Cargando…

In vitro Susceptibility Testing of Essential Oils against Gram-positive and Gram-negative Clinical Isolates, including Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE)

BACKGROUND: In the era of antibiotic resistance, alternative anti-infectives must be explored. The National Action Plan for Combating Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria calls for developing nontraditional therapeutics, including natural compounds such as essential oils (EOs) (Goal 4.4). A pilot study pre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Patterson, Jan E, McElmeel, M.L, Wiederhold, Nathan P
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5631486/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.907
_version_ 1783269483358453760
author Patterson, Jan E
McElmeel, M.L
Wiederhold, Nathan P
author_facet Patterson, Jan E
McElmeel, M.L
Wiederhold, Nathan P
author_sort Patterson, Jan E
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In the era of antibiotic resistance, alternative anti-infectives must be explored. The National Action Plan for Combating Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria calls for developing nontraditional therapeutics, including natural compounds such as essential oils (EOs) (Goal 4.4). A pilot study previously showed in vitro activity of EOs against CRE and warranted further study of their antibacterial activity. We studied cinnamon bark, clove, lavender, lemongrass, eucalyptus, oregano, rosemary, thyme, tea tree, manuka, and Thieves® blend (Young Living Essential Oils, Lehi UT) against an expanded panel of Gram-positive and Gram-negative isolates. METHODS: 30 Gram-positive and 70 Gram-negative clinical isolates, including CRE, were tested using CLSI methods. Isolates were grown overnight on TSA; 0.5 McFarland suspensions in sterile water were swabbed over Mueller–Hinton agar using the Kirby–Bauer method. 20 μl of full-strength oils were pipetted onto blank paper disks in a sterile dish. Disks were placed aseptically onto the plates immediately after inoculating disks. Vancomycin was tested with Gram-positives and meropenem with Gram-negatives. Median zone diameters are shown. RESULTS: EOs oregano, thyme, cinnamon bark, and lemongrass had the largest zones of inhibition against Gram-positive organisms and were larger than those of vancomycin for MRSA/MSSA. Cinnamon bark had the largest zone of inhibition against P. aeruginosa and was larger than that of meropenem. Oregano, thyme, cinnamon bark had the largest zones of inhibition against Enterobacteriaceae and were larger than those of meropenem against K. pneumoniae and E. cloacae. CONCLUSION: Essential oils showed significant in vitro activity against clinical isolates, including CRE. Further study of the clinical activity of essential oils is warranted. DISCLOSURES: J. E. Patterson, Young Living Essential Oils: Independent Contractor, Salary
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5631486
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56314862017-11-07 In vitro Susceptibility Testing of Essential Oils against Gram-positive and Gram-negative Clinical Isolates, including Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) Patterson, Jan E McElmeel, M.L Wiederhold, Nathan P Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: In the era of antibiotic resistance, alternative anti-infectives must be explored. The National Action Plan for Combating Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria calls for developing nontraditional therapeutics, including natural compounds such as essential oils (EOs) (Goal 4.4). A pilot study previously showed in vitro activity of EOs against CRE and warranted further study of their antibacterial activity. We studied cinnamon bark, clove, lavender, lemongrass, eucalyptus, oregano, rosemary, thyme, tea tree, manuka, and Thieves® blend (Young Living Essential Oils, Lehi UT) against an expanded panel of Gram-positive and Gram-negative isolates. METHODS: 30 Gram-positive and 70 Gram-negative clinical isolates, including CRE, were tested using CLSI methods. Isolates were grown overnight on TSA; 0.5 McFarland suspensions in sterile water were swabbed over Mueller–Hinton agar using the Kirby–Bauer method. 20 μl of full-strength oils were pipetted onto blank paper disks in a sterile dish. Disks were placed aseptically onto the plates immediately after inoculating disks. Vancomycin was tested with Gram-positives and meropenem with Gram-negatives. Median zone diameters are shown. RESULTS: EOs oregano, thyme, cinnamon bark, and lemongrass had the largest zones of inhibition against Gram-positive organisms and were larger than those of vancomycin for MRSA/MSSA. Cinnamon bark had the largest zone of inhibition against P. aeruginosa and was larger than that of meropenem. Oregano, thyme, cinnamon bark had the largest zones of inhibition against Enterobacteriaceae and were larger than those of meropenem against K. pneumoniae and E. cloacae. CONCLUSION: Essential oils showed significant in vitro activity against clinical isolates, including CRE. Further study of the clinical activity of essential oils is warranted. DISCLOSURES: J. E. Patterson, Young Living Essential Oils: Independent Contractor, Salary Oxford University Press 2017-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5631486/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.907 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Patterson, Jan E
McElmeel, M.L
Wiederhold, Nathan P
In vitro Susceptibility Testing of Essential Oils against Gram-positive and Gram-negative Clinical Isolates, including Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE)
title In vitro Susceptibility Testing of Essential Oils against Gram-positive and Gram-negative Clinical Isolates, including Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE)
title_full In vitro Susceptibility Testing of Essential Oils against Gram-positive and Gram-negative Clinical Isolates, including Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE)
title_fullStr In vitro Susceptibility Testing of Essential Oils against Gram-positive and Gram-negative Clinical Isolates, including Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE)
title_full_unstemmed In vitro Susceptibility Testing of Essential Oils against Gram-positive and Gram-negative Clinical Isolates, including Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE)
title_short In vitro Susceptibility Testing of Essential Oils against Gram-positive and Gram-negative Clinical Isolates, including Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE)
title_sort in vitro susceptibility testing of essential oils against gram-positive and gram-negative clinical isolates, including carbapenem-resistant enterobacteriaceae (cre)
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5631486/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.907
work_keys_str_mv AT pattersonjane invitrosusceptibilitytestingofessentialoilsagainstgrampositiveandgramnegativeclinicalisolatesincludingcarbapenemresistantenterobacteriaceaecre
AT mcelmeelml invitrosusceptibilitytestingofessentialoilsagainstgrampositiveandgramnegativeclinicalisolatesincludingcarbapenemresistantenterobacteriaceaecre
AT wiederholdnathanp invitrosusceptibilitytestingofessentialoilsagainstgrampositiveandgramnegativeclinicalisolatesincludingcarbapenemresistantenterobacteriaceaecre