Cargando…

Antimicrobial Stewardship Facetime: Comparison of Two Rounding Models at a Tertiary Medical Center

BACKGROUND: As an 886-bed tertiary care hospital with both teaching and private physician groups, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center has a unique opportunity to incorporate antimicrobial stewardship pharmacist (ASP) rounds with both a general medicine teaching service (TS) as well as a non-teaching hospita...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Haoshu, Smith, Ethan, Marks, Gregory, Ochner, Margaret, Watson, Richard, Krishna, Sneha, Tran, Hai, Shane, Rita, Murthy, Rekha, Grein, Jonathan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5631759/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.612
_version_ 1783269551795863552
author Yang, Haoshu
Smith, Ethan
Marks, Gregory
Ochner, Margaret
Watson, Richard
Krishna, Sneha
Tran, Hai
Shane, Rita
Murthy, Rekha
Grein, Jonathan
author_facet Yang, Haoshu
Smith, Ethan
Marks, Gregory
Ochner, Margaret
Watson, Richard
Krishna, Sneha
Tran, Hai
Shane, Rita
Murthy, Rekha
Grein, Jonathan
author_sort Yang, Haoshu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: As an 886-bed tertiary care hospital with both teaching and private physician groups, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center has a unique opportunity to incorporate antimicrobial stewardship pharmacist (ASP) rounds with both a general medicine teaching service (TS) as well as a non-teaching hospitalist group (NTH). The impact of ASP rounds on antimicrobial (ABX) utilization and notable differences in clinical outcomes associated with both rounding models were evaluated. METHODS: An ASP was incorporated into existing teaching rounds for TS and disposition planning rounds for NTH. ASP-TS and ASP-NTH rounds both occurred once daily on weekdays with facetime of 3-4 hours per day for TS and 0.5-1 hour per day for NTH. Metrics included ASP recommendations and acceptance rates, total ASP time, ABX utilization, and clinical outcomes. Chi-squared and the Student’s t-test were used as appropriate. RESULTS: Between November 2016 to April 2017, ASPs reviewed 3184 NTH patients and 1322 TS patients. More opportunities for ASP intervention were identified with TS (40% vs. 26%, P < 0.001). Overall recommendation acceptance rates were higher for TS compared with NTH (95% vs. 79%, P < 0.001). Total recommendations identified per ASP-hour were higher for NTH vs. TS (1.76 vs. 0.93). ASP recommendations targeting ABX de-escalation, unnecessary use of fluoroquinolones, and treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria were similar for both groups. Compared with baseline rates, ASP rounds were associated with a significant reduction (-6%, P = 0.01) in ABX days-of-therapy (DOT) for NTH but not for TS (-1%, P = 0.6). Anti-Pseudomonal (PSA) DOT significantly declined in both NTH (-11%,
P = 0.04) and TS (-22%, P = 0.02). No significant changes in mortality, length of stay, and 30-day readmission rates were observed for either group. CONCLUSION: ASP rounds identified ample opportunities for improvement in ABX utilization in both NTH and TS models. Rounds were associated with a significant reduction in anti-PSA DOT for both models and a significant reduction in overall ABX DOT for NTH group. Although NTH provided a higher patient volume and allowed for more interventions per ASP-hour compared with the TS model, acceptance rates were lower, which may reflect a shorter amount of time spent on patient discussions. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5631759
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56317592017-11-07 Antimicrobial Stewardship Facetime: Comparison of Two Rounding Models at a Tertiary Medical Center Yang, Haoshu Smith, Ethan Marks, Gregory Ochner, Margaret Watson, Richard Krishna, Sneha Tran, Hai Shane, Rita Murthy, Rekha Grein, Jonathan Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: As an 886-bed tertiary care hospital with both teaching and private physician groups, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center has a unique opportunity to incorporate antimicrobial stewardship pharmacist (ASP) rounds with both a general medicine teaching service (TS) as well as a non-teaching hospitalist group (NTH). The