Cargando…

Prevalence of Clostridium difficile and Multidrug Resistant Gram-negative Rods in the Soil from Southeastern Wisconsin

BACKGROUND: Preliminary data suggests that community-onset Clostridium difficile might be more common in rural areas. Thus, farms—specifically livestock farms—might be a major reservoir of C. difficile. Similarly, antibiotic exposures might predispose farm animals for colonization with multidrug res...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lor, Angela, Tran, Cathy, Jencson, Annette, Cadnum, Jennifer, Donskey, Curtis, Munoz-Price, L Silvia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5631557/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.945
_version_ 1783269501443244032
author Lor, Angela
Tran, Cathy
Jencson, Annette
Cadnum, Jennifer
Donskey, Curtis
Munoz-Price, L Silvia
author_facet Lor, Angela
Tran, Cathy
Jencson, Annette
Cadnum, Jennifer
Donskey, Curtis
Munoz-Price, L Silvia
author_sort Lor, Angela
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Preliminary data suggests that community-onset Clostridium difficile might be more common in rural areas. Thus, farms—specifically livestock farms—might be a major reservoir of C. difficile. Similarly, antibiotic exposures might predispose farm animals for colonization with multidrug resistant Gram-negative organisms. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of C. difficile and multidrug resistant gram-negative rods in the soil of Southeastern Wisconsin farms. METHODS: From July to September of 2016, soil samples were collected from farms with livestock animals. Soil samples were collected using gloves and sample containers. Soil samples were collected from farms specifically in or near Washington, Waukesha, and Milwaukee counties which are within the proximity of Milwaukee Metro area. Soil samples were cultured for C. difficile and Gram-negative rods on selective plates and by broth enrichment. RESULTS: A total of 20 farms participated in this study with a total of 40 soil samples. Out of the 40 soil samples, 20 were from an area where animals roam or where manure was used and the remaining 20 were from an area where animals are prohibited or where there was no manure. Out of the 20 soil samples where animals roam, 10 (50%), tested positive for C. difficile. Out of 20 soil samples where animals are prohibited, 13 samples (65%) tested positive for C. difficile. 2 of the 23 C. difficile isolates recovered were toxigenic. Eight (40%) of the 20 soil samples where animals roam tested positive for fluoroquinolone-resistant bacteria (FQR). While 5 (25%) of the 20 soil samples where animals are prohibited, tested positive for FQR bacteria. An Acinetobacter calcoaceticus was found to exhibit carbapenem-resistance. CONCLUSION: We found soil colonization with C. difficile and FQR in 65% and 25%, respectively, where animals are prohibited. Where animals roam we found C. difficile and FQR 50% and 40%, respectively. Our study suggests that farms may be a significant community source for C. difficile and fluoroquinolone resistant organisms. Additional testing should be done to examine factors that might be increasing antibiotic resistance in farms (e.g., antibiotic exposure). DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5631557
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56315572017-11-07 Prevalence of Clostridium difficile and Multidrug Resistant Gram-negative Rods in the Soil from Southeastern Wisconsin Lor, Angela Tran, Cathy Jencson, Annette Cadnum, Jennifer Donskey, Curtis Munoz-Price, L Silvia Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Preliminary data suggests that community-onset Clostridium difficile might be more common in rural areas. Thus, farms—specifically livestock farms—might be a major reservoir of C. difficile. Similarly, antibiotic exposures might predispose farm animals for colonization with multidrug resistant Gram-negative organisms. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of C. difficile and multidrug resistant gram-negative rods in the soil of Southeastern Wisconsin farms. METHODS: From July to September of 2016, soil samples were collected from farms with livestock animals. Soil samples were collected using gloves and sample containers. Soil samples were collected from farms specifically in or near Washington, Waukesha, and Milwaukee counties which are within the proximity of Milwaukee Metro area. Soil samples were cultured for C. difficile and Gram-negative rods on selective plates and by broth enrichment. RESULTS: A total of 20 farms participated in this study with a total of 40 soil samples. Out of the 40 soil samples, 20 were from an area where animals roam or where manure was used and the remaining 20 were from an area where animals are prohibited or where there was no manure. Out of the 20 soil samples where animals roam, 10 (50%), tested positive for C. difficile. Out of 20 soil samples where animals are prohibited, 13 samples (65%) tested positive for C. difficile. 2 of the 23 C. difficile isolates recovered were toxigenic. Eight (40%) of the 20 soil samples where animals roam tested positive for fluoroquinolone-resistant bacteria (FQR). While 5 (25%) of the 20 soil samples where animals are prohibited, tested positive for FQR bacteria. An Acinetobacter calcoaceticus was found to exhibit carbapenem-resistance. CONCLUSION: We found soil colonization with C. difficile and FQR in 65% and 25%, respectively, where animals are prohibited. Where animals roam we found C. difficile and FQR 50% and 40%, respectively. Our study suggests that farms may be a significant community source for C. difficile and fluoroquinolone resistant organisms. Additional testing should be done to examine factors that might be increasing antibiotic resistance in farms (e.g., antibiotic exposure). DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2017-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5631557/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.945 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Lor, Angela
Tran, Cathy
Jencson, Annette
Cadnum, Jennifer
Donskey, Curtis
Munoz-Price, L Silvia
Prevalence of Clostridium difficile and Multidrug Resistant Gram-negative Rods in the Soil from Southeastern Wisconsin
title Prevalence of Clostridium difficile and Multidrug Resistant Gram-negative Rods in the Soil from Southeastern Wisconsin
title_full Prevalence of Clostridium difficile and Multidrug Resistant Gram-negative Rods in the Soil from Southeastern Wisconsin
title_fullStr Prevalence of Clostridium difficile and Multidrug Resistant Gram-negative Rods in the Soil from Southeastern Wisconsin
title_full_unstemmed Prevalence of Clostridium difficile and Multidrug Resistant Gram-negative Rods in the Soil from Southeastern Wisconsin
title_short Prevalence of Clostridium difficile and Multidrug Resistant Gram-negative Rods in the Soil from Southeastern Wisconsin
title_sort prevalence of clostridium difficile and multidrug resistant gram-negative rods in the soil from southeastern wisconsin
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5631557/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.945
work_keys_str_mv AT lorangela prevalenceofclostridiumdifficileandmultidrugresistantgramnegativerodsinthesoilfromsoutheasternwisconsin
AT trancathy prevalenceofclostridiumdifficileandmultidrugresistantgramnegativerodsinthesoilfromsoutheasternwisconsin
AT jencsonannette prevalenceofclostridiumdifficileandmultidrugresistantgramnegativerodsinthesoilfromsoutheasternwisconsin
AT cadnumjennifer prevalenceofclostridiumdifficileandmultidrugresistantgramnegativerodsinthesoilfromsoutheasternwisconsin
AT donskeycurtis prevalenceofclostridiumdifficileandmultidrugresistantgramnegativerodsinthesoilfromsoutheasternwisconsin
AT munozpricelsilvia prevalenceofclostridiumdifficileandmultidrugresistantgramnegativerodsinthesoilfromsoutheasternwisconsin