Cargando…

An Evaluation of Vitek2™ Direct Susceptibility Testing (DST) of 
Gram-Negative Bacteria (GNB) from Positive Blood Cultures (+BC).

BACKGROUND: Delayed reporting of antibiotic susceptibility results impacts the treatment of patients with bacteremia. We evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of DST of GNB from pellets used for rapid identification (ID) directly from +BC. METHODS: Pellets from 1.5 mL of +BC in our lab have been...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gregson, Daniel, Church, Deirdre, Chan, Wilson W, Williscroft, Holly, Campbell, Lorraine, Pitout, Johann
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5631148/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1560
_version_ 1783269380659871744
author Gregson, Daniel
Church, Deirdre
Chan, Wilson W
Williscroft, Holly
Campbell, Lorraine
Pitout, Johann
author_facet Gregson, Daniel
Church, Deirdre
Chan, Wilson W
Williscroft, Holly
Campbell, Lorraine
Pitout, Johann
author_sort Gregson, Daniel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Delayed reporting of antibiotic susceptibility results impacts the treatment of patients with bacteremia. We evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of DST of GNB from pellets used for rapid identification (ID) directly from +BC. METHODS: Pellets from 1.5 mL of +BC in our lab have been used for the direct speciation of bacteria. For 109 samples identified as aerobic GNB on these pellets, the remainder of the sample was suspended in 0.45% NaCl to a standard density of 0.5 McFarland. Specimens were then processed using Vitek2(TM) N216 cards according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Results were compared with those from susceptibility testing from plate subculture 18 – 24 hours later. Antibiotics not reported on blood isolates from this card including were not included in the analysis. To increase the number of antibiotic-resistant organisms (ARO), 35 highly resistant GNB were seeded into BC and processed as above. RESULTS: Clinical specimens tested included 80 E. coli (EC), 14 K. pneumoniae, 5 K. oxytoca, 3 E. cloacae, and 2 P. aeruginosa, 2 P. mirabilis, and one each of S. marscesens, S. typhi, P. vulgaris, and R. planticola. DST results were available on average 24.8 (95% CI 23.4 - 26.2) hours earlier. Of 235 antibiotic resistant results, there were 2 very major errors (VME) (0.85%) with DST - both in EC against cefepime (CPM). These isolates flagged as possible ESBL-producers based on the ceftazidime (CTAZ) or ceftriaxone (CTRX) DST. Two major errors (MAE) occurred with trimpethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (0.85%). Minor errors occurred in 17 cases all within one dilution of the standard MIC. All of the other tests resulted in categorical or essential agreement. On the ARO tested, there were 405 antibiotic resistant results on standard testing. In this set, there were 10 VME (0.25%); including 1 amikacin, 2 CPM, 1 CTRX, 6 meropenem (MERO). Mechanisms of resistance in these VME included organisms with VIM (6), OXA (3), and KPC (1) genes. All VME with CPM, MERO, and CTRX were flagged as potential ESBL-producers base on the CTAZ result. One MAE with cefoxitin. CONCLUSION: DST from BC produces reliable results 24 hour sooner than standard testing. Isolates flagged for potential resistance to thirdgeneration cephalosporin and/or carbapenem on DST need further testing. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5631148
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56311482017-11-07 An Evaluation of Vitek2™ Direct Susceptibility Testing (DST) of 
Gram-Negative Bacteria (GNB) from Positive Blood Cultures (+BC). Gregson, Daniel Church, Deirdre Chan, Wilson W Williscroft, Holly Campbell, Lorraine Pitout, Johann Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Delayed reporting of antibiotic susceptibility results impacts the treatment of patients with bacteremia. We evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of DST of GNB from pellets used for rapid identification (ID) directly from +BC. METHODS: Pellets from 1.5 mL of +BC in our lab have been used for the direct speciation of bacteria. For 109 samples identified as aerobic GNB on these pellets, the remainder of the sample was suspended in 0.45% NaCl to a standard density of 0.5 McFarland. Specimens were then processed using Vitek2(TM) N216 cards according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Results were compared with those from susceptibility testing from plate subculture 