Cargando…

Antimicrobial Activity of Ceftolozane–Tazobactam Tested against Contemporary (2012–2016) Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa from ICU vs. non-ICU Isolates Collected in US Medical Centers

BACKGROUND: Ceftolozane-tazobactam (C-T) is a combination of a novel antipseudomonal cephalosporin and a well-described β-lactamase inhibitor. C-T was approved by the United States (US) Food and Drug Administration in 2014 for complicated urinary tract infections, including acute pyelonephritis and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shortridge, Dee, Duncan, Leonard R, Pfaller, Michael A, Flamm, Robert K
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5631266/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.894
_version_ 1783269425539973120
author Shortridge, Dee
Duncan, Leonard R
Pfaller, Michael A
Flamm, Robert K
author_facet Shortridge, Dee
Duncan, Leonard R
Pfaller, Michael A
Flamm, Robert K
author_sort Shortridge, Dee
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Ceftolozane-tazobactam (C-T) is a combination of a novel antipseudomonal cephalosporin and a well-described β-lactamase inhibitor. C-T was approved by the United States (US) Food and Drug Administration in 2014 for complicated urinary tract infections, including acute pyelonephritis and complicated intra-abdominal infections. C-T is currently in clinical trials for the treatment of hospital-acquired pneumonia. The Program to Assess Ceftolozane-Tazobactam Susceptibility (PACTS) monitors C-T resistance to gram-negative (GN) isolates worldwide. This study compares the activities of C-T and comparators against GN isolates from ICU patients and non-ICU patients. METHODS: A total of 3,100 GN ICU isolates and 3,271 isolates from non-ICU patients were collected from 30 US hospitals in 2012–2016. Isolates were tested for susceptibility (S) to C-T and comparators by CLSI broth microdilution methodology in a central monitoring laboratory. Other antibiotics tested included amikacin (AMK), cefepime (FEP), ceftazidime (CAZ), colistin (COL), meropenem (MER), and piperacillin-tazobactam (TZP). CLSI (2017) interpretive criteria were used for all except COL with Enterobacteriaceae (ENT), for which EUCAST (2017) criteria were used. RESULTS: The most common ENT species from ICU and non-ICU patients were similar. The 3 most common ENT for ICU and non-ICU isolates were Klebsiella pneumoniae, 24.1% and 25.8%; Escherichia coli, 19.4% and 18.2%; and Serratia marcescens, 14.7% and 14.3%, respectively. The most common non-enteric species was Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PSA) for ICU and non-ICU (72.7% and 78.2%). ICU ENT isolates generally had a lower %S than non-ICU (Table). ENT showed more variability than PSA for %S between ICU and non-ICU. CONCLUSION: For ENT overall, MER and AMK were the most active, followed by C-T. Comparing ICU and non-ICU, MER and C-T were slightly more active vs. non-ICU ENT, while AMK %S was similar for both. For PSA, COL was the most active; C-T and AMK were similar. Activities between ICU and non-ICU isolates were similar for C-T and COL while AMK was more active vs. ICU isolates, and MER was more active vs. non-ICU. C-T showed potent activity against ICU and non-ICU isolates for ENT and PSA. DISCLOSURES: D. Shortridge, Merck: Research Contractor, Research grant; L. R. Duncan, Merck: Research Contractor, Research grant; M. A. Pfaller, Merck: Research Contractor, Research grant; R. K. Flamm, Merck: Research Contractor, Research grant
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5631266
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56312662017-11-07 Antimicrobial Activity of Ceftolozane–Tazobactam Tested against Contemporary (2012–2016) Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa from ICU vs. non-ICU Isolates Collected in US Medical Centers Shortridge, Dee Duncan, Leonard R Pfaller, Michael A Flamm, Robert K Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Ceftolozane-tazobactam (C-T) is a combination of a novel antipseudomonal cephalosporin and a well-described β-lactamase inhibitor. C-T was approved by the United States (US) Food and Drug Administration in 2014 for complicated urinary tract infections, including acute pyelonephritis and complicated intra-abdominal infections. C-T is currently in clinical trials for the treatment of hospital-acquired pneumonia. The Program to Assess Ceftolozane-Tazobactam Susceptibility (PACTS) monitors C-T resistance to gram-negative (GN) isolates worldwide. This study compares the activities of