Cargando…

Evaluation of telavancin dose capping in a large community hospital

BACKGROUND: Telavancin is a bactericidal lipoglycopeptide treat susceptible Gram-positive pathogens including Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Pharmacokinetic studies have shown that obese patients have increased exposure to telavancin compared with non-obese patients. Dose capping of 75...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hassoun, Ali, Edwards, Jonathan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5631713/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.656
_version_ 1783269540243701760
author Hassoun, Ali
Edwards, Jonathan
author_facet Hassoun, Ali
Edwards, Jonathan
author_sort Hassoun, Ali
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Telavancin is a bactericidal lipoglycopeptide treat susceptible Gram-positive pathogens including Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Pharmacokinetic studies have shown that obese patients have increased exposure to telavancin compared with non-obese patients. Dose capping of 750 mg was utilized in selected patients with the purpose of minimizing toxicity and decreasing costs without compromising efficacy. METHODS: Retrospective case series includes adult patients admitted from 2010–2016 who received at least three doses of telavancin. Data collection includes patient demographics, telavancin dosing, antibiotic indication, length of stay, laboratory and microbiological data, and case mix index (CMI). The primary outcome is to assess the efficacy of capping telavancin doses at 750 mg compared with non-capped doses. Secondary outcomes include safety and financial outcomes, as well as readmission rates. RESULTS: 333 patients were evaluated with 164 meeting the inclusion criteria. Seventy-three patients in the capped group vs. 91 in the non-capped group. Most common infections included ABSSI, pneumonia and bacteremia. Mean weight 110 kg in capped vs. 108 kg in noncapped, mean age 52 vs. 58, male 63% vs. 70%, fever resolution 83% vs. 60%, CMI 3.19 vs. 3.43 Six patients (8.2%) in the capped group were readmitted and 6 (8.5%) needed additional antibiotics compared with 12 (13.2%) and 9 (9.9%) in the non-capped group, respectively. Seven (9.6%) patients in the capped group experienced nephrotoxicity compared with 21 (23.1%) in the non-capped group (P = 0.04). The capped group experienced 7 (9.6%) incidents of mortality vs. 28 (30.8%) in the non-capped group (P = 0.001). When doses were capped, approximately $1,400 was saved per patient. CONCLUSION: The use of a capped 750 mg telavancin dose in adult patients appears to be an alternative dosing scheme that maintains efficacy and safety as well as being associated with reduced cost. Additional pharmacokinetic and clinical studies are needed to further investigate the use of capped dosing of telavancin to support the findings of this retrospective case series. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5631713
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56317132017-11-07 Evaluation of telavancin dose capping in a large community hospital Hassoun, Ali Edwards, Jonathan Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Telavancin is a bactericidal lipoglycopeptide treat susceptible Gram-positive pathogens including Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Pharmacokinetic studies have shown that obese patients have increased exposure to telavancin compared with non-obese patients. Dose capping of 750 mg was utilized in selected patients with the purpose of minimizing toxicity and decreasing costs without compromising efficacy. METHODS: Retrospective case series includes adult patients admitted from 2010–2016 who received at least three doses of telavancin. Data collection includes patient demographics, telavancin dosing, antibiotic indication, length of stay, laboratory and microbiological data, and case mix index (CMI). The primary outcome is to assess the efficacy of capping telavancin doses at 750 mg compared with non-capped doses. Secondary outcomes include safety and financial outcomes, as well as readmission rates. RESULTS: 333 patients were evaluated with 164 meeting the inclusion criteria. Seventy-three patients in the capped group vs. 91 in the non-capped group. Most common infections included ABSSI, pneumonia and bacteremia. Mean weight 110 kg in capped vs. 108 kg in noncapped, mean age 52 vs. 58, male 63% vs. 70%, fever resolution 83% vs. 60%, CMI 3.19 vs. 3.43 Six patients (8.2%) in the capped group were readmitted and 6 (8.5%) needed additional antibiotics compared with 12 (13.2%) and 9 (9.9%) in the non-capped group, respectively. Seven (9.6%) patients in the capped group experienced nephrotoxicity compared with 21 (23.1%) in the non-capped group (P = 0.04). The capped group experienced 7 (9.6%) incidents of mortality vs. 28 (30.8%) in the non-capped group (P = 0.001). When doses were capped, approximately $1,400 was saved per patient. CONCLUSION: The use of a capped 750 mg telavancin dose in adult patients appears to be an alternative dosing scheme that maintains efficacy and safety as well as being associated with reduced cost. Additional pharmacokinetic and clinical studies are needed to further investigate the use of capped dosing of telavancin to support the findings of this retrospective case series. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2017-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5631713/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.656 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Hassoun, Ali
Edwards, Jonathan
Evaluation of telavancin dose capping in a large community hospital
title Evaluation of telavancin dose capping in a large community hospital
title_full Evaluation of telavancin dose capping in a large community hospital
title_fullStr Evaluation of telavancin dose capping in a large community hospital
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of telavancin dose capping in a large community hospital
title_short Evaluation of telavancin dose capping in a large community hospital
title_sort evaluation of telavancin dose capping in a large community hospital
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5631713/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.656
work_keys_str_mv AT hassounali evaluationoftelavancindosecappinginalargecommunityhospital
AT edwardsjonathan evaluationoftelavancindosecappinginalargecommunityhospital