Cargando…

The Impact of Routine Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) Screening during Pregnancy on the Seroepidemiology of Chlamydial Infection in Children, 1991–2015

BACKGROUND: CT remains the most prevalent STI in developed and developing countries.Prenatal screening and treatment of pregnant women has resulted in a dramatic decrease of perinatal CT infection. There have been limited seroepidemiologic studies in unselected children and adolescents following the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Banniettis, Natalie, Wisecup, Kimberly, Byland, Leah, Watanabe, Izumi, Clement, Sheinese, Hammerschlag, Margaret, Kohlhoff, Stephan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5631221/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1811
_version_ 1783269398666018816
author Banniettis, Natalie
Wisecup, Kimberly
Byland, Leah
Watanabe, Izumi
Clement, Sheinese
Hammerschlag, Margaret
Kohlhoff, Stephan
author_facet Banniettis, Natalie
Wisecup, Kimberly
Byland, Leah
Watanabe, Izumi
Clement, Sheinese
Hammerschlag, Margaret
Kohlhoff, Stephan
author_sort Banniettis, Natalie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: CT remains the most prevalent STI in developed and developing countries.Prenatal screening and treatment of pregnant women has resulted in a dramatic decrease of perinatal CT infection. There have been limited seroepidemiologic studies in unselected children and adolescents following the implementation of routine CT screening as first recommended by the CDC in 1993. METHODS: Anonymized banked sera (-80°C) and prospectively collected sera from children and adolescents in Brooklyn, NY, were tested for anti-CT IgG via a validated enzyme immunoassay. Serum samples were divided by collection years: Group 1 (1991–1995, prescreening) and Group 2 (2012–2015, post-screening). Infants <1 year of age were excluded due to interference of maternal antibody. Maternal screening and CT infection rates during pregnancy were determined via a retrospective review of 200 random charts (2016–2017). Statistical analysis by Fisher’s exact test. RESULTS: 297 serum samples were identified (age range 1–20 years). 18.5% (10/54) of subjects ≤10 years of age in Group 1 tested positive for anti-CT IgG, while none tested positive in Group 2 (0/55), P = .0006. Children >10 years had a prevalence of 10.3% (3/29) in Group 1 and 7.5% (12/159) in Group 2, P = .7. Maternal screening rate was estimated at 95.5%, with 100% screened if <25 years of age. The rate of maternal CT infection during pregnancy was 4.5% (9/200) overall, 8% (4/49) in <25 year olds and 3.3% (5/151) in ≥25 year olds. CONCLUSION: Children ≤10 years of age in the prescreening group (1991–1995) had relatively high rates of seropositivity, likely due to persistence of antibody from perinatal infection. The absence of CT antibody in children ≤10 years of age in the post-screening group (2012–2015) and the high rate of prenatal screening (>95%) in this high-risk population suggest prenatal screening and treatment of pregnant women has been effective at preventing perinatal CT infection. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5631221
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56312212017-11-07 The Impact of Routine Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) Screening during Pregnancy on the Seroepidemiology of Chlamydial Infection in Children, 1991–2015 Banniettis, Natalie Wisecup, Kimberly Byland, Leah Watanabe, Izumi Clement, Sheinese Hammerschlag, Margaret Kohlhoff, Stephan Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: CT remains the most prevalent STI in developed and developing countries.Prenatal screening and treatment of pregnant women has resulted in a dramatic decrease of perinatal CT infection. There have been limited seroepidemiologic studies in unselected children and adolescents following the implementation of routine CT screening as first recommended by the CDC in 1993. METHODS: Anonymized banked sera (-80°C) and prospectively collected sera from children and adolescents in Brooklyn, NY, were tested for anti-CT IgG via a validated enzyme immunoassay. Serum samples were divided by collection years: Group 1 (1991–1995, prescreening) and Group 2 (2012–2015, post-screening). Infants <1 year of age were excluded due to interference of maternal antibody. Maternal screening and CT infection rates during pregnancy were determined via a retrospective review of 200 random charts (2016–2017). Statistical analysis by Fisher’s exact test. RESULTS: 297 serum samples were identified (age range 1–20 years). 