Cargando…

In Vitro Activity of Newer Antimicrobials and Relevant Comparators Vs. 349 Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Clinical Isolates Obtained from Patients in Canadian Hospitals (CANWARD, 2011–2016)

BACKGROUND: Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is a non-fermentative gram-negative bacillus that has emerged as an important opportunistic pathogen among hospitalized, debilitated patients. Treatment options for infections caused by this organism are limited because it is intrinsically resistant to antimi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Walkty, Andrew, Baxter, Melanie, Adam, Heather J, Lagace-Wiens, Philippe, Karlowsky, James, Zhanel, George
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5631693/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.899
_version_ 1783269535107776512
author Walkty, Andrew
Baxter, Melanie
Adam, Heather J
Lagace-Wiens, Philippe
Karlowsky, James
Zhanel, George
author_facet Walkty, Andrew
Baxter, Melanie
Adam, Heather J
Lagace-Wiens, Philippe
Karlowsky, James
Zhanel, George
author_sort Walkty, Andrew
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is a non-fermentative gram-negative bacillus that has emerged as an important opportunistic pathogen among hospitalized, debilitated patients. Treatment options for infections caused by this organism are limited because it is intrinsically resistant to antimicrobials from multiple different classes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the in vitro activity of several newer antimicrobial agents (ceftazidime-avibactam [CZA], ceftolozane-tazobactam [C/T], moxifloxacin [MXF], tigecycline [TGC]) and relevant comparators [e.g., trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole [TMP-SMX]) against a large collection of S. maltophilia clinical isolates obtained as part of an ongoing national surveillance study (CANWARD, 2011–2016). METHODS: From January 2011 to December 2016, inclusive, 12 to 15 sentinel hospitals across Canada submitted clinical isolates from patients attending ERs, medical and surgical wards, hospital clinics, and ICUs (CANWARD). Each center was asked to annually submit clinical isolates (consecutive, one per patient/infection site) from blood (100), respiratory (100), urine (25), and wound (25) infections. Susceptibility testing was performed using broth microdilution as described by CLSI. MICs were interpreted using CLSI breakpoints, where available. RESULTS: 349 S. maltophilia clinical isolates were obtained as a part of CANWARD (86% from a respiratory source). The susceptibility profile of these isolates is presented below. CONCLUSION: TMP-SMX continues to demonstrate excellent in-vitro activity against S. maltophilia clinical isolates. MXF and TGC may also prove useful in the treatment of infections caused by this pathogen. DISCLOSURES: G. Zhanel, Achaogen: Research relationship, Research support Astellas: Research relationship, Research support Merck Canada: Research relationship, Research support Merck USA: Research relationship, Research support Paratek Pharma: Research relationship, Research support Pharmascience: Research relationship, Research support Sunovion: Research relationship, Research support Tetraphase: Research relationship, Research support The Medicines Co.: Research relationship, Research support Zoetis: Research relationship, Research support
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5631693
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56316932017-11-07 In Vitro Activity of Newer Antimicrobials and Relevant Comparators Vs. 349 Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Clinical Isolates Obtained from Patients in Canadian Hospitals (CANWARD, 2011–2016) Walkty, Andrew Baxter, Melanie Adam, Heather J Lagace-Wiens, Philippe Karlowsky, James Zhanel, George Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is a non-fermentative gram-negative bacillus that has emerged as an important opportunistic pathogen among hospitalized, debilitated patients. Treatment options for infections caused by this organism are limited because it is intrinsically resistant to antimicrobials from multiple different classes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the in vitro activity of several newer antimicrobial agents (ceftazidime-avibactam [CZA], ceftolozane-tazobactam [C/T], moxifloxacin [MXF], tigecycline [TGC]) and relevant comparators [e.g., trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole [TMP-SMX]) against a large collection of S. maltophilia clinical isolates obtained as part