Cargando…

Evaluation of the Hepatitis C Cascade of Care in a Multidisciplinary Infectious Diseases Clinic

BACKGROUND: Despite emerging hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatments, barriers remain within the cascade of care (CoC) that limit impact in real-world practice. Assessing breakdown in the HCV CoC will provide targets for interventions to facilitate improved access and treatment. The objective of this stu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bagwell, Autumn, Douglas, Andrew, Chastain, Cody
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5631696/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.385
_version_ 1783269535907840000
author Bagwell, Autumn
Douglas, Andrew
Chastain, Cody
author_facet Bagwell, Autumn
Douglas, Andrew
Chastain, Cody
author_sort Bagwell, Autumn
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite emerging hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatments, barriers remain within the cascade of care (CoC) that limit impact in real-world practice. Assessing breakdown in the HCV CoC will provide targets for interventions to facilitate improved access and treatment. The objective of this study was to identify factors associated with movement through the HCV CoC after referral to a multidisciplinary infectious diseases (ID) clinic, including both general and historically difficult to treat populations. METHODS: This is a single-center, retrospective, cohort study of patients receiving care at the Vanderbilt University Medical Center (VUMC) ID Clinic between July 2015 and September 2016. Data were collected from the electronic medical record used for patient care. For the purposes of this study, the defined CoC started with referral to the VUMC ID clinic and followed progression through HCV evaluation, prescription, approval, initiation, and completion of treatment, and achievement of sustained virologic response at least 12 weeks after treatment completion (SVR12). The primary endpoint was completion of treatment. Secondary endpoints were achievement of each stage in the CoC. Univariate analyses were used to identify patient groups less likely to advance through the CoC. RESULTS: Of the 182 patients referred to the VUMC ID clinic during our study period, 101 (55.5%) achieved the primary endpoint of treatment completion. Having Medicaid insurance was associated with a lower rate of treatment approval compared with those with other forms of insurance or no insurance (76.2% compared with 97.8%, P < 0.001). The largest loss of patients in the CoC occurred from referral to an evaluation (37.7%). Of those patients completing an evaluation, 88.6% completed treatment, and 81.5% achieved an SVR12. The presence of HIV coinfection, psychiatric disorder, cirrhosis, or ongoing illicit drug use was not found to impact the primary endpoint. CONCLUSION: This study shows overall high rates of HCV CoC completion within a multidisciplinary ID Clinic. The primary barrier to treatment completion identified was having Medicaid insurance. Based on our results, emphasis should be placed on improving patient engagement in care from referral to HCV evaluation. DISCLOSURES: C. Chastain, Gilead Sciences: Grant Investigator and Research Contractor, Grant Recipient, Research Grant and Research Support.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5631696
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56316962017-11-07 Evaluation of the Hepatitis C Cascade of Care in a Multidisciplinary Infectious Diseases Clinic Bagwell, Autumn Douglas, Andrew Chastain, Cody Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Despite emerging hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatments, barriers remain within the cascade of care (CoC) that limit impact in real-world practice. Assessing breakdown in the HCV CoC will provide targets for interventions to facilitate improved access and treatment. The objective of this study was to identify factors associated with movement through the HCV CoC after referral to a multidisciplinary infectious diseases (ID) clinic, including both general and historically difficult to treat populations. METHODS: This is a single-center, retrospective, cohort study of patients receiving care at the Vanderbilt University Medical Center (VUMC) ID Clinic between July 2015 and September 2016. Data were collected from the electronic medical record used for patient care. For the purposes of this study, the defined CoC started with referral to the VUMC ID clinic and followed progression through HCV evaluation, prescription, approval, initiation, and completion of treatment, and achievement of sustained virologic response at least 12 weeks after treatment completion (SVR12). The primary endpoint was completion of treatment. Secondary endpoints were achievement of each stage in the CoC. Univariate analyses were used to identify patient groups less likely to advance through the CoC. RESULTS: Of the 182 patients referred to the VUMC ID clinic during our study period, 101 (55.5%) achieved the primary endpoint of treatment completion. Having Medicaid insurance was associated with a lower rate of treatment approval compared with those with other forms of insurance or no insurance (76.2% compared with 97.8%, P < 0.001). The largest loss of patients in the CoC occurred from referral to an evaluation (37.7%). Of those patients completing an evaluation, 88.6% completed treatment, and 81.5% achieved an SVR12. The presence of HIV coinfection, psychiatric disorder, cirrhosis, or ongoing illicit drug use was not found to impact the primary endpoint. CONCLUSION: This study shows overall high rates of HCV CoC completion within a multidisciplinary ID Clinic. The primary barrier to treatment completion identified was having Medicaid insurance. Based on our results, emphasis should be placed on improving patient engagement in care from referral to HCV evaluation. DISCLOSURES: C. Chastain, Gilead Sciences: Grant Investigator and Research Contractor, Grant Recipient, Research Grant and Research Support. Oxford University Press 2017-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5631696/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.385 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Bagwell, Autumn
Douglas, Andrew
Chastain, Cody
Evaluation of the Hepatitis C Cascade of Care in a Multidisciplinary Infectious Diseases Clinic
title Evaluation of the Hepatitis C Cascade of Care in a Multidisciplinary Infectious Diseases Clinic
title_full Evaluation of the Hepatitis C Cascade of Care in a Multidisciplinary Infectious Diseases Clinic
title_fullStr Evaluation of the Hepatitis C Cascade of Care in a Multidisciplinary Infectious Diseases Clinic
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the Hepatitis C Cascade of Care in a Multidisciplinary Infectious Diseases Clinic
title_short Evaluation of the Hepatitis C Cascade of Care in a Multidisciplinary Infectious Diseases Clinic
title_sort evaluation of the hepatitis c cascade of care in a multidisciplinary infectious diseases clinic
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5631696/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.385
work_keys_str_mv AT bagwellautumn evaluationofthehepatitisccascadeofcareinamultidisciplinaryinfectiousdiseasesclinic
AT douglasandrew evaluationofthehepatitisccascadeofcareinamultidisciplinaryinfectiousdiseasesclinic
AT chastaincody evaluationofthehepatitisccascadeofcareinamultidisciplinaryinfectiousdiseasesclinic