Cargando…

Evaluation of the FilmArray Meningitis/Encephalitis Molecular Panel in a Tertiary Care Public County Hospital

BACKGROUND: Rapid diagnosis and treatment of meningitis and encephalitis is critical to reduce morbidity and mortality. The Biofire FilmArray Meningitis/Encephalitis (ME) Panel is a rapid, multiplex PCR assay that targets 14 common bacterial, viral, and fungal agents of ME. To our knowledge, there a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Tae Hun, Minejima, Emi, Spellberg, Brad, Shulman, Ira, Holtom, Paul, Kang, Tarina, Butler-Wu, Susan M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5631135/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1563
_version_ 1783269377356857344
author Kim, Tae Hun
Minejima, Emi
Spellberg, Brad
Shulman, Ira
Holtom, Paul
Kang, Tarina
Butler-Wu, Susan M
author_facet Kim, Tae Hun
Minejima, Emi
Spellberg, Brad
Shulman, Ira
Holtom, Paul
Kang, Tarina
Butler-Wu, Susan M
author_sort Kim, Tae Hun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Rapid diagnosis and treatment of meningitis and encephalitis is critical to reduce morbidity and mortality. The Biofire FilmArray Meningitis/Encephalitis (ME) Panel is a rapid, multiplex PCR assay that targets 14 common bacterial, viral, and fungal agents of ME. To our knowledge, there are no published studies evaluating the ME Panel’s impact on clinical decision-making. METHODS: Retrospective chart review was performed on 100 consecutive cases from January through April 2017 who underwent testing with the ME Panel. ME Panel results were compared with conventional testing methods. Each case was categorized as either contributory (n = 51), possibly contributory (n = 13), or noncontributory (n = 36) based upon clinicians’ acknowledgement and utilization of ME Panel results. Duration of ME antimicrobial therapy (bacterial, viral, and/or fungal) was determined for each case. RESULTS: The average patient age was 41.1 years, with 37% of cases having either a new or established HIV diagnosis at the time of testing. The average turnaround time to reporting was 3.7 hours. The ME panel was positive in seven cases and demonstrated 100% sensitivity and 100% clinical specificity. During the study period, ME Panel detected infections with varicella-zoster virus, Cryptococcus neoformans in three different patients, Listeria monocytogenes, enterovirus, and Streptococcus pneumoniae. The ME panel detected L. monocytogenes and S. pneumoniae despite antibiotic therapy prior to lumbar puncture. The CSF cultures were subsequently negative but blood cultures were positive. Duration of antibacterial therapy was significantly decreased in the contributory and possibly contributory cases compared with noncontributory cases (28.38 hours vs. 76.69 hours, P = 0.04). Although not statistically significant, similar reductions were observed in duration of antiviral therapy (P = 0.4). CONCLUSION: The FilmArray ME Panel demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity during the study period and was capable of detecting infections that would only have been diagnosed by blood culture. Duration of therapy was reduced in patients where the ME panel was contributory to clinical medical decision-making. DISCLOSURES: S. M. Butler-Wu, Biofire Diagnostics: Consultant, Consulting fee and Research support
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5631135
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56311352017-11-07 Evaluation of the FilmArray Meningitis/Encephalitis Molecular Panel in a Tertiary Care Public County Hospital Kim, Tae Hun Minejima, Emi Spellberg, Brad Shulman, Ira Holtom, Paul Kang, Tarina Butler-Wu, Susan M Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Rapid diagnosis and treatment of meningitis and encephalitis is critical to reduce morbidity and mortality. The Biofire FilmArray Meningitis/Encephalitis (ME) Panel is a rapid, multiplex PCR assay that targets 14 common bacterial, viral, and fungal agents of ME. To our knowledge, there are no published studies evaluating the ME Panel’s impact on clinical decision-making. METHODS: Retrospective chart review was performed on 100 consecutive cases from January through April 2017 who underwent testing with the ME Panel. ME Panel results were compared with conventional testing methods. Each case was categorized as either contributory (n = 51), possibly contributory (n = 13), or noncontributory (n = 36) based upon clinicians’ acknowledgement and utilization of ME Panel results. Duration of ME antimicrobial therapy (bacterial, viral, and/or fungal) was determined for each case. RESULTS: The average patient age was 41.1 years, with 37% of cases having either a new or established HIV diagnosis at the time of testing. The average turnaround time to reporting was 3.7 hours. The ME panel was positive in seven cases and demonstrated 100% sensitivity and 100% clinical specificity. During the study period, ME Panel detected infections with varicella-zoster virus, Cryptococcus neoformans in three different patients, Listeria monocytogenes, enterovirus, and Streptococcus pneumoniae. The ME panel detected L. monocytogenes and S. pneumoniae despite antibiotic therapy prior to lumbar puncture. The CSF cultures were subsequently negative but blood cultures were positive. Duration of antibacterial therapy was significantly decreased in the contributory and possibly contributory cases compared with noncontributory cases (28.38 hours vs. 76.69 hours, P = 0.04). Although not statistically significant, similar reductions were observed in duration of antiviral therapy (P = 0.4). CONCLUSION: The FilmArray ME Panel demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity during the study period and was capable of detecting infections that would only have been diagnosed by blood culture. Duration of therapy was reduced in patients where the ME panel was contributory to clinical medical decision-making. DISCLOSURES: S. M. Butler-Wu, Biofire Diagnostics: Consultant, Consulting fee and Research support Oxford University Press 2017-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5631135/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1563 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Kim, Tae Hun
Minejima, Emi
Spellberg, Brad
Shulman, Ira
Holtom, Paul
Kang, Tarina
Butler-Wu, Susan M
Evaluation of the FilmArray Meningitis/Encephalitis Molecular Panel in a Tertiary Care Public County Hospital
title Evaluation of the FilmArray Meningitis/Encephalitis Molecular Panel in a Tertiary Care Public County Hospital
title_full Evaluation of the FilmArray Meningitis/Encephalitis Molecular Panel in a Tertiary Care Public County Hospital
title_fullStr Evaluation of the FilmArray Meningitis/Encephalitis Molecular Panel in a Tertiary Care Public County Hospital
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the FilmArray Meningitis/Encephalitis Molecular Panel in a Tertiary Care Public County Hospital
title_short Evaluation of the FilmArray Meningitis/Encephalitis Molecular Panel in a Tertiary Care Public County Hospital
title_sort evaluation of the filmarray meningitis/encephalitis molecular panel in a tertiary care public county hospital
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5631135/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1563
work_keys_str_mv AT kimtaehun evaluationofthefilmarraymeningitisencephalitismolecularpanelinatertiarycarepubliccountyhospital
AT minejimaemi evaluationofthefilmarraymeningitisencephalitismolecularpanelinatertiarycarepubliccountyhospital
AT spellbergbrad evaluationofthefilmarraymeningitisencephalitismolecularpanelinatertiarycarepubliccountyhospital
AT shulmanira evaluationofthefilmarraymeningitisencephalitismolecularpanelinatertiarycarepubliccountyhospital
AT holtompaul evaluationofthefilmarraymeningitisencephalitismolecularpanelinatertiarycarepubliccountyhospital
AT kangtarina evaluationofthefilmarraymeningitisencephalitismolecularpanelinatertiarycarepubliccountyhospital
AT butlerwususanm evaluationofthefilmarraymeningitisencephalitismolecularpanelinatertiarycarepubliccountyhospital