impact of ASP rounds on antimicrobial (ABX) utilization and notable differences in clinical outcomes associated with both rounding models were evaluated. METHODS: An ASP was incorporated into existing teaching rounds for TS and disposition planning rounds for NTH. ASP-TS and ASP-NTH rounds both occurred once daily on weekdays with facetime of 3-4 hours per day for TS and 0.5-1 hour per day for NTH. Metrics included ASP recommendations and acceptance rates, total ASP time, ABX utilization, and clinical outcomes. Chi-squared and the Student’s t-test were used as appropriate. RESULTS: Between November 2016 to April 2017, ASPs reviewed 3184 NTH patients and 1322 TS patients. More opportunities for ASP intervention were identified with TS (40% vs. 26%, P < 0.001). Overall recommendation acceptance rates were higher for TS compared with NTH (95% vs. 79%, P < 0.001). Total recommendations identified per ASP-hour were higher for NTH vs. TS (1.76 vs. 0.93). ASP recommendations targeting ABX de-escalation, unnecessary use of fluoroquinolones, and treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria were similar for both groups. Compared with baseline rates, ASP rounds were associated with a significant reduction (-6%, P = 0.01) in ABX days-of-therapy (DOT) for NTH but not for TS (-1%, P = 0.6). Anti-Pseudomonal (PSA) DOT significantly declined in both NTH (-11%,
P = 0.04) and TS (-22%, P = 0.02). No significant changes in mortality, length of stay, and 30-day readmission rates were observed for either group. CONCLUSION: ASP rounds identified ample opportunities for improvement in ABX utilization in both NTH and TS models. Rounds were associated with a significant reduction in anti-PSA DOT for both models and a significant reduction in overall ABX DOT for NTH group. Although NTH provided a higher patient volume and allowed for more interventions per ASP-hour compared with the TS model, acceptance rates were lower, which may reflect a shorter amount of time spent on patient discussions. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2017-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5631759/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.612 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Yang, Haoshu
Smith, Ethan
Marks, Gregory
Ochner, Margaret
Watson, Richard
Krishna, Sneha
Tran, Hai
Shane, Rita
Murthy, Rekha
Grein, Jonathan
Antimicrobial Stewardship Facetime: Comparison of Two Rounding Models at a Tertiary Medical Center
title Antimicrobial Stewardship Facetime: Comparison of Two Rounding Models at a Tertiary Medical Center
title_full Antimicrobial Stewardship Facetime: Comparison of Two Rounding Models at a Tertiary Medical Center
title_fullStr Antimicrobial Stewardship Facetime: Comparison of Two Rounding Models at a Tertiary Medical Center
title_full_unstemmed Antimicrobial Stewardship Facetime: Comparison of Two Rounding Models at a Tertiary Medical Center
title_short Antimicrobial Stewardship Facetime: Comparison of Two Rounding Models at a Tertiary Medical Center
title_sort antimicrobial stewardship facetime: comparison of two rounding models at a tertiary medical center
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5631759/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.612
work_keys_str_mv AT yanghaoshu antimicrobialstewardshipfacetimecomparisonoftworoundingmodelsatatertiarymedicalcenter
AT smithethan antimicrobialstewardshipfacetimecomparisonoftworoundingmodelsatatertiarymedicalcenter
AT marksgregory antimicrobialstewardshipfacetimecomparisonoftworoundingmodelsatatertiarymedicalcenter
AT ochnermargaret antimicrobialstewardshipfacetimecomparisonoftworoundingmodelsatatertiarymedicalcenter
AT watsonrichard antimicrobialstewardshipfacetimecomparisonoftworoundingmodelsatatertiarymedicalcenter
AT krishnasneha antimicrobialstewardshipfacetimecomparisonoftworoundingmodelsatatertiarymedicalcenter
AT tranhai antimicrobialstewardshipfacetimecomparisonoftworoundingmodelsatatertiarymedicalcenter
AT shanerita antimicrobialstewardshipfacetimecomparisonoftworoundingmodelsatatertiarymedicalcenter
AT murthyrekha antimicrobialstewardshipfacetimecomparisonoftworoundingmodelsatatertiarymedicalcenter
AT greinjonathan antimicrobialstewardshipfacetimecomparisonoftworoundingmodelsatatertiarymedicalcenter