Cargando…
Impact of an Automatic Hospital Probiotic Protocol on Clostridium difficile Infection Rates and Antibiotic Usage Patterns
BACKGROUND: The use of probiotics in hospitalized patients ordered antibiotics has been associated with a preventative effect against Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) in a few small studies and meta-analyses. Starting in 2014, all adult patients admitted to our 330-bed community hospital who we...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5631319/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx162.003 |
_version_ | 1783269438675484672 |
---|---|
author | Slain, Douglas Georgulis, Amy Dermitt, Ronald Morris, Laura Colodny, Stephen |
author_facet | Slain, Douglas Georgulis, Amy Dermitt, Ronald Morris, Laura Colodny, Stephen |
author_sort | Slain, Douglas |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The use of probiotics in hospitalized patients ordered antibiotics has been associated with a preventative effect against Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) in a few small studies and meta-analyses. Starting in 2014, all adult patients admitted to our 330-bed community hospital who were started on an antibiotic automatically received a course of the probiotic Saccharomyces boulardii (SB). Our study provides a much larger experience with which to assess the preventative use of SB in patients receiving concomitant antibiotics. METHODS: Rates of CDI were compared during the 3-year periods before and after the automatic SB protocol implementation. CDI infection rates using ICD-9 code and CDC hospital-associated infection (HAI) definitions were compared. The use of CDI treatment agents (oral vancomycin and oral metronidazole) expressed in DDD/1,000 patient-days, and rates of SB infections/cultures were also assessed. All rates were standardized per hospital census. Clostridium difficile laboratory detection was performed by PCR analysis throughout the study period. RESULTS: Case rates of CDI using ICD-9 or CDC HAI definitions did not differ before and after protocol implementation (P = 0.165 and P = 0.521, respectively). The use of CDI treatment antibiotics were also similar; oral metronidazole (P = 0.269), oral vancomycin (P = 0.938), total CDI agents (P = 0.633). Positive specimen cultures for SB where identified in two patients prior to protocol and in 27 patients during the protocol years. Actual SB infections from sterile body sites were identified in five patients during the protocol vs. only one case in the pre-protocol years (P = 0.035). The average yearly cost of SB prophylaxis was $63,000. CONCLUSION: In our global assessment of this data, the use of an automatic SB protocol at our community hospital was not associated with a protective effect against CDI. The use of SB was associated with an increased risk of SB infections. Further study of SB and other probiotic formulations for CDI prevention are warranted. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5631319 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56313192017-11-07 Impact of an Automatic Hospital Probiotic Protocol on Clostridium difficile Infection Rates and Antibiotic Usage Patterns Slain, Douglas Georgulis, Amy Dermitt, Ronald Morris, Laura Colodny, Stephen Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: The use of probiotics in hospitalized patients ordered antibiotics has been associated with a preventative effect against Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) in a few small studies and meta-analyses. Starting in 2014, all adult patients admitted to our 330-bed community hospital who were started on an antibiotic automatically received a course of the probiotic Saccharomyces boulardii (SB). Our study provides a much larger experience with which to assess the preventative use of SB in patients receiving concomitant antibiotics. METHODS: Rates of CDI were compared during the 3-year periods before and after the automatic SB protocol implementation. CDI infection rates using ICD-9 code and CDC hospital-associated infection (HAI) definitions were compared. The use of CDI treatment agents (oral vancomycin and oral metronidazole) expressed in DDD/1,000 patient-days, and rates of SB infections/cultures were also assessed. All rates were standardized per hospital census. Clostridium difficile laboratory detection was performed by PCR analysis throughout the study period. RESULTS: Case rates of CDI using ICD-9 or CDC HAI definitions did not differ before and after protocol implementation (P = 0.165 and P = 0.521, respectively). The use of CDI treatment antibiotics were also similar; oral metronidazole (P = 0.269), oral vancomycin (P = 0.938), total CDI agents (P = 0.633). Positive specimen cultures for SB where identified in two patients prior to protocol and in 27 patients during the protocol years. Actual SB infections from sterile body sites were identified in five patients during the protocol vs. only one case in the pre-protocol years (P = 0.035). The average yearly cost of SB prophylaxis was $63,000. CONCLUSION: In our global assessment of this data, the use of an automatic SB protocol at our community hospital was not associated with a protective effect against CDI. The use of SB was associated with an increased risk of SB infections. Further study of SB and other probiotic formulations for CDI prevention are warranted. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2017-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5631319/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx162.003 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Abstracts Slain, Douglas Georgulis, Amy Dermitt, Ronald Morris, Laura Colodny, Stephen Impact of an Automatic Hospital Probiotic Protocol on Clostridium difficile Infection Rates and Antibiotic Usage Patterns |
title | Impact of an Automatic Hospital Probiotic Protocol on Clostridium difficile Infection Rates and Antibiotic Usage Patterns |
title_full | Impact of an Automatic Hospital Probiotic Protocol on Clostridium difficile Infection Rates and Antibiotic Usage Patterns |
title_fullStr | Impact of an Automatic Hospital Probiotic Protocol on Clostridium difficile Infection Rates and Antibiotic Usage Patterns |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of an Automatic Hospital Probiotic Protocol on Clostridium difficile Infection Rates and Antibiotic Usage Patterns |
title_short | Impact of an Automatic Hospital Probiotic Protocol on Clostridium difficile Infection Rates and Antibiotic Usage Patterns |
title_sort | impact of an automatic hospital probiotic protocol on clostridium difficile infection rates and antibiotic usage patterns |
topic | Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5631319/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx162.003 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT slaindouglas impactofanautomatichospitalprobioticprotocolonclostridiumdifficileinfectionratesandantibioticusagepatterns AT georgulisamy impactofanautomatichospitalprobioticprotocolonclostridiumdifficileinfectionratesandantibioticusagepatterns AT dermittronald impactofanautomatichospitalprobioticprotocolonclostridiumdifficileinfectionratesandantibioticusagepatterns AT morrislaura impactofanautomatichospitalprobioticprotocolonclostridiumdifficileinfectionratesandantibioticusagepatterns AT colodnystephen impactofanautomatichospitalprobioticprotocolonclostridiumdifficileinfectionratesandantibioticusagepatterns |