Cargando…

Physician and Infection Preventionists Perceptions on Communicable Disease Reporting—Indiana, 201

BACKGROUND: Regarding mandatory reporting of communicable diseases, studies have previously examined the compliance rate of physicians, but not barriers or preferred public health outreach methods. This study assessed perceptions for reporting communicable diseases and identified the preferred route...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Richards, Shawn, Golwalkar, Mugdha, Sundararajan, Madhura
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5631615/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.523
_version_ 1783269515733237760
author Richards, Shawn
Golwalkar, Mugdha
Sundararajan, Madhura
author_facet Richards, Shawn
Golwalkar, Mugdha
Sundararajan, Madhura
author_sort Richards, Shawn
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Regarding mandatory reporting of communicable diseases, studies have previously examined the compliance rate of physicians, but not barriers or preferred public health outreach methods. This study assessed perceptions for reporting communicable diseases and identified the preferred route of education for Indiana healthcare professionals. METHODS: A web-based survey was developed by the Indiana State Department of Health using SurveyMonkey and distributed via several Indiana healthcare distribution lists. The survey consisted of 17 questions and responses were collected for seven days. The target population included advanced health care providers (AHCP), infection preventionists (IP), and nurses. Respondents were separated into two distinct categories, AHCP and IP/nurses, based on reported professional role. RESULTS: Respondents included 183 AHCP’s and 67 IP/nurses. Of these, 55% of AHCPs reported contacting the health department to report a communicable disease compared with 90% of IP/nurses. The most frequently reported barriers by AHCPs were “do not know what diseases to report” (18% of AHCPs, 1% of IP/nurses), “too much time required” (17% of both groups), and “do not know what number to call” (17% of AHCPs, 8% of IP/nurses). Only 34% of AHCPs surveyed knew how to contact the local health department, while 87% of IP/nurses knew how to contact the local health department. Both AHCPs and IP/nurses preferred to receive education from the health department through literature provided via email, videos provided via email, and lunch-and-learn session. The provider survey facilitated the design of a Lunch and Learn (L&L) presentation used to address discrepancies in reporting. The ISDH presented the L&L in Indiana’s largest hospital systems to educate healthcare professionals on state reporting protocol and associated procedures. The ISDH L&L was received by 400 health care professionals at 3 separate locations. CONCLUSION: Barriers to reporting can significantly hinder communicable disease surveillance in Indiana. Educational outreach should use preferred methods reported by AHCPs and IP/nurses to reduce barriers to reporting and improve reporting compliance. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5631615
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56316152017-11-07 Physician and Infection Preventionists Perceptions on Communicable Disease Reporting—Indiana, 201 Richards, Shawn Golwalkar, Mugdha Sundararajan, Madhura Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Regarding mandatory reporting of communicable diseases, studies have previously examined the compliance rate of physicians, but not barriers or preferred public health outreach methods. This study assessed perceptions for reporting communicable diseases and identified the preferred route of education for Indiana healthcare professionals. METHODS: A web-based survey was developed by the Indiana State Department of Health using SurveyMonkey and distributed via several Indiana healthcare distribution lists. The survey consisted of 17 questions and responses were collected for seven days. The target population included advanced health care providers (AHCP), infection preventionists (IP), and nurses. Respondents were separated into two distinct categories, AHCP and IP/nurses, based on reported professional role. RESULTS: Respondents included 183 AHCP’s and 67 IP/nurses. Of these, 55% of AHCPs reported contacting the health department to report a communicable disease compared with 90% of IP/nurses. The most frequently reported barriers by AHCPs were “do not know what diseases to report” (18% of AHCPs, 1% of IP/nurses), “too much time required” (17% of both groups), and “do not know what number to call” (17% of AHCPs, 8% of IP/nurses). Only 34% of AHCPs surveyed knew how to contact the local health department, while 87% of IP/nurses knew how to contact the local health department. Both AHCPs and IP/nurses preferred to receive education from the health department through literature provided via email, videos provided via email, and lunch-and-learn session. The provider survey facilitated the design of a Lunch and Learn (L&L) presentation used to address discrepancies in reporting. The ISDH presented the L&L in Indiana’s largest hospital systems to educate healthcare professionals on state reporting protocol and associated procedures. The ISDH L&L was received by 400 health care professionals at 3 separate locations. CONCLUSION: Barriers to reporting can significantly hinder communicable disease surveillance in Indiana. Educational outreach should use preferred methods reported by AHCPs and IP/nurses to reduce barriers to reporting and improve reporting compliance. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2017-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5631615/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.523 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Richards, Shawn
Golwalkar, Mugdha
Sundararajan, Madhura
Physician and Infection Preventionists Perceptions on Communicable Disease Reporting—Indiana, 201
title Physician and Infection Preventionists Perceptions on Communicable Disease Reporting—Indiana, 201
title_full Physician and Infection Preventionists Perceptions on Communicable Disease Reporting—Indiana, 201
title_fullStr Physician and Infection Preventionists Perceptions on Communicable Disease Reporting—Indiana, 201
title_full_unstemmed Physician and Infection Preventionists Perceptions on Communicable Disease Reporting—Indiana, 201
title_short Physician and Infection Preventionists Perceptions on Communicable Disease Reporting—Indiana, 201
title_sort physician and infection preventionists perceptions on communicable disease reporting—indiana, 201
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5631615/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.523
work_keys_str_mv AT richardsshawn physicianandinfectionpreventionistsperceptionsoncommunicablediseasereportingindiana201
AT golwalkarmugdha physicianandinfectionpreventionistsperceptionsoncommunicablediseasereportingindiana201
AT sundararajanmadhura physicianandinfectionpreventionistsperceptionsoncommunicablediseasereportingindiana201