Cargando…

Epidemiologic Trends in Clostridium difficile Isolate Ribotypes in United States from 2010 to 2014

BACKGROUND: Trends in the distribution of ribotypes for C. difficile associated diarrheal isolates obtained over time in the United States are lacking. As part of surveillance program for C. difficile susceptibility, we analyzed stool isolates for ribotype distribution from a phase 2 trial of suroto...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Snydman, David R, McDermott, Laura A, Jenkins, Stephen G, Goldstein, Ellie J C, Patel, Robin, Forbes, Betty A, Johnson, Stuart, Gerding, Dale N, Thorpe, Cheleste M, Walk, Seth T
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5631345/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.973
_version_ 1783269445412585472
author Snydman, David R
McDermott, Laura A
Jenkins, Stephen G
Goldstein, Ellie J C
Patel, Robin
Forbes, Betty A
Johnson, Stuart
Gerding, Dale N
Thorpe, Cheleste M
Walk, Seth T
author_facet Snydman, David R
McDermott, Laura A
Jenkins, Stephen G
Goldstein, Ellie J C
Patel, Robin
Forbes, Betty A
Johnson, Stuart
Gerding, Dale N
Thorpe, Cheleste M
Walk, Seth T
author_sort Snydman, David R
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Trends in the distribution of ribotypes for C. difficile associated diarrheal isolates obtained over time in the United States are lacking. As part of surveillance program for C. difficile susceptibility, we analyzed stool isolates for ribotype distribution from a phase 2 trial of surotomycin (2010–2011) (North America sites) as well as a national surveillance study from 2011–2014. Isolates for the surveillance study were referred from 6 geographically distinct medical centers. METHODS: C. difficile isolates or C. difficile toxin + stools from patients with C. difficile associated diarrhea (CDAD) were submitted for testing to Tufts Medical Center. Following isolation and confirmation as C. difficile, a random sample of isolates were ribotyped by PCR capillary gel electrophoresis. RESULTS: 673 isolates over the 5 years of the analysis have been ribotyped to date. There were 49 unique ribotype designations, and 16 ribotypes had more than 10 isolates. The ribotype distribution by year is shown in the table. CONCLUSION: There has been a change in the frequency of ribotypes over time in the US. Of the most common ribotypes seen, 027 has decreased by over 50% while there has been an increase of 014-020, 002, and 106. 014-020 is now the most common ribotype seen in the US. These data suggest that there is a changing epidemiology of C. difficile in the US and continuous monitoring of the ribotype distributions and clinical implications is warranted. DISCLOSURES: D. R. Snydman, Merck: Consultant and Grant Investigator, Consulting fee and Research grant; Shire: Consultant, Consulting fee; Summit PLC: Consultant and Grant Investigator, Consulting fee and Research grant; BioK+: Consultant, Consulting fee; Actelion: Grant Investigator, Research grant; S. G. Jenkins, Cormedix: Consultant, Consulting fee; Bayer: Consultant, Consulting fee; Merck: Grant Investigator and Scientific Advisor, Research grant; E. J. C. Goldstein, Merck: Grant Investigator, Scientific Advisor and Speaker’s Bureau, Consulting fee and Grant recipient; Cubist: Grant Investigator, Scientific Advisor and Speaker’s Bureau, Consulting fee; Actelion: Grant Investigator, Grant recipient; Summit PLC: Grant Investigator and Scientific Advisor, Grant recipient; R. Patel, Curetis: Consultant, Grant Investigator and Speaker’s Bureau, Consulting fee and Research grant; Pocared: Grant Investigator, Research grant; nanoMR: Grant Investigator, Research grant; BioFire: Grant Investigator, Research grant; Check-Points: Grant Investigator, Research grant; 3M: Grant Investigator, Research grant; Cubist: Grant Investigator, Research grant; Merck: Grant Investigator, Research grant; S. Johnson, Bio-K+: Consultant, Consulting fee; D. N. Gerding, Merck, Shire, Cubist, Rebiotix, sanofi pasteur, Summit, DaVoltera, Actelion: Consultant, Consulting fee; CDC, US Dept of Veterans Affairs Research Service: Grant Investigator, Research grant
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5631345
