmicrobiotatransplant AT dreesmarci factorsaffectingeffectivenessoffecalmicrobiotatransplant AT depalmafedele factorsaffectingeffectivenessoffecalmicrobiotatransplant AT herdmanchristine factorsaffectingeffectivenessoffecalmicrobiotatransplant AT myersonscott factorsaffectingeffectivenessoffecalmicrobiotatransplant AT baconalfrede factorsaffectingeffectivenessoffecalmicrobiotatransplant |