Cargando…
Comparative Effectiveness of Vancomycin vs. Metronidazole in Mild Clostridium difficile Infections, and Potential Impact on Subsequent Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus (VRE) Isolation
BACKGROUND: The epidemiology and clinical characteristics of Clostridium difficile infections (CDI) have evolved dramatically in the past decade. Vancomycin is the treatment of choice for moderate to severe CDI, with superior cure rates observed in comparative trials. However, controlled comparative...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5631449/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.966 |
_version_ | 1783269473828995072 |
---|---|
author | Youngster, Ilan Lazarovitch, Zipora Bondorenco, Marina Mengesha, Betlehem Toledano, Limor Kachlon, Yael Marchaim, Dror |
author_facet | Youngster, Ilan Lazarovitch, Zipora Bondorenco, Marina Mengesha, Betlehem Toledano, Limor Kachlon, Yael Marchaim, Dror |
author_sort | Youngster, Ilan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The epidemiology and clinical characteristics of Clostridium difficile infections (CDI) have evolved dramatically in the past decade. Vancomycin is the treatment of choice for moderate to severe CDI, with superior cure rates observed in comparative trials. However, controlled comparative efficacy data pertaining to mild CDI is lacking. Furthermore, the potential impact of vancomycin treatment on subsequent Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus (VRE) isolation rates remains unknown at the individual patient level. METHODS: A Retrospective cohort analysis was executed at the Assaf Harofeh Medical Center, Israel, from 2010 to 2015. Adult patients (>18 years) with a first episode of acute CDI, determined per pre-established criteria, were enrolled. The efficacy of vancomycin vs..metronidazole was evaluated in the subset of patients with mild CDI. The outcomes of patients, who received vancomycin or metronidazole (but not both), were compared by Cox regression. A prediction score was used to control for possible confounders associated with being treated with vancomycin. The independent association of oral vancomycin treatment during the acute CDI and later (up to 18 months) VRE isolation was analyzed using Cox regression. RESULTS: A total of 413 patients with CDI were included in the study. The majority were elderly (median age 75 years, range 19–120), and had extensive comorbidities (mean Charlson’s combined condition score 6.7 ± 3.4) and significant acute illness indices (35% with severe to fulminant Horn index). Among 126 patients with mild disease, no differences were observed in terms of clinical outcomes between vancomycin or metronidazole treatment. Metronidazole remained non-inferior even after incorporating a prediction score to control for confounders associated with being a “vancomycin case”. Ten patients had new post-CDI VRE isolation. In multivariable analysis, oral vancomycin treatment during the acute CDI was the strongest independent predictor for later isolation of VRE (aOR=6.7, P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that metronidazole should remain the recommended treatment of choice for mild CDI, due to clinical non-inferiority and an apparent association between vancomycin therapy and subsequent VRE isolation on an individual patient level analysis. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5631449 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56314492017-11-07 Comparative Effectiveness of Vancomycin vs. Metronidazole in Mild Clostridium difficile Infections, and Potential Impact on Subsequent Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus (VRE) Isolation Youngster, Ilan Lazarovitch, Zipora Bondorenco, Marina Mengesha, Betlehem Toledano, Limor Kachlon, Yael Marchaim, Dror Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: The epidemiology and clinical characteristics of Clostridium difficile infections (CDI) have evolved dramatically in the past decade. Vancomycin is the treatment of choice for moderate to severe CDI, with superior cure rates observed in comparative trials. However, controlled comparative efficacy data pertaining to mild CDI is lacking. Furthermore, the potential impact of vancomycin treatment on subsequent Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus (VRE) isolation rates remains unknown at the individual patient level. METHODS: A Retrospective cohort analysis was executed at the Assaf Harofeh Medical Center, Israel, from 2010 to 2015. Adult patients (>18 years) with a first episode of acute CDI, determined per pre-established criteria, were enrolled. The efficacy of vancomycin vs..metronidazole was evaluated in the subset of patients with mild CDI. The outcomes of