of an ongoing national surveillance study (CANWARD, 2011–2016). METHODS: From January 2011 to December 2016, inclusive, 12 to 15 sentinel hospitals across Canada submitted clinical isolates from patients attending ERs, medical and surgical wards, hospital clinics, and ICUs (CANWARD). Each center was asked to annually submit clinical isolates (consecutive, one per patient/infection site) from blood (100), respiratory (100), urine (25), and wound (25) infections. Susceptibility testing was performed using broth microdilution as described by CLSI. MICs were interpreted using CLSI breakpoints, where available. RESULTS: 349 S. maltophilia clinical isolates were obtained as a part of CANWARD (86% from a respiratory source). The susceptibility profile of these isolates is presented below. CONCLUSION: TMP-SMX continues to demonstrate excellent in-vitro activity against S. maltophilia clinical isolates. MXF and TGC may also prove useful in the treatment of infections caused by this pathogen. DISCLOSURES: G. Zhanel, Achaogen: Research relationship, Research support Astellas: Research relationship, Research support Merck Canada: Research relationship, Research support Merck USA: Research relationship, Research support Paratek Pharma: Research relationship, Research support Pharmascience: Research relationship, Research support Sunovion: Research relationship, Research support Tetraphase: Research relationship, Research support The Medicines Co.: Research relationship, Research support Zoetis: Research relationship, Research support Oxford University Press 2017-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5631693/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.899 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Walkty, Andrew
Baxter, Melanie
Adam, Heather J
Lagace-Wiens, Philippe
Karlowsky, James
Zhanel, George
In Vitro Activity of Newer Antimicrobials and Relevant Comparators Vs. 349 Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Clinical Isolates Obtained from Patients in Canadian Hospitals (CANWARD, 2011–2016)
title In Vitro Activity of Newer Antimicrobials and Relevant Comparators Vs. 349 Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Clinical Isolates Obtained from Patients in Canadian Hospitals (CANWARD, 2011–2016)
title_full In Vitro Activity of Newer Antimicrobials and Relevant Comparators Vs. 349 Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Clinical Isolates Obtained from Patients in Canadian Hospitals (CANWARD, 2011–2016)
title_fullStr In Vitro Activity of Newer Antimicrobials and Relevant Comparators Vs. 349 Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Clinical Isolates Obtained from Patients in Canadian Hospitals (CANWARD, 2011–2016)
title_full_unstemmed In Vitro Activity of Newer Antimicrobials and Relevant Comparators Vs. 349 Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Clinical Isolates Obtained from Patients in Canadian Hospitals (CANWARD, 2011–2016)
title_short In Vitro Activity of Newer Antimicrobials and Relevant Comparators Vs. 349 Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Clinical Isolates Obtained from Patients in Canadian Hospitals (CANWARD, 2011–2016)
title_sort in vitro activity of newer antimicrobials and relevant comparators vs. 349 stenotrophomonas maltophilia clinical isolates obtained from patients in canadian hospitals (canward, 2011–2016)
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5631693/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.899
work_keys_str_mv AT walktyandrew invitroactivityofnewerantimicrobialsandrelevantcomparatorsvs349stenotrophomonasmaltophiliaclinicalisolatesobtainedfrompatientsincanadianhospitalscanward20112016
AT baxtermelanie invitroactivityofnewerantimicrobialsandrelevantcomparatorsvs349stenotrophomonasmaltophiliaclinicalisolatesobtainedfrompatientsincanadianhospitalscanward20112016
AT adamheatherj invitroactivityofnewerantimicrobialsandrelevantcomparatorsvs349stenotrophomonasmaltophiliaclinicalisolatesobtainedfrompatientsincanadianhospitalscanward20112016
AT lagacewiensphilippe invitroactivityofnewerantimicrobialsandrelevantcomparatorsvs349stenotrophomonasmaltophiliaclinicalisolatesobtainedfrompatientsincanadianhospitalscanward20112016
AT karlowskyjames invitroactivityofnewerantimicrobialsandrelevantcomparatorsvs349stenotrophomonasmaltophiliaclinicalisolatesobtainedfrompatientsincanadianhospitalscanward20112016
AT zhanelgeorge invitroactivityofnewerantimicrobialsandrelevantcomparatorsvs349stenotrophomonasmaltophiliaclinicalisolatesobtainedfrompatientsincanadianhospitalscanward20112016