Cargando…
The Impact of Routine Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) Screening during Pregnancy on the Seroepidemiology of Chlamydial Infection in Children, 1991–2015
BACKGROUND: CT remains the most prevalent STI in developed and developing countries.Prenatal screening and treatment of pregnant women has resulted in a dramatic decrease of perinatal CT infection. There have been limited seroepidemiologic studies in unselected children and adolescents following the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5631221/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1811 |
_version_ | 1783269398666018816 |
---|---|
author | Banniettis, Natalie Wisecup, Kimberly Byland, Leah Watanabe, Izumi Clement, Sheinese Hammerschlag, Margaret Kohlhoff, Stephan |
author_facet | Banniettis, Natalie Wisecup, Kimberly Byland, Leah Watanabe, Izumi Clement, Sheinese Hammerschlag, Margaret Kohlhoff, Stephan |
author_sort | Banniettis, Natalie |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: CT remains the most prevalent STI in developed and developing countries.Prenatal screening and treatment of pregnant women has resulted in a dramatic decrease of perinatal CT infection. There have been limited seroepidemiologic studies in unselected children and adolescents following the implementation of routine CT screening as first recommended by the CDC in 1993. METHODS: Anonymized banked sera (-80°C) and prospectively collected sera from children and adolescents in Brooklyn, NY, were tested for anti-CT IgG via a validated enzyme immunoassay. Serum samples were divided by collection years: Group 1 (1991–1995, prescreening) and Group 2 (2012–2015, post-screening). Infants <1 year of age were excluded due to interference of maternal antibody. Maternal screening and CT infection rates during pregnancy were determined via a retrospective review of 200 random charts (2016–2017). Statistical analysis by Fisher’s exact test. RESULTS: 297 serum samples were identified (age range 1–20 years). 18.5% (10/54) of subjects ≤10 years of age in Group 1 tested positive for anti-CT IgG, while none tested positive in Group 2 (0/55), P = .0006. Children >10 years had a prevalence of 10.3% (3/29) in Group 1 and 7.5% (12/159) in Group 2, P = .7. Maternal screening rate was estimated at 95.5%, with 100% screened if <25 years of age. The rate of maternal CT infection during pregnancy was 4.5% (9/200) overall, 8% (4/49) in <25 year olds and 3.3% (5/151) in ≥25 year olds. CONCLUSION: Children ≤10 years of age in the prescreening group (1991–1995) had relatively high rates of seropositivity, likely due to persistence of antibody from perinatal infection. The absence of CT antibody in children ≤10 years of age in the post-screening group (2012–2015) and the high rate of prenatal screening (>95%) in this high-risk population suggest prenatal screening and treatment of pregnant women has been effective at preventing perinatal CT infection. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5631221 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56312212017-11-07 The Impact of Routine Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) Screening during Pregnancy on the Seroepidemiology of Chlamydial Infection in Children, 1991–2015 Banniettis, Natalie Wisecup, Kimberly Byland, Leah Watanabe, Izumi Clement, Sheinese Hammerschlag, Margaret Kohlhoff, Stephan Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: CT remains the most prevalent STI in developed and developing countries.Prenatal screening and treatment of pregnant women has resulted in a dramatic decrease of perinatal CT infection. There have been limited seroepidemiologic studies in unselected children and adolescents following the implementation of routine CT screening as first recommended by the CDC in 1993. METHODS: Anonymized banked sera (-80°C) and prospectively collected sera from children and adolescents in Brooklyn, NY, were tested for anti-CT IgG via a validated enzyme immunoassay. Serum samples were divided by collection years: Group 1 (1991–1995, prescreening) and Group 2 (2012–2015, post-screening). Infants <1 year of age were excluded due to interference of maternal antibody. Maternal screening and CT infection rates during pregnancy were determined via a retrospective review of 200 random charts (2016–2017). Statistical analysis by Fisher’s exact test. RESULTS: 297 serum samples were identified (age range 1–20 years). 