Cargando…
Prevalence of Clostridium difficile and Multidrug Resistant Gram-negative Rods in the Soil from Southeastern Wisconsin
BACKGROUND: Preliminary data suggests that community-onset Clostridium difficile might be more common in rural areas. Thus, farms—specifically livestock farms—might be a major reservoir of C. difficile. Similarly, antibiotic exposures might predispose farm animals for colonization with multidrug res...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5631557/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.945 |
_version_ | 1783269501443244032 |
---|---|
author | Lor, Angela Tran, Cathy Jencson, Annette Cadnum, Jennifer Donskey, Curtis Munoz-Price, L Silvia |
author_facet | Lor, Angela Tran, Cathy Jencson, Annette Cadnum, Jennifer Donskey, Curtis Munoz-Price, L Silvia |
author_sort | Lor, Angela |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Preliminary data suggests that community-onset Clostridium difficile might be more common in rural areas. Thus, farms—specifically livestock farms—might be a major reservoir of C. difficile. Similarly, antibiotic exposures might predispose farm animals for colonization with multidrug resistant Gram-negative organisms. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of C. difficile and multidrug resistant gram-negative rods in the soil of Southeastern Wisconsin farms. METHODS: From July to September of 2016, soil samples were collected from farms with livestock animals. Soil samples were collected using gloves and sample containers. Soil samples were collected from farms specifically in or near Washington, Waukesha, and Milwaukee counties which are within the proximity of Milwaukee Metro area. Soil samples were cultured for C. difficile and Gram-negative rods on selective plates and by broth enrichment. RESULTS: A total of 20 farms participated in this study with a total of 40 soil samples. Out of the 40 soil samples, 20 were from an area where animals roam or where manure was used and the remaining 20 were from an area where animals are prohibited or where there was no manure. Out of the 20 soil samples where animals roam, 10 (50%), tested positive for C. difficile. Out of 20 soil samples where animals are prohibited, 13 samples (65%) tested positive for C. difficile. 2 of the 23 C. difficile isolates recovered were toxigenic. Eight (40%) of the 20 soil samples where animals roam tested positive for fluoroquinolone-resistant bacteria (FQR). While 5 (25%) of the 20 soil samples where animals are prohibited, tested positive for FQR bacteria. An Acinetobacter calcoaceticus was found to exhibit carbapenem-resistance. CONCLUSION: We found soil colonization with C. difficile and FQR in 65% and 25%, respectively, where animals are prohibited. Where animals roam we found C. difficile and FQR 50% and 40%, respectively. Our study suggests that farms may be a significant community source for C. difficile and fluoroquinolone resistant organisms. Additional testing should be done to examine factors that might be increasing antibiotic resistance in farms (e.g., antibiotic exposure). DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5631557 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56315572017-11-07 Prevalence of Clostridium difficile and Multidrug Resistant Gram-negative Rods in the Soil from Southeastern Wisconsin Lor, Angela Tran, Cathy Jencson, Annette Cadnum, Jennifer Donskey, Curtis Munoz-Price, L Silvia Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Preliminary data suggests that community-onset Clostridium difficile might be more common in rural areas. Thus, farms—specifically livestock farms—might be a major reservoir of C. difficile. Similarly, antibiotic exposures might predispose farm animals for colonization with multidrug resistant Gram-negative organisms. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of C. difficile and multidrug resistant gram-negative rods in the soil of Southeastern Wisconsin farms. METHODS: From July to September of 2016, soil samples were collected from farms with livestock animals. Soil samples were collected using gloves and sample containers. Soil samples were collected from farms specifically in or near Washington, Waukesha, and Milwaukee counties which are within the proximity of Milwaukee Metro area. Soil samples were cultured for C. difficile and Gram-negative rods on selective plates and by broth enrichment. RESULTS: A total of 20 farms participated in this study with a total of 40 soil samples. Out of the 40 soil samples, 20 were from an area where animals roam or where manure was used and the remaining 20 were from an area where animals are prohibited or where there was no manure. Out of the 20 soil samples where animals roam, 10 (50%), tested positive for C. difficile. Out of 20 soil samples where animals are prohibited, 13 samples (65%) tested positive for C. difficile. 2 of the 23 C. difficile isolates recovered were toxigenic. Eight (40%) of the 20 soil samples where animals roam tested positive for fluoroquinolone-resistant bacteria (FQR). While 5 (25%) of the 20 soil samples where animals are prohibited, tested positive for FQR bacteria. An Acinetobacter calcoaceticus was found to exhibit carbapenem-resistance. CONCLUSION: We found soil colonization with C. difficile and FQR in 65% and 25%, respectively, where animals are prohibited. Where animals roam we found C. difficile and FQR 50% and 40%, respectively. Our study suggests that farms may be a significant community source for C. difficile and fluoroquinolone resistant organisms. Additional testing should be done to examine factors that might be increasing antibiotic resistance in farms (e.g., antibiotic exposure). DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2017-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5631557/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.945 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Abstracts Lor, Angela Tran, Cathy Jencson, Annette Cadnum, Jennifer Donskey, Curtis Munoz-Price, L Silvia Prevalence of Clostridium difficile and Multidrug Resistant Gram-negative Rods in the Soil from Southeastern Wisconsin |
title | Prevalence of Clostridium difficile and Multidrug Resistant Gram-negative Rods in the Soil from Southeastern Wisconsin |
title_full | Prevalence of Clostridium difficile and Multidrug Resistant Gram-negative Rods in the Soil from Southeastern Wisconsin |
title_fullStr | Prevalence of Clostridium difficile and Multidrug Resistant Gram-negative Rods in the Soil from Southeastern Wisconsin |
title_full_unstemmed | Prevalence of Clostridium difficile and Multidrug Resistant Gram-negative Rods in the Soil from Southeastern Wisconsin |
title_short | Prevalence of Clostridium difficile and Multidrug Resistant Gram-negative Rods in the Soil from Southeastern Wisconsin |
title_sort | prevalence of clostridium difficile and multidrug resistant gram-negative rods in the soil from southeastern wisconsin |
topic | Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5631557/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.945 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lorangela prevalenceofclostridiumdifficileandmultidrugresistantgramnegativerodsinthesoilfromsoutheasternwisconsin AT trancathy prevalenceofclostridiumdifficileandmultidrugresistantgramnegativerodsinthesoilfromsoutheasternwisconsin AT jencsonannette prevalenceofclostridiumdifficileandmultidrugresistantgramnegativerodsinthesoilfromsoutheasternwisconsin AT cadnumjennifer prevalenceofclostridiumdifficileandmultidrugresistantgramnegativerodsinthesoilfromsoutheasternwisconsin AT donskeycurtis prevalenceofclostridiumdifficileandmultidrugresistantgramnegativerodsinthesoilfromsoutheasternwisconsin AT munozpricelsilvia prevalenceofclostridiumdifficileandmultidrugresistantgramnegativerodsinthesoilfromsoutheasternwisconsin |