Cargando…
Evaluation of a Risk Stratification Guideline for the Treatment of Neutropenic Fever in Oncology Patients
BACKGROUND: Neutropenic fever (NF) is a serious complication of chemotherapy. Approximately 23% of NF cases are related to bacteremia, with higher mortality attributed to infections caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Therefore, empiric anti-pseudomonal (AP) coverage is critical for patients with NF....
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5631302/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1273 |
_version_ | 1783269434396246016 |
---|---|
author | Wollenziehn, Amber Revolinski, Sara Lorge, Aaron Wainaina, J Njeri Huang, Angela |
author_facet | Wollenziehn, Amber Revolinski, Sara Lorge, Aaron Wainaina, J Njeri Huang, Angela |
author_sort | Wollenziehn, Amber |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Neutropenic fever (NF) is a serious complication of chemotherapy. Approximately 23% of NF cases are related to bacteremia, with higher mortality attributed to infections caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Therefore, empiric anti-pseudomonal (AP) coverage is critical for patients with NF. However, no recommendations exist as to which AP agent is preferred. Traditionally at Froedtert Hospital, meropenem was prescribed as empiric therapy for NF despite a low incidence of multidrug resistant (MDR) pathogens. In June 2016, Froedtert Hospital implemented guidelines for the treatment of NF to guide initial AP antibiotic selection based on risk factors for MDR gram-negative infections. Risk stratification reserves broadest spectrum antimicrobials (eg, meropenem) for patients at highest risk of MDR organisms. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was completed to evaluate NF treatment pre-guideline (Jan 1-June 30, 2015) and post-guideline implementation (June 23- Dec 31, 2016). All patients ≥18 years old, admitted to Froedtert Hospital that met NF definition criteria were included. RESULTS: A total of 79 patients in the pre-guideline implementation group (pre-group) and 91 patients in the post-guideline implementation group (post-group) were included. In the pre-group, only 26 (32.8%) patients would have met criteria to receive meropenem, however 71 (89.8%) received it. In comparison, in the post-group, 29 (41.8%) patients qualified to receive meropenem based on risk-stratification and 8 patients (8.8%) received it, due to primary teams opting for non-carbapenem APs despite meeting criteria for meropenem. In the post-group, there were 4 cases of infections with a MDR organism requiring meropenem. All 4 patients met guideline criteria to receive meropenem (2 patients received meropenem, 2 did not due to guideline noncompliance). Therefore, the incidence of appropriate empiric AP therapy recommended by the NF guideline was 100%. 30-day all-cause mortality was 17.7% in the pre-group and 15.5% in the post-group. CONCLUSION: Appropriate use of a NF risk stratification tool resulted in a significant reduction in unnecessary AP carbapenem use without compromising antimicrobial coverage of isolated organisms or patient outcomes. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5631302 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56313022017-11-07 Evaluation of a Risk Stratification Guideline for the Treatment of Neutropenic Fever in Oncology Patients Wollenziehn, Amber Revolinski, Sara Lorge, Aaron Wainaina, J Njeri Huang, Angela Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Neutropenic fever (NF) is a serious complication of chemotherapy. Approximately 23% of NF cases are related to bacteremia, with higher mortality attributed to infections caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Therefore, empiric anti-pseudomonal (AP) coverage is critical for patients with NF. However, no recommendations exist as to which AP agent is preferred. Traditionally at Froedtert Hospital, meropenem was prescribed as empiric therapy for NF despite a low incidence of multidrug resistant (MDR) pathogens. In June 2016, Froedtert Hospital implemented guidelines for the treatment of NF to guide initial AP antibiotic selection based on risk factors for MDR gram-negative infections. Risk stratification reserves broadest spectrum antimicrobials (eg, meropenem) for patients at highest risk of MDR organisms. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was completed to evaluate NF treatment pre-guideline (Jan 1-June 30, 2015) and post-guideline implementation (June 23- Dec 31, 2016). All patients ≥18 years old, admitted to Froedtert Hospital that met NF definition criteria were included. RESULTS: A total of 79 patients in the pre-guideline implementation group (pre-group) and 91 patients in the post-guideline implementation group (post-group) were included. In the pre-group, only 26 (32.8%) patients would have met criteria to receive meropenem, however 71 (89.8%) received it. In comparison, in the post-group, 29 (41.8%) patients qualified to receive meropenem based on risk-stratification and 8 patients (8.8%) received it, due to primary teams opting for non-carbapenem APs despite meeting criteria for meropenem. In the post-group, there were 4 cases of infections with a MDR organism requiring meropenem. All 4 patients met guideline criteria to receive meropenem (2 patients received meropenem, 2 did not due to guideline noncompliance). Therefore, the incidence of appropriate empiric AP therapy recommended by the NF guideline was 100%. 30-day all-cause mortality was 17.7% in the pre-group and 15.5% in the post-group. CONCLUSION: Appropriate use of a NF risk stratification tool resulted in a significant reduction in unnecessary AP carbapenem use without compromising antimicrobial coverage of isolated organisms or patient outcomes. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2017-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5631302/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1273 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Abstracts Wollenziehn, Amber Revolinski, Sara Lorge, Aaron Wainaina, J Njeri Huang, Angela Evaluation of a Risk Stratification Guideline for the Treatment of Neutropenic Fever in Oncology Patients |
title | Evaluation of a Risk Stratification Guideline for the Treatment of Neutropenic Fever in Oncology Patients |
title_full | Evaluation of a Risk Stratification Guideline for the Treatment of Neutropenic Fever in Oncology Patients |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of a Risk Stratification Guideline for the Treatment of Neutropenic Fever in Oncology Patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of a Risk Stratification Guideline for the Treatment of Neutropenic Fever in Oncology Patients |
title_short | Evaluation of a Risk Stratification Guideline for the Treatment of Neutropenic Fever in Oncology Patients |
title_sort | evaluation of a risk stratification guideline for the treatment of neutropenic fever in oncology patients |
topic | Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5631302/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1273 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wollenziehnamber evaluationofariskstratificationguidelineforthetreatmentofneutropenicfeverinoncologypatients AT revolinskisara evaluationofariskstratificationguidelineforthetreatmentofneutropenicfeverinoncologypatients AT lorgeaaron evaluationofariskstratificationguidelineforthetreatmentofneutropenicfeverinoncologypatients AT wainainajnjeri evaluationofariskstratificationguidelineforthetreatmentofneutropenicfeverinoncologypatients AT huangangela evaluationofariskstratificationguidelineforthetreatmentofneutropenicfeverinoncologypatients |