Cargando…

Oral vs. Intravenous Antibiotics for the Treatment of Acute Bacterial Osteomyelitis in the Veteran Population

BACKGROUND: The optimal route for administration of antibiotics in the treatment of acute bacterial osteomyelitis (ABOM) has not been clearly defined. Based on pharmacokinetic data and expert opinion, intravenous (IV) antibiotics are considered the standard of care. Studies demonstrate reasonable or...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Turnbull, Caitlin, Young, Lisa, Lowery, Sheryl
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5631624/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.072
_version_ 1783269517934198784
author Turnbull, Caitlin
Young, Lisa
Lowery, Sheryl
author_facet Turnbull, Caitlin
Young, Lisa
Lowery, Sheryl
author_sort Turnbull, Caitlin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The optimal route for administration of antibiotics in the treatment of acute bacterial osteomyelitis (ABOM) has not been clearly defined. Based on pharmacokinetic data and expert opinion, intravenous (IV) antibiotics are considered the standard of care. Studies demonstrate reasonable oral (PO) absorption and bone penetration of certain antibiotics, supporting the potential efficacy of their use in the treatment of ABOM. The purpose of this study was to determine whether a difference exists in treatment outcomes in Veterans with ABOM treated with PO vs. IV antibiotics. METHODS: This is a retrospective, electronic chart review of patients diagnosed with ABOM between October 1, 2008, and September 30, 2013. Subjects were evaluated and placed into two groups: (1) IV antibiotics for at least 4 weeks or (2) PO antibiotics for at least 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was treatment failure within one year of diagnosis. Treatment failure was defined as recurrence of infection, amputation of the infected bone, or if they were lost to follow-up. RESULTS: In total, 83 patients, accounting for 89 episodes of ABOM were included in this study; 41 in the IV group and 48 in the PO group. Treatment failure occurred in 14 patients in the IV group (34.15%) and 17 patients in the PO group (35.42%), P = 0.90. Subgroup analysis of subjects with diabetes mellitus, peripheral vascular disease, body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m(2), and those ≥ 65 years also found no difference between groups. After at least 4 weeks of antibiotic therapy, 10 patients in the IV group and five patients in the PO group had an amputation of the infected bone, P = 0.14. Mean length of hospital stay was significantly longer in the IV group at 8.55 days as compared with the PO group at 2.23 days, P < 0.0001. CONCLUSION: Treatment of ABOM with PO antibiotics may serve as a reasonable alternative to IV antibiotics, showing similar efficacy and reduced hospital stay. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5631624
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56316242017-11-07 Oral vs. Intravenous Antibiotics for the Treatment of Acute Bacterial Osteomyelitis in the Veteran Population Turnbull, Caitlin Young, Lisa Lowery, Sheryl Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: The optimal route for administration of antibiotics in the treatment of acute bacterial osteomyelitis (ABOM) has not been clearly defined. Based on pharmacokinetic data and expert opinion, intravenous (IV) antibiotics are considered the standard of care. Studies demonstrate reasonable oral (PO) absorption and bone penetration of certain antibiotics, supporting the potential efficacy of their use in the treatment of ABOM. The purpose of this study was to determine whether a difference exists in treatment outcomes in Veterans with ABOM treated with PO vs. IV antibiotics. METHODS: This is a retrospective, electronic chart review of patients diagnosed with ABOM between October 1, 2008, and September 30, 2013. Subjects were evaluated and placed into two groups: (1) IV antibiotics for at least 4 weeks or (2) PO antibiotics for at least 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was treatment failure within one year of diagnosis. Treatment failure was defined as recurrence of infection, amputation of the infected bone, or if they were lost to follow-up. RESULTS: In total, 83 patients, accounting for 89 episodes of ABOM were included in this study; 41 in the IV group and 48 in the PO group. Treatment failure occurred in 14 patients in the IV group (34.15%) and 17 patients in the PO group (35.42%), P = 0.90. Subgroup analysis of subjects with diabetes mellitus, peripheral vascular disease, body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m(2), and those ≥ 65 years also found no difference between groups. After at least 4 weeks of antibiotic therapy, 10 patients in the IV group and five patients in the PO group had an amputation of the infected bone, P = 0.14. Mean length of hospital stay was significantly longer in the IV group at 8.55 days as compared with the PO group at 2.23 days, P < 0.0001. CONCLUSION: Treatment of ABOM with PO antibiotics may serve as a reasonable alternative to IV antibiotics, showing similar efficacy and reduced hospital stay. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2017-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5631624/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.072 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Turnbull, Caitlin
Young, Lisa
Lowery, Sheryl
Oral vs. Intravenous Antibiotics for the Treatment of Acute Bacterial Osteomyelitis in the Veteran Population
title Oral vs. Intravenous Antibiotics for the Treatment of Acute Bacterial Osteomyelitis in the Veteran Population
title_full Oral vs. Intravenous Antibiotics for the Treatment of Acute Bacterial Osteomyelitis in the Veteran Population
title_fullStr Oral vs. Intravenous Antibiotics for the Treatment of Acute Bacterial Osteomyelitis in the Veteran Population
title_full_unstemmed Oral vs. Intravenous Antibiotics for the Treatment of Acute Bacterial Osteomyelitis in the Veteran Population
title_short Oral vs. Intravenous Antibiotics for the Treatment of Acute Bacterial Osteomyelitis in the Veteran Population
title_sort oral vs. intravenous antibiotics for the treatment of acute bacterial osteomyelitis in the veteran population
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5631624/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.072
work_keys_str_mv AT turnbullcaitlin oralvsintravenousantibioticsforthetreatmentofacutebacterialosteomyelitisintheveteranpopulation
AT younglisa oralvsintravenousantibioticsforthetreatmentofacutebacterialosteomyelitisintheveteranpopulation
AT lowerysheryl oralvsintravenousantibioticsforthetreatmentofacutebacterialosteomyelitisintheveteranpopulation