Cargando…

Impact of minocycline, polymyxin B, meropenem, and amikacin on growth-prevention of Acinetobacter baumannii with various biofilm-forming capabilities

BACKGROUND: Acinetobacter baumannii is a clinically challenging pathogen with biofilm (BF)- forming capabilities, making eradication difficult. The objective of this study was to compare in vitro activity of minocycline, polymyxin B, meropenem, and amikacin and evaluate the effectiveness in preventi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Beganovic, Maya, Luther, Megan, Daffinee, Kathryn, LaPlante, Kerry
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5631598/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.657
_version_ 1783269511515865088
author Beganovic, Maya
Luther, Megan
Daffinee, Kathryn
LaPlante, Kerry
author_facet Beganovic, Maya
Luther, Megan
Daffinee, Kathryn
LaPlante, Kerry
author_sort Beganovic, Maya
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Acinetobacter baumannii is a clinically challenging pathogen with biofilm (BF)- forming capabilities, making eradication difficult. The objective of this study was to compare in vitro activity of minocycline, polymyxin B, meropenem, and amikacin and evaluate the effectiveness in preventing BF formation utilizing previously validated methodology. METHODS: Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) were performed on all isolates in duplicate using CLSI standards. Tryptic soy broth plus 1% dextrose (TSB+D1%) was used to quantify BF formation of 12 clinically unique and diverse strains of A. baumannii. Biofilm prevention concentration (BPC) was defined as the concentration of drug where no biofilm attachment was observed, as determined by optical density (OD). BPC was determined by evaluating increasing concentrations of antibiotic in TSB+D1% for 48 hours. BF was quantified by measuring OD of each well at 570nm via spectrophotometer. Previously described BF adherence categories were utilized to define BF strength (OD(570) > 2 = strong; OD(570) 1–2 = moderate; OD(570) >0.5 <1 = weak; OD(570) ≤ 0.5 = none). RESULTS: Twelve clinical isolates were evaluated with a full range of BF formation capabilities. Prevention of BF formation was observed at concentrations below the MIC by 2.57 ± 4.12-fold for minocycline, 5.57 ± 8.97-fold for polymyxin B, 5.77 ± 17.56-fold for meropenem, and 0.72 ± 0.35-fold for amikacin. Minocycline prevented BF formation at or below the MIC for 75% of isolates tested vs. 67% for polymyxin B, 33% for meropenem, and 33% for amikacin. Free drug concentrations at the end of a dosing interval, derived from pharmacokinetic data, imply that BF would be prevented for 75% of minocycline-exposed isolates vs. 58.3% polymyxin B-, 8.3% meropenem-, and 8.3% amikacin- exposed isolates. CONCLUSION: Minocycline, polymyxin B and meropenem prevented BF formation at clinically relevant concentrations. Prompt antimicrobial administration may be critical to prevent attachment of pathogen. BF production increased or remained unchanged in the presence of amikacin. Due to toxicity concerns and variation in resistance patterns, minocycline is a viable treatment option against A. baumannii. Additional studies are warranted. DISCLOSURES: K. LaPlante, Merck: Grant Investigator, Grant recipient. Pfizer: Grant Investigator, Grant recipient. Cempra: Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee. The Medicines Company: Grant Investigator, Grant recipient. Allergan: Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee. Bard/ Davol: Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee. Ocean Spray: Grant Investigator and Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee and Grant recipient. Zavante: Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee. Achaogen: Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5631598
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56315982017-11-07 Impact of minocycline, polymyxin B, meropenem, and amikacin on growth-prevention of Acinetobacter baumannii with various biofilm-forming capabilities Beganovic, Maya Luther, Megan Daffinee, Kathryn LaPlante, Kerry Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Acinetobacter baumannii is a clinically challenging pathogen with biofilm (BF)- forming capabilities, making eradication difficult. The objective of this study was to compare in vitro activity of minocycline, polymyxin B, meropenem, and amikacin and evaluate the effectiveness in preventing BF formation utilizing previously validated methodology. METHODS: Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) were