18.5% (10/54) of subjects ≤10 years of age in Group 1 tested positive for anti-CT IgG, while none tested positive in Group 2 (0/55), P = .0006. Children >10 years had a prevalence of 10.3% (3/29) in Group 1 and 7.5% (12/159) in Group 2, P = .7. Maternal screening rate was estimated at 95.5%, with 100% screened if <25 years of age. The rate of maternal CT infection during pregnancy was 4.5% (9/200) overall, 8% (4/49) in <25 year olds and 3.3% (5/151) in ≥25 year olds. CONCLUSION: Children ≤10 years of age in the prescreening group (1991–1995) had relatively high rates of seropositivity, likely due to persistence of antibody from perinatal infection. The absence of CT antibody in children ≤10 years of age in the post-screening group (2012–2015) and the high rate of prenatal screening (>95%) in this high-risk population suggest prenatal screening and treatment of pregnant women has been effective at preventing perinatal CT infection. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2017-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5631221/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1811 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Banniettis, Natalie
Wisecup, Kimberly
Byland, Leah
Watanabe, Izumi
Clement, Sheinese
Hammerschlag, Margaret
Kohlhoff, Stephan
The Impact of Routine Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) Screening during Pregnancy on the Seroepidemiology of Chlamydial Infection in Children, 1991–2015
title The Impact of Routine Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) Screening during Pregnancy on the Seroepidemiology of Chlamydial Infection in Children, 1991–2015
title_full The Impact of Routine Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) Screening during Pregnancy on the Seroepidemiology of Chlamydial Infection in Children, 1991–2015
title_fullStr The Impact of Routine Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) Screening during Pregnancy on the Seroepidemiology of Chlamydial Infection in Children, 1991–2015
title_full_unstemmed The Impact of Routine Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) Screening during Pregnancy on the Seroepidemiology of Chlamydial Infection in Children, 1991–2015
title_short The Impact of Routine Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) Screening during Pregnancy on the Seroepidemiology of Chlamydial Infection in Children, 1991–2015
title_sort impact of routine chlamydia trachomatis (ct) screening during pregnancy on the seroepidemiology of chlamydial infection in children, 1991–2015
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5631221/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1811
work_keys_str_mv AT banniettisnatalie theimpactofroutinechlamydiatrachomatisctscreeningduringpregnancyontheseroepidemiologyofchlamydialinfectioninchildren19912015
AT wisecupkimberly theimpactofroutinechlamydiatrachomatisctscreeningduringpregnancyontheseroepidemiologyofchlamydialinfectioninchildren19912015
AT bylandleah theimpactofroutinechlamydiatrachomatisctscreeningduringpregnancyontheseroepidemiologyofchlamydialinfectioninchildren19912015
AT watanabeizumi theimpactofroutinechlamydiatrachomatisctscreeningduringpregnancyontheseroepidemiologyofchlamydialinfectioninchildren19912015
AT clementsheinese theimpactofroutinechlamydiatrachomatisctscreeningduringpregnancyontheseroepidemiologyofchlamydialinfectioninchildren19912015
AT hammerschlagmargaret theimpactofroutinechlamydiatrachomatisctscreeningduringpregnancyontheseroepidemiologyofchlamydialinfectioninchildren19912015
AT kohlhoffstephan theimpactofroutinechlamydiatrachomatisctscreeningduringpregnancyontheseroepidemiologyofchlamydialinfectioninchildren19912015
AT banniettisnatalie impactofroutinechlamydiatrachomatisctscreeningduringpregnancyontheseroepidemiologyofchlamydialinfectioninchildren19912015
AT wisecupkimberly impactofroutinechlamydiatrachomatisctscreeningduringpregnancyontheseroepidemiologyofchlamydialinfectioninchildren19912015
AT bylandleah impactofroutinechlamydiatrachomatisctscreeningduringpregnancyontheseroepidemiologyofchlamydialinfectioninchildren19912015
AT watanabeizumi impactofroutinechlamydiatrachomatisctscreeningduringpregnancyontheseroepidemiologyofchlamydialinfectioninchildren19912015
AT clementsheinese impactofroutinechlamydiatrachomatisctscreeningduringpregnancyontheseroepidemiologyofchlamydialinfectioninchildren19912015
AT hammerschlagmargaret impactofroutinechlamydiatrachomatisctscreeningduringpregnancyontheseroepidemiologyofchlamydialinfectioninchildren19912015
AT kohlhoffstephan impactofroutinechlamydiatrachomatisctscreeningduringpregnancyontheseroepidemiologyofchlamydialinfectioninchildren19912015