Cargando…

Can We Distinguish between Human Parechovirus Type 3 and Enteroviruses Infection in Neonates and Young Infants Based on their Clinical and Laboratory Findings?

BACKGROUND: Human parechovirus type 3 (HPeV3) and enteroviruses (EVs) are the major viral pathogens causing severe diseases in neonates and young infants. Although two infections typically occur in summer, and initial clinical presentations are similar, differences in clinical and laboratory charact...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Izumita, Ryohei, Aizawa, Yuta, Habuka, Rie, Watanabe, Kanako, Otsuka, Taketo, Saitoh, Akihiko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5631368/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1858
_version_ 1783269451399954432
author Izumita, Ryohei
Aizawa, Yuta
Habuka, Rie
Watanabe, Kanako
Otsuka, Taketo
Saitoh, Akihiko
author_facet Izumita, Ryohei
Aizawa, Yuta
Habuka, Rie
Watanabe, Kanako
Otsuka, Taketo
Saitoh, Akihiko
author_sort Izumita, Ryohei
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Human parechovirus type 3 (HPeV3) and enteroviruses (EVs) are the major viral pathogens causing severe diseases in neonates and young infants. Although two infections typically occur in summer, and initial clinical presentations are similar, differences in clinical and laboratory characteristics of HPeV3- and EV- infections are not well described. METHODS: From January 2014 to December 2016, we prospectively obtained serum and/or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples from febrile neonates and young infants < 4 months suspecting sepsis and meningoencephalitis in Niigata, Japan. RNA/DNA were extracted from the samples and viral etiologies including HPeV3, EVs, and/or herpes simplex virus were tested using the real-time PCR, followed by genetic sequencing and typing. The comparison was made between HPeV3- and EVs-infected patients based on their medical records and subsequent questionnaires using appropriate statistical analyses. RESULTS: In total, we obtained 212 serum and 170 CSF samples from 222 patients. HPeV3 and EVs were detected for 56 (25%) and 43 patients (19%) (Figure), and their median ages were 29 and 24 days (P = 0.58), respectively. HPeV3-infected patients presented with higher median body temperature (38.9 °C vs 38.5 °C, P < 0.001), heart rates (184/minute vs. 161/minute, P = 0.002), peripheral coldness (72% vs. 34%, P < 0.001), skin mottling (65% vs. 23%, P < 0.001), and grunting (22% vs. 5%, P = 0.014) than EVs-infected patients. Additionally, systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) was more frequently observed in HPeV3-infected patients than in EVs-infected patients (82% vs. 58%, P = 0.009). In the laboratory data, median white blood cell count was lower in HPeV3-infected patients than those in EVs-infected patients (5,200/µL vs. 8,900/µL, P < 0.001). The pleocytosis was observed 58% of EVs-infected patients, but none of the HPeV3-infected patients (P < 0.001); however, HPeV3 RNA was frequently detected than EVs in CSF (90% vs 66%, P = 0.012). CONCLUSION: This study showed that HPeV3-infected neonates and young infants presented more severe clinical manifestations than those infected with EVs. Significant tachycardia, poor peripheral circulation, and fulfilling SIRS criteria at the presentation may be the clues considering HPeV3 infection rather than EVs infection. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5631368
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56313682017-11-07 Can We Distinguish between Human Parechovirus Type 3 and Enteroviruses Infection in Neonates and Young Infants Based on their Clinical and Laboratory Findings? Izumita, Ryohei Aizawa, Yuta Habuka, Rie Watanabe, Kanako Otsuka, Taketo Saitoh, Akihiko Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Human parechovirus type 3 (HPeV3) and enteroviruses (EVs) are the major viral pathogens causing severe diseases in neonates and young infants. Although two infections typically occur in summer, and initial clinical presentations are similar, differences in clinical and laboratory characteristics of HPeV3- and EV- infections are not well described. METHODS: From January 2014 to December 2016, we prospectively obtained serum and/or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples from febrile neonates and young infants < 4 months