18.5% (10/54) of subjects ≤10 years of age in Group 1 tested positive for anti-CT IgG, while none tested positive in Group 2 (0/55), P = .0006. Children >10 years had a prevalence of 10.3% (3/29) in Group 1 and 7.5% (12/159) in Group 2, P = .7. Maternal screening rate was estimated at 95.5%, with 100% screened if <25 years of age. The rate of maternal CT infection during pregnancy was 4.5% (9/200) overall, 8% (4/49) in <25 year olds and 3.3% (5/151) in ≥25 year olds. CONCLUSION: Children ≤10 years of age in the prescreening group (1991–1995) had relatively high rates of seropositivity, likely due to persistence of antibody from perinatal infection. The absence of CT antibody in children ≤10 years of age in the post-screening group (2012–2015) and the high rate of prenatal screening (>95%) in this high-risk population suggest prenatal screening and treatment of pregnant women has been effective at preventing perinatal CT infection. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2017-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5631221/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1811 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Abstracts Banniettis, Natalie Wisecup, Kimberly Byland, Leah Watanabe, Izumi Clement, Sheinese Hammerschlag, Margaret Kohlhoff, Stephan The Impact of Routine Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) Screening during Pregnancy on the Seroepidemiology of Chlamydial Infection in Children, 1991–2015 |
title | The Impact of Routine Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) Screening during Pregnancy on the Seroepidemiology of Chlamydial Infection in Children, 1991–2015 |
title_full | The Impact of Routine Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) Screening during Pregnancy on the Seroepidemiology of Chlamydial Infection in Children, 1991–2015 |
title_fullStr | The Impact of Routine Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) Screening during Pregnancy on the Seroepidemiology of Chlamydial Infection in Children, 1991–2015 |
title_full_unstemmed | The Impact of Routine Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) Screening during Pregnancy on the Seroepidemiology of Chlamydial Infection in Children, 1991–2015 |
title_short | The Impact of Routine Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) Screening during Pregnancy on the Seroepidemiology of Chlamydial Infection in Children, 1991–2015 |
title_sort | impact of routine chlamydia trachomatis (ct) screening during pregnancy on the seroepidemiology of chlamydial infection in children, 1991–2015 |
topic | Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5631221/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1811 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT banniettisnatalie theimpactofroutinechlamydiatrachomatisctscreeningduringpregnancyontheseroepidemiologyofchlamydialinfectioninchildren19912015 AT wisecupkimberly theimpactofroutinechlamydiatrachomatisctscreeningduringpregnancyontheseroepidemiologyofchlamydialinfectioninchildren19912015 AT bylandleah theimpactofroutinechlamydiatrachomatisctscreeningduringpregnancyontheseroepidemiologyofchlamydialinfectioninchildren19912015 AT watanabeizumi theimpactofroutinechlamydiatrachomatisctscreeningduringpregnancyontheseroepidemiologyofchlamydialinfectioninchildren19912015 AT clementsheinese theimpactofroutinechlamydiatrachomatisctscreeningduringpregnancyontheseroepidemiologyofchlamydialinfectioninchildren19912015 AT hammerschlagmargaret theimpactofroutinechlamydiatrachomatisctscreeningduringpregnancyontheseroepidemiologyofchlamydialinfectioninchildren19912015 AT kohlhoffstephan theimpactofroutinechlamydiatrachomatisctscreeningduringpregnancyontheseroepidemiologyofchlamydialinfectioninchildren19912015 AT banniettisnatalie impactofroutinechlamydiatrachomatisctscreeningduringpregnancyontheseroepidemiologyofchlamydialinfectioninchildren19912015 AT wisecupkimberly impactofroutinechlamydiatrachomatisctscreeningduringpregnancyontheseroepidemiologyofchlamydialinfectioninchildren19912015 AT bylandleah impactofroutinechlamydiatrachomatisctscreeningduringpregnancyontheseroepidemiologyofchlamydialinfectioninchildren19912015 AT watanabeizumi impactofroutinechlamydiatrachomatisctscreeningduringpregnancyontheseroepidemiologyofchlamydialinfectioninchildren19912015 AT clementsheinese impactofroutinechlamydiatrachomatisctscreeningduringpregnancyontheseroepidemiologyofchlamydialinfectioninchildren19912015 AT hammerschlagmargaret impactofroutinechlamydiatrachomatisctscreeningduringpregnancyontheseroepidemiologyofchlamydialinfectioninchildren19912015 AT kohlhoffstephan impactofroutinechlamydiatrachomatisctscreeningduringpregnancyontheseroepidemiologyofchlamydialinfectioninchildren19912015 |