Cargando…

Clinical Impact of Two Different Multiplex Respiratory Panel Assays on Management of Hospitalized Children Aged ≤24 months

BACKGROUND: Highly multiplexed molecular assays are popular in clinical laboratories due their high sensitivity, specificity and relatively rapid turn-around time (TAT) for results. Luminex™ respiratory viral panel (RVP) detects 12 respiratory viruses, while BioFire™ respiratory panel (RP) detects 2...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hassan, Ferdaus, Lee, Brian, Goldman, Jennifer, Jackson, Mary Anne, Selvarangan, Rangaraj
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5631748/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx162.079
_version_ 1783269549015040000
author Hassan, Ferdaus
Lee, Brian
Goldman, Jennifer
Jackson, Mary Anne
Selvarangan, Rangaraj
author_facet Hassan, Ferdaus
Lee, Brian
Goldman, Jennifer
Jackson, Mary Anne
Selvarangan, Rangaraj
author_sort Hassan, Ferdaus
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Highly multiplexed molecular assays are popular in clinical laboratories due their high sensitivity, specificity and relatively rapid turn-around time (TAT) for results. Luminex™ respiratory viral panel (RVP) detects 12 respiratory viruses, while BioFire™ respiratory panel (RP) detects 20 respiratory pathogens (17 viruses, 3 bacteria). The aim of the current study was to compare the impact of RVP and RP assay on management of hospitalized children aged ≤24 months. METHODS: Retrospective data were collected to compare the clinical impact from two multiplex molecular assays (RVP, December 2008–May 2012; RP August 2012–June 2015) on management and outcomes of hospitalized patients. Patients aged ≤24 months and positive for at least one respiratory virus were included. Patients who were (1) receiving immune suppressive therapy, (2) neonates requiring intensive care, or (3) hospitalized for >7 days were excluded. RESULTS: A total of 810 patients in RVP and 2,095 patients in RP group were included. The median TAT for RVP and RP assay were 29 hours (IQR 26–58 hours) and 4 hours (IQR 2–8 hours), respectively (P < 0.001). Significantly higher number of children in RVP group (44%, 357/810) received empiric antibiotic therapy compared with RP group (28%, 595/2095) (P < 0.001). Following PCR test reporting, the rate of antibiotic discontinuation was higher in the RP group (23%, 135/595) vs. RVP group (16%, 56/357) (P < 0.001). Antibiotics were discontinued more often in older children aged 6–24 months (23%, 113/492) compared with children aged < 60 days (11%, 34/297) (P < 0.001). Following positive influenza test results, more children received timely oseltamivir in the RP group (85%, 48/56) compared with the RVP group (17%, 7/41) (P < 0.001). The median length of hospitalization (LOH) was shorter in the RP group (48 hours, IQR 32–76 hours) than in the RVP group (54 hours, IQR 39–89 hours) (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Rapid availability of test results from RP assay was associated with reduced antibiotic use, timely antiviral therapy and decreased LOH. The implementation of a more comprehensive respiratory multiplex molecular assay with rapid reporting of test results has the potential to improve management of hospitalized children, decrease unnecessary antibiotic therapy and reduce overall costs. DISCLOSURES: R. Selvarangan, BioFire Diagnostics: Board Member and Investigator, Consulting fee and Research grant; Luminex Diagnostics: Investigator, Research grant
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5631748
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56317482017-11-07 Clinical Impact of Two Different Multiplex Respiratory Panel Assays on Management of Hospitalized Children Aged ≤24 months Hassan, Ferdaus Lee, Brian Goldman, Jennifer Jackson, Mary Anne Selvarangan, Rangaraj Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Highly multiplexed molecular assays are popular in clinical laboratories due their high sensitivity, specificity and relatively rapid turn-around time (TAT) for results. Luminex™ respiratory viral panel (RVP) detects 12 respiratory viruses, while BioFire™ respiratory panel (RP) detects 20 respiratory