Cargando…

Utility of Diagnostic Bone Biopsies in the Management of Osteomyelitis Through Retrospective Analysis: How Golden Is This Gold Standard?

BACKGROUND: Bone biopsy is considered the gold standard for diagnosis and treatment of osteomyelitis (OM), but few studies have investigated the extent to which it influences antimicrobial therapy in non-vertebral bones. The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinician-initiated changes to empiri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hirschfeld, Cole, Kapadia, Shashi, Bryan, Joanna, Jannat-Khah, Deanna, May, Benjamin, Friedman, Tamir, Vielemeyer, Ole, Esquivel, Ernie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5631739/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.056
_version_ 1783269546759553024
author Hirschfeld, Cole
Kapadia, Shashi
Bryan, Joanna
Jannat-Khah, Deanna
May, Benjamin
Friedman, Tamir
Vielemeyer, Ole
Esquivel, Ernie
author_facet Hirschfeld, Cole
Kapadia, Shashi
Bryan, Joanna
Jannat-Khah, Deanna
May, Benjamin
Friedman, Tamir
Vielemeyer, Ole
Esquivel, Ernie
author_sort Hirschfeld, Cole
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Bone biopsy is considered the gold standard for diagnosis and treatment of osteomyelitis (OM), but few studies have investigated the extent to which it influences antimicrobial therapy in non-vertebral bones. The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinician-initiated changes to empiric antimicrobial therapy after obtaining bone biopsy results. A secondary aim was to identify predictors of a positive bone culture. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all cases of non-vertebral OM in patients who underwent image-guided bone biopsies between 2009 and 2016. Data on pathologic and microbiologic yield were collected and logistic regression was used to determine potential factors affecting the microbiologic yield. Post-biopsy empiric antibiotics and final antibiotics were compared with determine if there was a change in antibiotic treatment after biopsy results were reported. RESULTS: We evaluated 203 bone biopsies in 185 patients. Samples from 115 (57%) cases were sent to pathology, of which 33 (29%) confirmed OM. All samples were sent to microbiology and 57 (28%) yielded a positive result. Diabetes (OR=2.39, P = 0.021) and white blood cell count (OR=1.13, P = 0.006) were significantly associated with positive bone cultures in multivariate analyses. There was no association between positive cultures and number of samples cultured, needle size, prior antibiotic use, or antibiotic-free days. Post-biopsy empiric antibiotics were given in 138 (68%) cases. Therapy was narrowed to target specific organisms in seven cases and changed due to inadequate empiric treatment in three cases. Targeted therapy was initiated in 4/65 cases, in which empiric antibiotics had been initially withheld. While final antibiotics were withheld in 38/146 with negative bone cultures, empiric antibiotics were discontinued in only eight cases. CONCLUSION: In patients with non-vertebral OM, bone biopsy cultures rarely yielded results that necessitated changes in antibiotic management. Identified bone organisms were treated by empiric therapy in most patients. While bone biopsy remains the gold standard diagnostic test for OM, further work is needed to identify patients whose management may be impacted by this procedure. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5631739
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56317392017-11-07 Utility of Diagnostic Bone Biopsies in the Management of Osteomyelitis Through Retrospective Analysis: How Golden Is This Gold Standard? Hirschfeld, Cole Kapadia, Shashi Bryan, Joanna Jannat-Khah, Deanna May, Benjamin Friedman, Tamir Vielemeyer, Ole Esquivel, Ernie Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Bone biopsy is considered the gold standard for diagnosis and treatment of osteomyelitis (OM), but few studies have investigated the extent to which it influences antimicrobial therapy in non-vertebral bones. The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinician-initiated changes to empiric antimicrobial therapy after obtaining bone biopsy results. A secondary aim was to identify predictors of a positive bone culture. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all cases of non-vertebral OM in patients who underwent image-guided bone biopsies between 2009 and 2016. Data on pathologic and microbiologic yield were collected and logistic regression was used to determine potential factors affecting the microbiologic yield. Post-biopsy empiric antibiotics and final antibiotics were compared with determine if there was a change in antibiotic treatment after biopsy results were reported. RESULTS: We evaluated 203 bone biopsies in 185 patients. Samples from 115 (57%) cases were sent to pathology, of which 33 (29%) confirmed OM. All samples were sent to microbiology and 57 (28%) yielded a positive result. Diabetes (OR=2.39, P = 0.021) and white blood cell count (OR=1.13, P = 0.006) were significantly associated with positive bone cultures in multivariate analyses. There was no association between positive cultures and number of samples cultured, needle size, prior antibiotic use, or antibiotic-free days. Post-biopsy empiric antibiotics were given in 138 (68%) cases. Therapy was narrowed to target specific organisms in seven cases and changed due to inadequate empiric treatment in three cases. Targeted therapy was initiated in 4/65 cases, in which empiric antibiotics had been initially withheld. While final antibiotics were withheld in 38/146 with negative bone cultures, empiric antibiotics were discontinued in only eight cases. CONCLUSION: In patients with non-vertebral OM, bone biopsy cultures rarely yielded results that necessitated changes in antibiotic management. Identified bone organisms were treated by empiric therapy in most patients. While bone biopsy remains the gold standard diagnostic test for OM, further work is needed to identify patients whose management may be impacted by this procedure. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2017-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5631739/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.056 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Hirschfeld, Cole
Kapadia, Shashi
Bryan, Joanna
Jannat-Khah, Deanna
May, Benjamin
Friedman, Tamir
Vielemeyer, Ole
Esquivel, Ernie
Utility of Diagnostic Bone Biopsies in the Management of Osteomyelitis Through Retrospective Analysis: How Golden Is This Gold Standard?
title Utility of Diagnostic Bone Biopsies in the Management of Osteomyelitis Through Retrospective Analysis: How Golden Is This Gold Standard?
title_full Utility of Diagnostic Bone Biopsies in the Management of Osteomyelitis Through Retrospective Analysis: How Golden Is This Gold Standard?
title_fullStr Utility of Diagnostic Bone Biopsies in the Management of Osteomyelitis Through Retrospective Analysis: How Golden Is This Gold Standard?
title_full_unstemmed Utility of Diagnostic Bone Biopsies in the Management of Osteomyelitis Through Retrospective Analysis: How Golden Is This Gold Standard?
title_short Utility of Diagnostic Bone Biopsies in the Management of Osteomyelitis Through Retrospective Analysis: How Golden Is This Gold Standard?
title_sort utility of diagnostic bone biopsies in the management of osteomyelitis through retrospective analysis: how golden is this gold standard?
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5631739/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.056
work_keys_str_mv AT hirschfeldcole utilityofdiagnosticbonebiopsiesinthemanagementofosteomyelitisthroughretrospectiveanalysishowgoldenisthisgoldstandard
AT kapadiashashi utilityofdiagnosticbonebiopsiesinthemanagementofosteomyelitisthroughretrospectiveanalysishowgoldenisthisgoldstandard
AT bryanjoanna utilityofdiagnosticbonebiopsiesinthemanagementofosteomyelitisthroughretrospectiveanalysishowgoldenisthisgoldstandard
AT jannatkhahdeanna utilityofdiagnosticbonebiopsiesinthemanagementofosteomyelitisthroughretrospectiveanalysishowgoldenisthisgoldstandard
AT maybenjamin utilityofdiagnosticbonebiopsiesinthemanagementofosteomyelitisthroughretrospectiveanalysishowgoldenisthisgoldstandard
AT friedmantamir utilityofdiagnosticbonebiopsiesinthemanagementofosteomyelitisthroughretrospectiveanalysishowgoldenisthisgoldstandard
AT vielemeyerole utilityofdiagnosticbonebiopsiesinthemanagementofosteomyelitisthroughretrospectiveanalysishowgoldenisthisgoldstandard
AT esquivelernie utilityofdiagnosticbonebiopsiesinthemanagementofosteomyelitisthroughretrospectiveanalysishowgoldenisthisgoldstandard