patients, who received vancomycin or metronidazole (but not both), were compared by Cox regression. A prediction score was used to control for possible confounders associated with being treated with vancomycin. The independent association of oral vancomycin treatment during the acute CDI and later (up to 18 months) VRE isolation was analyzed using Cox regression. RESULTS: A total of 413 patients with CDI were included in the study. The majority were elderly (median age 75 years, range 19–120), and had extensive comorbidities (mean Charlson’s combined condition score 6.7 ± 3.4) and significant acute illness indices (35% with severe to fulminant Horn index). Among 126 patients with mild disease, no differences were observed in terms of clinical outcomes between vancomycin or metronidazole treatment. Metronidazole remained non-inferior even after incorporating a prediction score to control for confounders associated with being a “vancomycin case”. Ten patients had new post-CDI VRE isolation. In multivariable analysis, oral vancomycin treatment during the acute CDI was the strongest independent predictor for later isolation of VRE (aOR=6.7, P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that metronidazole should remain the recommended treatment of choice for mild CDI, due to clinical non-inferiority and an apparent association between vancomycin therapy and subsequent VRE isolation on an individual patient level analysis. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2017-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5631449/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.966 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Abstracts Youngster, Ilan Lazarovitch, Zipora Bondorenco, Marina Mengesha, Betlehem Toledano, Limor Kachlon, Yael Marchaim, Dror Comparative Effectiveness of Vancomycin vs. Metronidazole in Mild Clostridium difficile Infections, and Potential Impact on Subsequent Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus (VRE) Isolation |
title | Comparative Effectiveness of Vancomycin vs. Metronidazole in Mild Clostridium difficile Infections, and Potential Impact on Subsequent Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus (VRE) Isolation |
title_full | Comparative Effectiveness of Vancomycin vs. Metronidazole in Mild Clostridium difficile Infections, and Potential Impact on Subsequent Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus (VRE) Isolation |
title_fullStr | Comparative Effectiveness of Vancomycin vs. Metronidazole in Mild Clostridium difficile Infections, and Potential Impact on Subsequent Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus (VRE) Isolation |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Effectiveness of Vancomycin vs. Metronidazole in Mild Clostridium difficile Infections, and Potential Impact on Subsequent Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus (VRE) Isolation |
title_short | Comparative Effectiveness of Vancomycin vs. Metronidazole in Mild Clostridium difficile Infections, and Potential Impact on Subsequent Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus (VRE) Isolation |
title_sort | comparative effectiveness of vancomycin vs. metronidazole in mild clostridium difficile infections, and potential impact on subsequent vancomycin-resistant enterococcus (vre) isolation |
topic | Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5631449/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.966 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT youngsterilan comparativeeffectivenessofvancomycinvsmetronidazoleinmildclostridiumdifficileinfectionsandpotentialimpactonsubsequentvancomycinresistantenterococcusvreisolation AT lazarovitchzipora comparativeeffectivenessofvancomycinvsmetronidazoleinmildclostridiumdifficileinfectionsandpotentialimpactonsubsequentvancomycinresistantenterococcusvreisolation AT bondorencomarina comparativeeffectivenessofvancomycinvsmetronidazoleinmildclostridiumdifficileinfectionsandpotentialimpactonsubsequentvancomycinresistantenterococcusvreisolation AT mengeshabetlehem comparativeeffectivenessofvancomycinvsmetronidazoleinmildclostridiumdifficileinfectionsandpotentialimpactonsubsequentvancomycinresistantenterococcusvreisolation AT toledanolimor comparativeeffectivenessofvancomycinvsmetronidazoleinmildclostridiumdifficileinfectionsandpotentialimpactonsubsequentvancomycinresistantenterococcusvreisolation AT kachlonyael comparativeeffectivenessofvancomycinvsmetronidazoleinmildclostridiumdifficileinfectionsandpotentialimpactonsubsequentvancomycinresistantenterococcusvreisolation AT marchaimdror comparativeeffectivenessofvancomycinvsmetronidazoleinmildclostridiumdifficileinfectionsandpotentialimpactonsubsequentvancomycinresistantenterococcusvreisolation |