C-T and comparators against GN isolates from ICU patients and non-ICU patients. METHODS: A total of 3,100 GN ICU isolates and 3,271 isolates from non-ICU patients were collected from 30 US hospitals in 2012–2016. Isolates were tested for susceptibility (S) to C-T and comparators by CLSI broth microdilution methodology in a central monitoring laboratory. Other antibiotics tested included amikacin (AMK), cefepime (FEP), ceftazidime (CAZ), colistin (COL), meropenem (MER), and piperacillin-tazobactam (TZP). CLSI (2017) interpretive criteria were used for all except COL with Enterobacteriaceae (ENT), for which EUCAST (2017) criteria were used. RESULTS: The most common ENT species from ICU and non-ICU patients were similar. The 3 most common ENT for ICU and non-ICU isolates were Klebsiella pneumoniae, 24.1% and 25.8%; Escherichia coli, 19.4% and 18.2%; and Serratia marcescens, 14.7% and 14.3%, respectively. The most common non-enteric species was Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PSA) for ICU and non-ICU (72.7% and 78.2%). ICU ENT isolates generally had a lower %S than non-ICU (Table). ENT showed more variability than PSA for %S between ICU and non-ICU. CONCLUSION: For ENT overall, MER and AMK were the most active, followed by C-T. Comparing ICU and non-ICU, MER and C-T were slightly more active vs. non-ICU ENT, while AMK %S was similar for both. For PSA, COL was the most active; C-T and AMK were similar. Activities between ICU and non-ICU isolates were similar for C-T and COL while AMK was more active vs. ICU isolates, and MER was more active vs. non-ICU. C-T showed potent activity against ICU and non-ICU isolates for ENT and PSA. DISCLOSURES: D. Shortridge, Merck: Research Contractor, Research grant; L. R. Duncan, Merck: Research Contractor, Research grant; M. A. Pfaller, Merck: Research Contractor, Research grant; R. K. Flamm, Merck: Research Contractor, Research grant Oxford University Press 2017-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5631266/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.894 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Shortridge, Dee
Duncan, Leonard R
Pfaller, Michael A
Flamm, Robert K
Antimicrobial Activity of Ceftolozane–Tazobactam Tested against Contemporary (2012–2016) Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa from ICU vs. non-ICU Isolates Collected in US Medical Centers
title Antimicrobial Activity of Ceftolozane–Tazobactam Tested against Contemporary (2012–2016) Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa from ICU vs. non-ICU Isolates Collected in US Medical Centers
title_full Antimicrobial Activity of Ceftolozane–Tazobactam Tested against Contemporary (2012–2016) Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa from ICU vs. non-ICU Isolates Collected in US Medical Centers
title_fullStr Antimicrobial Activity of Ceftolozane–Tazobactam Tested against Contemporary (2012–2016) Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa from ICU vs. non-ICU Isolates Collected in US Medical Centers
title_full_unstemmed Antimicrobial Activity of Ceftolozane–Tazobactam Tested against Contemporary (2012–2016) Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa from ICU vs. non-ICU Isolates Collected in US Medical Centers
title_short Antimicrobial Activity of Ceftolozane–Tazobactam Tested against Contemporary (2012–2016) Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa from ICU vs. non-ICU Isolates Collected in US Medical Centers
title_sort antimicrobial activity of ceftolozane–tazobactam tested against contemporary (2012–2016) enterobacteriaceae and pseudomonas aeruginosa from icu vs. non-icu isolates collected in us medical centers
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5631266/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.894
work_keys_str_mv AT shortridgedee antimicrobialactivityofceftolozanetazobactamtestedagainstcontemporary20122016enterobacteriaceaeandpseudomonasaeruginosafromicuvsnonicuisolatescollectedinusmedicalcenters
AT duncanleonardr antimicrobialactivityofceftolozanetazobactamtestedagainstcontemporary20122016enterobacteriaceaeandpseudomonasaeruginosafromicuvsnonicuisolatescollectedinusmedicalcenters
AT pfallermichaela antimicrobialactivityofceftolozanetazobactamtestedagainstcontemporary20122016enterobacteriaceaeandpseudomonasaeruginosafromicuvsnonicuisolatescollectedinusmedicalcenters
AT flammrobertk antimicrobialactivityofceftolozanetazobactamtestedagainstcontemporary20122016enterobacteriaceaeandpseudomonasaeruginosafromicuvsnonicuisolatescollectedinusmedicalcenters