Cargando…

Broad In Vitro Activity Analysis of Tedizolid Compared with Other Agents against a Global Collection of Gram-Positive Isolates Causing Bloodstream Infections (2014–2016)

BACKGROUND: Tedizolid (TZD) is an oxazolidinone derivative with oral and intravenous formulations approved for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections in the US, European countries, and other regions. This study evaluated TZD’s and comparators’ activity against a collecti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mendes, Rodrigo E, Shortridge, Dee, Sader, Helio S, Duncan, Leonard R, Flamm, Robert K
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5631246/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.906
_version_ 1783269412930846720
author Mendes, Rodrigo E
Shortridge, Dee
Sader, Helio S
Duncan, Leonard R
Flamm, Robert K
author_facet Mendes, Rodrigo E
Shortridge, Dee
Sader, Helio S
Duncan, Leonard R
Flamm, Robert K
author_sort Mendes, Rodrigo E
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Tedizolid (TZD) is an oxazolidinone derivative with oral and intravenous formulations approved for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections in the US, European countries, and other regions. This study evaluated TZD’s and comparators’ activity against a collection of clinical isolates causing bloodstream infections (BSI). METHODS: A total of 7,284 gram-positive isolates collected during the Surveillance of Tedizolid Activity and Resistance (STAR) Program for 2014–2016 were included. Bacteria were identified by standard algorithms and MALDI-TOF-MS. Susceptibility (S) testing was performed by CLSI methods, and interpretation used CLSI and EUCAST criteria. RESULTS: This Staphylococcus aureus collection contained 33.8% methicillin-resistant isolates. TZD was the most potent agent tested against all S. aureus (MIC(50/90), 0.12/0.12 µg/mL; 100.0%S) and the MRSA subset (Table). Other tested agents described in Table also had in vitro MRSA coverage. 15.6% of enterococci were vancomycin-resistant, which were mostly Enterococcus faecium (59.8%). Linezolid (LZD), ampicillin, daptomycin (DAP), and vancomycin (VAN) showed equivalent MIC(50) values (1 µg/mL) against E. faecalis, but these MIC(50) results were 8-fold higher than TZD (MIC(50), 0.12 µg/mL). Although LZD and DAP were highly active (98.9–99.4%S) against E. faecium, TZD MICs were 8- to 16-fold lower that LZD and DAP. Ceftaroline (CPT) showed the lowest MIC values against Streptococcus pneumoniae, whereas TZD and VAN were similarly active. TZD and CPT showed the lowest MIC(90) values against viridans group streptococci, while CPT, ceftriaxone, and penicillin had the lowest MIC(90) results against β-hemolytic streptococci. CONCLUSION: TZD had potent activities against this global population of gram-positive clinical isolates that caused BSI. This in vitro potency and a favorable pharmacodynamic profile may suggest TZD is a promising candidate for treating BSI caused by gram-positive isolates, especially E. faecium. DISCLOSURES: R. E. Mendes, Merck: Research Contractor, Research grant; D. Shortridge, Merck: Research Contractor, Research grant; H. S. Sader, Merck: Research Contractor, Research grant; L. R. Duncan, Merck: Research Contractor, Research grant; R. K. Flamm, Merck: Research Contractor, Research grant
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5631246
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56312462017-11-07 Broad In Vitro Activity Analysis of Tedizolid Compared with Other Agents against a Global Collection of Gram-Positive Isolates Causing Bloodstream Infections (2014–2016) Mendes, Rodrigo E Shortridge, Dee Sader, Helio S Duncan, Leonard R Flamm, Robert K Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Tedizolid (TZD) is an oxazolidinone derivative with oral and intravenous formulations approved for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections in the US, European countries, and other regions. This study evaluated TZD’s and comparators’ activity against a collection of clinical isolates causing bloodstream infections (BSI). METHODS: A total of 7,284 gram-positive isolates collected during the Surveillance of Tedizolid Activity and Resistance (STAR) Program for 2014–2016 were included. Bacteria were identified by standard algorithms and MALDI-TOF-MS. Susceptibility (S) testing was performed by CLSI methods, and interpretation used CLSI and EUCAST criteria. RESULTS: This Staphylococcus aureus collection contained 33.8% methicillin-resistant isolates. TZD was the most potent agent tested against all S. aureus (MIC(50/90), 0.12/0.12 µg/mL; 100.0%S) and the MRSA subset (Table). Other tested agents described in Table also had in vitro MRSA coverage. 