pathogens (17 viruses, 3 bacteria). The aim of the current study was to compare the impact of RVP and RP assay on management of hospitalized children aged ≤24 months. METHODS: Retrospective data were collected to compare the clinical impact from two multiplex molecular assays (RVP, December 2008–May 2012; RP August 2012–June 2015) on management and outcomes of hospitalized patients. Patients aged ≤24 months and positive for at least one respiratory virus were included. Patients who were (1) receiving immune suppressive therapy, (2) neonates requiring intensive care, or (3) hospitalized for >7 days were excluded. RESULTS: A total of 810 patients in RVP and 2,095 patients in RP group were included. The median TAT for RVP and RP assay were 29 hours (IQR 26–58 hours) and 4 hours (IQR 2–8 hours), respectively (P < 0.001). Significantly higher number of children in RVP group (44%, 357/810) received empiric antibiotic therapy compared with RP group (28%, 595/2095) (P < 0.001). Following PCR test reporting, the rate of antibiotic discontinuation was higher in the RP group (23%, 135/595) vs. RVP group (16%, 56/357) (P < 0.001). Antibiotics were discontinued more often in older children aged 6–24 months (23%, 113/492) compared with children aged < 60 days (11%, 34/297) (P < 0.001). Following positive influenza test results, more children received timely oseltamivir in the RP group (85%, 48/56) compared with the RVP group (17%, 7/41) (P < 0.001). The median length of hospitalization (LOH) was shorter in the RP group (48 hours, IQR 32–76 hours) than in the RVP group (54 hours, IQR 39–89 hours) (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Rapid availability of test results from RP assay was associated with reduced antibiotic use, timely antiviral therapy and decreased LOH. The implementation of a more comprehensive respiratory multiplex molecular assay with rapid reporting of test results has the potential to improve management of hospitalized children, decrease unnecessary antibiotic therapy and reduce overall costs. DISCLOSURES: R. Selvarangan, BioFire Diagnostics: Board Member and Investigator, Consulting fee and Research grant; Luminex Diagnostics: Investigator, Research grant Oxford University Press 2017-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5631748/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx162.079 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Hassan, Ferdaus
Lee, Brian
Goldman, Jennifer
Jackson, Mary Anne
Selvarangan, Rangaraj
Clinical Impact of Two Different Multiplex Respiratory Panel Assays on Management of Hospitalized Children Aged ≤24 months
title Clinical Impact of Two Different Multiplex Respiratory Panel Assays on Management of Hospitalized Children Aged ≤24 months
title_full Clinical Impact of Two Different Multiplex Respiratory Panel Assays on Management of Hospitalized Children Aged ≤24 months
title_fullStr Clinical Impact of Two Different Multiplex Respiratory Panel Assays on Management of Hospitalized Children Aged ≤24 months
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Impact of Two Different Multiplex Respiratory Panel Assays on Management of Hospitalized Children Aged ≤24 months
title_short Clinical Impact of Two Different Multiplex Respiratory Panel Assays on Management of Hospitalized Children Aged ≤24 months
title_sort clinical impact of two different multiplex respiratory panel assays on management of hospitalized children aged ≤24 months
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5631748/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx162.079
work_keys_str_mv AT hassanferdaus clinicalimpactoftwodifferentmultiplexrespiratorypanelassaysonmanagementofhospitalizedchildrenaged24months
AT leebrian clinicalimpactoftwodifferentmultiplexrespiratorypanelassaysonmanagementofhospitalizedchildrenaged24months
AT goldmanjennifer clinicalimpactoftwodifferentmultiplexrespiratorypanelassaysonmanagementofhospitalizedchildrenaged24months
AT jacksonmaryanne clinicalimpactoftwodifferentmultiplexrespiratorypanelassaysonmanagementofhospitalizedchildrenaged24months
AT selvaranganrangaraj clinicalimpactoftwodifferentmultiplexrespiratorypanelassaysonmanagementofhospitalizedchildrenaged24months