Cargando…
Routine Cryptococcal Antigen Screening in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: Is it Time to Save Lives and Money?
BACKGROUND: Cryptococcosis affects 1 in 270 solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients with high mortality. In HIV-infected patients, cryptococcal antigen (CRAG) is detectable in blood weeks to months before symptomatic infection and screening is recommended. No screening guidelines exist for SOT recip...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5631690/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx162.128 |
_version_ | 1783269534381113344 |
---|---|
author | George, Ige Rajasingham, Radha Powderly, William Boulware, David |
author_facet | George, Ige Rajasingham, Radha Powderly, William Boulware, David |
author_sort | George, Ige |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Cryptococcosis affects 1 in 270 solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients with high mortality. In HIV-infected patients, cryptococcal antigen (CRAG) is detectable in blood weeks to months before symptomatic infection and screening is recommended. No screening guidelines exist for SOT recipients. METHODS: We performed a cost-effectiveness analysis of CRAG screening amongst SOT recipients. We estimated costs of screening from Medicare reimbursement of $16.49 for CPT 87899 (Infectious agent antigen detection by immunoassay). We determined the number at risk from a large cohort of 42,634 adult SOT recipients from ICD-9 CM billing data from HCUP State Inpatient Databases of Florida (2006–2012), New York (2006–2011), and California (2004–2010). Cost of screening was compared with the cost of inpatient hospitalization. RESULTS: Among 42,634 adult SOT recipients, 158 (0.37%) developed cryptococcosis at a median time of 15.5 months (range 0.1 -80) after transplant. During the 43 month follow-up, there was approximately 2.5% annual mortality. The estimated cost of hospital care for cryptococcal meningitis per person is approximately $70,000 in 2016 with current explosive cost of flucytosine at ~$29,000 per 2 weeks. Thus, the total estimated cost of hospital care in the cohort would be $11.0 million in 2016. In comparison, the cost to screen all 42,634 SOT recipients every three months would be $8.8 million. If CRAG screening could detect 75% of asymptomatic cryptococcal antigenemia prior to symptomatic disease requiring prolonged hospitalization, it would be approximately cost neutral ($11.5 million), and even cost saving if above 80% of hospitalizations are averted. Alternatively stated, for every one hospitalization avoided, 4245 persons could be CRAG screened for similar cost and likely better outcome. CONCLUSION: Assuming the ability of routine screening to identify 75% of patients who would develop invasive cryptococcosis; CRAG screening every 3 months among SOT recipients likely would be at least cost neutral to the healthcare system. Antecedent duration of cryptococcal antigenemia prior to symptomatic disease in Non-HIV/SOT cohorts to inform optimal screening intervals should be further studied. Prospective SOT cohorts should validate this approach to save lives in a cost-effective manner. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5631690 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56316902017-11-07 Routine Cryptococcal Antigen Screening in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: Is it Time to Save Lives and Money? George, Ige Rajasingham, Radha Powderly, William Boulware, David Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Cryptococcosis affects 1 in 270 solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients with high mortality. In HIV-infected patients, cryptococcal antigen (CRAG) is detectable in blood weeks to months before symptomatic infection and screening is recommended. No screening guidelines exist for SOT recipients. METHODS: We performed a cost-effectiveness analysis of CRAG screening amongst SOT recipients. We estimated costs of screening from Medicare reimbursement of $16.49 for CPT 87899 (Infectious agent antigen detection by immunoassay). We determined the number at risk from a large cohort of 42,634 adult SOT recipients from ICD-9 CM billing data from HCUP State Inpatient Databases of Florida (2006–2012), New York (2006–2011), and California (2004–2010). Cost of screening was compared with the cost of inpatient hospitalization. RESULTS: Among 42,634 adult SOT recipients, 158 (0.37%) developed cryptococcosis at a median time of 15.5 months (range 0.1 -80) after transplant. During the 43 month follow-up, there was approximately 2.5% annual mortality. The estimated cost of hospital care for cryptococcal meningitis per person is approximately $70,000 in 2016 with current explosive cost of flucytosine at ~$29,000 per 2 weeks. Thus, the total estimated cost of hospital care in the cohort would be $11.0 million in 2016. In comparison, the cost to screen all 42,634 SOT recipients every three months would be $8.8 million. If CRAG screening could detect 75% of asymptomatic cryptococcal antigenemia prior to symptomatic disease requiring prolonged hospitalization, it would be approximately cost neutral ($11.5 million), and even cost saving if above 80% of hospitalizations are averted. Alternatively stated, for every one hospitalization avoided, 4245 persons could be CRAG screened for similar cost and likely better outcome. CONCLUSION: Assuming the ability of routine screening to identify 75% of patients who would develop invasive cryptococcosis; CRAG screening every 3 months among SOT recipients likely would be at least cost neutral to the healthcare system. Antecedent duration of cryptococcal antigenemia prior to symptomatic disease in Non-HIV/SOT cohorts to inform optimal screening intervals should be further studied. Prospective SOT cohorts should validate this approach to save lives in a cost-effective manner. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2017-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5631690/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx162.128 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Abstracts George, Ige Rajasingham, Radha Powderly, William Boulware, David Routine Cryptococcal Antigen Screening in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: Is it Time to Save Lives and Money? |
title | Routine Cryptococcal Antigen Screening in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: Is it Time to Save Lives and Money? |
title_full | Routine Cryptococcal Antigen Screening in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: Is it Time to Save Lives and Money? |
title_fullStr | Routine Cryptococcal Antigen Screening in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: Is it Time to Save Lives and Money? |
title_full_unstemmed | Routine Cryptococcal Antigen Screening in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: Is it Time to Save Lives and Money? |
title_short | Routine Cryptococcal Antigen Screening in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: Is it Time to Save Lives and Money? |
title_sort | routine cryptococcal antigen screening in solid organ transplant recipients: is it time to save lives and money? |
topic | Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5631690/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx162.128 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT georgeige routinecryptococcalantigenscreeninginsolidorgantransplantrecipientsisittimetosavelivesandmoney AT rajasinghamradha routinecryptococcalantigenscreeninginsolidorgantransplantrecipientsisittimetosavelivesandmoney AT powderlywilliam routinecryptococcalantigenscreeninginsolidorgantransplantrecipientsisittimetosavelivesandmoney AT boulwaredavid routinecryptococcalantigenscreeninginsolidorgantransplantrecipientsisittimetosavelivesandmoney |