Cargando…
Prevalence of Tuberculous Spondylodisciitis and Diagnostic Utility of Xpert MTB RIF
BACKGROUND: To understand the prevalence of TB spondylodisciitis and the diagnostic utility of Xpert MTB RIF test (Genexpert) in the diagnosis of TB spondylodisciitis as compared with a Composite Reference Standard (CRS) based on clinical, mycobacterial smear, culture, pathological, radiological fin...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5631286/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1644 |
_version_ | 1783269430590963712 |
---|---|
author | Ananthanarayanan, Rajalakshmi Unnikrishnan, Ranjith Shyni, Sherin Purayyil, Amarnath |
author_facet | Ananthanarayanan, Rajalakshmi Unnikrishnan, Ranjith Shyni, Sherin Purayyil, Amarnath |
author_sort | Ananthanarayanan, Rajalakshmi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To understand the prevalence of TB spondylodisciitis and the diagnostic utility of Xpert MTB RIF test (Genexpert) in the diagnosis of TB spondylodisciitis as compared with a Composite Reference Standard (CRS) based on clinical, mycobacterial smear, culture, pathological, radiological findings and clinical follow up. METHODS: 69 patients with infective spondylodisciitis who underwent surgical or image guided tissue biopsy were evaluated during May 2014 to February 2017. Tuberculous spondylodisciiitis were classified as ‘confirmed’ if culture grew MTB, ‘probable’ if in the absence of positive AFB culture, clinical, radiological or pathological findings favor TB, ‘possible’ if all negative but response to ATT was noted. RESULTS: 36 patient had culture confirmed pyogenic spondylodisciitis; 17 cases were treated empirically though the tissue culture were negative as HPE was suggestive of pyogenic spondylodisciitis. 3 had non-infective etiology. Among 30 who were treated as tuberculous spondylosdisciitis, in initial 16 patients genexpert was not done due to non-availability. Among these 16 patients, 1 had confirmed TB as the tissue grew MTB (MDR TB), 15 were treated as probable TB. All patients except one had good outcome. In the 14 patients treated as tuberculous spondylodisciitis in whom genexpert was done, 12 patients had positive genexpert as compared with 7 AFB culture positive patients. In two samples in which genexpert was negative, TB was confirmed by AFB culture and in another by HPE. All patients except one (who had underling lymphoma) improved with ATT. In all other 10 cases where genexpert was negative, the etiology was pyogenic. CONCLUSION: Pyogenic spondylodisciitis is more prevalent than tuberculous spondylodisciits in this study. Genexpert in tissue from infective spondylodisciitis is more sensitive than AFB smear and culture in diagnosing tuberculous spondylodisciitis. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5631286 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56312862017-11-07 Prevalence of Tuberculous Spondylodisciitis and Diagnostic Utility of Xpert MTB RIF Ananthanarayanan, Rajalakshmi Unnikrishnan, Ranjith Shyni, Sherin Purayyil, Amarnath Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: To understand the prevalence of TB spondylodisciitis and the diagnostic utility of Xpert MTB RIF test (Genexpert) in the diagnosis of TB spondylodisciitis as compared with a Composite Reference Standard (CRS) based on clinical, mycobacterial smear, culture, pathological, radiological findings and clinical follow up. METHODS: 69 patients with infective spondylodisciitis who underwent surgical or image guided tissue biopsy were evaluated during May 2014 to February 2017. Tuberculous spondylodisciiitis were classified as ‘confirmed’ if culture grew MTB, ‘probable’ if in the absence of positive AFB culture, clinical, radiological or pathological findings favor TB, ‘possible’ if all negative but response to ATT was noted. RESULTS: 36 patient had culture confirmed pyogenic spondylodisciitis; 17 cases were treated empirically though the tissue culture were negative as HPE was suggestive of pyogenic spondylodisciitis. 3 had non-infective etiology. Among 30 who were treated as tuberculous spondylosdisciitis, in initial 16 patients genexpert was not done due to non-availability. Among these 16 patients, 1 had confirmed TB as the tissue grew MTB (MDR TB), 15 were treated as probable TB. All patients except one had good outcome. In the 14 patients treated as tuberculous spondylodisciitis in whom genexpert was done, 12 patients had positive genexpert as compared with 7 AFB culture positive patients. In two samples in which genexpert was negative, TB was confirmed by AFB culture and in another by HPE. All patients except one (who had underling lymphoma) improved with ATT. In all other 10 cases where genexpert was negative, the etiology was pyogenic. CONCLUSION: Pyogenic spondylodisciitis is more prevalent than tuberculous spondylodisciits in this study. Genexpert in tissue from infective spondylodisciitis is more sensitive than AFB smear and culture in diagnosing tuberculous spondylodisciitis. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2017-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5631286/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1644 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Abstracts Ananthanarayanan, Rajalakshmi Unnikrishnan, Ranjith Shyni, Sherin Purayyil, Amarnath Prevalence of Tuberculous Spondylodisciitis and Diagnostic Utility of Xpert MTB RIF |
title | Prevalence of Tuberculous Spondylodisciitis and Diagnostic Utility of Xpert MTB RIF |
title_full | Prevalence of Tuberculous Spondylodisciitis and Diagnostic Utility of Xpert MTB RIF |
title_fullStr | Prevalence of Tuberculous Spondylodisciitis and Diagnostic Utility of Xpert MTB RIF |
title_full_unstemmed | Prevalence of Tuberculous Spondylodisciitis and Diagnostic Utility of Xpert MTB RIF |
title_short | Prevalence of Tuberculous Spondylodisciitis and Diagnostic Utility of Xpert MTB RIF |
title_sort | prevalence of tuberculous spondylodisciitis and diagnostic utility of xpert mtb rif |
topic | Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5631286/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1644 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ananthanarayananrajalakshmi prevalenceoftuberculousspondylodisciitisanddiagnosticutilityofxpertmtbrif AT unnikrishnanranjith prevalenceoftuberculousspondylodisciitisanddiagnosticutilityofxpertmtbrif AT shynisherin prevalenceoftuberculousspondylodisciitisanddiagnosticutilityofxpertmtbrif AT purayyilamarnath prevalenceoftuberculousspondylodisciitisanddiagnosticutilityofxpertmtbrif |