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56313452017-11-07 Epidemiologic Trends in Clostridium difficile Isolate Ribotypes in United States from 2010 to 2014 Snydman, David R McDermott, Laura A Jenkins, Stephen G Goldstein, Ellie J C Patel, Robin Forbes, Betty A Johnson, Stuart Gerding, Dale N Thorpe, Cheleste M Walk, Seth T Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Trends in the distribution of ribotypes for C. difficile associated diarrheal isolates obtained over time in the United States are lacking. As part of surveillance program for C. difficile susceptibility, we analyzed stool isolates for ribotype distribution from a phase 2 trial of surotomycin (2010–2011) (North America sites) as well as a national surveillance study from 2011–2014. Isolates for the surveillance study were referred from 6 geographically distinct medical centers. METHODS: C. difficile isolates or C. difficile toxin + stools from patients with C. difficile associated diarrhea (CDAD) were submitted for testing to Tufts Medical Center. Following isolation and confirmation as C. difficile, a random sample of isolates were ribotyped by PCR capillary gel electrophoresis. RESULTS: 673 isolates over the 5 years of the analysis have been ribotyped to date. There were 49 unique ribotype designations, and 16 ribotypes had more than 10 isolates. The ribotype distribution by year is shown in the table. CONCLUSION: There has been a change in the frequency of ribotypes over time in the US. Of the most common ribotypes seen, 027 has decreased by over 50% while there has been an increase of 014-020, 002, and 106. 014-020 is now the most common ribotype seen in the US. These data suggest that there is a changing epidemiology of C. difficile in the US and continuous monitoring of the ribotype distributions and clinical implications is warranted. DISCLOSURES: D. R. Snydman, Merck: Consultant and Grant Investigator, Consulting fee and Research grant; Shire: Consultant, Consulting fee; Summit PLC: Consultant and Grant Investigator, Consulting fee and Research grant; BioK+: Consultant, Consulting fee; Actelion: Grant Investigator, Research grant; S. G. Jenkins, Cormedix: Consultant, Consulting fee; Bayer: Consultant, Consulting fee; Merck: Grant Investigator and Scientific Advisor, Research grant; E. J. C. Goldstein, Merck: Grant Investigator, Scientific Advisor and Speaker’s Bureau, Consulting fee and Grant recipient; Cubist: Grant Investigator, Scientific Advisor and Speaker’s Bureau, Consulting fee; Actelion: Grant Investigator, Grant recipient; Summit PLC: Grant Investigator and Scientific Advisor, Grant recipient; R. Patel, Curetis: Consultant, Grant Investigator and Speaker’s Bureau, Consulting fee and Research grant; Pocared: Grant Investigator, Research grant; nanoMR: Grant Investigator, Research grant; BioFire: Grant Investigator, Research grant; Check-Points: Grant Investigator, Research grant; 3M: Grant Investigator, Research grant; Cubist: Grant Investigator, Research grant; Merck: Grant Investigator, Research grant; S. Johnson, Bio-K+: Consultant, Consulting fee; D. N. Gerding, Merck, Shire, Cubist, Rebiotix, sanofi pasteur, Summit, DaVoltera, Actelion: Consultant, Consulting fee; CDC, US Dept of Veterans Affairs Research Service: Grant Investigator, Research grant Oxford University Press 2017-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5631345/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.973 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Snydman, David R
McDermott, Laura A
Jenkins, Stephen G
Goldstein, Ellie J C
Patel, Robin
Forbes, Betty A
Johnson, Stuart
Gerding, Dale N
Thorpe, Cheleste M
Walk, Seth T
Epidemiologic Trends in Clostridium difficile Isolate Ribotypes in United States from 2010 to 2014
title Epidemiologic Trends in Clostridium difficile Isolate Ribotypes in United States from 2010 to 2014
title_full Epidemiologic Trends in Clostridium difficile Isolate Ribotypes in United States from 2010 to 2014
title_fullStr Epidemiologic Trends in Clostridium difficile Isolate Ribotypes in United States from 2010 to 2014
title_full_unstemmed Epidemiologic Trends in Clostridium difficile Isolate Ribotypes in United States from 2010 to 2014
title_short Epidemiologic Trends in Clostridium difficile Isolate Ribotypes in United States from 2010 to 2014
title_sort epidemiologic trends in clostridium difficile isolate ribotypes in united states from 2010 to 2014
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5631345/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.973
work_keys_str_mv AT snydmandavidr epidemiologictrendsinclostridiumdifficileisolateribotypesinunitedstatesfrom2010to2014
AT mcdermottlauraa epidemiologictrendsinclostridiumdifficileisolateribotypesinunitedstatesfrom2010to2014
AT jenkinsstepheng epidemiologictrendsinclostridiumdifficileisolateribotypesinunitedstatesfrom2010to2014
AT goldsteinelliejc epidemiologictrendsinclostridiumdifficileisolateribotypesinunitedstatesfrom2010to2014
AT patelrobin epidemiologictrendsinclostridiumdifficileisolateribotypesinunitedstatesfrom2010to2014
AT forbesbettya epidemiologictrendsinclostridiumdifficileisolateribotypesinunitedstatesfrom2010to2014
AT johnsonstuart epidemiologictrendsinclostridiumdifficileisolateribotypesinunitedstatesfrom2010to2014
AT gerdingdalen epidemiologictrendsinclostridiumdifficileisolateribotypesinunitedstatesfrom2010to2014
AT thorpechelestem epidemiologictrendsinclostridiumdifficileisolateribotypesinunitedstatesfrom2010to2014
AT walksetht epidemiologictrendsinclostridiumdifficileisolateribotypesinunitedstatesfrom2010to2014