Cargando…

Detection of Respiratory Pathogens in Parapneumonic Effusions by Hypothesis-free, Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS)

BACKGROUND: Species-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing of pleural fluid (PF) from children with parapneumonic effusion (PPE) has increased pathogen identification in pediatric PPE. However, a pathogen is not detected in 25–35% of cases. Hypothesis-free, next-generation sequencing (NGS)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ampofo, Krow, Pavia, Andrew, Blaschke, Anne J, Schlaberg, Robert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5631737/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx162.044
_version_ 1783269546250993664
author Ampofo, Krow
Pavia, Andrew
Blaschke, Anne J
Schlaberg, Robert
author_facet Ampofo, Krow
Pavia, Andrew
Blaschke, Anne J
Schlaberg, Robert
author_sort Ampofo, Krow
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Species-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing of pleural fluid (PF) from children with parapneumonic effusion (PPE) has increased pathogen identification in pediatric PPE. However, a pathogen is not detected in 25–35% of cases. Hypothesis-free, next-generation sequencing (NGS) provides a more comprehensive alternative and has led to pathogen detection in PCR-negative samples. However, the utility of NGS in the evaluation of PF from children with PPE is unknown. METHODS: Archived PF (n = 20) from children younger than 18 years with PPE and hospitalized at Primary Children’s Hospital, Utah, in 2015 and previously tested by PCR were evaluated. Ten PCR-negative and 10 PCR-positive PF specimens were tested using RNA-seq at an average depth of 7.7×10(6) sequencing reads per sample. NGS data were analyzed with Taxonomer. We compared pathogens detected by blood and PF culture, PCR, and NGS. RESULTS: Overall, compared with blood/PF culture, PF PCR and PF NGS testing of PF increased bacterial identification from 15% to 50% (P < 0.05) and 65% (P = 0.003), respectively. Pathogen detection in PF by PCR and NGS were comparable (50 vs. 65%, p = NS) (Table). However, compared with PF PCR, NGS significantly increased detection of S. pyogenes (20% vs. 55%; P < 0.05), with 100% concordance when detected by PCR and culture. Detection of Fusobacterium spp. (10 vs. 10%) by PF NGS and PF PCR were comparable. In contrast, there was no detection of S. pneumoniae (15 vs. 0%) by PF NGS compared with PF PCR. CONCLUSION: PF NGS testing significantly improves bacterial identification and comparable to PF PCR testing, which can help inform antimicrobial selection. However there were differences in detection of S. pneumoniae and S. pyogenes. Further studies of NGS testing of PF of children with PPE are needed to assess its potential in the evaluation of PPE in children. DISCLOSURES: A. J. Blaschke, BioFire Diagnostics LLC: Collaborator, Have intellectual property in BioFire Diagnostics through the University of Utah and Investigator, Licensing agreement or royalty and Research support; R. Schlaberg, IDbyDNA: Co-founder, Consultant and Shareholder, Stock
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5631737
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56317372017-11-07 Detection of Respiratory Pathogens in Parapneumonic Effusions by Hypothesis-free, Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) Ampofo, Krow Pavia, Andrew Blaschke, Anne J Schlaberg, Robert Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Species-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing of pleural fluid (PF) from children with parapneumonic effusion (PPE) has increased pathogen identification in pediatric PPE. However, a pathogen is not detected in 25–35% of cases. Hypothesis-free, next-generation sequencing (NGS) provides a more comprehensive alternative and has led to pathogen detection in PCR-negative samples. However, the utility of NGS in the evaluation of PF from children with PPE is unknown. METHODS: Archived PF (n = 20) from children younger than 18 years with PPE and hospitalized at Primary Children’s Hospital, Utah, in 2015 and previously tested by PCR were evaluated. Ten PCR-negative and 10 PCR-positive PF specimens were tested using RNA-seq at an average depth of 7.7×10(6) sequencing reads per sample. NGS data were analyzed with Taxonomer. We compared pathogens detected by blood and PF culture, PCR, and NGS. RESULTS: Overall, compared with blood/PF culture, PF PCR and PF NGS testing of PF increased bacterial identification from 15% to 50% (P < 0.05) and 65% (P = 0.003), respectively. Pathogen detection in PF by PCR and NGS were comparable (50 vs. 65%, p = NS) (Table). However, compared with PF PCR, NGS significantly increased detection of S. pyogenes (20% vs. 55%; P < 0.05), with 100% concordance when detected by PCR and culture. Detection of Fusobacterium spp. (10 vs. 10%) by PF NGS and PF PCR were comparable. In contrast, there was no detection of S. pneumoniae (15 vs. 0%) by PF NGS compared with PF PCR. CONCLUSION: PF NGS testing significantly improves bacterial identification and comparable to PF PCR testing, which can help inform antimicrobial selection. However there were differences in detection of S. pneumoniae and S. pyogenes. Further studies of NGS testing of PF of children with PPE are needed to assess its potential in the evaluation of PPE in children. DISCLOSURES: A. J. Blaschke, BioFire Diagnostics LLC: Collaborator, Have intellectual property in BioFire Diagnostics through the University of Utah and Investigator, Licensing agreement or royalty and Research support; R. Schlaberg, IDbyDNA: Co-founder, Consultant and Shareholder, Stock Oxford University Press 2017-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5631737/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx162.044 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Ampofo, Krow
Pavia, Andrew
Blaschke, Anne J
Schlaberg, Robert
Detection of Respiratory Pathogens in Parapneumonic Effusions by Hypothesis-free, Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS)
title Detection of Respiratory Pathogens in Parapneumonic Effusions by Hypothesis-free, Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS)
title_full Detection of Respiratory Pathogens in Parapneumonic Effusions by Hypothesis-free, Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS)
title_fullStr Detection of Respiratory Pathogens in Parapneumonic Effusions by Hypothesis-free, Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS)
title_full_unstemmed Detection of Respiratory Pathogens in Parapneumonic Effusions by Hypothesis-free, Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS)
title_short Detection of Respiratory Pathogens in Parapneumonic Effusions by Hypothesis-free, Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS)
title_sort detection of respiratory pathogens in parapneumonic effusions by hypothesis-free, next-generation sequencing (ngs)
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5631737/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx162.044
work_keys_str_mv AT ampofokrow detectionofrespiratorypathogensinparapneumoniceffusionsbyhypothesisfreenextgenerationsequencingngs
AT paviaandrew detectionofrespiratorypathogensinparapneumoniceffusionsbyhypothesisfreenextgenerationsequencingngs
AT blaschkeannej detectionofrespiratorypathogensinparapneumoniceffusionsbyhypothesisfreenextgenerationsequencingngs
AT schlabergrobert detectionofrespiratorypathogensinparapneumoniceffusionsbyhypothesisfreenextgenerationsequencingngs