15.6% of enterococci were vancomycin-resistant, which were mostly Enterococcus faecium (59.8%). Linezolid (LZD), ampicillin, daptomycin (DAP), and vancomycin (VAN) showed equivalent MIC(50) values (1 µg/mL) against E. faecalis, but these MIC(50) results were 8-fold higher than TZD (MIC(50), 0.12 µg/mL). Although LZD and DAP were highly active (98.9–99.4%S) against E. faecium, TZD MICs were 8- to 16-fold lower that LZD and DAP. Ceftaroline (CPT) showed the lowest MIC values against Streptococcus pneumoniae, whereas TZD and VAN were similarly active. TZD and CPT showed the lowest MIC(90) values against viridans group streptococci, while CPT, ceftriaxone, and penicillin had the lowest MIC(90) results against β-hemolytic streptococci. CONCLUSION: TZD had potent activities against this global population of gram-positive clinical isolates that caused BSI. This in vitro potency and a favorable pharmacodynamic profile may suggest TZD is a promising candidate for treating BSI caused by gram-positive isolates, especially E. faecium. DISCLOSURES: R. E. Mendes, Merck: Research Contractor, Research grant; D. Shortridge, Merck: Research Contractor, Research grant; H. S. Sader, Merck: Research Contractor, Research grant; L. R. Duncan, Merck: Research Contractor, Research grant; R. K. Flamm, Merck: Research Contractor, Research grant Oxford University Press 2017-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5631246/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.906 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Mendes, Rodrigo E
Shortridge, Dee
Sader, Helio S
Duncan, Leonard R
Flamm, Robert K
Broad In Vitro Activity Analysis of Tedizolid Compared with Other Agents against a Global Collection of Gram-Positive Isolates Causing Bloodstream Infections (2014–2016)
title Broad In Vitro Activity Analysis of Tedizolid Compared with Other Agents against a Global Collection of Gram-Positive Isolates Causing Bloodstream Infections (2014–2016)
title_full Broad In Vitro Activity Analysis of Tedizolid Compared with Other Agents against a Global Collection of Gram-Positive Isolates Causing Bloodstream Infections (2014–2016)
title_fullStr Broad In Vitro Activity Analysis of Tedizolid Compared with Other Agents against a Global Collection of Gram-Positive Isolates Causing Bloodstream Infections (2014–2016)
title_full_unstemmed Broad In Vitro Activity Analysis of Tedizolid Compared with Other Agents against a Global Collection of Gram-Positive Isolates Causing Bloodstream Infections (2014–2016)
title_short Broad In Vitro Activity Analysis of Tedizolid Compared with Other Agents against a Global Collection of Gram-Positive Isolates Causing Bloodstream Infections (2014–2016)
title_sort broad in vitro activity analysis of tedizolid compared with other agents against a global collection of gram-positive isolates causing bloodstream infections (2014–2016)
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5631246/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.906
work_keys_str_mv AT mendesrodrigoe broadinvitroactivityanalysisoftedizolidcomparedwithotheragentsagainstaglobalcollectionofgrampositiveisolatescausingbloodstreaminfections20142016
AT shortridgedee broadinvitroactivityanalysisoftedizolidcomparedwithotheragentsagainstaglobalcollectionofgrampositiveisolatescausingbloodstreaminfections20142016
AT saderhelios broadinvitroactivityanalysisoftedizolidcomparedwithotheragentsagainstaglobalcollectionofgrampositiveisolatescausingbloodstreaminfections20142016
AT duncanleonardr broadinvitroactivityanalysisoftedizolidcomparedwithotheragentsagainstaglobalcollectionofgrampositiveisolatescausingbloodstreaminfections20142016
AT flammrobertk broadinvitroactivityanalysisoftedizolidcomparedwithotheragentsagainstaglobalcollectionofgrampositiveisolatescausingbloodstreaminfections20142016