Cargando…

Factors Affecting Effectiveness of Fecal Microbiota Transplant

BACKGROUND: Fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) is an effective treatment for relapsing Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). With more widespread use of this intervention, variable cure rates (70–95%) have been observed. We conducted this study to identify specific patient- and procedure-level facto...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mosby, Danielle, Mcgraw, Patty, Duffalo, Chad, Drees, Marci, Depalma, Fedele, Herdman, Christine, Myerson, Scott, Bacon, Alfred E
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5631128/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.959
_version_ 1783269375572180992
author Mosby, Danielle
Mcgraw, Patty
Duffalo, Chad
Drees, Marci
Depalma, Fedele
Herdman, Christine
Myerson, Scott
Bacon, Alfred E
author_facet Mosby, Danielle
Mcgraw, Patty
Duffalo, Chad
Drees, Marci
Depalma, Fedele
Herdman, Christine
Myerson, Scott
Bacon, Alfred E
author_sort Mosby, Danielle
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) is an effective treatment for relapsing Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). With more widespread use of this intervention, variable cure rates (70–95%) have been observed. We conducted this study to identify specific patient- and procedure-level factors affecting FMT effectiveness, hypothesizing that those patients with higher comorbidity, inadequate bowel preparation, and shorter retention of transplant would fail more frequently. METHODS: At our 2-hospital, >1100-bed community-based academic center, we prospectively followed patients pre/post-FMT between June 2014-April 2017. To undergo FMT, patients must have ≥2 CDI relapses and failed vancomycin taper. We entered all FMT patients into a registry and followed them regularly for up to 1 year, collecting age, Charlson Comorbidity Index, number of CDI relapses, Boston bowel prep score, and stool retention time. FMT donor stool was obtained from OpenBiome (Boston, MA). We defined failure as recurrent CDI requiring treatment ≤8 weeks after FMT. We used 1-sided t-tests to test our hypotheses. RESULTS: During the study period, 41 patients (mean age 65 years, SD 17.6) underwent FMT. Most (37, 90%) were performed via colonoscopy, 1 via upper endoscopy, and 3 via oral preparation (capsules). FMT failure occurred in 10 patients (24.4%). Nearly half (n = 20) reported adverse events, including constipation, gas, abdominal pain, blood in stool, and fatigue. Three patients expired from comorbid disease, and 3 were lost to follow-up. Patients with higher Charlson scores failed more frequently (P = 0.04), and history of tumor (P = 0.03) and pulmonary disease (P = 0.04) were both associated with failure. No other factors, including age, retention time, and Boston bowel prep score, were associated with failure. CONCLUSION: This study found that patients with multiple comorbid conditions, as defined by the Charlson index, are at risk for FMT failure. However, quality of bowel prep and retention time did not predict FMT failure. Future studies should include larger samples of FMT patients to determine whether specific comorbidities such as history of tumor and pulmonary disease are clinically significant predictors of FMT failure. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5631128
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56311282017-11-07 Factors Affecting Effectiveness of Fecal Microbiota Transplant Mosby, Danielle Mcgraw, Patty Duffalo, Chad Drees, Marci Depalma, Fedele Herdman, Christine Myerson, Scott Bacon, Alfred E Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) is an effective treatment for relapsing Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). With more widespread use of this intervention, variable cure rates (70–95%) have been observed. We conducted this study to identify specific patient- and procedure-level factors affecting FMT effectiveness, hypothesizing that those patients with higher comorbidity, inadequate bowel preparation, and shorter retention of transplant would fail more frequently. METHODS: At our 2-hospital, >1100-bed community-based academic center, we prospectively followed patients pre/post-FMT between June 2014-April 2017. To undergo FMT, patients must have ≥2 CDI relapses and failed vancomycin taper. We entered all FMT patients into a registry and followed them regularly for up to 1 year, collecting age, Charlson Comorbidity Index, number of CDI relapses, Boston bowel prep score, and stool retention time. FMT donor stool was obtained from OpenBiome (Boston, MA). We defined failure as recurrent CDI requiring treatment ≤8 weeks after FMT. We used 1-sided t-tests to test our hypotheses. RESULTS: During the study period, 41 patients (mean age 65 years, SD 17.6) underwent FMT. Most (37, 90%) were performed via colonoscopy, 1 via upper endoscopy, and 3 via oral preparation (capsules). FMT failure occurred in 10 patients (24.4%). Nearly half (n = 20) reported adverse events, including constipation, gas, abdominal pain, blood in stool, and fatigue. Three patients expired from comorbid disease, and 3 were lost to follow-up. Patients with higher Charlson scores failed more frequently (P = 0.04), and history of tumor (P = 0.03) and pulmonary disease (P = 0.04) were both associated with failure. No other factors, including age, retention time, and Boston bowel prep score, were associated with failure. CONCLUSION: This study found that patients with multiple comorbid conditions, as defined by the Charlson index, are at risk for FMT failure. However, quality of bowel prep and retention time did not predict FMT failure. Future studies should include larger samples of FMT patients to determine whether specific comorbidities such as history of tumor and pulmonary disease are clinically significant predictors of FMT failure. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2017-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5631128/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.959 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Mosby, Danielle
Mcgraw, Patty
Duffalo, Chad
Drees, Marci
Depalma, Fedele
Herdman, Christine
Myerson, Scott
Bacon, Alfred E
Factors Affecting Effectiveness of Fecal Microbiota Transplant
title Factors Affecting Effectiveness of Fecal Microbiota Transplant
title_full Factors Affecting Effectiveness of Fecal Microbiota Transplant
title_fullStr Factors Affecting Effectiveness of Fecal Microbiota Transplant
title_full_unstemmed Factors Affecting Effectiveness of Fecal Microbiota Transplant
title_short Factors Affecting Effectiveness of Fecal Microbiota Transplant
title_sort factors affecting effectiveness of fecal microbiota transplant
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5631128/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.959
work_keys_str_mv AT mosbydanielle factorsaffectingeffectivenessoffecalmicrobiotatransplant
AT mcgrawpatty factorsaffectingeffectivenessoffecalmicrobiotatransplant
AT duffalochad factorsaffectingeffectivenessoffecalmicrobiotatransplant
AT dreesmarci factorsaffectingeffectivenessoffecalmicrobiotatransplant
AT depalmafedele factorsaffectingeffectivenessoffecalmicrobiotatransplant
AT herdmanchristine factorsaffectingeffectivenessoffecalmicrobiotatransplant
AT myersonscott factorsaffectingeffectivenessoffecalmicrobiotatransplant
AT baconalfrede factorsaffectingeffectivenessoffecalmicrobiotatransplant