suspecting sepsis and meningoencephalitis in Niigata, Japan. RNA/DNA were extracted from the samples and viral etiologies including HPeV3, EVs, and/or herpes simplex virus were tested using the real-time PCR, followed by genetic sequencing and typing. The comparison was made between HPeV3- and EVs-infected patients based on their medical records and subsequent questionnaires using appropriate statistical analyses. RESULTS: In total, we obtained 212 serum and 170 CSF samples from 222 patients. HPeV3 and EVs were detected for 56 (25%) and 43 patients (19%) (Figure), and their median ages were 29 and 24 days (P = 0.58), respectively. HPeV3-infected patients presented with higher median body temperature (38.9 °C vs 38.5 °C, P < 0.001), heart rates (184/minute vs. 161/minute, P = 0.002), peripheral coldness (72% vs. 34%, P < 0.001), skin mottling (65% vs. 23%, P < 0.001), and grunting (22% vs. 5%, P = 0.014) than EVs-infected patients. Additionally, systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) was more frequently observed in HPeV3-infected patients than in EVs-infected patients (82% vs. 58%, P = 0.009). In the laboratory data, median white blood cell count was lower in HPeV3-infected patients than those in EVs-infected patients (5,200/µL vs. 8,900/µL, P < 0.001). The pleocytosis was observed 58% of EVs-infected patients, but none of the HPeV3-infected patients (P < 0.001); however, HPeV3 RNA was frequently detected than EVs in CSF (90% vs 66%, P = 0.012). CONCLUSION: This study showed that HPeV3-infected neonates and young infants presented more severe clinical manifestations than those infected with EVs. Significant tachycardia, poor peripheral circulation, and fulfilling SIRS criteria at the presentation may be the clues considering HPeV3 infection rather than EVs infection. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2017-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5631368/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1858 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Izumita, Ryohei
Aizawa, Yuta
Habuka, Rie
Watanabe, Kanako
Otsuka, Taketo
Saitoh, Akihiko
Can We Distinguish between Human Parechovirus Type 3 and Enteroviruses Infection in Neonates and Young Infants Based on their Clinical and Laboratory Findings?
title Can We Distinguish between Human Parechovirus Type 3 and Enteroviruses Infection in Neonates and Young Infants Based on their Clinical and Laboratory Findings?
title_full Can We Distinguish between Human Parechovirus Type 3 and Enteroviruses Infection in Neonates and Young Infants Based on their Clinical and Laboratory Findings?
title_fullStr Can We Distinguish between Human Parechovirus Type 3 and Enteroviruses Infection in Neonates and Young Infants Based on their Clinical and Laboratory Findings?
title_full_unstemmed Can We Distinguish between Human Parechovirus Type 3 and Enteroviruses Infection in Neonates and Young Infants Based on their Clinical and Laboratory Findings?
title_short Can We Distinguish between Human Parechovirus Type 3 and Enteroviruses Infection in Neonates and Young Infants Based on their Clinical and Laboratory Findings?
title_sort can we distinguish between human parechovirus type 3 and enteroviruses infection in neonates and young infants based on their clinical and laboratory findings?
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5631368/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1858
work_keys_str_mv AT izumitaryohei canwedistinguishbetweenhumanparechovirustype3andenterovirusesinfectioninneonatesandyounginfantsbasedontheirclinicalandlaboratoryfindings
AT aizawayuta canwedistinguishbetweenhumanparechovirustype3andenterovirusesinfectioninneonatesandyounginfantsbasedontheirclinicalandlaboratoryfindings
AT habukarie canwedistinguishbetweenhumanparechovirustype3andenterovirusesinfectioninneonatesandyounginfantsbasedontheirclinicalandlaboratoryfindings
AT watanabekanako canwedistinguishbetweenhumanparechovirustype3andenterovirusesinfectioninneonatesandyounginfantsbasedontheirclinicalandlaboratoryfindings
AT otsukataketo canwedistinguishbetweenhumanparechovirustype3andenterovirusesinfectioninneonatesandyounginfantsbasedontheirclinicalandlaboratoryfindings
AT saitohakihiko canwedistinguishbetweenhumanparechovirustype3andenterovirusesinfectioninneonatesandyounginfantsbasedontheirclinicalandlaboratoryfindings