18 – 24 hours later. Antibiotics not reported on blood isolates from this card including were not included in the analysis. To increase the number of antibiotic-resistant organisms (ARO), 35 highly resistant GNB were seeded into BC and processed as above. RESULTS: Clinical specimens tested included 80 E. coli (EC), 14 K. pneumoniae, 5 K. oxytoca, 3 E. cloacae, and 2 P. aeruginosa, 2 P. mirabilis, and one each of S. marscesens, S. typhi, P. vulgaris, and R. planticola. DST results were available on average 24.8 (95% CI 23.4 - 26.2) hours earlier. Of 235 antibiotic resistant results, there were 2 very major errors (VME) (0.85%) with DST - both in EC against cefepime (CPM). These isolates flagged as possible ESBL-producers based on the ceftazidime (CTAZ) or ceftriaxone (CTRX) DST. Two major errors (MAE) occurred with trimpethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (0.85%). Minor errors occurred in 17 cases all within one dilution of the standard MIC. All of the other tests resulted in categorical or essential agreement. On the ARO tested, there were 405 antibiotic resistant results on standard testing. In this set, there were 10 VME (0.25%); including 1 amikacin, 2 CPM, 1 CTRX, 6 meropenem (MERO). Mechanisms of resistance in these VME included organisms with VIM (6), OXA (3), and KPC (1) genes. All VME with CPM, MERO, and CTRX were flagged as potential ESBL-producers base on the CTAZ result. One MAE with cefoxitin. CONCLUSION: DST from BC produces reliable results 24 hour sooner than standard testing. Isolates flagged for potential resistance to thirdgeneration cephalosporin and/or carbapenem on DST need further testing. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2017-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5631148/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1560 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Gregson, Daniel
Church, Deirdre
Chan, Wilson W
Williscroft, Holly
Campbell, Lorraine
Pitout, Johann
An Evaluation of Vitek2™ Direct Susceptibility Testing (DST) of 
Gram-Negative Bacteria (GNB) from Positive Blood Cultures (+BC).
title An Evaluation of Vitek2™ Direct Susceptibility Testing (DST) of 
Gram-Negative Bacteria (GNB) from Positive Blood Cultures (+BC).
title_full An Evaluation of Vitek2™ Direct Susceptibility Testing (DST) of 
Gram-Negative Bacteria (GNB) from Positive Blood Cultures (+BC).
title_fullStr An Evaluation of Vitek2™ Direct Susceptibility Testing (DST) of 
Gram-Negative Bacteria (GNB) from Positive Blood Cultures (+BC).
title_full_unstemmed An Evaluation of Vitek2™ Direct Susceptibility Testing (DST) of 
Gram-Negative Bacteria (GNB) from Positive Blood Cultures (+BC).
title_short An Evaluation of Vitek2™ Direct Susceptibility Testing (DST) of 
Gram-Negative Bacteria (GNB) from Positive Blood Cultures (+BC).
title_sort evaluation of vitek2™ direct susceptibility testing (dst) of 
gram-negative bacteria (gnb) from positive blood cultures (+bc).
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5631148/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1560
work_keys_str_mv AT gregsondaniel anevaluationofvitek2directsusceptibilitytestingdstofgramnegativebacteriagnbfrompositivebloodculturesbc
AT churchdeirdre anevaluationofvitek2directsusceptibilitytestingdstofgramnegativebacteriagnbfrompositivebloodculturesbc
AT chanwilsonw anevaluationofvitek2directsusceptibilitytestingdstofgramnegativebacteriagnbfrompositivebloodculturesbc
AT williscroftholly anevaluationofvitek2directsusceptibilitytestingdstofgramnegativebacteriagnbfrompositivebloodculturesbc
AT campbelllorraine anevaluationofvitek2directsusceptibilitytestingdstofgramnegativebacteriagnbfrompositivebloodculturesbc
AT pitoutjohann anevaluationofvitek2directsusceptibilitytestingdstofgramnegativebacteriagnbfrompositivebloodculturesbc
AT gregsondaniel evaluationofvitek2directsusceptibilitytestingdstofgramnegativebacteriagnbfrompositivebloodculturesbc
AT churchdeirdre evaluationofvitek2directsusceptibilitytestingdstofgramnegativebacteriagnbfrompositivebloodculturesbc
AT chanwilsonw evaluationofvitek2directsusceptibilitytestingdstofgramnegativebacteriagnbfrompositivebloodculturesbc
AT williscroftholly evaluationofvitek2directsusceptibilitytestingdstofgramnegativebacteriagnbfrompositivebloodculturesbc
AT campbelllorraine evaluationofvitek2directsusceptibilitytestingdstofgramnegativebacteriagnbfrompositivebloodculturesbc
AT pitoutjohann evaluationofvitek2directsusceptibilitytestingdstofgramnegativebacteriagnbfrompositivebloodculturesbc