performed on all isolates in duplicate using CLSI standards. Tryptic soy broth plus 1% dextrose (TSB+D1%) was used to quantify BF formation of 12 clinically unique and diverse strains of A. baumannii. Biofilm prevention concentration (BPC) was defined as the concentration of drug where no biofilm attachment was observed, as determined by optical density (OD). BPC was determined by evaluating increasing concentrations of antibiotic in TSB+D1% for 48 hours. BF was quantified by measuring OD of each well at 570nm via spectrophotometer. Previously described BF adherence categories were utilized to define BF strength (OD(570) > 2 = strong; OD(570) 1–2 = moderate; OD(570) >0.5 <1 = weak; OD(570) ≤ 0.5 = none). RESULTS: Twelve clinical isolates were evaluated with a full range of BF formation capabilities. Prevention of BF formation was observed at concentrations below the MIC by 2.57 ± 4.12-fold for minocycline, 5.57 ± 8.97-fold for polymyxin B, 5.77 ± 17.56-fold for meropenem, and 0.72 ± 0.35-fold for amikacin. Minocycline prevented BF formation at or below the MIC for 75% of isolates tested vs. 67% for polymyxin B, 33% for meropenem, and 33% for amikacin. Free drug concentrations at the end of a dosing interval, derived from pharmacokinetic data, imply that BF would be prevented for 75% of minocycline-exposed isolates vs. 58.3% polymyxin B-, 8.3% meropenem-, and 8.3% amikacin- exposed isolates. CONCLUSION: Minocycline, polymyxin B and meropenem prevented BF formation at clinically relevant concentrations. Prompt antimicrobial administration may be critical to prevent attachment of pathogen. BF production increased or remained unchanged in the presence of amikacin. Due to toxicity concerns and variation in resistance patterns, minocycline is a viable treatment option against A. baumannii. Additional studies are warranted. DISCLOSURES: K. LaPlante, Merck: Grant Investigator, Grant recipient. Pfizer: Grant Investigator, Grant recipient. Cempra: Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee. The Medicines Company: Grant Investigator, Grant recipient. Allergan: Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee. Bard/ Davol: Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee. Ocean Spray: Grant Investigator and Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee and Grant recipient. Zavante: Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee. Achaogen: Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee. Oxford University Press 2017-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5631598/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.657 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Beganovic, Maya
Luther, Megan
Daffinee, Kathryn
LaPlante, Kerry
Impact of minocycline, polymyxin B, meropenem, and amikacin on growth-prevention of Acinetobacter baumannii with various biofilm-forming capabilities
title Impact of minocycline, polymyxin B, meropenem, and amikacin on growth-prevention of Acinetobacter baumannii with various biofilm-forming capabilities
title_full Impact of minocycline, polymyxin B, meropenem, and amikacin on growth-prevention of Acinetobacter baumannii with various biofilm-forming capabilities
title_fullStr Impact of minocycline, polymyxin B, meropenem, and amikacin on growth-prevention of Acinetobacter baumannii with various biofilm-forming capabilities
title_full_unstemmed Impact of minocycline, polymyxin B, meropenem, and amikacin on growth-prevention of Acinetobacter baumannii with various biofilm-forming capabilities
title_short Impact of minocycline, polymyxin B, meropenem, and amikacin on growth-prevention of Acinetobacter baumannii with various biofilm-forming capabilities
title_sort impact of minocycline, polymyxin b, meropenem, and amikacin on growth-prevention of acinetobacter baumannii with various biofilm-forming capabilities
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5631598/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.657
work_keys_str_mv AT beganovicmaya impactofminocyclinepolymyxinbmeropenemandamikacinongrowthpreventionofacinetobacterbaumanniiwithvariousbiofilmformingcapabilities
AT luthermegan impactofminocyclinepolymyxinbmeropenemandamikacinongrowthpreventionofacinetobacterbaumanniiwithvariousbiofilmformingcapabilities
AT daffineekathryn impactofminocyclinepolymyxinbmeropenemandamikacinongrowthpreventionofacinetobacterbaumanniiwithvariousbiofilmformingcapabilities
AT laplantekerry impactofminocyclinepolymyxinbmeropenemandamikacinongrowthpreventionofacinetobacterbaumanniiwithvariousbiofilmformingcapabilities