Cargando…

Evaluation of a Risk Stratification Guideline for the Treatment of Neutropenic Fever in Oncology Patients

BACKGROUND: Neutropenic fever (NF) is a serious complication of chemotherapy. Approximately 23% of NF cases are related to bacteremia, with higher mortality attributed to infections caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Therefore, empiric anti-pseudomonal (AP) coverage is critical for patients with NF....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wollenziehn, Amber, Revolinski, Sara, Lorge, Aaron, Wainaina, J Njeri, Huang, Angela
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5631302/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1273
_version_ 1783269434396246016
author Wollenziehn, Amber
Revolinski, Sara
Lorge, Aaron
Wainaina, J Njeri
Huang, Angela
author_facet Wollenziehn, Amber
Revolinski, Sara
Lorge, Aaron
Wainaina, J Njeri
Huang, Angela
author_sort Wollenziehn, Amber
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Neutropenic fever (NF) is a serious complication of chemotherapy. Approximately 23% of NF cases are related to bacteremia, with higher mortality attributed to infections caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Therefore, empiric anti-pseudomonal (AP) coverage is critical for patients with NF. However, no recommendations exist as to which AP agent is preferred. Traditionally at Froedtert Hospital, meropenem was prescribed as empiric therapy for NF despite a low incidence of multidrug resistant (MDR) pathogens. In June 2016, Froedtert Hospital implemented guidelines for the treatment of NF to guide initial AP antibiotic selection based on risk factors for MDR gram-negative infections. Risk stratification reserves broadest spectrum antimicrobials (eg, meropenem) for patients at highest risk of MDR organisms. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was completed to evaluate NF treatment pre-guideline (Jan 1-June 30, 2015) and post-guideline implementation (June 23- Dec 31, 2016). All patients ≥18 years old, admitted to Froedtert Hospital that met NF definition criteria were included. RESULTS: A total of 79 patients in the pre-guideline implementation group (pre-group) and 91 patients in the post-guideline implementation group (post-group) were included. In the pre-group, only 26 (32.8%) patients would have met criteria to receive meropenem, however 71 (89.8%) received it. In comparison, in the post-group, 29 (41.8%) patients qualified to receive meropenem based on risk-stratification and 8 patients (8.8%) received it, due to primary teams opting for non-carbapenem APs despite meeting criteria for meropenem. In the post-group, there were 4 cases of infections with a MDR organism requiring meropenem. All 4 patients met guideline criteria to receive meropenem (2 patients received meropenem, 2 did not due to guideline noncompliance). Therefore, the incidence of appropriate empiric AP therapy recommended by the NF guideline was 100%. 30-day all-cause mortality was 17.7% in the pre-group and 15.5% in the post-group. CONCLUSION: Appropriate use of a NF risk stratification tool resulted in a significant reduction in unnecessary AP carbapenem use without compromising antimicrobial coverage of isolated organisms or patient outcomes. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5631302
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56313022017-11-07 Evaluation of a Risk Stratification Guideline for the Treatment of Neutropenic Fever in Oncology Patients Wollenziehn, Amber Revolinski, Sara Lorge, Aaron Wainaina, J Njeri Huang, Angela Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Neutropenic fever (NF) is a serious complication of chemotherapy. Approximately 23% of NF cases are related to bacteremia, with higher mortality attributed to infections caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Therefore, empiric anti-pseudomonal (AP) coverage is critical for patients with NF. However, no recommendations exist as to which AP agent is preferred. Traditionally at Froedtert Hospital, meropenem was prescribed as empiric therapy for NF despite a low incidence of multidrug resistant (MDR) pathogens. In June 2016, Froedtert Hospital implemented guidelines for the treatment of NF to guide initial AP antibiotic selection based on risk factors for MDR gram-negative infections. Risk stratification reserves broadest spectrum antimicrobials (eg, meropenem) for patients at highest risk of MDR organisms. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was completed to evaluate NF treatment pre-guideline (Jan 1-June 30, 2015) and post-guideline implementation (June 23- Dec 31, 2016). All patients ≥18 years old, admitted to Froedtert Hospital that met NF definition criteria were included. RESULTS: A total of 79 patients in the pre-guideline implementation group (pre-group) and 91 patients in the post-guideline implementation group (post-group) were included. In the pre-group, only 26 (32.8%) patients would have met criteria to receive meropenem, however 71 (89.8%) received it. In comparison, in the post-group, 29 (41.8%) patients qualified to receive meropenem based on risk-stratification and 8 patients (8.8%) received it, due to primary teams opting for non-carbapenem APs despite meeting criteria for meropenem. In the post-group, there were 4 cases of infections with a MDR organism requiring meropenem. All 4 patients met guideline criteria to receive meropenem (2 patients received meropenem, 2 did not due to guideline noncompliance). Therefore, the incidence of appropriate empiric AP therapy recommended by the NF guideline was 100%. 30-day all-cause mortality was 17.7% in the pre-group and 15.5% in the post-group. CONCLUSION: Appropriate use of a NF risk stratification tool resulted in a significant reduction in unnecessary AP carbapenem use without compromising antimicrobial coverage of isolated organisms or patient outcomes. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2017-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5631302/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1273 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Wollenziehn, Amber
Revolinski, Sara
Lorge, Aaron
Wainaina, J Njeri
Huang, Angela
Evaluation of a Risk Stratification Guideline for the Treatment of Neutropenic Fever in Oncology Patients
title Evaluation of a Risk Stratification Guideline for the Treatment of Neutropenic Fever in Oncology Patients
title_full Evaluation of a Risk Stratification Guideline for the Treatment of Neutropenic Fever in Oncology Patients
title_fullStr Evaluation of a Risk Stratification Guideline for the Treatment of Neutropenic Fever in Oncology Patients
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of a Risk Stratification Guideline for the Treatment of Neutropenic Fever in Oncology Patients
title_short Evaluation of a Risk Stratification Guideline for the Treatment of Neutropenic Fever in Oncology Patients
title_sort evaluation of a risk stratification guideline for the treatment of neutropenic fever in oncology patients
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5631302/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1273
work_keys_str_mv AT wollenziehnamber evaluationofariskstratificationguidelineforthetreatmentofneutropenicfeverinoncologypatients
AT revolinskisara evaluationofariskstratificationguidelineforthetreatmentofneutropenicfeverinoncologypatients
AT lorgeaaron evaluationofariskstratificationguidelineforthetreatmentofneutropenicfeverinoncologypatients
AT wainainajnjeri evaluationofariskstratificationguidelineforthetreatmentofneutropenicfeverinoncologypatients
AT huangangela evaluationofariskstratificationguidelineforthetreatmentofneutropenicfeverinoncologypatients