Cargando…

Outcomes of Kidney Transplantation with a CMV Matching Allocation Schema

BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection continues to be a major cause of morbidity in kidney transplant recipients. The CMV donor-positive (D+)/recipient-negative (R−) serostatus pairing poses highest risk for CMV disease. METHODS: In September 2012, we adopted a CMV matching allocation policy a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Strasfeld, Lynne, Basuli, Debargha, Norman, Douglas, Langewisch, Eric, Olyaei, Ali, Lockridge, Joseph
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5631860/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx162.028
_version_ 1783269576628240384
author Strasfeld, Lynne
Basuli, Debargha
Norman, Douglas
Langewisch, Eric
Olyaei, Ali
Lockridge, Joseph
author_facet Strasfeld, Lynne
Basuli, Debargha
Norman, Douglas
Langewisch, Eric
Olyaei, Ali
Lockridge, Joseph
author_sort Strasfeld, Lynne
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection continues to be a major cause of morbidity in kidney transplant recipients. The CMV donor-positive (D+)/recipient-negative (R−) serostatus pairing poses highest risk for CMV disease. METHODS: In September 2012, we adopted a CMV matching allocation policy at the centers served by our organ procurement organization, the Pacific Northwest Transplant Bank. CMV serostatus was used as a criterion in determining deceased donor kidney allocation, whereby R− kidney transplant recipients were preferentially paired with a D− organ, and R+ recipients with an R+ organ. We performed a retrospective analysis of CMV-related outcomes for 400 consecutive kidney recipients, 196 prior to (January 1, 2010– August 31, 2012) and 204 following (September 1, 2012–December 3, 2014) implementation of the CMV matching allocation schema at our center. We also looked at waitlist time for patients transplanted during the same period. RESULTS: The percentage of D+/R− transplants performed decreased from 17.3% to 2.5% (P < 0.001) after implementation of the CMV matching allocation strategy (Figure 1). CMV viremia decreased from 13.3% to 5.9% (P = 0.0118), and CMV syndrome or disease decreased from 9.2% to 2.9% (P = 0.00859) (Table 1). The percentage of patients treated for CMV infection overall decreased from 10.7% to 5.4% (P = 0.0498). Median days on the waitlist prior to transplantation increased from 793 (PRE) to 944 (POST) due to growing wait list size, but neither R− nor R+ patients appeared to be disadvantaged: wait times increased from 808.5 to 958 for the R− subset and from 777.5 to 933 for the R+ subset (Figure 2). CONCLUSION: CMV disease occurred infrequently in our cohort, in the context of 6 months of valganciclovir prophylaxis post-transplant and post-prophylaxis pre-emptive monitoring strategy for our D+/R− recipients. Following implementation of an allocation schema that took CMV serostatus into account, the rate of CMV infection and antiviral treatment decreased significantly. DISCLOSURES: L. Strasfeld, Merck: Independent Contractor, Salary
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5631860
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56318602017-11-07 Outcomes of Kidney Transplantation with a CMV Matching Allocation Schema Strasfeld, Lynne Basuli, Debargha Norman, Douglas Langewisch, Eric Olyaei, Ali Lockridge, Joseph Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection continues to be a major cause of morbidity in kidney transplant recipients. The CMV donor-positive (D+)/recipient-negative (R−) serostatus pairing poses highest risk for CMV disease. METHODS: In September 2012, we adopted a CMV matching allocation policy at the centers served by our organ procurement organization, the Pacific Northwest Transplant Bank. CMV serostatus was used as a criterion in determining deceased donor kidney allocation, whereby R− kidney transplant recipients were preferentially paired with a D− organ, and R+ recipients with an R+ organ. We performed a retrospective analysis of CMV-related outcomes for 400 consecutive kidney recipients, 196 prior to (January 1, 2010– August 31, 2012) and 204 following (September 1, 2012–December 3, 2014) implementation of the CMV matching allocation schema at our center. We also looked at waitlist time for patients transplanted during the same period. RESULTS: The percentage of D+/R− transplants performed decreased from 17.3% to 2.5% (P < 0.001) after implementation of the CMV matching allocation strategy (Figure 1). CMV viremia decreased from 13.3% to 5.9% (P = 0.0118), and CMV syndrome or disease decreased from 9.2% to 2.9% (P = 0.00859) (Table 1). The percentage of patients treated for CMV infection overall decreased from 10.7% to 5.4% (P = 0.0498). Median days on the waitlist prior to transplantation increased from 793 (PRE) to 944 (POST) due to growing wait list size, but neither R− nor R+ patients appeared to be disadvantaged: wait times increased from 808.5 to 958 for the R− subset and from 777.5 to 933 for the R+ subset (Figure 2). CONCLUSION: CMV disease occurred infrequently in our cohort, in the context of 6 months of valganciclovir prophylaxis post-transplant and post-prophylaxis pre-emptive monitoring strategy for our D+/R− recipients. Following implementation of an allocation schema that took CMV serostatus into account, the rate of CMV infection and antiviral treatment decreased significantly. DISCLOSURES: L. Strasfeld, Merck: Independent Contractor, Salary Oxford University Press 2017-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5631860/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx162.028 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Strasfeld, Lynne
Basuli, Debargha
Norman, Douglas
Langewisch, Eric
Olyaei, Ali
Lockridge, Joseph
Outcomes of Kidney Transplantation with a CMV Matching Allocation Schema
title Outcomes of Kidney Transplantation with a CMV Matching Allocation Schema
title_full Outcomes of Kidney Transplantation with a CMV Matching Allocation Schema
title_fullStr Outcomes of Kidney Transplantation with a CMV Matching Allocation Schema
title_full_unstemmed Outcomes of Kidney Transplantation with a CMV Matching Allocation Schema
title_short Outcomes of Kidney Transplantation with a CMV Matching Allocation Schema
title_sort outcomes of kidney transplantation with a cmv matching allocation schema
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5631860/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx162.028
work_keys_str_mv AT strasfeldlynne outcomesofkidneytransplantationwithacmvmatchingallocationschema
AT basulidebargha outcomesofkidneytransplantationwithacmvmatchingallocationschema
AT normandouglas outcomesofkidneytransplantationwithacmvmatchingallocationschema
AT langewischeric outcomesofkidneytransplantationwithacmvmatchingallocationschema
AT olyaeiali outcomesofkidneytransplantationwithacmvmatchingallocationschema
AT lockridgejoseph outcomesofkidneytransplantationwithacmvmatchingallocationschema